Gift Giving Culture in University and Designing Gift Objets Through Corporate Values

Yıl 2018, , 42 - 66, 05.06.2018

Nazlı Gürgan , Mine Ovacık

https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.509545

Öz

Corporate cultural objects are designed to be given as gifts, which represent the cultural
characteristifs of that particular corporation. While gifts of a university are possibly designed
and produced through its collective knowledge of art, design and technology, this production is a
remarkable tool projecting values of the university. In this respect, this research is conducted as a
design project with the method of practice-based research.

In this article, not only the process and outcomes of the project is shared but also, the following
issues are questioned: What is the role of the object in gift giving? If gift giving in our daily life is
personal, how can corporate gifts reflect its corporational values? How could cultural objects of a
university that reflect its institutional culture and values be designed? How could these designed
objects become visible? This research is based on the idead that products’ design value reinforces
corporate belonging, and aims to create an exemplary model for the production of university gift
objects by turning academic studio works into products, contributing to sustainable local production
methods through collaboration with contemporary design. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gift, Corporate Gift, Gift Design, Brand, Craft and Design

Üniversitede Hediye Verme Kültürü ve Kurumsal Değerlere Uygun Hediyelik Eşya Tasarımı

Öz

Kurum kültür nesnesi, kurumların kültürel özelliklerini barındıran, hediye vermek üzere tasarlanmış eşyadır. Bir üniversitenin hediyeleri, bünyesinde bulunan sanat, tasarım ve teknoloji
birikimi aracılığıyla yaratılmış ve üretilmiş kültür nesneleri olabilirken, bu üretim, o üniversitenin
kendini ve değerlerini yansıtacak önemli bir araçtır. Bu fikirden yola çıkılarak uygulama temelli
araştırma yöntemiyle bir tasarım projesi gerçekleştirmiştir.

Bu makalede, projenin araştırma ve tasarım uygulama süreci ve sonuçları paylaşılırken, aynı
zamanda şu konular sorgulanmaktadır: Hediye verme eyleminde nesnenin rolü nedir? Gündelik
yaşamda, özel hayatımızda hediye vermek kişisel bir eylemken, kurumlarda verilen hediyeler, kurumsal değerleri nasıl yansıtabilir? Bir üniversitenin kurumsal değerlerini ve kültürünü yansıtan
nesneler nasıl tasarlanabilir? Tasarlanan bu ürünlerin görünürlüğü nasıl sağlanabilir? Tasarım
değeri yüksek ürünlerin kurumsal aidiyet duygusunu pekiştirdiği bilgisiyle yola çıkılan bu projede,
üniversitenin öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı çalışmalarını dönüştürerek, yerel üretim yöntemlerinin
çağdaş tasarım iş birliği ile sürdürülmesine katkıda bulunarak, üniversitenin hediyelik eşya üretiminde örnek bir model oluşturma amacına ulaşılmıştır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hediye, Kurumsal Hediye, Hediyelik Eşya Tasarımı, Marka, Zanaat ve Tasarım

Kaynakça

• 34-14 KHAS. (2013). (Kadir Has Üniversitesi) Ocak 7, 2017 tarihinde 34-14 KHAS: http://www.34-14khas.com.tr/aboutus adresinden alındı.
• Alfody, S. (2007). NeoCraft: Modernity and The Crafts. Canada: The Press of The Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
• Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business.
• Anderson, L. & Littrell M. (1995). Souvenir-Purchase Behavior of Women Tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 22, 328- 348.
• Asplet, M. & Cooper, M. (2000). Cultural Designs in New Zealand Souvenir Clothing: The Question of Authenticity. Tou- rism Management, 21, 307-312.
• Blundell, V. (1993). Aboriginal Empowerment and Souvenir Trade in Canada. Annals of Tourism Research, 20, 64-87.
• Bolabola, C. A. (1980). The Impact of Tourism on Fijian Woodcarving. F. Rajotte içinde, Pacific Tourism: As Islanders See It. (93-97). Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies.
• Chen Design Associates. (2011). Fingerprint: The Evolution of Handmade Elements in Graphic Design. Ohio: HOW Books.
• Coşar, M. (2008). Türk Kültüründe Hediyenin Algılanışı. İÜ Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, 38.
• Cohen, J. H. (2001). Textile, Tourism and Community Development. Annals of Tourism Research, 28, 378-398.
• Combrink, T. & Swanson K. K. (2000). Souvenir Choice and Gender: An Evaluation of Domestic Souvenir Choice Attribu- tes of Tourists in the Four Corners Region of the Southwest. Travel and Tourism Research Association Annual, (378-383). de Kadt, E. (1981). Arts, Crafts and Cultural Manifestations. Ekistics, 48, 244-247.
• Evans, G. (2000). Contemporary Crafts as Souvenirs, Artefacts and Functional Goods and their Role in Local Economic Diversification and Cultural Development. Hitchcock, M & Teague K. içinde, Souvenirs: The Material Culture of Tourism. (127-146). Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Güvenç, B. (2007). Kültürün ABC’si. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Gordon, B. (1986). The Souvenir: Messenger of the Extraordinary. Journal of Popular Culture, 20(3), 135-146.
• Gormsen, E. (1981). Mexican Handicrafts Under the Influence of International Tourism: Development and Regional Emp- loyment. Ibero-Amerikanisches Archiv, 7, 77-110.
• Graburn, N. H. (1976). Ethnic Tourist Arts: Cultural Expressions from the Fourth World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• İTÜ. (2017). İTÜ1173. https://www.1773itu.com adresinden alındı. Kim, S. & Littrell, M. (1999). Predicting Souvenir Purchase Intentions. Journal of Travel Research, 38(2), 153-162.
• Kim, S. & Littrell, M. (2001). Souvenir Buying Intentions for Self versus Others. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(3), 638- 657.
• Koepke, P. (2016). Patterns: Inside The Design Library. Phaidon Press.
• Komter, A. (2007). Gift and Social Relations: The Mechanisms of Reciprocity. International Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 93-107.
• Krippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
• Littrell, M., Anderson, L, Brown, P. (1993). What Makes a Craft Souvenir Authentic? Annals of Tourism Research, 20, 197-215.
• Littrell, M., Baizerman S, Kean R., Gahring, S., Niemeyer, S., Reilly, R., & Stout, J. (1994). Souvenirs and Tourism Styles. Journal of Travel Research, 33(1), 3-11.
• Mauss, M. (1966). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. (I. Cunnison, Çev.) London: Cohen & West.
• Morbello, M. (1996). Zoo Veneers: Animals and Ethnic Crafts at the San Diego Zoo. Communication Review, 1(4), 521-543.
• Osgood, C., Suci, G., Tannnenbaum, P. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
• Schädler, K. F. (1979). African Arts and Crafts in a World of Changing Values. J. A. Kryden içinde, Tourism and Develop- ment (s. 146-156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Swanson, K. K., & Horridge, P. (2002). Tourists’ Souvenir Purchase Behavior and Retailers’ Awareness of Tourists’ Purchase Behavior in the Southwest. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 20(2), 62-76.
• Swanson, K. K, Horridge, P. (2004). A Structural Model for Souvenir Consumption, Travel Activities and Tourist Demog- raphics. Journal of Travel Research, 42(1), 372-380.
• Swanson, K. K., & Horridge, P (2006). Travel Motivations as Souvenir Purchase Indicators. Tourism Management, 27, 671-683.
• Swanson, K. K. & Timothy, D. J. (2012). Souvenirs: Icons of Meaning, Commercialization and Commoditization. Tourism Management, 33, 489-499.
• The Harvard Shop. (2017). (Harvard University) Ocak 5, 2017 tarihinde The Harvard Shop: https://www.theharvardshop. com adresinden alındı.
• Timothy, D. J. (2005). Shopping Tourism, Retailing and Leisure. Clevedon: Channel View.
• University of Glasgow Shops. (2017). (U. o. Glasgow, Prodüktör) Ocak 6, 2017 tarihinde University of Glasgow Shops: https://www.universityofglasgowshops.com/pages/about-us adresinden alındı
• Yu, H. & Littrell, M. (2003). Product and Process Orientations to Tourism Shopping. Journal of Travel Research., 42, 140- 150.