Eleştirel pedagoji ve dil öğretmenlerinin dil yeterliliği: Eleştirel dil yeterliliğine doğru

Öz

Yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin dil yeterlilikleri üzerine yapılan çalışmalar son yıllarda büyük ilgi uyandırmıştır. Ancak eleştirel bakış açılarını göz ardı eden geleneksel yaklaşımlar çerçevesine uygun olarak sadece ana akım temel beceriler öne sürülmüştür. Marx'ın fikirlerinden kaynaklanan eleştirel teori, bireylerin herhangi bir soruna veya konuya sosyo-politik bir bakış açısıyla yaklaşmasını sağlamayı amaçlayan eleştirel pedagoji üretmiş olsa da, dil öğretmeni eğitimi alanındaki uygulamaları yeterince gözlemlenmemiştir. Bu çalışma, dil öğretmenlerine geçici bir müfredatla uygulama örneği sağlayarak kritik dil yeterliliğini geliştirmelerine yardımcı olmayı amaçlamaktadır. Böyle bir örnek kullanmanın yararı,öğretmenlerin dili yalnızca eleştirellikten yoksun bir araç olarak değil, kendi içinde bir amaç olarak algılamalarını sağlayabilir. Bu nedenle, temel becerilerden oluşan ana dil yeterliliğine eleştirellik boyutunu eklemek, eleştirel dil öğretmenlerini, yakın sosyal çevrelerini dönüştürmeye ve içsel motivasyonun benimsenmesine vurgu yaparak anlamlı değişiklikler yaratmaya çalışan entelektüeller olarak üretebilir. Eleştirel okuryazarlık ve eleştirel bilincin dil yeterliliğinin içeriğine dahil edilmesi, dil öğretmenlerini, çıktıya dönüşebilen otantik, anlamlı ve anlaşılır girdi sağlayan otantik sosyo-politik meseleleri ele alabilmeleri açısından güçlendirebilir. Bu anlamda eleştirellik ve yansıtma, dil öğretmenleri için dil yeterliliğinin vazgeçilmez iki unsuru olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Critical pedagogy
• language proficiency
• language teacher education
• criticality

Critical pedagogy and language teachers` language proficiency: Towards critical language proficiency

Abstract

Studies on language proficiency of foreign language teachers have evoked considerable interest in recent decades. However, only mainstream core skills have been propounded in line with the framework of conventional approaches that have ignored critical perspectives. Although critical theory emanating from the ideas of Marx has produced critical pedagogy that aims to enable individuals to approach any subject or issue from a socio-political perspective, its applications have been insufficiently observed in the realm of language teacher education. This study aims to help language teachers improve critical language proficiency by providing them with an example of practice with a tentative syllabus. The benefit of using such an example might enable them to perceive language as an aim in itself rather than merely a tool that is devoid of criticality. Therefore, adding the dimension of criticality to mainstream language proficiency composed of core skills may produce critical language teachers as intellectuals attempting to transform their immediate social circles and create meaningful changes with an emphasis on the adoption of intrinsic motivation. The incorporation of critical literacy and critical consciousness into the content of language proficiency can empower language teachers in that they can address authentic socio-political issues that provide authentic, meaningful and comprehensible input which can turn into output. In this sense, criticality and reflection can be two indispensable elements of language proficiency for language teachers.

Keywords

• Critical pedagogy
• language proficiency
• language teacher education
• criticality

Kaynakça

1. Alptekin, C. (2002). Toward intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56 (1), 57-64.
2. Apple, M. W. (2011). Paulo Freire, critical pedagogy and the tasks of the critical scholar/activist. Revista e-curriculum, 7(3), 1-21.
3. Au, W. (2017). The dialectical materialism of Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy. Revista Reflexão e Ação, Santa Cruz do Sul, 25(2), 171-195.
4. Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Ballantyne, K., & Rivera, C. (2014). Language proficiency for academic achievement in the international baccalaureate diploma program. Washington, DC: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
6. Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. The ELT Journal 55 (1), 21–9.
7. Brannen, J. (Ed.). (2017). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. London: Routledge.
8. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
10. Cullen, R. (1994). Incorporating a language improvement component in teacher training programmes. ELT Journal, 48(2), 162–72. Retrieved from http://203.72.145.166/elt/files/48-2-7.pdf
11. Edge, J. and S. Garton. (2009). From experience to knowledge in ELT. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
13. Enever, J. (2011). ELLE: Early language learning in Europe. UK: British Council.
14. Farrell, T.S. and J. Richards. (2007). Teachers’ language proficiency. In Reflective Language Teaching: From research to practice, (Ed) T.S. Farrell (pp. 55–66). London: Continuum.
15. Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach (Trans. D. Macedo, D.Koike, & A. Oliveira). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Trans. M. Bergman Ramos). New York: Continuum.
17. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Green-wood Publishing Group.
18. Giroux, H. A. (2004). Critical pedagogy and the postmodern/modern divide: Towards a pedagogy of democratization. Teacher education quarterly, 31(1), 31-47.
19. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Hoey, M. (2012). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. New York: Routledge.
21. Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2009). Teacher preparation and non-native English-speaking educators. The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 3, 91-101.
22. Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1859- 1875. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.007
23. Kızılaslan, I. (2011). ELT student teachers’ competence for teaching language skills: a qualitative exploration. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(1), 161-169.
24. Kim, S. and C. Elder. (2008). Target language use in foreign language classrooms: practices and perceptions of native speaker teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum 21 (2), 167–85. doi:10.1080/07908310802287574
25. Kömür, Ş. (2010). Teaching knowledge and teacher competencies: a case study of Turkish preservice English teachers. Teaching Education, 21 (3), 279-296.
26. Köse, S. (2010). A Study on the correlation between reading comprehension and translation skills of ELT students. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 43 (1), 219-241.
27. Lafayette, R. L. (1993). Subject-matter content: What every foreign language teacher needs to know. In Guntermann, G. (Ed.) Developing language teachers for a changing world. p. 124-158. Lincolnwood, IL: National textbook Library.
28. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove: Language teaching publications.
29. Lightbown, P. and N. Spada. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Mclaren, P. (2020). The future of critical pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(12), 1243-1248.
31. McNamara, D. (1991). Subject knowledge and its application: problems and possibilities for teacher educators. The Journal of Education for Teaching 17 (2), 113–28.
32. Medgyes, P. (2001). When the teacher is a non-native speaker. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3, 429-442.
33. Murdoch, G. (1994). Language development provision in teacher training curricula. The ELT Journal 48 ( 3), 253–65.
34. Müller, H., & Nel, N. (2010). The impact of teachers’ limited English proficiency on English second language learners in South African schools. South African Journal of Education, 30, 635-650.
35. Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. Developments in sociology, 20, 103-118.
36. Şalli-Çopur, D. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in initial years of service: A case study on the graduates of METU foreign language education program (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University).
37. Schilling, J. (2006). On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 28-37.
38. Shin, S. (2008). Preparing non-native English speaking ESL teachers. Teacher Development 12 ( 1), 57–65. doi:10.1080/13664530701827749.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, p. 4-14.
40. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International journal of corpus linguistics, 8(2), 209-243.
41. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Topkaya, E. and Yavuz, A. (2005). A study on student teachers’ perceptions of their acquired competencies. Fourth International ELT Research Conference: Reflecting on Insights from ELT Research (26-28 Mayıs). Çanakkale: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi.
43. Tsui, S.B.M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Yılmaz, D. (2005). İngilizce öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin yabancı dili đletişim aracı olarak kullanabilme yeterlilikleri. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi., 7 (1), 15- 23.
45. Yüksel, H. G. (2014). Teachers of the future: Perceived teaching competences and visions of pre- service English language teachers. Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 27-39.