Edith Nesbit's contemporary fairy tales: The influence of childhood experiences on artistic manifestation

Abstract

This research conducts a comprehensive examination of the influence exerted by early life experiences on an author's literary corpus, with a particular emphasis on Edith Nesbit (1858-1924), the author of children’s novel, and her incorporation of childhood memories to enrich the contemporary fairy tale genre. Utilizing Melanie Klein’s (1882-1960) theoretical framework, a renowned Austrian-British psychoanalyst, the investigation endeavours to deliver an exhaustive analysis of Nesbit's artistic persona. Nesbit's children's narratives, as modern fairy tales, embody an internal realm of unconscious reverie akin to Klein's concept of phantasy. Central to Nesbit's tales are young protagonists who confront challenges associated with separation from caregivers, the establishment of identity, reality appraisal, body image maturation, and object relations. Edith Nesbit's harrowing childhood experiences shaped her into the imaginative author she ultimately became. By delving into the realm of fantasy and creativity, Nesbit achieved a sense of completeness and resilience, allowing her to overcome her feelings of loss and vulnerability. This research aims to shed light on the complex link between a writer's formative years and their creative expressions by examining the remnants of Nesbit's early life experiences. Furthermore, by emphasizing Edith Nesbit's ability to transform her experiences into her artistic body of work, this study also demonstrates the power of artistic expression as a means of self-exploration and healing.

Keywords

• childhood
• fairy tale
• Melanie Klein
• phantasy
• Edith Nesbit

Kaynakça

1. Aiken, J. (1996). Celebration of Edith Nesbit. London: The Edith Nesbit Society.
2. Fitzsimons, E. (2019). The Life and Loves of E. Nesbit. The Art of Books.
3. Freud, S. (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess 1887-1904 (J. Masson, Trans.; J. Masson, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
4. Freud, S. (1959). Creative Writers and Daydreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (pp. 141-153). Hogarth Press.
5. Grotstein, J. (1995). Object Relations Theory. In E. Neressian & F. Koopff (Eds.), Textbook of Psychoanalysis (pp. 89-126). American Psychiatric Press.
6. Illustrated London News. (1862, April 5).
7. Kavaler-Adler, S. (2014). The Klein-Winnicott dialectic: Transformative new metapsychology and interactive clinical theory. Karnack.
8. Klein, M. (2004). Infantile anxiety-situations reflected in a work of art and in the creative impulse. In S. Gosso (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and art: Kleinian perspectives (pp. 33–41). Karnac Books.

9. Klein, M. (1988). Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms. In Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963. Virago.
10. Klein, M. (1932). On Observing the Behaviours of Young Infants. In Developments in Psychoanalysis. Hogarth.
11. Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, B. (2003). Fantasy and Origins of Sexuality. In R. Steiner (Ed.), Unconscious Phantasy (pp. 103-107). Karnac Books.
12. McDonald, G. (1984). The Fantastic Imagination. In R. H. Boyer & K. J. Zahorski (Eds.), Fantasists on Fantasy. Avon.
13. Nesbit, E. (2017). My School Days. Dodo Press.
14. Nesbit, E. (1913). Wings and the Child. Hodder and Stoughton.
15. Nesbit, E. (1905). The Railway Children. Macmillan Company.
16. Nesbit, E. (1907). The Enchanted Castle. T. Fisher Unwin.
17. Nesbit, E. (1899). The Story of the Treasure Seekers. T. Fisher Unwin.
18. Nesbit, E. (1901). The Wouldbegoods. Harper and Brothers.
19. Philips, A., & Stonebridge, L. (Eds.). (1998). Reading Melanie Klein (p. 220). Routledge.
20. Segal, H. (1990). The Work of Hanna Segal: A Kleinian Approach to Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson Inc.
21. Segal, H. (2002). Introduction to the Works of Hanna Segal. Hogarth.
22. Tolkien, J.R.R. (1966). The Tolkien Reader. Ballantine Books.
23. Trosman, H. (1990). Transformation of Unconscious Fantasies in Art. Journal of the America Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 47-60.