Araştırma Makalesi

ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 34 14 Aralık 2016
PDF İndir
EN TR

Virtue Epistemology of Ernest Sosa

Öz

In this article, I explore the views of Ernest Sosa, a living analytic philosopher who developed a virtue epistemology out of the contemporary virtue ethics. Virtue theory in ethics is personbased rather than act-based; and similarly virtue theory in epistemology is person-based rather than belief/proposition-based. In this way, Sosa who has defended person-based theory of justification with the aid of intellectual virtue, developed a theory that can be an alternative to foundationalism, coherentism and post-Gettier problems. The theory is a refined version of reliabilism and its roots can be traced back to Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes and Reid in classical epistemology and it also basically depends on epistemology of Alvin Goldman in contemporary epistemology. One of the most important features of this epistemology is refrain from dichotomies such as foundationalism/coherentism and internalism/externalism and try to surpass polarization by reconciling them. Finally, virtue epistemology of Sosa defends epistemology as a normative discipline against Quineist radical naturalized epistemology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Virtue epistemology,Ernest Sosa,Intellectual Virtue,Reliabilism,Normativity

Kaynakça

  1. Alpyagil, Recep, “Virtue in Islam”, The Handbook of Virtue Ethics, Stan van Hooft (ed.),
  2. Anscombe, G. E. M., “Modern Moral Philosophy”, Philosophy, 33 (1958).
  3. Audi, Robert, “Intellectual Virtue and Epistemic Power”, Ernest Sosa and His Critics,
  4. Ayten, Ali, Erdeme Dönüş: Psikoloji ve Mutluluk Yolu, İkinci Baskı, İstanbul: İz Yayıncı-lık, 2016.
  5. Batak, Kemal, “Aristoteles’te Entelektüel Erdemler”, Felsefe Dünyası, Sayı 63 (2016).
  6. _______, “Ernest Sosa ve Gettier Problemi”, Ethos, Sayı: 9 (2) (Temmuz, 2016).
  7. _______, “Ernest Sosa’da Hayvani Bilgi ve Tefekküri Bilgi”, Kutadgubilig, Sayı: 32
  8. _______, “Ernest Sosa’nın Temelci ve Bağdaşımcı Gerekçelendirme Eleştirisi”, FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), Sayı: 21 (2016).
  9. _______, Felsefenin Sonu?: W. V. Quine, Doğallaştırılmış Epistemoloji ve A Priori
  10. Feldman, Richard, “Foundational Justification”, Ernest Sosa and His Critics, John Greco (ed.), Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Batak, K. (2016). ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(34), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.17335/sakaifd.292618
AMA
1.Batak K. ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;18(34):1-29. doi:10.17335/sakaifd.292618
Chicago
Batak, Kemal. 2016. “ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ”. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18 (34): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.17335/sakaifd.292618.
EndNote
Batak K (01 Aralık 2016) ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18 34 1–29.
IEEE
[1]K. Batak, “ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ”, Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 18, sy 34, ss. 1–29, Ara. 2016, doi: 10.17335/sakaifd.292618.
ISNAD
Batak, Kemal. “ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ”. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18/34 (01 Aralık 2016): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.17335/sakaifd.292618.
JAMA
1.Batak K. ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;18:1–29.
MLA
Batak, Kemal. “ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ”. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 18, sy 34, Aralık 2016, ss. 1-29, doi:10.17335/sakaifd.292618.
Vancouver
1.Kemal Batak. ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2016;18(34):1-29. doi:10.17335/sakaifd.292618