THE EFFECTS OF SOME LOWER EXTREMITY KINEMATIC PARAMETERS ON ACCURACY THROWING IN TEAM HANDBALL

Öz

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of throwing velocity and accuracy on some kinematic parameters in elite and amateur handball players. Two groups of young healthy, male subjects took part in the experiments: one group of 9 handball players, Turkish National Handball Team (Group 1 (age:25.44±3.28 year, height: 188.88±6.75 cm, weight: 89.55±10.33 kg), another group of 9 physical education students (Group 2 (age: 22.66±1.58 year, height: 183.88±5.17 cm, weight: 89.00±11.82 kg ). In this study, thirty six overarm throwing performance were recorded by using two cameras (BASLER- A602 fc color, 100 Hz ) and tested using HUBAG software. Student-t test for independent samples was used to compare baseline values between groups. The Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between isokinetic strength and ball velocity. The level of significance was set at 0,05. Stride lengths of Group II were not increased as a linear, before the throwing. Only there was a signifant diffrences between groups at value of L3(%h) in accuracy throwing (p<.05). The angle of knee flexion bigger than the other group at cocking phase and ball release phase. It was found negative correlation between lead knee flexion and ball release angle and between lead knee flexion angle and trunk side angle in cocking phase at accuracy throwing. There was a significant difference between groups at ball velocity, but elite handball players throw with lower throwing velocity but more accurately.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

BAZI ALT EKSTREMİTE KİNEMATİK PARAMETRELERİNİN HENTBOLDA İSABETLİ ATIŞ PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ.

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, hentbolda yüksek temel kale atışlarında bazı kinematik parametrelerin atış hızı ve isabetliliğine etkisinin incelenmesidir. Araştırmaya 9 elit erkek hentbol oyuncusu (Türkiye Milli Hentbol Takımında oynayan)(Grup 1) ve 9 erkek Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu öğrencisi(Grup 2) olmak üzere toplam 18 sporcu katılmıştır. Her sporcu, üç adım hız alarak atış çizgisinden 6 m uzaklıkta bulunan kalenin üst köşelerine yerleştirilen hedeflere temel atış performansı gerçekleştirmiş, uygulanan performans iki adet hızlı video kamera (BASLER- A602 fc color, 100 Hz) ile kayıt edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler HUBAG hareket analiz programı ile üç boyutlu olarak analiz edilmiştir. Her sporcu iki kale atışı gerçekleştirmiş, isabetli ve isabetsiz atışları değerlendirilmiştir. Kinematik parametrelerin gruplar arasındaki farklılıklarının belirlenmesinde Student-t testi, Mann-Whitney U testi, parametreler arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesinde Pearson Korelasyonu kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar p<.05 seviyesinde değerlendirilmiştir. Atış öncesi adım uzunluk değerlerinde, Grup 2'de, Grup 1'de olduğu gibi lineer bir artış gözlenmemiş, sadece isabetli atışlarda L3(%h) değerinde gruplar arasında anlamlı fark belirlenmiştir (p<.05). Kurulma evresinde ve topun elden ayrılma evresinde diz fleksiyon açı değerleri Grup 2 için daha büyük bulunmuştur. İsabetli atışlarda kurulma evresinde diz fleksiyon açısı ile topun uçuş açısı ve gövdenin yana eğilme açısı arasında negatif yönde ilişki bulunmuştur. İsabetli kale atışlarında top hızı gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuş, daha fazla isabetli atış yapan grubun top hızı daha düşük belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Temel atış, hentbol, kinematik analiz, biyomekanik

Kaynakça

1. Fleisig GS, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR, Matsuo T, Satterwhite Y, Barrentine SW. (1996). Kinematic and kinetic comparison between baseball pitching and football passing. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 12:207-224.
2. Fleisig GS, Kingsley DS, Fotice JW, Dinen KP, Ranganathan R, Dun S. et al. (2006). Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collagiate baseball pitchers, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 34;423.
3. Fradet L, Botcazou M, Durocher C, Cretual A, Multon F, Prioux J. et al. (2004). Do handball players always exhibit a proximal-to-distal segmental sequence? Journal of Sports Science, 22, 439-447.
4. Hamill J, Knutzen K. (2003). Biomechanical Basis of Human Movement, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins A Wolters Kluwer Company, U.S.A.
5. Hirashima M, Kudo K, Ohtsuki T. (2003). Utilization and compensation of interaction torques during ball- throwing movements, Journal of Neurophysiology, 89: 1784-1796.
6. Hoff, J., Almaasbakk,B. (1995). The effects of maximum strength training on throwing velocity and muscle strength in female team handball players, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Reserach, 9(4): 255-258.
7. Hong D., Cheung T.K., Roberts E.R. (2001). A three- dimensional, six-segment chain analysis of forceful overarm throwing, Journal of Electromyography 11, 95- 112.
8. Hore J. (1996). Motor control, excitement, and overarm throwing, Journal of Physiology Pharmacology, 74: 385- 389.

9. Ishida K., Hirano Y. (2004). Effects of non-throwing am on trunk and throwing arm movements in baseball pitching, International Journal of Sport and Health Science Vol.2, 119-128.
10. Jensen K, Johansen L., Larson B. (1999). 5th World Congress on Sport Science and Medicine in Sport : Physical performance in Danish elite team handball players, , Sydney.
11. Jöris HJ, van Muyen AJ, van Ingen Schenau GJ, Kemper HC. (1985). Force, velocity and energy flow during the overarm throw in female handball players. Journal of Biomechanics . 18(6), 409-14.
12. Kotzamanidis C, Skoufas K, Hatzikotoulas D, Patikas G, Koutras H. (1987). ISBS: The relationship between the physical and strength variables of the lower limbs and the velocity of ball release in various types of handball throws.
13. Lidor R, Argov E, Daniel S. (1998). An exploratory study of perceptual-motor abilities of women: novice and skilled players of team handball, Perceptual Motor Skills, 86(1):297-88.
14. Magill RA. (2004). Motor Learning Concept and Applications, McGraw Hill Companies, U.S.A.
15. Matsuo T, Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Andrews JR. (2001). Comparison of kinematic and temporal parameters between different pitch velocity groups. Journal of Applied Biomechanics . 17, 1-13.
16. McGinnis PM. (1999). Biomechanics of Sport and Exercises, Human Kinetics.
17. Morris C, Bartlett R. (1996) Biomechanical factors critical for performance in the men’s javelin throw. Sports Medicine, 21, 438-446.
18. Muijen van AE, Jris H, Kemper HCG, Ingen Schenau Van GJ. (1991). Throwing practice with different ball weights: effects on throwing velocity and muscle strength in female handball players. Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation, 2:103-113.
19. Muratlı S, Toraman F, Çetin E. (2000). Sportif Hareketlerin Biomekanik Temelleri, Bağırgan Yayınevi, Ankara.
20. Özer K. (1993) Antropometri . Sporda Morfolojik Planlama . Kazancı Matbaacılık, 39-61. İstanbul.
21. Schmidt RA,Wrisberg CA. (2000) Motor Learning and Performance, Human Kinetics.
22. Sachlikidis A, Salter C. (2007). A biomechanical comparison of dominant and nondominant arm throws for speed and accuracy, Sports Biomechanics, 6:3, 334- 344.
23. Schmidt RC, Corey D, Fitzpatrick P, Riley M. (1995). The oscillatory basis of Fitts Law. Ed: G.Bardy, R.J. Bootsma and Y. Guiard, Studies in Perception and Action III B. Lawrence Erlbbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Stodden DF, Fleisig GS, McLean SP, Lyman SL, Andrews JR. (2001). Relationship of pelvis and upper torso kinematics to pitched baseball velocity. Journal of Applied Biomechanics . 17(2), 164-172.
25. Sommervoll Y. (2005). Effects of gender and training experience on kinematical and temporal aspects of overarm throwing technique, IDR 3900, Master thesis in Human Movement Science, Human Movement Science Program, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
26. Van den Tillaar R. (2004). Effect of different training programs on the velocity of overarm throwing, A brief review, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(2), 388-396.
27. Van den Tillaar R, Ettema G. (2003) Influence of instruction on velocity and accuracy of overarm throwing, Perceptual and Motor Skills, Apr;96(2):423- 34.
28. Van den Tillaar R, Ettema G. (2007). A three- dimensional analysis of overarm throwing in experienced handball players, Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 23:12-19.
29. Wit A, Eliasz J. (1990). A three-dimensional kinematic analysis of handball throws, Sports Wyczynowy, 9/10, 17-23.
30. Zheng N, Fleisig GS, Barrentine S, Andrews JR. (2004). Biomechanics of pitching. In George Hung (ed) Biomedical Engineering Principles in Sports, Kluwer Akademic/Plenum Publishers, Chapter 9, 209-256.