Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ÇAĞDAŞ SANAT BAĞLAMINDA YAPAY ZEKA İLE ÜRETİLEN RESİMLERİN YARATICILIĞI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME: EDMOND DE BELAMY PORTRESİ

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 15- Özel sayı, 893 - 907, 20.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1805282

Öz

Yapay zeka, çağdaş sanatta yalnızca bir araç olarak değil, aynı zamanda sanatın doğasına
dair tartışmaların merkezinde yer alan kavramsal bir unsur olarak konumlanmaktadır. Bu
çalışmada, yapay zekanın sanatsal üretime entegrasyonu ile yaratıcılığın insana özgü olup
olmadığı tartışması, GAN teknolojisiyle oluşturulan ve algoritmik bir imza taşıyan Edmond
de Belamy portresi üzerinden ele alınmıştır. Christie’s müzayedesinde yüksek bir fiyata
satılmasıyla dikkat çeken bu eser, sanatın geleneksel sınırlarını zorlamış ve sanat piyasasındaki
değer algısını sorgulamaya açmıştır. Yapılan incelemeler, yapay zeka ile üretilen
eserlerin yaratıcısının sanatçı ya da kodlayıcı olarak değerlendirilebileceğini, insan-yapay
zeka işbirliklerinin yeni üretim modelleri sunabileceğini ve sanatsal değerin büyük ölçüde
piyasa dinamikleriyle belirlendiğini göstermektedir. Bu dönüşüm süreci, sanatın yalnızca
insan merkezli bir faaliyet olup olmadığına dair süregelen tartışmaları derinleştirirken,
yapay zekanın yaratıcılık üzerindeki etkisini anlamak için disiplinler arası bir yaklaşımı ve
sanat, teknoloji, felsefe gibi alanların iç içe geçmesini gerektirecektir. Bu bağlamda, sanatın
geleceği, insan ve yapay zekanın nasıl bir iş birliği geliştireceğine ve bu etkileşimin sanatsal
ifade biçimlerine nasıl yön vereceğine bağlı olarak şekillenecektir.

Kaynakça

  • Artut, S. (2019). Yapay zekâ olgusunun güncel sanat çalışmalarındaki açılımları. İnsan ve İnsan, 6 (22), 767-783.
  • Boden, M.A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms; Press: London, UK.
  • Cohn, B. (2018). Up for Bid, AI Art Signed ‘Algorithm’, New York Times. https://time.com/5357221/obvious-artificial-intelligence-art/ Cohen, Harold. (1999). “Colouring without Seeing: A Problem in Machine Creativity”. AISB quarterly. 102: 26-35.
  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Can Machines Create Art?. Philos. Technol. 30, 285–303. Chi, J. (2024). The evolutionary impact of artificial intelligence on contemporary artistic practices.
  • Communications in Humanities Research, 35, 52-57.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Llorens-Largo, F., & Vidal, J. (2024). La nueva realidad de la educación ante los avances de la inteligencia artificial generativa. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1), 9-39.
  • Goenaga, M. A. (2020). A critique of contemporary artificial intelligence art: Who is Edmond de Belamy?. AusArt, 8(1), 49-64.
  • Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27.
  • Hertzmann, A. (2018, May). Can computers create art?. In Arts (Vol. 7, No. 2, p. 18). MDPI.
  • Hertzmann, A. (2020). Computers do not make art, people do. Communications of the ACM, 63(5), 45-48. Kurt, D. E. (2018). Artistic creativity in artificial intelligence. Master diss., Radbound University.
  • Magni, F., Park, J., & Chao, M. M. (2024). Humans as creativity gatekeepers: Are we biased against AI creativity?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(3), 643-656.
  • McCormack, J., Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019, Nisan). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In International conference on computational intelligence in music, sound, art and design (part of EvoStar) (pp. 35-50). Cham:Springer International Publishing.
  • Nugent, C. (2018). The Painter Behind These Artworks Is an AI Program. Do They Still Count As Art? Time. https://time.com/5357221/obvious-artificial-intelligence-art/ Obvious and the interface between art and artificial intelligence. (2018, 12 Aralık). Christie’s. 10.02.2025 tarihinde https://www.christies.com/stories/a-collaboration-between-two-artists-one-human-one-a-machine-0cd01f4e232f4279a525a446d60d4cd1#FID-9332adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Rani, S., Jining, D., Shah, D. et al. (2024). Examining the impacts of artificial intelligence technology and computing on digital art: a case study of Edmond de Belamy and its aesthetic values and techniques. AI & Soc.
  • Sawyer, R.K. (2014). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. Vincent, J. (2018, 23 Ekim). How three French students used borrowed code to put the first AI portrait in Christie’s.
  • TheVerge.https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/23/18013190/ai-art-portrait-auction-christies belamy-obvious-robbie-barrat-gans Zou, X. (2024). The Development and Impact of AI-Generated Content in Contemporary Painting. Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 6, 188195.

A STUDY ON THE CREATIVITY OF PAINTINGS PRODUCED WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY ART: PORTRAIT OF EDMOND DE BELAMY

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 15- Özel sayı, 893 - 907, 20.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1805282

Öz

Artificial intelligence is positioned in contemporary art not only as a tool but also as a conceptual
element at the center of debates on the nature of art. In this study, the integration
of artificial intelligence into artistic production and the debate on whether creativity is
inherent to human beings is addressed through the portrait of Edmond de Belamy, created
with GAN technology and bearing an algorithmic signature. This work, which attracted
attention with its high price at Christie's auction, pushed the traditional boundaries of
art and questioned the perception of value in the art market. The analysis shows that the
creators of works produced with artificial intelligence can be considered as artists or coders,
that human-artificial intelligence collaborations can offer new production models, and that
artistic value is largely determined by market dynamics. This transformation process deepens
the ongoing debates on whether art is solely a human-centered activity, while understanding
the impact of artificial intelligence on creativity requires an interdisciplinary
approach, intertwining fields such as art, technology, and philosophy. In this context, the
future of art will be shaped by how humans and artificial intelligence collaborate and how
this interaction influences artistic forms of expression.

Kaynakça

  • Artut, S. (2019). Yapay zekâ olgusunun güncel sanat çalışmalarındaki açılımları. İnsan ve İnsan, 6 (22), 767-783.
  • Boden, M.A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms; Press: London, UK.
  • Cohn, B. (2018). Up for Bid, AI Art Signed ‘Algorithm’, New York Times. https://time.com/5357221/obvious-artificial-intelligence-art/ Cohen, Harold. (1999). “Colouring without Seeing: A Problem in Machine Creativity”. AISB quarterly. 102: 26-35.
  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Can Machines Create Art?. Philos. Technol. 30, 285–303. Chi, J. (2024). The evolutionary impact of artificial intelligence on contemporary artistic practices.
  • Communications in Humanities Research, 35, 52-57.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Llorens-Largo, F., & Vidal, J. (2024). La nueva realidad de la educación ante los avances de la inteligencia artificial generativa. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1), 9-39.
  • Goenaga, M. A. (2020). A critique of contemporary artificial intelligence art: Who is Edmond de Belamy?. AusArt, 8(1), 49-64.
  • Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27.
  • Hertzmann, A. (2018, May). Can computers create art?. In Arts (Vol. 7, No. 2, p. 18). MDPI.
  • Hertzmann, A. (2020). Computers do not make art, people do. Communications of the ACM, 63(5), 45-48. Kurt, D. E. (2018). Artistic creativity in artificial intelligence. Master diss., Radbound University.
  • Magni, F., Park, J., & Chao, M. M. (2024). Humans as creativity gatekeepers: Are we biased against AI creativity?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(3), 643-656.
  • McCormack, J., Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019, Nisan). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In International conference on computational intelligence in music, sound, art and design (part of EvoStar) (pp. 35-50). Cham:Springer International Publishing.
  • Nugent, C. (2018). The Painter Behind These Artworks Is an AI Program. Do They Still Count As Art? Time. https://time.com/5357221/obvious-artificial-intelligence-art/ Obvious and the interface between art and artificial intelligence. (2018, 12 Aralık). Christie’s. 10.02.2025 tarihinde https://www.christies.com/stories/a-collaboration-between-two-artists-one-human-one-a-machine-0cd01f4e232f4279a525a446d60d4cd1#FID-9332adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Rani, S., Jining, D., Shah, D. et al. (2024). Examining the impacts of artificial intelligence technology and computing on digital art: a case study of Edmond de Belamy and its aesthetic values and techniques. AI & Soc.
  • Sawyer, R.K. (2014). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. Vincent, J. (2018, 23 Ekim). How three French students used borrowed code to put the first AI portrait in Christie’s.
  • TheVerge.https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/23/18013190/ai-art-portrait-auction-christies belamy-obvious-robbie-barrat-gans Zou, X. (2024). The Development and Impact of AI-Generated Content in Contemporary Painting. Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 6, 188195.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Çağdaş Sanat
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Özge Öner 0000-0001-7726-3763

Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi 28 Mayıs 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Ekim 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 15- Özel sayı

Kaynak Göster

APA Öner, Ö. (2025). ÇAĞDAŞ SANAT BAĞLAMINDA YAPAY ZEKA İLE ÜRETİLEN RESİMLERİN YARATICILIĞI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME: EDMOND DE BELAMY PORTRESİ. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi(15- Özel sayı), 893-907. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1805282