Kurum bakımı sonrası yılmazlığı artıran ögeler: yılmazlık teorisi bağlamında değerlendirme

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 59 - 72, 01.07.2022

Metin Gani Tapan

Öz

Kurum bakımı deneyimi olan bireyler akranlarına göre bazı zorlukları yaşayabilmektedirler. Barınma, sosyal destek kaynaklarının yetersiz olması, fiziksel/ruhsal sorunlar ve eğitim/iş yaşamında karşılaşılan zorluklar gençlerin yaşadıkları başlıca sorunlar arasında gösterilmektedir. Bu deneyimler gençlerin sorun çözme/baş etme düzeylerini olumsuz bir biçimde etkileyebilmekte bu durum gençlerin yaşam olayları karşısında akranlarına oranla yılmazlıklarının zayıf olmasına neden olabilmektedir. Bu makalede bakım deneyimi olan bireylerin yaşamlarında yılmazlığı artıran faktörler; bireysel kaynaklar ve aile/bakım verenlerin desteği, sosyal ağlar, eğitim yaşamına katılım, olumlu istihdam deneyimleri başlıkları altında aktarılmıştır. Ayrıca yılmazlığı geliştirdiği değerlendirilen uygulamalar karşılaştırmalı olarak açıklanarak bu gurupta yer alan bireylere yönelik sosyal hizmet müdahale uygulama önerilerinde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurum Bakımı, Bakım Sonrası Yaşam, Yılmzalık

After the ınstitution care components that ıncrease to resilience: evoluation in the contexs of resilience theory

Öz

Individuals with institutional care experience may experience some difficulties compared to their peers. Shelter, insufficient social support resources, physical/mental problems and difficulties encountered in education/work life are among the main problems faced by young people. These experiences can negatively affect the problem solving/coping levels of young people, which can cause young people to have weaker resilience compared to their peers in the face of life events. In this article, the factors that increase resilience in the lives of individuals with care experience; individual resources and support from family/caregivers, social networks, participation in education life, positive employment experiences presented under the headings. In addition, the practices that are evaluated to improve resilience are explained comparatively and suggestions for social work intervention practices are made for the individuals in this group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Institutional Care, Care After Life, Resilience

Kaynakça

• Arnau-Sabatés, L (2015) What helps young care leavers to enter the world of work? Possible lessons learned from an exploratory study in Ireland and Catalonia Children and Youth Services Review Volume 53, June 2015, Pages 185-191.
• Arnett, J. J. (2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. England: Oxford University Press.
• Barnardos,(2019). Online Erişim Tarihi:14.12.2021.
• Barn, R., & Tan, J. P. (2012). Foster youth and crime: Employing general strain theory to promote understanding. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 212-220.
• Barn, R. (2010). Care leavers and social capital: Understanding and negotiating racial and ethnic identity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(5), 832-850.
• Bellıs, M. A., Hardcastle, K., Ford, K., Hughes, K., Ashton, K., Quġgg, Z., & Butler, N. (2017). Does continuous trusted adult support in childhood impart life-course resilience against adverse childhood experiences-a retrospective study on adult health-harming behaviours and mental well-being. BMC psychiatry, 17(1), 110.
• Bengtsson, M (2018) ‘Well, it’s up to me now’ – young care leavers’ strategies for handling adversities when leaving out-of-home care in Sweden Nordic Social Work Research, 8:sup1, 8-18
• Boduroğlu, G. (2016). Kurum bakımından ayrılan bireylerin yaşamın düzenlenmesi ve uyum sürecinde karşılaştığı sorunlar ve sosyal destek kaynakları (Doctoral dissertation, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
• Cathcart-rake, W., & Robinson, M. (2018). Promoting Scholarship at Regional Medical Campuses. Journal of Regional Medical Campuses, 1(1).
• Cashmore, J., & Paxman, M. (2007). Longitudinal study of wards leaving care: Four to five years on. NSW Department of Community Services.
• Collins, M. E., Paris, R., & Ward, R. L. (2008). The permanence of family ties: Implications for youth transitioning from foster care. American Journal of orthopsychiatry, 78(1), 54-62. Dockrell, J. E., & Hurry, J. (2018). The identification of speech and language problems in elementary school: Diagnosis and co-occurring needs. Research in developmental disabilities, 81, 52-64.
• Dumont, M., & Provost, M. (1999). Resilience in adolescents: Protective role of social support, coping strategies, self-esteem, and social activities on experience of stressand depression. Journal of Youth & Adolescence,28(3), 343–363.
• Dutta, S. (2017). Life after leaving care: Experiences of young Indian girls. Children and Youth Services Review, 73, 266-273.
• Dickens, L. F. (2016). The contribution of resilience to the 12-month transitional outcomes of care- leavers in South Africa. Doctoral Thesis, University of Johannesburg.
• Dixon, J (2007) Obstacles to participation in education, employment and training for young people leaving care Social Work & Social Sciences Review 13(2) 2007 pp.18-34
• Furey, R., & Harris‐Evans, J. (2021). Work and resilience: Care leavers' experiences of navigating towards employment and independence. Child & Family Social Work.
• Furey, R (2021) Work and resilience: Care leavers' experiences of navigating towards employment and independence Child & Family Social Work. 2021; 1– 11.
• Garza, C. M. (2017). Foster youth aging out of foster care and their relationships with caregivers (Doctoral dissertation).
• Hammond, C., & Feinstein, L. (2006). Are those who flourished at school healthier adults? What role for adult education?[Wider Benefits of Learning Research Report No. 17]. Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning.
• Harvey, A., Mcnamara, P., Andrewartha, L., & Luckman, M. (2015). Out of care, into university: Raising higher education access and achievement of care leavers. Melbourne: LaTrobe University.
• Harrison, N., Baker, Z., & Stevenson, J. (2020). Employment and further study outcomes for care-experienced graduates in the UK. Higher Education, 1-22.
• Hiles, D., Moss, D., Wright, J., & Dallos, R. (2013). Young people's experience of social support during the process of leaving care: A review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 2059-2071.
• Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2012). Leaving care: Looking ahead and aiming higher. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1107-1114.
• Stein, M. (2008). Resilience and young people leaving care. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 35-44.
• Zeıra, a., Arzev, s., Benbenıshty, r., & Portnoy, H. (2014). Children in educational residential care: A cohort study of Israeli youth. Australian Social Work, 67(1), 55-70.
• Sebba, J., Berridge, D., Luke, N., Fletcher, J., Bell, K., Strand, S., ... & O’Higgins, A. (2015). The educational progress of looked after children in England: Linking care and educational data. University of Oxford Department of Education/University of Bristol.
• Turgut, A. Ş. (2018). Türkiye’deki kurum bakımında büyümüş bireylerin psikolojik dayanıklılık (yılmazlık) düzeylerinin incelenmesi.
• Munson, M. R., Smalling, S. E., Spencer, R., Scott Jr, L. D., & Tracy, E. M. (2010). A steady presence in the midst of change: Non-kin natural mentors in the lives of older youth exiting foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(4), 527-535.
• Merdinger, J. M., Hines, A. M., Lemon Osterling, K., & Wyatt, P. (2005). Pathways to college for former foster youth: Understanding factors that contribute to educational success. Child welfare, 84(6).
• Mendes, P., Johnson, G., & Moslehuddin, B. (2011). Young people leaving state out-of-home care. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
• Olsson, C. A., Bond, L., Burns, J. M., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Sawyer, S. M. (2003). Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis. Journal of adolescence, 26(1), 1-11.
• Rutter, M., Giller H. and Hagell, A. (1998) Antisocial Behaviour by Young People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sulimani-Aidan, Y. (2020). Social networks during the transition to adulthood from the perspective of Israeli care leavers and their social workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105075.
• Schiff, M., & Benbenishty, R. (2006). Functioning of Israeli group-homes alumni: Exploring gender differences and in-care correlates. Children and Youth ServicesReview,28(2), 133–157.
• Sulimani-Aidan, Y., Benbenishty, R., Dinisman, T., & Zeira, A. (2013). Care leavers in Israel: What contributes to better adjustment to life after care? Journal of Social Service Research, 39(5), 704-718.
• Sulimani-aidan, Y.,& Melkman, E. (2018). Risk and resilience in the transition to adulthood from the point of view of care leavers and caseworkers. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 135-140.
• Snow, K., & Mann-Feder, V. (2013). Peer-centered practice: a theoretical framework for intervention with young people in and from care. Child welfare, 92(4).
• Steın, M. (2006). Research review: young people leaving care. Child and Family Social Work, 11, 273-279.
• Stein, M. (2008). Resilience and young people leaving care. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 35-44.
• Wade, J. (2008). The ties that bind: Support from birth families and substitute families for young people leaving care. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 39–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bc