Airport Management and Human-Technology Interaction: An Analysis within the Framework of Conjoined Agency Typology

Öz

This study examines the interaction of humans and technology in the management of airports from the perspective of the conjoined agency typology. Accordingly, it aims to reveal how the interaction between humans and technology relates to airport management practices in airports. This study indicates that what kind of division of labor has been between the human and technology in performing the practices those are based on safety and health. This division of labor between the human and technology has been searched based on the development of the process of practice and implementing the practice. In this context, one airport and one airline in Turkiye were included as samples, and research findings were obtained using a qualitative research method. The research findings indicate that the human factor is still important in shaping and developing practices in airports, and that full automation has not yet been established. In conclusion, it was observed that in airports, assisting augmenting, and arresting technology types are used, while automating technology has not yet been fully implemented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Airport management
• digitalization
• conjoined agency
• human-technology interaction

Havalimanı İşletmeciliği ve İnsan-Teknoloji Etkileşimi: Yapışık Eyleyenler Tipolojisi Bağlamında Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışmada, havalimanı işletmeciliğindeki uygulamalar ile insan ve teknoloji arasında nasıl bir etkileşim olduğu yapışık eyleyenler tipolojisi çerçevesinden incelenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda havalimanlarında insan ve teknoloji etkileşimin havalimanı işletmeciliğindeki uygulamalarla nasıl bir ilişkiye sahip olduğu ortaya konulmak istenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, havalimanlarının yönetiminde ‘güvenlik ve sağlık’ esas olan ve teknolojiden yararlanılan pratiklere dair süreçlerin geliştirilmesinde ve bu pratiklere nihai olarak karar verilmesinde insan ve teknoloji arasında nasıl bir görev dağılımı olduğu gösterilmektedir. Bu minvalde Türkiye bağlamında bir havalimanı ve bir hava yolu örnekleme dahil edilmiştir ve nitel araştırma yöntemi takip edilerek araştırma bulgularına ulaşılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları havalimanlarındaki uygulamaların şekillenmesinde ve gelişmesinde insan faktörünün hâlâ önemli olduğuna, tam bir otomasyonun henüz yerleşmediğine işaret etmektedir. Sonuç olarak, havalimanlarında tutuklu, yardımcı teknoloji ve geliştirici teknoloji türlerinin kullanıldığı, otomasyon teknolojisinin ise henüz alana yerleşmediği görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Havalimanı işletmeciliği
• dijitalleşme
• yapışık eyleyenler
• insan-teknoloji etkileşimi

Kaynakça

1. Alvesson, M., Hallett, T., & Spicer, A. (2019). Uninhibited Institutionalisms. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 119-127.
2. Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2019). Neo-Institutional Theory and Organization Studies: A Mid-Life Crisis? Organization Studies, 40(2), 199-218.
3. Arena, M., & Aprea, C. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Air Transport: Overview and Implications. Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research. 2(1). doi:10.21926/aeer.2101002.
4. Aviation Turkey (2019). https://www.aviationturkey.com/en/issues/. (Accessed on 09.08.2021).
5. Bader, V., & Kaiser, S. (2019). Algorithmic Decision-Making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence. Organization, 26(5), 655-672.
6. Bhardwaj, V., Agarwal, P., Nayak, S. R., Sisodiya, M. S., & Singh, V. (2021). Usance of Industrial 4.0 Technique to Overcome the Pandemic Situation of Covid 19. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1017 012029.
7. Blištanová, M., Tirpáková, M., & Brunová, L. (2021). Overview of Safety Measures at Selected Airports during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13, 8499, 1-14, doi.org/10.3390/su13158499.
8. Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1989a). Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 411-430.

9. Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M.T. (1989b). On Using Institutional Theory in Studying Organizational Populations. American Sociological Review, 54(4), 545-548.
10. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Studies. London, UK: SAGE.
11. Cummings, M. (2014). Man versus Machine or Man + Machine? IEEE Intelligent Systems. September/October, 62-69.
12. Drljaca, M., Štimac, I., Bracic, M., & Petar, S. (2020). The Role and Influence of Industry 4.0. in Airport Operations in the Context of Covid-19. Sustainability, 12, 10614, 1-18, doi:10.3390/su122410614.
13. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
14. Fernandes, E., & Pacheco, R. R. (2010). A Quality approach to airport management. Qual Quant, 44, 551-564. Fleming, P. (2019). Robots and Organization Studies: Why Robots Might not want to steal your job. Organization Studies, 40(1), 23-37.
15. Fisher, D., & Fleming, P. (2025). Competing With Smart Machines: The Dark Side ‘Conjoined Agency’ in Contemporary Organizations. Organization Studies, DOI: 10.1177/01708406251391972.
16. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660.
17. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.
18. Gray, B., Purdy, J. M., & Ansari, S. S. (2015). From Interactions to Institutions: Microprocesses of Framing and Mechanisms for the Structuring of Institutional Fields. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 115-143.
19. Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, S. H. (2021). The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 534-551.
20. Hainen, A. M., Remias, S. M., & Bullock, D. M. (2013). Collection and Analysis of Multi-Modal Airport Land Side Probe Data from Blueooth Enabled Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Annual Conefrence on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), The Hague, The Netherlands, October 6-9, 2013.
21. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
22. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1986). Where do Organizational Forms Come From? Sociological Forum, 1(1), 50-72.
23. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1987). The Ecology of Organizational Founding: American Labour Unions, 1836-1985. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 910-943.
24. Hansmeirer, S., & van Hulsen, L. (2021). SOS in the sky: Can technologies make airports ready for “take-off” again? An Exploratory Case Study of Frankfurt Airport. Unpublished Master Project Thesis within Business Administration, Jönköping University.
25. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital Innovation and Transformation: An Institutional Perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52-61.
26. Hoc, J-M. (2001). Towards a Cognitive Approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 54, 509-540.
27. Hoffman, G., & Ju. W. (2014). Designing Robots with Movement in Mind. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3(1), 89-122.
28. Hsu, G., & Hannan, M. T. (2005). Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 16(5), 474-490.
29. https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Istatistikler.aspx (Accessed on. 09.08.2021).
30. ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization), (2006). Annex 17: Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlwaful Interference. Eighth Edition.
31. ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization), (2016). Annex 19: Safety Management (Second Edition).
32. ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization), (2017). DOC 10118 Global Aviation Security Plan. https://www.icao.int/Security/Documents/GLOBAL%20AVIATION%20SECURITY%20PLAN%20EN.pdf (Accessed on 09.08.2021).
33. ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization), (2020). DOC 10144 Handbook for CAAs on the Management of Aviation Safety Risks Related to COVID-19. https://www.icao.int/safety/SafetyManagement/Doc10144/Doc%2010144.pdf (Accessed on 09.08.2021).
34. ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization), (2021). DOC 10152 Testing and Cross-Border Risk Management Measures Manual. Second Edition.
35. Jain, N., Gupta, V., Temperini, V., Meissner, D., & D’angelo, E. (2024). Human Machine Interactions: From Past to Future- A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Management History, 30(2), 263-302.
36. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366-410.
37. Koenig, F., Found, P. A., Kumar, M., & Rich, N. (2021). Condition-based Maintenance for Major Airport Baggage Systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(3), 722-741.
38. Kumar, N., & Lee, S. C. (2022). Human-Machine Interface in Smart Factory: A Systematic Literature Review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174. 121284.
39. Li, J., Li, M., Wang, X., & Thatcher, J. B., (2021). Strategic Directions for AI: Thev Role of CIOs and Boards of Directors. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1603-1643.
40. Liang, C-C., & Shiau, W-L. (2018). Moderating Effect of Privacy Concerns and Subjective Norms between Satisfaction and Repurchase of airline e-ticket through Airline Ticket Vendors. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(12), 1142-1159.
41. Lindebaum, D., Vesa, M., & den Hond, F. (2020). Insigths from “The machine stops” to Better Understand Rational Assumptions in Algorithmic Decision Making and Its Implications for Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 247-263.
42. Liu, S. (2021). Health Check Among Passengers Air Travel in the Age of COVID-19. Master Thesis, Arizona State University.
43. Marmier, F., Filipas, I., & Zaharia, S. E. (2023). Transition 4.0 for the Airport Industry. IFAC Papers Online Conference Paper Archive, 56(2), 3698-3703.
44. Memika, T., & Polat, T. K. (2023). Internet of Things Supported Airport Boarding System and Evaluation with Fuzzy. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 35(3), 2687-2702.
45. Munir, K. A. (2011). Financial Crisis 2008-2009: What Does the Silence of Institutional Theorists Tell Us? Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(2), 114-117.
46. Munir, K. A. (2015). A Loss of Power in Institutional Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 90-92.
47. Munir, K. A. (2019). Challenging Institutional Theory’s Critical Credentials. Organization Theory, 1, 1-10. Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2021). Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 552-571.
48. Naboush, E., & Alnimer, R. (2020). Air Carrier’s Liability for the Safety of Passengers during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101896, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101896.
49. Nardo, M., Forino, D., & Murino, T. (2020). The Evolution of Man-Machine Interaction: The Role of Human in Industry 4.0 Paradigm. Production & Manufacturing Research, 8(1), 20-34.
50. Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 439-471.
51. Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimate Distinctiveness and the Entrepreneurial Identity: Influence on Investor Judgments of New Venture Plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479-499.
52. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
53. Öztürk, D. (2021). What does Artificial Intelligence Mean for Organizations? A Systematic Review of Organization Studies Research and a Way Forward. İçinde The impact of Artificial Intelligence on Governance, Economics and Finance (Volume: I), Chapter 14. ss.265-289.
54. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210.
55. Romanelli, E. (1991). The Evolution of New Organizational Forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 79-103.
56. Rudko, I., Bonab, A. B., Fedele, M., & Formisano, A. V. (2025). New Instiutional Theory and AI: Toward Rethinking of Artificial Intelligence in Organizations. Journal of Management History, 31(2), 261-284.
57. Ruef, M. (2000). The Emergence of Organizational Forms: A Community Ecology Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 658-714.
58. Serrano, F., & Kazda, A. (2020). The future of airports post COVID-19. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101900, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101900.
59. Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66-83.
60. Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Driven Institutional Change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877-904.
61. Sun, X., Wandelt, S., Zheng, C., & Zhang, A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and air transportation: Successfully navigating the paper hurricane. Journal of Air Transport Management, 94, 102062, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102062.
62. Tan, J. H., & Masood, T. (2021). Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Airports-A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2112. 14333.
63. Teodorescu, M. H. M., Morse, L., Awwad, Y., & Kane, G. C. (2021). Failures of Fairness in Automation Require a Deeper Understanding of Human-ML Augmentation. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1483-1499.
64. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Tuchen, S., Arora, M., & Blessing, L. (2020). Airport user experience unpacked: Conceptualizing its potential in the face of COVID-19. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101919.
66. Tunçalp, D. (2016). Questioning the Ontology of Sociomateriality: A Critical Realist Perspective. Management Decision, 54(5), 1073-1087.
67. Tunçalp, D. (2021). Nitel Araştırmalarda Paradigmalar, Yöntembilimleri ve Araştırma Titizliği. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 1-47.
68. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis (Second Edition). California: SAGE Publications.