Çocuklar İçin Serbest Zaman Aktivite Anketi'nin Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1, 9 - 19, 10.04.2020

Onur İşler Necip Demirci Ayda Karaca

https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.661978

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Telford, Salmon, Jolley ve Crawford tarafından 2004 yılında geliştirilen Çocuklar İçin Serbest Zaman Aktivite Anketi'nin (Children’s Leisure Activities Study Survey) Türk kültürüne uyarlanması, geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin saptanmasıdır. 2017-2018 eğitim-öğretim yılında Ankara ilindeki ortaokullara devam eden ve yaşları 11 ile 14 arasında değişen toplam 405 öğrenci çalışmaya katılmayı gönüllü olarak kabul etmiştir. Anketin uyarlanması süreci iki aşamadan oluşmaktadır. Birinci aşamada İngilizceden Türkçeye çevrilmesi ve Türkçeden İngilizceye geri çevrilmesidir. İkinci aşamada ise Türkçe ifadelerin anlaşılırlığının test edilmesi için pilot uygulama gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonrasında geçerlik çalışması için 104 öğrenciye bir haftalık fiziksel aktivite günlüğü dağıtılmıştır. Yedinci günün sonunda günlük formu öğrencilerden geri toplanmış ve Çocuklar İçin Serbest Zaman Aktivite Anketi aynı gün uygulanmıştır. Güvenirlik çalışması için 301 öğrenciye bir hafta arayla iki kez anket uygulanmıştır. Uyum geçerliğinin belirlenmesi için sınıf içi korelasyon katsayıları hesaplanmış ve anketin orta şiddetli, yüksek şiddetli ve orta-yüksek şiddetli fiziksel aktiviteleri içeren aktif bölümünün geçerli (SKK=0.50 ile 0.95 arasında; p<0.05) olduğu ancak düşük şiddetli aktiviteleri içeren inaktif bölümünün geçerli olmadığı (p>0.05) saptanmıştır. Güvenirlik analizleri sonucunda ise sınıf içi korelasyon katsayılarının farklı şiddetteki aktivite türlerinde tüm yaş düzeyleri için (11-14 yaş) 0.52 ila 0.91 arasında değiştiği görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak; Çocuklar İçin Serbest Zaman Aktivite Anketi (ÇSZAA)’nin 11-14 yaşları arasındaki çocuklarda düşük şiddetli (inaktif) aktivitelerin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılamayacağı ancak orta şiddetli, yüksek şiddetli ve orta-yüksek şiddetli fiziksel aktivitelerin değerlendirilmesinde hem geçerli hem de güvenilir bir anket olması nedeniyle 11-14 yaşları arasındaki çocuklarda kullanılabileceği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Serbest zaman fiziksel aktivitesi, Güvenirlik, Geçerlik, Anket, çocuklar

Adaptation of Children's Leisure Activities Study Survey: Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

The aim of this study was to adapt the “Children's Leisure Activities Study Survey (CLASS)” developed by Telford, Salmon, Jolley, and Crawford in 2004, for Turkish language and culture and to determine its validity and reliability. The participants of the study consisted of who volunteered of 405 students aged 11 to 14 attending secondary school in Ankara in the 2017-2018 academic year. The process of adaptation of the questionnaire consisted of two steps. Translation and back-translation were conducted in the first step, and the intelligibility of Turkish expressions was tested in the second step. Afterward, the physical activity diary was applied for the past seven days to 104 students for the validity study. The physical activity diary was collected from the students at the end of the seventh day. And the questionnaire was applied to the students on the same day. For the reliability study, the questionnaire was administered to 301 students twice a week apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients for concurrent validity ranged between 0.50 and 0.95 for all age levels in the active part of the questionnaire (p< 0.05). But the inactive part of the questionnaire with low-intensity activities was found not valid (p> 0.05). As a result of the reliability analysis, it was found that the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.52 and 0.91 for all age levels (11-14) in different intensities of activities. As a result, CLASS cannot be used to evaluate low-intensity activities in Turkish children aged 11-14. But, it is a valid and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of moderate intensity, vigorous intensity, and moderate to vigorous intensity physical activities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leisure time physical activity, Children, Validity, Reliability, questionnaire

Kaynakça

• 1. Aggio D, Fairclough S, Knowles Z, Graves L. (2016). Validity and reliability of a Modified English Version of the Physical Activity Auestionnaire for Adolescents. Archives of Public Health, 74(1),
• 2. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, ve diğ. (2000). Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32(9), 498–504.
• 3. Ainsworth BE, Cahalin L, Buman M, Ross R. (2015). The current state of physical activity assessment tools. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases; 57(4), 387-395.
• 4. Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJ. (2015). Bouts and breaks in children's sedentary time: currently used operational definitions and recommendations for future research. Preventive Medicine, 77, 1-3.
• 5. Anderson PM, Butcher KF. (2006). Childhood Obesity: Trends and Potential Causes. The Future of Children, 16(1), 19-45.
• 6. Bangsbo J, Krustrup P, Duda J, Hillman C, Andersen LB, Weiss M, ve diğ. (2016). The Copenhagen Consensus Conference 2016: children, youth, and physical activity in schools and during leisure time. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(19), 1177-1178.
• 7. Bobakova D, Hamrik Z, Badura P, Sigmundova D, Nalecz H, Kalman M. (2015). Test–retest reliability of selected physical activity and sedentary behaviour HBSC items in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. International Journal of Public Health, 60(1), 59-67.
• 8. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. (1985). Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports, 100(2), 126.
• 9. Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. (2010). Physical activity questionnaires for youth. Sports Medi¬cine, 40(7), 539-63.
• 10. Corder K, Van Sluijs EM, Wright A, Whincup P, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U. (2009). Is it possible to assess free-living physical activity and energy expenditure in young people by self-report? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(3), 862-870.
• 11. Emlek Sert Z, Bayık Temel A. (2014). İlköğretim öğrencileri için fiziksel aktivite soru formunun Türk toplumuna uyarlanması: geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 7(2), 173-177.
• 12. Helmerhorst HHJ, Brage S, Warren J, Besson H, Ekelund U. (2012). A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 103.
• 13. Hills AP, Mokhtar N, Byrne NM. (2014). Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Frontiers in Nutrition, 1,5. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00005.
• 14. Huang YJ, Wong SH, Salmon J. (2009). Reliability and validity of the modified Chinese version of the Children’s Leisure Activities Study Survey (CLASS) questionnaire in assessing physical activity among Hong Kong children. Pediatric exercise science, 21(3), 339-353.
• 15. Janssen I. (2007). Physical activity guidelines for children and youth. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 32(S2E), 109-121.
• 16. Janz KF, Lutuchy EM., Wenthe P, Levy SM. (2008). Measuring activity in children and adolescents using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 40(4), 767-772.
• 17. Karaca, A. (2017). Fiziksel aktivite değerlendirme yöntemleri. Ankara: Spor Yayınevi.
• 18. Lachat CK, Verstraeten R, Hagströmer M, Khan NC, Van NDA, Dung NQ ve diğ. (2008). Validity of two physical activity questionnaires (IPAQ and PAQA) for Vietnamese adolescents in rural and urban areas. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(1), 37.
• 19. Laguna M, Ruiz JR, Gallardo C, García‐Pastor T, Lara MT, Aznar S. (2013). Obesity and physical activity patterns in children and adolescents. Journal of paediatrics and child health, 49(11), 942-949.
• 20. Landis JR, Koch GG. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
• 21. Loprinzi PD, Cardinal BJ. (2011). Measuring children’s physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, 9(1), 15-23.
• 22. PAGAC (Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee). (2018). Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• 23. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, ve diğ. (2018). The physical activity guidelines for Americans. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 320(19), 2020-2028.
• 24. Porter AK, Matthews KJ, Salvo D, Kohl HW. (2017). Associations of physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time with cardiovascular fitness in United States adolescents: results from the NHANES National Youth Fitness Survey. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 14(7), 506-512.
• 25. Ridley K, Olds TS, Hill A. (2006). The Multimedia activity recall for children and adolescents (MARCA): development and evaluation. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3(1), 10.
• 26. Sirard JR, Pate RR. (2001). Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Medicine, 31(6), 439-454.
• 27. Strath SJ, Bassett JrDR, Swartz AM. (2004). Comparison of the college alumnus questionnaire physical activity index with objective monitoring. Annals of Epidemiology, 14(6), 409-415.
• 28. Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE, Ekelund U, Freedson PS, Gary RA, ve diğ. (2013). Guide to the assessment of physical activity: clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 128(20), 2259-2279.
• 29. Telford A, Salmon J, Jolley D, Crawford D. (2004). Reliability and validity of physical activity questionnaires for children: the Children’s Leisure Activities Study Survey (CLASS). Pediatric Exercise Science,16(1), 64-78.
• 30. Van der Ploeg HP, Hillsdon M. (2017). Is sedentary behaviour just physical inactivity by another name? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 142.
• 31. Van Dyck D, Cerin E, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Hinckson E, Reis RS, Davey R., ve diğ. (2015). International study of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time with body mass index and obesity: IPEN adult study. International Journal of Obesity, 39(2), 199.
• 32. Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Troos¬ters T. ve diğ. (2005). How to assess physical activity? How to assess phy¬sical fitness? European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 12(2), 102-14.
• 33. Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D. (2000). Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 71(2), 59-73.
• 34. Welk GJ, Wickel E, Peterson M, Heitzler CD, Fulton JE, Potter LD. (2007). Reliability and validity of questions on the youth media campaign longitudinal survey. Medicine and Science İn Sports and Exercise, 39(4), 612-621.
• 35. WHO (World Health Organization). (2010). Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Erişim tarihi: 16.02. 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44399/9789241599979_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• 36. Wong SL, Leatherdale ST, Manske SR. (2006). Reliability and validity of a school-based physical activity questionnaire. Medicine and Science in Sports and Eexercise, 38(9), 1593-1600.
• 37. Yerlisu Lapa T, Certel Z, Kaplan K, Yağar G. (2016). Serbest Zaman Egzersiz Anketinin Adolesan Çağı Öğrencileri için Geçerlik Güvenirlik Çalışması. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 1-9.