A Cultural Materialist Approach to Gender through Look Back in Anger

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 39, 928 - 936, 21.04.2024

Ece Noya

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1470155

Öz

As John Osborne's Look Back in Anger illustrates, the Angry Young Men Movement centred mostly on male disaffection, reflecting the societal upheavals that occurred in Britain after World War II. Nevertheless, it mainly disregarded the particular challenges and cultural constraints that women encountered during that time. In addition to experiencing comparable psychological traumas from the war, women were compelled to return to constrictive domestic duties, which overshadowed their efforts and aspirations during the war. The movement's narratives ignored the complex difficulties women faced, such as the struggle for autonomy and the conflict with pre-war feminine norms, in favor of focusing on men's experiences, such as Jimmy Porter's existential problems. This omission draws attention to a critical weakness in the movement's analysis of post-World War II society and emphasizes the need for a gender-inclusive investigation of the psychological and cultural dynamics of this period. This paper attempts to examine Osborne’s Look Back in Anger in line with cultural materialist theory of Raymond Williams to analyze gendered power dynamics in the theater with a particular focus on the chosen play. The strategic portrayal of victimization within a gendered power system in the play is examined in this research. Using cultural artifacts and social conventions, it especially examines how the play's narrative and character interactions reflect and question the maintenance of gender hierarchies. The paper focuses on the interactions between male and female characters in order to dissect the intricate power struggles that are portrayed in the play.

Anahtar Kelimeler

angry young men movement, cultural materialism, significance of gender, power and gender relations, Look Back in Anger, John Osborne

Kaynakça

• Brooke, S. (1950). “Gender and Working Class Identity in Britain During The 1950s”. Journal. (N.d.). Retrieved 18 February 2024, from http://www.jstor.org.search.
• Dollimore, J., and Sinfield, A. (2002). History and ideology: The instance of Henry V. In J. Drakakis (Ed.), Alternative Shakespeares (pp. 209-230). London: Routledge.
• Fowler, J. (2005). Unleashing Britain: Theatre Gets Real. London: V&A Publications, pp. 38-40.
• Friedan B. (1962). The Feminine Mystigue. London: Penguin Books. 38-232.
• Haque S. (2014). “Alison Porter in Look Back in Anger: Is She Responsible for her Sufferings?” IIUC Studies. 10&11.65-80.
• Hayman, R. (1972). John Osborne. United Kingdom: Ungar.
• Innes, C.D. (2002). Modern British Drama: The Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Keyssar, H. (1988). [Review of Look Back in Gender, by M. Wandor]. Theatre Journal, 40(2), 280–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207672
• Mızıkyan, A. (2010). “John Osborne‟un Öfke‟sinde “Öfkeli Genç Adam” Jimmy Porter” Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi, (16),44-45. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/teddergi/issue/18477/194565
• Mohammed, H.S. (2022). “An Appraisal of Dominance in Osborne’s “Look Back in Anger””. Occasional Papers. 78.
• Osborne, J. (1960). Look Back in Anger. London and Boston: Faber & Faber.
• Öztürk, E. (1993). “Class Hate into Sexual Hate”. Bilkent University.
• Rusinko, S. (1989). British Drama, 1950 to the Present. Boston: G.K. Hall and Co..2.
• Sinfield, A. (2004). Literature, Politics and Culture in Post-war Britain. Continuum, London.
• Taylor, J. (2013). Cultural Materialism. In M. Payne and J. Barbera (Eds.), A Dictionary of Cultural and Critical Theory (pp. 161-163). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Taylor, J.R. (1963). Anger and After. London: Penguin Books.
• Taylor, J.R. (1978). Anger and After: A Guide to the New British Drama, London, Methuen & Co. Ltd., Hill & Wang Inc.
• Tecimer, E. (2005). “The Analysis of the theme of Anger in John Osborne’s Plays: Look Back in Anger, Inadmissible Evidence, Watch it Come Down”.METU.
• Wandor, M. (2014). Gender: Sexuality and the Family in Post-War British Drama: Sexuality and the Family in Post-War British Drama. Routledge.
• Williams, R. (1960). Culture and Society: 1780-1950. Newyork: Anchor Books.
• Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/will93760
• Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford University Press.
• Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press Oxford [Eng.]
• Williams, R. (2006). Modern tragedy. Ontario: Broadview.