Tasarım Kavramında Yaşanan Öze Dönük Paradigma Değişimi Ve Mekân Tasarımına Yönelik Açılımları

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 110 - 127, 21.12.2018

Özge Kandemir

https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.529700

Cited By: 1

Öz

Günümüzde farklı alanların kapsamına giren tasarım kavramının temelde ne olduğunun
anlaşılmasına duyulan ihtiyacın giderek arttığı görülmektedir. Bu nedenle, tasarım kavramının
kökeninin ne olduğunun ve özünün ne anlama geldiğinin sorgulanarak anlaşılması, yaşanacak
tasarım sürecinin yapısını, tasarım sürecini etkileyen faktörleri ve açığa çıkan/çıkacak olan sonuç
ürünlere yönelik yaklaşımı belirlemede giderek önem kazanmıştır. Tasarım kavramına yönelik değişen yaklaşım, tasarım araştırmaları alanı içerisinde günümüzde “paradigma değişimi” olarak
nitelendirilen öze dönük bir yönelim göstermektedir. Bu çerçevede ele alınan çalışmada “Tasarım
Kavramı” irdelenerek kavramın özünün yakalanması ve bu özün barındırdığı alt açılımların belirlenerek ortaya konulması hedeflenmiştir. Tasarım Kavramına yönelik sorgulamaların doğurduğu,
paradigma değişimi olarak nitelendirilen yaklaşım biçiminin mekân tasarımı için yeni ve yeniden
ortaya çıkardığı kavramlar belirlenerek aktarılmaya çalışılmıştır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tasarım Kavramı, Paradigma Değişimi, İnsan Odaklı Tasarım, Tasarım Deneyimi, Mekân Tasarımı

A Paradigm Shift In The Design Concept Towards It’s Origin And It’s Expansions For The Spatial Design

Öz

It is seen that the need to understand the concept of design used by different disciplines has
been increased. For this reason, understanding what the origin of the design concept is and what
its essence means is getting more and more important to determine the structure of the design
process, the factors affecting the design process, and the approach towards the end products. This
chancing approach to the design concept tends to its essence which is described as a paradigm shift
within the field of design research nowadays. Thus, the aim of this study is to capture the essence
of design concept, to determine its expansions, and then put forward them through examining. On
this direction, the concepts, which are revealed over again by the approach defined as a paradigm
shift are tried to be indicated for the spatial design in this article. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Design Concept, Paradigm Shift, Human-Centered Design, Design Experience, Spatial Design.

Kaynakça

• Benzel, K. F. (1997) The Room in Context. Design beyond boundaries. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Blanqui, L. A. (2009) Eternity according to the stars (Çev: M. H. Anderson). CR: The New Centennial Review, 9 (3), 3-60.
• Brown, T. (2008). “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review. June: 84-95.
• Buchanan, R. (2000). “Good Design in the Digital Age”. AIGA Journal of Design for the Network Economy | Volume 1, Number 1.
• Carman, T. (2012). ForeWord. Phenomenology of Perception. Oxon: Routledge.
• Colebrook, C. (1998), Gilles Deleuze. Bagimsis Kitaplar.
• Cross, N. (2007). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Basel: Birkhäuser GmbH.
• Çörekçioğlu, H. (2010). Parçalanmış Politik Birliği Yeniden Kurmak: Hikaye Anlatımı. Özgürlük, Eşitlik ve Kardeşlik. Birinci Uluslararası Felsefe Kongresi, Bursa.
• Dohr, J. and Portillo, M. (2011). Design Thinking for Interiors. Inquiry + Experience+ Impact. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Dreyus, H. L. and Spinosa, C. (1997). Highway Bridges and Feasts: Heidegger and Borgmann on How to Affirm Technology. Man and World 30: 159–177.
• Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion. Design Issues: Volume 17, Number 1 Winter.
• Hassenzahl, M., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbac, S., Laschke, M., Len, E. and Kim, J. (2013). “Designing Moments of Meaning and Pleasure. Experience Design and Happiness” International Journal of Design. Vol 7, No 3. 21-31.
• Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
• Hesket, J. (2002). Toothpicks and Logos Design in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
• IDEO, (2015). The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. https://www.ideo.com/work/human-centered-design-toolkit/
• Irbite, A. (2014). “The Importance Of The Paradigm Shift In The Development Of Design Industry And Design Education”. Proceeding of the International Scientifical Conference May 23th – 24th, 2014 Volume II.
• Jay, M. (2012). Deneyim Şarkıları, Evrensel Bir Tema Üzerine Modern Çeşitlemeler. Çev: Barış Engin Aksoy. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Jonas, W. (1996). “System Thinking in Industrial Design”. Proceeding of System Dynamics 96, Jully 22-26, 1196, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Pp. 241-244.
• Kant, E. and Newell, A. (1984). “Problem Solving Techniques for the Design of Algorithms,” Information Processing and Management, Volume 20, Issues 1–2, Pp. 97-118.
• Kazmierczak, E. T. (2003). “Design as Meaning Making: From Making Things to the Design of Thing.” Design Issues: 19, 2: 45-59.
• Krippendorff, Klaus. (1989). “On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts” or on the Proposition that “Design is Making Sense (of Things).”” Design Issues 5,2: 9-39.
• Krippendorff, Klaus. (2004). “Intrinsic Motivation and Human-Centered Design” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5,1: 1-12.
• Krippendorff, Klaus. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Published by CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
• Krippendorff, Klaus. (2007). Design Research, an Oxymoron? Design Research Now Essays and Selected Projects Basel: Birkhauser, 67-80.
• Kuhn, L. (2008) “Complexity and Educational Research: A Critical Reflection” Complexity Theory and The Philosophy of Education. Ed. Mark Mason. Wiley-Blackwell .Pp. 169-180.
• Kuhn, T. S. (1982) Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı, Çev. Nilüfer Kuyaş. Birinci Baskı. Alan Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Lawson, B. (1990). How Designers Think. The Design Process Demystified. Second Edition, Oxford: An İmprint of Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
• Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekanın Üretimi. Çev. Işık Ergüden. Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Malpas, J. E. (1999). Place and Experience. A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Malpas, J. (2006). Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World. Cambridge: The MIT Press
• Margolin V. (1998). Design for a Sustainable World, Design Issues, Vol.14,No.2, Pp.83-92.
• Margolin V. and Margolin S. (2002). A “Social Model of Design: Issues of Practice and Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology” Design Issues: Vol.18, No. 4 Autumn.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Algılanan Dünya. Çev: Ömer Aygün. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Oxon: Routledge.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2016). Algının Fenomonolojisi. Çev: Emine Sarıkartal ve Eylem Hacımuratoğlu. İthaki Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Mitcham, C. (1995). Ethics into Design, Discovering Design, Explorations in Design Studies. Ed. Richard Buchanan, Victor Margolin. Thu University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, Pp. 173-189.
• Muratovski, G. (2015). Paradigm Shift: Report on the New Role of Design in Business and Society, Tongji University and Tongji University Press.
• Norberg-Schultz. C. (1984). Genius Loci, Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli International Publications, INC.
• Norman, D. A. And Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research Versus Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues 30,1:78-96.
• Pallasmaa, J. (2011). Tenin Gözleri. Çev: Aziz Ufuk Kılıç. YEM Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Papanek, V. (1985). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Thames and Hudson Ltd; 2 edition.
• Papanek, V. (2004). Design for the Real World, Human Ecology and Social Change, Thames & Hudson Ltd.
• Redström, J. (2006). “Towards User Design? On the Shift from Object to User as the Subject of Design.” Design Studies 27, 2: 123-139.
• Rittel, Horst W. and Webber, Melvin M. (1973). “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planing” Policiy Sciences 4: 155-169.
• Rodriguez L. & Peralta, C. (2014). “From Product to Service Design: A Thinking Paradigm Shift” www.FORMakademisk. org, Vol.7, Nr.3, 2014, Art. 5, 1-27.
• Schrag, Calvin O.(2006). Heidegger Felsefesinde Fenomonoloji Varlık Bilim ve Tarih. Çev. Serdar Şen. ÇTTAD, V/13. Ss. 205-215.
• Sharr, A. (2007). Heidegger for Architect. Taylor & Francis Group.
• Sharr, A. (2010). Mimarlar için Heidegger. Çev: Volkan Atmaca. Yem Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Sheehan, T. (2011). “Astonishing! Things Make Sense!” Gatherings, 1: 1-16.
• Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition 3rd Edition, MIT Press.
• Throop, C. J. (2003). “Articulating Experience” SAGE Publications 3,2: 219–241. TDK. Türk Dil Kurumu, Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&view=bts&kategori1=veritbn&kelimesec=21743
• Wang, T. (2010). A New Paradigm for Design Studio Education. JADE 29.2.2010. 173-183.