Mathematics teachers' opinions about their professional development and lesson planning: Lesson study perspectives

Abstract

The lesson study is a teaching model that emerged from the needs for teachers’ developments in their professions in Japan. This method allows teachers to work collaboratively in line with some common goals, (i) to plan their lessons, (ii) to eliminate their professional deficiencies, and (iii) to gain different perspectives by contributing to their professional development. In this context, the aim of the study is to determine elementary school mathematics teachers’ opinions on how the lesson study activities contribute to their professional developments. In addition, determining how teachers plan the lessons with respect to lesson study activities is another goal of this study. The method of the research is action research, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The study, carried out in the form of three lesson cycles, was completed in six weeks. Content analysis method was used to analyze the data in this study. The coding process of the data is based on constant comparison method. The research results indicated that the collaboration among mathematics teachers using the lesson method contributed to their professional development in various ways, and that teachers prepared lesson plans by paying attention to different factors related to geometry lesson before instructions. Consequently, some suggestions were made on the results obtained.

Keywords

• Lesson study
• teachers’ professional development
• lesson plan
• elementary school mathematics teachers

Matematik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişim ve ders planlamalarına yönelik görüşleri: Ders imecesi perspektifleri

Öz

Ders imecesi Japonya’da öğretmenlerin mesleklerindeki gelişim ihtiyaçlarından ortaya çıkan bir öğretim modelidir. Bu yöntem öğretmenlerin bazı ortak hedefler doğrultusunda işbirliği içinde çalışmalarına, (i) derslerini planlamalarına, (ii) mesleki eksikliklerini gidermelerine ve (iii) mesleki gelişimlerine katkıda bulunarak farklı bakış açıları kazanmalarına olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı, ders imecesi etkinliklerinin ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimlerine nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu tespit etmektir. Ayrıca öğretmenlerin dersleri nasıl planladıklarını belirlemek de bu çalışmanın diğer bir amaçtır. Araştırmanın yöntemi nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan eylem araştırmasıdır. Üç ders döngüsü şeklinde gerçekleştirilen çalışma altı haftada tamamlanmıştır. Araştırmada verilerin analizinde içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Verilerin kodlanma süreci sürekli karşılaştırma analizine dayanmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçları, matematik öğretmenleri arasında ders yöntemini kullanarak yapılan işbirliğinin mesleki gelişimlerine çeşitli yönlerden katkı sağladığını, öğretmenlerin öğretim öncesinde geometri dersi ile ilgili farklı faktörleri dikkate alarak ders planları hazırladıklarını göstermiştir. Bu doğrultuda elde edilen sonuçlara ilişkin bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ders imecesi
• öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi
• ders planı
• ortaokul matematik öğretmenleri

Kaynakça

1. Altun, M. (2006). Matematik öğretiminde gelişmeler. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 223-238.
2. Asan, A. & Güneş, G. (2005). Oluşturmacı yaklaşıma göre tasarlanan öğrenme ortamının matematik başarısına etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 105-121.
3. Bogner, L. (2008). Using lesson study as an instrument to find the mental models of teaching and learning held by career and technical education instructors. The International Journal of Learning, 15(1), 239-244.
4. Bütün, M. (2015). Evaluation of the lesson study model in teaching practice course: Problems and solutions. Adıyaman University Journal fof Educational Sciences, 5(2), 136-167.
5. Clarke, D. (2013). Contingent conceptions of accomplished practice: The cultural specificity of discourse in and about the mathematics classroom. ZDM, 45(1), 21–33.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
7. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal Of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393-405.
8. Fernandez, M. L. (2008). Developing knowledge of teaching mathematics through cooperation and inquiry. Mathematics Teacher, 101(7), 534-538.

9. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J. & Chokshi, J. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185.
10. Fujii, T. (2019). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of lesson study. In: Huang, R., Takahashi, A., da Ponte, J.P. (Eds) Theory and practice of lesson study in mathematics. Advances in mathematics education. Springer, Cham.
11. Goetz, J. P. & LeCompte, M. D. (1982). Ethnographic data collection in evaluation research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(3), 387-400.
12. Günay, R., Yücel-Toy, B. & Bahadır, E. (2016). Öğretmen eğitiminde ders araştırması modeli ve Türkiye’de hizmet öncesi öğretmenlik uygulamalarına yönelik bir model önerisi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(42), 1224-1237.
13. Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2023). Elementary teachers’ experience of engaging with teaching through problem solving using lesson study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(4), 901-927.
14. İlğan, A. (2013). Öğretmenler için etkili mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6, 41-56.
15. Juang, Y. R., Liu, T. C. & Chan, T. W. (2008). Computer-supported teacher development of pedagogical content knowledge through developing school-based curriculum. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 149-170.
16. Kanbolat, O. (2015). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarıyla yürütülen ders imecesinde dış uzmanların paylaşım içerikleri ve rolleri. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
17. Lee, J. F. K. (2008). A Hong Kong case of lesson study: Benefits and concerns. Teaching And Teacher Education, 24, 1115-1124.
18. Lee, Y. A., & Takahashi, A. (2011). Lesson plans and the contingency of classroom interactions. Human Studies, 34(2), 209–227.
19. Lewis, C. (2002). Does lesson study have a future in the United States? Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development, 1, 1-23.
20. Lewis, C. (2009). What is the nature of knowledge development in lesson study? Educational Action Research, 17(1), 95–110.
21. Lewis, C. (2016). How does lesson study improve mathematics instruction? ZDM, 48, 571-580.
22. Meng, C. C. & Sam, L. C. (2011). Enhancing pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ skills of using the Geometer’s Sketchpad through lesson study. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 34(1), 90-110.
23. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Moss, J., Hawes, Z., Naqvi, S., & Caswell, B. (2015). Adapting Japanese lesson study to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry and spatial reasoning in early years classrooms: A case study. ZDM, 47, 377-390.
25. Murata A. & Takahashi A. (2002). Vehicle to connect theory, research and practice: How teacher thinking changes in district-level lesson study in Japan. In Haury D. L. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting of North American Chapter of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1879–1888). Columbus, OH.
26. Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston & A. Murata (Ed.), In Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education (pp.13-24). Dordrecht: Springer.
27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standarts for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
28. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264195905-en.pdf?expires=1711576869&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=D1F20BB49B5B1131F15F36031ACDA2BB
29. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: PISA, OECD Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
30. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. Paris PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
31. Perry, R. R. & Lewis, C. C. (2009). What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US? Journal of Education Change, 10, 365–391.
32. Robinson, N. & Leikin, R. (2011). One teacher, two lessons: The lesson study process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 139-161.
33. Sitton, P. A. (2006). The effectiveness of lesson study as a professional development model for k-5th grade teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University, Minneapolis.
34. Stigler, J. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the World's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.
35. Takahashi, A. & Yoshida, M. (2004). Ideas for establishing lesson-study communities. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(9), 436-443.
36. Taylor, A. R., Anderson, S., Meyer, K., Wagner, M. K. & West, C. (2005). Lesson study: A professional development model for mathematics reform. The Rural Educator, 26(2), 17-22.
37. Tepylo, D. R. H. (2008). Investigating the effects of lesson study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
38. The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study [TIMMS]. (1999). Third international mathematics and science study. Retrieved from http://TIMMS.Bc.Edu/TIMMS/Presspop3.Html.
39. Yarema, C. H. (2010). Mathematics teachers views of accountability testing revealed through lesson study. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 12(1), 3-18.
40. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9th Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.