Araştırma Makalesi

A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts

Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2 30 Aralık 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts

Öz

The rise of the Sociocultural Theory has featured individuals as members of a social group. It primarily asserts that individuals learn best in relation to other people, and language learning is not an exception. A great number of research studies have been conducted to investigate the role of interaction in language learning, nature of talk in interaction, and different aspects of conversations in diverse settings. Subsequent to the discovery of the power of interaction; teachers’ use of language, and skills in managing the interaction in the classroom have also gained importance. Many studies solely focused on the interactions and classroom discourse of in-service teachers in real classroom settings. However, the number of studies comparatively analyzing the classroom discourse managed by pre-service teachers (PSTs) in the microteaching and real classroom settings has remained scarce. The present research emerges out of this need to explore PSTs’ classroom discourse in microteaching and practice school contexts in a comparative manner. Three PSTs’ teaching implementations in two different settings were recorded, the interactions were transcribed, and committed to an in-depth analysis. In addition, one PST was invited to a stimulated-recall interview. The results of the current study demonstrated certain differences between microteaching and practice school contexts in terms of the classroom discourse. Inequalities in the amount of teacher talk in two contexts, difference in the rate of students’ participation, the organization of the interaction were among the major differences while the co-construction of classroom discourse and its effects on the learning process were among the commonalities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

micro teaching, teacher education, in-class interaction, classroom discourse

Kaynakça

  1. Allen, D. W., & Fortune, J. C. (1965). Microteaching: a new procedure in education. School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford.
  2. Arsal, Z. (2015). The effects of microteaching on the critical thinking dispositions of pre- service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(3), 140-153.
  3. Babalola, B. K. (2010). Mediated micro-teaching as a realistically efficient mode of teaching practice. Journal of Research in Education and Psychology, 1(2), 93-97.
  4. Bell, N. D. (2007). Microteaching: What is it that is going on here?. Linguistics and Education, 18(1), 24-40.
  5. Can, V. (2009). A microteaching application on a teaching practice course. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 125-140.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  7. Cripwell, K., & Geddes, M. (1982). The development of organizational skills through micro- teaching. ELT journal, 36(4), 232-236.
  8. Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. English Language Teaching Journal 52, 179–187.
  9. Cullen, R. (2001). The use of lesson transcripts for developing teachers' classroom language. System, 29(1), 27-43.
  10. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press, USA.

Kaynak Göster

APA
İlya, A. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1140040
AMA
1.İlya A. A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts. SUJEF. 2022;22(2):111-127. doi:10.53629/sakaefd.1140040
Chicago
İlya, Ali. 2022. “A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 22 (2): 111-27. https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1140040.
EndNote
İlya A (01 Aralık 2022) A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 22 2 111–127.
IEEE
[1]A. İlya, “A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts”, SUJEF, c. 22, sy 2, ss. 111–127, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.53629/sakaefd.1140040.
ISNAD
İlya, Ali. “A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 22/2 (01 Aralık 2022): 111-127. https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1140040.
JAMA
1.İlya A. A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts. SUJEF. 2022;22:111–127.
MLA
İlya, Ali. “A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 22, sy 2, Aralık 2022, ss. 111-27, doi:10.53629/sakaefd.1140040.
Vancouver
1.Ali İlya. A Comparative Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Microteaching and Practice School Contexts. SUJEF. 01 Aralık 2022;22(2):111-27. doi:10.53629/sakaefd.1140040