Alleviating reading difficulty in elementary students based on learning styles

Abstract

This study focuses on the effects of learning styles on correcting the reading errors and improving the reading comprehension skills of elementary school 4th and 5th grade students. The study was conducted over eight weeks with a total of 128 hours, 32 hours each with a total of four students from two elementary schools in the Western Black Sea region, who has reading difficulties without mental, auditory, or visual problems. Ministry of National Education’s Turkish textbooks for grades 1-5 were used in the study. The Marmara Learning Styles Scale showed the learning style preferences of three students as auditory and that of the remaining student as visual. For students with a auditory learning style, the researcher created audio recordings with appropriate stress and speed. Before the students read the text, audio recordings were played through headphones. After listening, the students were asked to read aloud. For students with visual learning style, illustrated texts; texts with underlined words; texts with words, syllables and sentences highlighted in colored letters were used. The students' reading errors were corrected by using the word box strategy. The findings showed that, at the final reading that took place at the end of the study, student A was at the frustration level (90%), while students B and C were at the instructional level and student D had progressed to the independent reading level. Consequently, it was concluded that reading and comprehension activities based on learning styles are effective in diagnosing reading difficulties in elementary school students.

Keywords

• Reading
• Reading difficulty
• Learning styles
• Reading styles

Kaynakça

1. Akçamete, G.ve Güneş, F. (1992). Üniversite öğrencilerinde etkili ve hızlı okumanın geliştirilmesi. Ankara Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 25(2), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000597
2. Akyol, H. (2005). Yeni programa uygun Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi. PegemA Yayıncılık.
3. Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi. PegemA Yayıncılık.
4. Angus, C. (2007). The effect of written word work using word boxes on the decoding fluency of young at-risk readers [Doctoral dissertation]. Washington State University.
5. Arnbak, E. (2004). When are poor reading skills a threat to educational achievement?. Reading and Writing, 17(5), 459-482.
6. Bacanlı, H. (2005). Duygusal davranış eğitimi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
7. Barber, L. & Carbo, M. (1994). A comparative study of the methods used in the teaching of reading. National Reading Styles Instute.
8. Carbo, M. (1980). Reading style: Diagnosis, evaluation, prescription. Academic Therapy, 16(1), 45-52.

9. Carbo, M. (1982). Reading style: Key to preventing reading failure in student learning styles and brain behavior. National Association of Secondary School Principals.
10. Carbo, M. (1986). Teaching students to read through their individual learning styles. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
11. Carbo, M. (1987). Reading style inventory. National Reading Styles Institute.
12. Carbo, M. (1995). Continuum of modeling reading methods. Teaching PreK-8, 26(1), 85.
13. Carnine, D. (2003). IDEA: Focusing on improving results for children with disabilities. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Education Reform of the House of Representatives, US Congress, Washington, DC, 1 March (2003).
14. Devault, R. & Joseph, L. M. (2004). Repeated readings combined with word boxes technique increases fluency levels of high school students with severe reading delays. Preventing School Failure, 49(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.49.1.22-27
15. Diken, H., İ. (2010). İlköğretimde kaynaştırma. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
16. Dunn, R. S., Dunn, K. J., & Price, G. E. (1981). Learning style inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
17. Dunn, R.. & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 7–12. Allyn & Bacon.
18. Dunn, R., Dunn, K. & Perrin, J. (1994). Teaching Young Children through Their Individual Learning Style. Allyn & Bacon.
19. Ekwall, E. E. & James, L. S. (1988). Diagnosis and remedation of the disabled reader. Allyn ande Bacon.
20. Given L. M. (Ed.) (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications
21. Harris, A. J. & Sipay, S. R. (1990). How to improve reading ability. Longman.
22. Hartman, V. (1995). Teaching and learning style preference. VCCA Journal, 9 (2), 18- 20.
23. Hays P. A. (2004). Case Study Research. deMarrais K. & Lapan S.D. (Ed.) Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and The Social Sciences (218- 234) LEA
24. Hoogeveen, F. R., Smeets, P. M., & Lancioni, G. E. (1989). Teaching moderately mentally retarded children basic reading skills. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(89)90025-5
25. Ingham, J. M. (1991). Matching instruction with employee perceptual preference significantly increases training effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920020108
26. Jarsonbeck, S. (1984). The effects of a right‐brain and mathematics curriculum on low achieving, fourth grade students [Doctoral dissertation]. University of South Florida.
27. Joseph, L. M. (2002). Facilitating word recognition and spelling using word boxes and word sort phonic procedures. School Psychology Review, 31,122 – 129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086146
28. Joseph, L. M. & McCachran, M. (2003). Comparison of a word study phonics technique between students with moderate and mild mental retardation and struggling readers without disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 192-199.
29. Koch, C. A. (1983). A comparison of responses of poor, average and good readers with the reading style inventory [Masters thesis]. Emporia State University.
30. May, B. F. (1986). Reading as communication: an interactive approach. Merrill Publishing Company.
31. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
32. Otrar, M. (2006). Öğrenme stilleri ile yetenekler, akademik başarı ve öss başarısı arasındaki ilişki, [Doktora Tezi], Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
33. Perfetti, C. (1986). Continuities in reading acquisition, reading skill and reading disability. Remedial and Speial Eduation, 7(1): 11–21.
34. Sondra, H. B, & O’Tuel, F. (1989). The effect of sustained silent reading and writing on achievement and attitudes of seventh and eighth grade students reading two years below grade level. Reading Improvement, 26 (4) 290-97.
35. Şimşek, Ö. (2007). Marmara öğrenme stilleri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve 9-11 yaş çocuklarının öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi. [Doktora Tezi], Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
36. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24 (5), 301-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250302400505
37. Vaughn, S., Bos, C., & Schumm, J. (2007). Teaching students who are exceptional, diverse, and at risk in the general education classrooms (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
38. Wiederholt, J.L.&Bryant, B.R. (1987). Assessing the reading abilities and instructional needs of students. The Pro Ed-Assessment Series.