Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SUSTAINABLE INTERIOR DESIGN/ARCHITECTURE RESEARCHES AFTER SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 546 - 564, 28.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1506512

Öz

The Global Goals for Sustainable Development, signed by 170 nations, including Turkey,
under UN leadership to address climate change and poverty, have 17 goals to be met by
2030. This study aims to evaluate the studies in the field of sustainable interior architecture/
design produced until the end of 2023, taking as reference the date (2015) when these
goals came into force. Bibliometric analysis used within the scope of the research. It provides
quantitative evaluation of publications through descriptive, conceptual and citation
analysis. Research and review articles from the scientifically approved Web of Science were
used in the study. After entering keywords, 8,354 publications were limited to 2,026 articles
with PRISMA protocol inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. There are sixteen
periodicals that are considered primary sources on environmentally friendly interior design/
architecture. The field’s core subjects are model development and life cycle evaluation,
while mechanical properties and durability are emerging. The original value of the study is
related to the subject it deals with and its scope. Bibliometric studies related to sustainable
interior/architecture are rare in the literature. There is no study examining the effects of the
Global Goals for Sustainable Development, which is the subject of the study.

Kaynakça

  • Abafe, E. A., Bahta, Y. T. and Jordaan, H. (2022). Exploring Biblioshiny for Historical Assessment of Global Research on Sustainable Use of Water in Agriculture. Sustainability, 14(17), 10651. DOI: 10.3390/su141710651
  • Ali, I. and Gölgeci, I. (2019). Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 49(8), 793–815. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM- 02-2019-0038
  • Andres, A. (2009). Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI: 10.1016/j. joi.2017.08.007
  • Ashour, M., Mahdiyar, A. and Haron, S. (2021), A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design, Sustainability, 13(18), 10403, DOI:10.3390/su131810403.
  • Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.
  • Burkut, E. B. (2023). Evaluation of Interior Architecture Education Research in the Web of Science Database: Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(1), 387–407. https://doi. org/10.30785/mbud.1263207
  • Carta, S., Pintacuda, L., Owen, I. and Turchi, T. (2021). Resilient Communities: A Novel Workflow. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil. 2021.767779
  • Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002
  • Desha, C., Caldera, S., and Hutchinson, D. (2021). Exploring the development of context appreciation in coursework that targets problem-solving for sustainable development. Internatıonal Journal of Sustaınability in Higher Education, 22(5), 1186–1224. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2020-0024
  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., and Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817–842. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0
  • Dixit, S., Stefanska, A., and Musiuk, A. (2021). Architectural form finding in arboreal supporting structure optimisation. AIN Shams Engineering Journal, 12(2), 2321–2329. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.022
  • Dushenko, M., Bjorbaek, C., and Steger-Jensen, K. (2019). Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port. Sustainability, 11(1). DOI: 10.3390/su11010087
  • Eck, N. van, and Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-009-0146-3
  • Elshafei, G., Vilcekova, S., Zelenakova, M. and Negm, A. (2021). Towards an Adaptation of Efficient Passive Design for Thermal Comfort Buildings. Sustainability, 13(17). DOI: 10.3390/su13179570
  • Garfield, E. and Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201. DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090140304
  • Ghamari, H., Golshany, N., Naghibi Rad, P. and Behzadi, F. (2021). Neuroarchitecture Assessment: An Overview and Bibliometric Analysis. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), Article 4. https://doi. org/10.3390/ejihpe11040099
  • Gmür, M. (2006). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27–57. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023619503005
  • Gong, J. and You, F. (2015). Sustainable design and synthesis of energy systems. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 10, 77–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.coche. 2015.09.001
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102(46), 16569–16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  • Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., and Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 89–114. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
  • Ismael, D., and Shealy, T. (2019). Industry Perceptions of Sustainable Design and Construction Practices in Kuwait. Journal of Green Building, 14(4), 169–193. DOI: 10.3992/1943-4618.14.4.169
  • Khahro, S., Kumar, D., Siddiqui, F., Ali, T., Raza, M. and Khoso, A. (2021). Optimizing Energy Use, Cost and Carbon Emission through Building Information Modelling and a Sustainability Approach: A Case-Study of a Hospital Building. Sustainability, 13(7). DOI: 10.3390/su13073675
  • Kreuzman, H. (2001). A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science. Scientometrics, 51(3), 525–539. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019647103469
  • Lopez, N., Martin, J., Biedermann, A., Saenz, J., and Fernandez-Vazquez, A. (2021). Projecting More Sustainable Product and Service Designs. Sustainability, 13(21). 11872. DOI: 10.3390/su132111872
  • Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
  • Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: Generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15), 1396–1408. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022
  • Milovanovic, J., Shealy, T. and Katz, A. (2021). Higher Perceived Design Thinking Traits and Active Learning in Design Courses Motivate Engineering Students to Tackle Energy Sustainability in Their Careers. Sustainability, 13(22). DOI: 10.3390/su132212570
  • Morell, M., Espelt, R. and Cano, M. (2020). Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections with the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(18). DOI: 10.3390/su12187640
  • Park, E. J. and Lee, S. (2022). Creative Thinking in the Architecture Design Studio: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. Buildings, 12(6), Article 6. https:// doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060828
  • Pouris, A., and Pouris, A. (2010). Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the World. Scientometrics, 86(2), 541–552. DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-010-0277-6
  • Ramani, K., Skerlos, S., and Slocum, A. (2010). Sustainable Design (Guest Editorial). Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 2.
  • Rowlands, I. (2005). Emerald authorship data, Lotka’s law and research productivity. Aslib Proceedings, 57(1), 5–10. DOI: 10.1108/00012530510579039
  • Rui, L., & Firzan, M. (2023). Bibliometric Overview and Visualization Analysis for Interior Design Research based on CiteSpace. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 14(1), 1–12.
  • Sanchez-Carracedo, F., Lopez, D., Martin, C., Vidal, E., Cabre, J., and Climent, J. (2020). The Sustainability Matrix: A Tool for Integrating and Assessing Sustainability in the Bachelor and Master Theses of Engineering Degrees. Sustainability, 12(14). DOI: 10.3390/su12145755
  • Snaith, B. A. (2013). An evaluation of author productivity in international radiography journals 2004–2011. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 60(3), 93–99. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.21
  • Suppipat, S., Teachavorasinskun, K., and Hu, A. (2021). Challenges of Applying Simplified LCA Tools in Sustainable Design Pedagogy. Sustainability, 13(4). DOI: 10.3390/su13042406
  • Thakker, V. and Bakshi, B. (2021). Toward sustainable circular economies: A computational framework for assessment and design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126353
  • Thakur, V., and Mangla, S. (2019). Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 847–862. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.201
  • UNSTT. (2012). Realizing the Future We Want for All: Report to the Secretary-General Koninklijke Brill NV. DOI: 10.1163/2210-7975_HRD-9823-0056
  • van der Velden, M. (2018). Digitalisation and the UN Sustainable development Goals: What role for design. Interaction Design and Architectures, 37, 160–174.
  • Vite, C. and Morbiducci, R. (2021), “Optimizing the Sustainable Aspects of the Design Process through Building Information Modeling”, Sustainability, 13(6). DOI: 10.3390/su13063041.
  • Yaşar, D. (2022). Trends of Research on Interıors: A Bibliometric Analysis of The Interiors: Design, Architecture, Culture Journal. Y. Aksoy & E. Duyan (Eds.), InContemporary Issues in Architecture and Urban Planning Architechture andExploration (pp. 18–28). DAKAM Books.
  • Zhao, X., Zuo, J., Wu, G. and Huang, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of green building research 2000-2016. Architectural Science Review, 62(1), 74–88. DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2018.1485548

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA İÇİN KÜRESEL AMAÇLAR SONRASI SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR İÇ MİMARİ VE TASARIM ARAŞTIRMALARI: BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 546 - 564, 28.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1506512

Öz

İklim değişikliği ve yoksulluk gibi temel sorunlarla savaşmak amacıyla Birleşmiş Milletler
öncülüğünde Türkiye dahil 170 ülkenin imzaladığı Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Küresel
Amaçlar 2030 yılına kadar başarılması gereken 17 temel amaçtan oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışma,
söz konusu amaçların yürürlüğe girdiği tarihi (2015) referans alıp 2023 yılı sonuna
kadar üretilmiş sürdürülebilir iç mimari tasarım alanındaki çalışmaları değerlendirerek
mevcut bilgi birikimine katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında kullanılan
bibliyometrik analiz; yayınların betimsel, kavramsal ve atıf analizi üzerinden nicel
olarak değerlendirilmesini sağlamaktadır. Çalışmada kullanılan yayınlar bilim dünyasınce
kabul gören Web of Science veritabanından elde edilen araştırma ve derleme makalelerinden
oluşmaktadır. Anahtar kelimeler girilerek elde edilen toplamda 8.354 yayın PRISMA
protokolü kapsamında dahil edilme ve çıkarılma kriterleri ile 2.026 makaleye indirgenmiş
ve analizler yapılmıştır. Çevreye duyarlı iç mekan tasarımı ve mimarisi konusunda birincil
kaynak sayılan on altı süreli yayın bulunmaktadır. Alanda çalışılan temel konuların model
geliştirme ve yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesine yönelik çalışmalar olduğu, yükselişte olan
konuların ise mekanik özellikler ve dayanıklılık temelli olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın
özgün değeri ele aldığı konu ve kapsamı ile ilgilidir. Sürdürülebilir iç mimarlık ile ilişkili
yapılan bibliyometrik analiz çalışmalarına alanyazında az rastlanılmaktadır. Çalışmanın
konusu olan Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Küresel Amaçların konuya olan etkilerini inceleyen
çalışma ise bulunmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Abafe, E. A., Bahta, Y. T. and Jordaan, H. (2022). Exploring Biblioshiny for Historical Assessment of Global Research on Sustainable Use of Water in Agriculture. Sustainability, 14(17), 10651. DOI: 10.3390/su141710651
  • Ali, I. and Gölgeci, I. (2019). Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 49(8), 793–815. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM- 02-2019-0038
  • Andres, A. (2009). Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI: 10.1016/j. joi.2017.08.007
  • Ashour, M., Mahdiyar, A. and Haron, S. (2021), A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design, Sustainability, 13(18), 10403, DOI:10.3390/su131810403.
  • Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.
  • Burkut, E. B. (2023). Evaluation of Interior Architecture Education Research in the Web of Science Database: Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(1), 387–407. https://doi. org/10.30785/mbud.1263207
  • Carta, S., Pintacuda, L., Owen, I. and Turchi, T. (2021). Resilient Communities: A Novel Workflow. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil. 2021.767779
  • Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002
  • Desha, C., Caldera, S., and Hutchinson, D. (2021). Exploring the development of context appreciation in coursework that targets problem-solving for sustainable development. Internatıonal Journal of Sustaınability in Higher Education, 22(5), 1186–1224. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2020-0024
  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., and Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817–842. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0
  • Dixit, S., Stefanska, A., and Musiuk, A. (2021). Architectural form finding in arboreal supporting structure optimisation. AIN Shams Engineering Journal, 12(2), 2321–2329. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.022
  • Dushenko, M., Bjorbaek, C., and Steger-Jensen, K. (2019). Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port. Sustainability, 11(1). DOI: 10.3390/su11010087
  • Eck, N. van, and Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-009-0146-3
  • Elshafei, G., Vilcekova, S., Zelenakova, M. and Negm, A. (2021). Towards an Adaptation of Efficient Passive Design for Thermal Comfort Buildings. Sustainability, 13(17). DOI: 10.3390/su13179570
  • Garfield, E. and Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201. DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090140304
  • Ghamari, H., Golshany, N., Naghibi Rad, P. and Behzadi, F. (2021). Neuroarchitecture Assessment: An Overview and Bibliometric Analysis. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), Article 4. https://doi. org/10.3390/ejihpe11040099
  • Gmür, M. (2006). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27–57. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023619503005
  • Gong, J. and You, F. (2015). Sustainable design and synthesis of energy systems. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 10, 77–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.coche. 2015.09.001
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102(46), 16569–16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  • Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., and Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 89–114. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
  • Ismael, D., and Shealy, T. (2019). Industry Perceptions of Sustainable Design and Construction Practices in Kuwait. Journal of Green Building, 14(4), 169–193. DOI: 10.3992/1943-4618.14.4.169
  • Khahro, S., Kumar, D., Siddiqui, F., Ali, T., Raza, M. and Khoso, A. (2021). Optimizing Energy Use, Cost and Carbon Emission through Building Information Modelling and a Sustainability Approach: A Case-Study of a Hospital Building. Sustainability, 13(7). DOI: 10.3390/su13073675
  • Kreuzman, H. (2001). A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science. Scientometrics, 51(3), 525–539. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019647103469
  • Lopez, N., Martin, J., Biedermann, A., Saenz, J., and Fernandez-Vazquez, A. (2021). Projecting More Sustainable Product and Service Designs. Sustainability, 13(21). 11872. DOI: 10.3390/su132111872
  • Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
  • Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: Generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15), 1396–1408. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022
  • Milovanovic, J., Shealy, T. and Katz, A. (2021). Higher Perceived Design Thinking Traits and Active Learning in Design Courses Motivate Engineering Students to Tackle Energy Sustainability in Their Careers. Sustainability, 13(22). DOI: 10.3390/su132212570
  • Morell, M., Espelt, R. and Cano, M. (2020). Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections with the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(18). DOI: 10.3390/su12187640
  • Park, E. J. and Lee, S. (2022). Creative Thinking in the Architecture Design Studio: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. Buildings, 12(6), Article 6. https:// doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060828
  • Pouris, A., and Pouris, A. (2010). Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the World. Scientometrics, 86(2), 541–552. DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-010-0277-6
  • Ramani, K., Skerlos, S., and Slocum, A. (2010). Sustainable Design (Guest Editorial). Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 2.
  • Rowlands, I. (2005). Emerald authorship data, Lotka’s law and research productivity. Aslib Proceedings, 57(1), 5–10. DOI: 10.1108/00012530510579039
  • Rui, L., & Firzan, M. (2023). Bibliometric Overview and Visualization Analysis for Interior Design Research based on CiteSpace. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 14(1), 1–12.
  • Sanchez-Carracedo, F., Lopez, D., Martin, C., Vidal, E., Cabre, J., and Climent, J. (2020). The Sustainability Matrix: A Tool for Integrating and Assessing Sustainability in the Bachelor and Master Theses of Engineering Degrees. Sustainability, 12(14). DOI: 10.3390/su12145755
  • Snaith, B. A. (2013). An evaluation of author productivity in international radiography journals 2004–2011. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 60(3), 93–99. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.21
  • Suppipat, S., Teachavorasinskun, K., and Hu, A. (2021). Challenges of Applying Simplified LCA Tools in Sustainable Design Pedagogy. Sustainability, 13(4). DOI: 10.3390/su13042406
  • Thakker, V. and Bakshi, B. (2021). Toward sustainable circular economies: A computational framework for assessment and design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126353
  • Thakur, V., and Mangla, S. (2019). Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 847–862. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.201
  • UNSTT. (2012). Realizing the Future We Want for All: Report to the Secretary-General Koninklijke Brill NV. DOI: 10.1163/2210-7975_HRD-9823-0056
  • van der Velden, M. (2018). Digitalisation and the UN Sustainable development Goals: What role for design. Interaction Design and Architectures, 37, 160–174.
  • Vite, C. and Morbiducci, R. (2021), “Optimizing the Sustainable Aspects of the Design Process through Building Information Modeling”, Sustainability, 13(6). DOI: 10.3390/su13063041.
  • Yaşar, D. (2022). Trends of Research on Interıors: A Bibliometric Analysis of The Interiors: Design, Architecture, Culture Journal. Y. Aksoy & E. Duyan (Eds.), InContemporary Issues in Architecture and Urban Planning Architechture andExploration (pp. 18–28). DAKAM Books.
  • Zhao, X., Zuo, J., Wu, G. and Huang, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of green building research 2000-2016. Architectural Science Review, 62(1), 74–88. DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2018.1485548
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sürdürülebilir Tasarım
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Meryem Geçimli 0000-0002-1776-1936

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Haziran 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Geçimli, M. (2024). SUSTAINABLE INTERIOR DESIGN/ARCHITECTURE RESEARCHES AFTER SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, 14(1), 546-564. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1506512