BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

AMERİKAN KOLEJ FUTBOL II. LİGİNDEKİ FUTBOL OYUNCULARININ ÜST BEDEN KUVVETİNİN EL KAVRAMA KUVVETİ TESTİNİ KULLANARAK TAHMİNİ (İNGİLİZCE).

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 26 - 23, 01.02.2009

Bülent Ağbuğa Ferman Konukman İlker Yılmaz

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Al-Abood SA, Bennett SJ, Hernandez FM, Ashford D, Davids K. (2002). Effect of verbal instructions and image size on visual search strategies in basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Sport Science, 20, 271– 278.
  • Anderson DI, Magill RA, Sekiya H. (2001). Motor learning as a function of kr schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33 (1), 59–66.
  • Beashel P, Sibson A. (2000). ICT–Help of hindrance. The British Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 31 (2), 6–8.
  • Boyce AB, Jenkins DW, Loftus JR, Jason R, Markos NJ. (1996). How should feedback be delivered? The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67 (1), 18–22.
  • Butler DL, Winne PH. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
  • Chen DD. (2001). Trends in augmented feedback research and tips for the practitioner. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 72 (1), 32. 7. Darden GF. (1997). Demonstrating motor skills- rethinking the expert demonstration. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 68 (6), 31–35.
  • Darden G, Shimon J. (2000). Revisit an “old” technology: videotape feedback for motor skill learning and performance. Strategies, 13 (3), 17–21.
  • Delgado AR, Prieto G. (2003). The effect of item feedback on multiple-choice test responses. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 73–85.
  • Doig SM. (1997). developing an understanding of the role of feedback in education. http://www.tedi.uq.edu. au/conferences/A_conf/papers/doig.html
  • Fredenburg KB, Lee AM, Solmon M. (2001). The effect of augmented feedback on students’ perceptions and performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72 (3), 232–242.
  • Graham G. (2001). Teaching Children Physical Education: Becoming A Master Teacher . (2nd Ed.) Human Kinetics Publish.
  • Guadagnoli MA, Dornier LA, Tandy R. (1996). Optimal length of summary knowledge of results: the influence of task-related experience and complexity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 239–248.
  • Guadagnoli MA, Kohl RM. (2001). Knowledge of results for motor learning: relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 33 (2), 217–224.
  • Guadagnoli N, Holcomb W, Davis B. (2002). The efficacy of video feedback for learning the golf swing. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20 (8), 615-622.
  • Hand J, Sidaway B. (1992). Relative frequency of modeling effects on the performance and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63 (1-Supplement), 57.
  • Harrison JM, Blakemore CL, Buck MM. (2001). Instructional Strategies For Secondary School Physical Education. (5th Edition). New York, Mcgraw-Hill Higer Education.
  • Hattie J, Timperley H. (2007). The power of feedback. Rewiew of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112.
  • Himberg C, Hutchinson GE, Roussell JM. (2003). Teaching Secondary Physical Education . Preparing Adolescents to Be Active for Life . United States: Human Kinetics.
  • Hodges NJ, Franks IM. (2001). Learning a coordination skill: interactive effects of instruction and feedback. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport, 72 (2), 132–142.
  • Ignico A. (1998). Status of research in qualitative assessment. Research Consortium Newsletter, 1, 2–3.
  • Ishikura T. (2008). Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual feedback in learning a golf putting task. Perceptual and Motor Skills . 106, 225–233.
  • Jambor EA, Weekes EM. (1995). Videotape feedback: make it more effective. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 66 (2), 48–50.
  • Jambor EA. (1996). Beyond language barriers: teaching techniques for swimming. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 67 (1), 34–36.
  • Juniu S. (2002) Implementing handheld computing technology in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 73, 3.
  • Kangalgil M, Demirhan G. (2008). The effects of different types of feedback on success in physical education lessons. FIEP World Congress . Sport Institute of Finland Vierumäki, Finland. p. 48.
  • Kluka DA. (1999). Motor Behavior: From Learning to Performance . United States: Morton Publishing Co., 197–203.
  • Konukman F, Petrakis E. (2001). Verbal and visual teaching cues for tenis. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 72, 3.
  • Liebermann DG, Katz L, Hughes MD, Bartlett RM, McClements J, Franks IM. (2002). Advances in the application of information technology to sport performance. Journal of Sport Science, 20, 755–769.
  • Magill RA. (2004). Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. (7th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • McCullagh P, Caird JK. (1990). Correct and learning models and the use of model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 107–116.
  • McCullagh P, Meyer KN. (1997). Learning versus correct models: influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport, 68 (1), 56–61.
  • McMorris T. (2004). Acquisition and Performance of Sports Skills . Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Mohnsen BS, Thompson C. (1997). Video technology in physical education. Strategies, 10 (6), 8–11.
  • Mory E. (1992). The use of ınformational feedback in ınstruction: implications for future research. Educational Training Research and Development, 40 (3), 5–20.
  • Morya E, Ranvaud R, Pinheiro WM. (2003). Dynamics of visual feedback in a laboratory simulation of a penalty kick. Journal of Sport Science, 21, 87–95.
  • Moston M, Ashworth S. (2002). Teaching Physical Education (5thed.) San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings Publish
  • Nelson J. (1993). What are some guidelines on giving feedback to students in physical education? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. 64, 13.
  • Panasuk R, LeBaron J. (1999). Student feedback: a tool for improving instruction. Education . 120 (2), 356– 368.
  • Pellett TL, Henschel-Pellett HA, Harrison JM. (1994). Feedback effect: field-based findings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 63 (8), 75–78.
  • Rink J. (1998). Teacher functions during activitiy. Vicki Maline and Sarah Reed (Eds). Teaching Physical Education for Learning . Dubuque: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
  • Rothstein AL. (1981). Using feedback to enhance learning and performance with emphasis on videotape replay. Sports Science Periodical on Research and Technology in Sport, 1, 1–7.
  • Schmidt RA. (1991). Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Practice . Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Books. 227–259.
  • Schmidt RA, Lee TD. (1999). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (3th ed.). Champaign, Human Kinetics.
  • Schmidt RA., Wrisberg CA. (2004).  Motor Learning and Performance. (3rded.) Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Seat JE, Wrisberg CA. (1996). The visual instruction system. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport, 67 (1), 106–108.
  • Siedentop D. (1991). Generic instructional strategies. James Bull (Ed.), Developing Teaching Skills in Physical Education . (205–223), Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
  • Sidaway B, Hand J. (1993). Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64 (1), 122–126.
  • Swinnen SP. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: a review. In H.N. Zelaznik (Ed) Advances in Motor Learning and Control (pp. 37–66) Campaign: Human Kinetics.
  • Taylor SL. (2006). A Study of the Effectiveness of Modern Digital Imaging Techniques with Middle School Physical Education Students During the Development and Acquisition of Motor Skills. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Florida State University College of Education.
  • Turner T. (1998). A Concise guide for the teacher- coach to successfully observe and correct motor skills. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69 (3), 7–9.
  • Wang J, Griffin M. (1998). Early correction of movement errors can help student performance. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69 (4).
  • Wrisberg CA. (2000). Study Guide for Motor Learning and Performance: A Problem-Based Learning Approach . Human Kinetics: USA.
  • Wuest DA, Bucher CA. (2006). Foundations of Physical Education, Exercise Science, and Sport . (15th Edition) New York: McGraw-Hill.

AMERİKAN KOLEJ FUTBOL II. LİGİNDEKİ FUTBOL OYUNCULARININ ÜST BEDEN KUVVETİNİN EL KAVRAMA KUVVETİ TESTİNİ KULLANARAK TAHMİNİ (İNGİLİZCE).

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 26 - 23, 01.02.2009

Bülent Ağbuğa Ferman Konukman İlker Yılmaz

Öz

Ö ğretim hizmetinin niteliğini artıran ve öğrenme düzeyini belirleyen en önemli öğelerden birisi dönüttür. Öğrenciye ders içerisinde bir beceriyle ilgili nasıl yaptığı, neleri tam yaptığı, neleri eksik yaptığı, yanlış yaptıklarının veya yapamadıklarının ne olduğu hakkında öğreten tarafından değişik şekillerde çeşitli ifadeler kullanılarak bilgi verilmesi gerekmektedir. Dönüt adı verilen bu işlem sonunda öğrenme doğru ve hızlı bir şekilde gerçekleşebilecektir. Buradan hareketle bu çalışmada dönüt kavramının ayrıntılı olarak ele alınması hem beden eğitimi öğretmenlerine yol gösterici olacak hem de derslerin veriminin artmasını sağlayacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Al-Abood SA, Bennett SJ, Hernandez FM, Ashford D, Davids K. (2002). Effect of verbal instructions and image size on visual search strategies in basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Sport Science, 20, 271– 278.
  • Anderson DI, Magill RA, Sekiya H. (2001). Motor learning as a function of kr schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33 (1), 59–66.
  • Beashel P, Sibson A. (2000). ICT–Help of hindrance. The British Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 31 (2), 6–8.
  • Boyce AB, Jenkins DW, Loftus JR, Jason R, Markos NJ. (1996). How should feedback be delivered? The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67 (1), 18–22.
  • Butler DL, Winne PH. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
  • Chen DD. (2001). Trends in augmented feedback research and tips for the practitioner. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 72 (1), 32. 7. Darden GF. (1997). Demonstrating motor skills- rethinking the expert demonstration. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 68 (6), 31–35.
  • Darden G, Shimon J. (2000). Revisit an “old” technology: videotape feedback for motor skill learning and performance. Strategies, 13 (3), 17–21.
  • Delgado AR, Prieto G. (2003). The effect of item feedback on multiple-choice test responses. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 73–85.
  • Doig SM. (1997). developing an understanding of the role of feedback in education. http://www.tedi.uq.edu. au/conferences/A_conf/papers/doig.html
  • Fredenburg KB, Lee AM, Solmon M. (2001). The effect of augmented feedback on students’ perceptions and performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72 (3), 232–242.
  • Graham G. (2001). Teaching Children Physical Education: Becoming A Master Teacher . (2nd Ed.) Human Kinetics Publish.
  • Guadagnoli MA, Dornier LA, Tandy R. (1996). Optimal length of summary knowledge of results: the influence of task-related experience and complexity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 239–248.
  • Guadagnoli MA, Kohl RM. (2001). Knowledge of results for motor learning: relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 33 (2), 217–224.
  • Guadagnoli N, Holcomb W, Davis B. (2002). The efficacy of video feedback for learning the golf swing. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20 (8), 615-622.
  • Hand J, Sidaway B. (1992). Relative frequency of modeling effects on the performance and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63 (1-Supplement), 57.
  • Harrison JM, Blakemore CL, Buck MM. (2001). Instructional Strategies For Secondary School Physical Education. (5th Edition). New York, Mcgraw-Hill Higer Education.
  • Hattie J, Timperley H. (2007). The power of feedback. Rewiew of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112.
  • Himberg C, Hutchinson GE, Roussell JM. (2003). Teaching Secondary Physical Education . Preparing Adolescents to Be Active for Life . United States: Human Kinetics.
  • Hodges NJ, Franks IM. (2001). Learning a coordination skill: interactive effects of instruction and feedback. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport, 72 (2), 132–142.
  • Ignico A. (1998). Status of research in qualitative assessment. Research Consortium Newsletter, 1, 2–3.
  • Ishikura T. (2008). Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual feedback in learning a golf putting task. Perceptual and Motor Skills . 106, 225–233.
  • Jambor EA, Weekes EM. (1995). Videotape feedback: make it more effective. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 66 (2), 48–50.
  • Jambor EA. (1996). Beyond language barriers: teaching techniques for swimming. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 67 (1), 34–36.
  • Juniu S. (2002) Implementing handheld computing technology in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 73, 3.
  • Kangalgil M, Demirhan G. (2008). The effects of different types of feedback on success in physical education lessons. FIEP World Congress . Sport Institute of Finland Vierumäki, Finland. p. 48.
  • Kluka DA. (1999). Motor Behavior: From Learning to Performance . United States: Morton Publishing Co., 197–203.
  • Konukman F, Petrakis E. (2001). Verbal and visual teaching cues for tenis. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 72, 3.
  • Liebermann DG, Katz L, Hughes MD, Bartlett RM, McClements J, Franks IM. (2002). Advances in the application of information technology to sport performance. Journal of Sport Science, 20, 755–769.
  • Magill RA. (2004). Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. (7th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • McCullagh P, Caird JK. (1990). Correct and learning models and the use of model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 107–116.
  • McCullagh P, Meyer KN. (1997). Learning versus correct models: influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport, 68 (1), 56–61.
  • McMorris T. (2004). Acquisition and Performance of Sports Skills . Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Mohnsen BS, Thompson C. (1997). Video technology in physical education. Strategies, 10 (6), 8–11.
  • Mory E. (1992). The use of ınformational feedback in ınstruction: implications for future research. Educational Training Research and Development, 40 (3), 5–20.
  • Morya E, Ranvaud R, Pinheiro WM. (2003). Dynamics of visual feedback in a laboratory simulation of a penalty kick. Journal of Sport Science, 21, 87–95.
  • Moston M, Ashworth S. (2002). Teaching Physical Education (5thed.) San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings Publish
  • Nelson J. (1993). What are some guidelines on giving feedback to students in physical education? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. 64, 13.
  • Panasuk R, LeBaron J. (1999). Student feedback: a tool for improving instruction. Education . 120 (2), 356– 368.
  • Pellett TL, Henschel-Pellett HA, Harrison JM. (1994). Feedback effect: field-based findings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 63 (8), 75–78.
  • Rink J. (1998). Teacher functions during activitiy. Vicki Maline and Sarah Reed (Eds). Teaching Physical Education for Learning . Dubuque: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
  • Rothstein AL. (1981). Using feedback to enhance learning and performance with emphasis on videotape replay. Sports Science Periodical on Research and Technology in Sport, 1, 1–7.
  • Schmidt RA. (1991). Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Practice . Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Books. 227–259.
  • Schmidt RA, Lee TD. (1999). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (3th ed.). Champaign, Human Kinetics.
  • Schmidt RA., Wrisberg CA. (2004).  Motor Learning and Performance. (3rded.) Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Seat JE, Wrisberg CA. (1996). The visual instruction system. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport, 67 (1), 106–108.
  • Siedentop D. (1991). Generic instructional strategies. James Bull (Ed.), Developing Teaching Skills in Physical Education . (205–223), Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
  • Sidaway B, Hand J. (1993). Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64 (1), 122–126.
  • Swinnen SP. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: a review. In H.N. Zelaznik (Ed) Advances in Motor Learning and Control (pp. 37–66) Campaign: Human Kinetics.
  • Taylor SL. (2006). A Study of the Effectiveness of Modern Digital Imaging Techniques with Middle School Physical Education Students During the Development and Acquisition of Motor Skills. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Florida State University College of Education.
  • Turner T. (1998). A Concise guide for the teacher- coach to successfully observe and correct motor skills. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69 (3), 7–9.
  • Wang J, Griffin M. (1998). Early correction of movement errors can help student performance. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69 (4).
  • Wrisberg CA. (2000). Study Guide for Motor Learning and Performance: A Problem-Based Learning Approach . Human Kinetics: USA.
  • Wuest DA, Bucher CA. (2006). Foundations of Physical Education, Exercise Science, and Sport . (15th Edition) New York: McGraw-Hill.
Toplam 53 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Yazarlar

Bülent Ağbuğa Bu kişi benim

Ferman Konukman Bu kişi benim

İlker Yılmaz Bu kişi benim

Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Ocak 2015
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Şubat 2009
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ağbuğa, B., Konukman, F., & Yılmaz, İ. (2009). AMERİKAN KOLEJ FUTBOL II. LİGİNDEKİ FUTBOL OYUNCULARININ ÜST BEDEN KUVVETİNİN EL KAVRAMA KUVVETİ TESTİNİ KULLANARAK TAHMİNİ (İNGİLİZCE). Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(1), 26-23.

9551


SPOR BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ


Yayın hakkı © Hacettepe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi