Damping Coefficients and Torque Calculations for the Joint's Stability of Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Robots

Öz

Exoskeleton robots are wearable electromechanical structures which can work interacting with human limbs. Theserobotsareused as assistivelimbs, rehabilitationandpoweraugmentationpurposesforelderly or paralyzedpersons andhealthypersons respectively.Human body neuro-muscular system varies the stiffness and damping of the human joints regularly and thus provides flexible and stable movement capability with minimum energy consumption. Damping coefficients and torques in the joints needs to be adjusted with the change of stiffness to provide stable behavior during walking cycles. Magneto-rheological brake are the passive actuators that can adjust the damping torques in a very short response time. However, the maximum values of damping coefficients and torques are needed for the design of MR dampers to be used in the joints of exoskeleton robots. Shamaei et. al. (2013) derived a set of statistical equations to predict thejoint stiffnessin a gait cycle for the persons with different height and weights. In this paper, the maximum values of damping coefficients and torques are calculated for the design of MR dampers to provide stability in the joints of exoskeleton robots. The results can be used as initial design criteria of MR dampers which will be added to the biomimetic joints of exoskeleton robots, prostheses, ortheses and humanoid robots

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Exoskeleton robot
• Orthesis
• Prosthesis
• Variable stiffness actuator
• Variable damping actuator
• Magneto-rheological brake
• Stability

Alt Uzuv Dış İskelet Robot Eklemlerinde Kararlılık İçin Sönümleme Katsayıları ve Momentlerinin Hesaplanması

Öz

Dış iskelet robotlar, insan uzuvları ile etkileşim halinde çalışan, giyilebilir elektromekanik yapılardır. Bu robotlar, yürüme engeli olan ya da yaşlı kişilerde yardımcı uzuv, felçli kişilerde rehabilitasyon ve sağlıklı insanlarda güç artırımı amacı ile kullanılmaktadır. İnsan vücudunun sinir-kas sistemi, bağlı bulundukları eklemlerde sertlik ve sönümlemeyi devamlı değiştirerek minimum enerji sarfiyatı ile esnek ve kararlı bir hareket kabiliyeti sağlamaktadır. Yürüme sırasında eklemlerin sertliğinin değişmesi ile birlikte kararlı bir yürümenin gerçeklenebilmesi için eklemlerdeki sönümleme katsayılarının ve sönümleme momentlerinin eş zamanlı olarak değiştirilmesi gerekmektedir. Manyeto-reolojik (MR) frenler, bu farklı sönümleme momentlerini en hızlı şekilde ayarlayabilen pasif eyleyicilerdir. Ancak, dış iskelet robotların eklemlerinde kullanılacak MR fren tasarımları için istenen maksimum sönümleme katsayısı ve sönümleme momenti değerlerinin bilinmesi gerekmektedir. Shamaei ve arkadaşları (2013) biyomekanik bir çalışma gerçekleştirerek farklı boy ve kilolardaki kişiler için yürüme sırasında eklem sertlik katsayısı değişimini genel istatiksel formüller ile ifade etmişlerdir. Bu makalede; alt uzuv dış iskelet robotların eklemlerinde kararlı bir yürüme davranışını sağlayabilecek MR fren tasarımları için gerekli olan sönümleme katsayısı ve momentlerinin maksimum değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, dış iskelet robotların, ortezlerin, protezlerin ve insansı robotların biyomimetik eklemelerine yerleştirilecek MR frenlerin başlangıç tasarım kriteri olarak kulllanılabilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dış iskelet robot
• Ortez
• Protez
• Sertliği değiştirilebilir eyleyici
• Sönümlemesi değiştirilebilir eyleyici
• Manyeto-reolojik fren
• Kararlılık

Kaynakça

1. Andriacchi, T.P., Ogle, J.A., Galante, J.O., 1977. Walking speed as a basis for normal and abnormal gait measurements. Journal of Biomechanics, 10, 261– 268.
2. Bovi, G., Rabuffetti, M., Mazzoleni, P., Ferrarin, M., 2010. A multiple-task gait analysis approach: kinematic, kinetic and EMG reference data for healthy young and adult subjects. Gait and Posture, 33, 6-13.
3. Chesney, C.W., 2002. Implementation of planar hybrid actıve/passıve forcefeedback user input device. (PhD Thesis), Unıversıty of Florida.
4. Collins, S., Kuo, A., 2010. Recycling energy to restore impaired ankle function during human walking. Plos One 5: e9307.
5. Contini, R., 1972. Body Segment Parameters Part II, Artificial Limbs,16, 1–19.
6. Crenna, P., Frigo, C., 2011. Dynamics of the ankle joint analyzed through moment-angle loops during human walking: gender and age effects. Human Movement Science, 30, 1185–1198.
7. Dempster, W. T., 1955. Space Requirements of the Seated Operator, WADC-TR-55-159.
8. Dempster, W. T., Gabel, W. C., Felts, W. J. L., 1959. The Anthropometry of Manual Work Space for the Seated Subjects, Am. J. Phys. Anthrop.,17, 289–317.

9. Drillis, R., Contini, R., 1966. Body Segment Parameters, Rep. 1163-03, Office of Vocational Rehabilitation, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, New York,.
10. Dollar, A.M., Herr, H., 2008. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 144–158.
11. Elftman, H., 1966. Biomechanics of Muscle, with Particular Application to Studies of Gait. J. Bone Joint Surg., 48-A, 363–377.
12. Enoch, A., Sutas, A., Nakaokay, S., Vijayakumar, S., 2012. BLUE: A Bipedal Robot with Variable Stiffness and Damping. Proc. 12th IEEE-RAS Intl. Conference on Humanoid Robots, Osaka-Japan.
13. Ferris, D., Lewis, C., 2009. Robotic lower limb exoskeletons using proportional myoelectric control. EMBC Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2119– 2124.
14. Frigo, C., Crenna, P., Jensen, L., 1996. Moment-angle relationship at lower limb joints during human walking
15. Electromyography and Kinesiology, 6, 177–190. velocities. Journal
16. of Gordon, K., Ferris, D., 2007. Learning to walk with a robotic ankle exoskeleton. Journal of Biomechanics, 40, 2636–2644.
17. Grieve, D. W., Cavanagh, P. R., Pheasant, S., 1978. Prediction of Gastrocnemius Length from Knee and Ankle Joint Posture. Biomechanics, cilt. VI-A, E. Asmussen and K. Jorgensen, Eds. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD, 405–412.
18. Haxton, H. A., 1944. Absolute Muscle Force in the Ankle Flexors of Man. J. Physiol., 103, 267–273.
19. Hatze, H., 1975. A New Method for the Simultaneous Measurement of the Moment of Inertia, the Damping Coefficient and the Location of the Center of Mass of a Body Segment in situation. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 34, 217–266.
20. Herr, H., Wilkenfeld, A., 2003. User-adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee, Industrial Robot. An International Journal, 30(1), 42–55.
21. Hitt, J., Sugar, T., Holgate, M., Bellman, R., Hollander, K., 2009. Robotic transtibial prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration. Industrial Robot- an International Journal, 36, 441–447.
22. Hollander, K. W., Ilg, R., Sugar, T. G., Herring, D., 2006. An efficient robotic tendon for gait assistance. J. Biomech. Eng., 128(5), 788–791.
23. Horak, F. B., Nashner., L. M., 1986. Central Programming of Postural Movements: Adaptation to Altered Surface
24. Neurophysiol., 55, 1369–1381, Configurations.
25. J. Horak, F. B., Nutt, J. G., Nashner., L. M., 1992. Postural Inflexibility in Parkinsonian Subjects. J. Neurol. Sci., 111, 46–58.
26. Jian, Y., Winter, D. A., Ishac, M. G., Gilchrist, L., 1992. Trajectory of the Body COG and COP During Initiation and Termination of Gait. Gait and Posture, 1, 9–22.
27. MacKinnon, C. D., Winter, D. A., 1993. Control of Whole Body Balance and Posture in the Frontal Plane During Walking. J. Biomech.,26, 633–644.
28. Maughan, R. J., Watson, J. S., Weir, J., 1983. Strength and Cross-Sectional Area of Human Skeletal Muscle. J. Physiol.,338, 37–49.
29. Migliore, S. A., Brown, E. A., DeWeerth, S. P., 2005. Biologically inspired joint stiffness control, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA’05), Nisan, 4519–4524.
30. Morita, T., Sugano S., 1997. Development of an anthropomorphic forcecontrolled manipulator WAM- 10. Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, 701–706 .
31. Ogata, K., 2010. Modern Control Engineering . ISBN: 0136156738, Prentice Hall.
32. Perry J., 1992. Gait analysis : normal and pathological function. Slack, Thorofare, NJ.
33. Poynor, J.C., 2001. Innovative designs for magneto- rheological dampers. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
34. Radulescu, A.,Howard, M., BraunD.J., Vijayakumar, S.,2012. Exploiting variable physical damping in rapid movement tasks. IEEE/ASME Int. Conference on Advanced Intellegent Machatronics, Taiwan.
35. Sawicki, G.S., Domingo, A., Ferris, D., 2006. The effects of powered ankle-foot orthoses on joint kinematics and muscle activation during walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 3, 3.
36. Sawicki, G.S., Lewis, C., Ferris, D., 2009. It pays to have a spring in your step. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 37, 130–138.
37. Shamaei, K., Dollar, A., 2011. On the Mechanics of the Knee During the Stance Phase of the Gait. IEEE- International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle.
38. Shamaei, K., Napolitano, P., Dollar, A., 2013. A Quasi- Passive Compliant Stance Control Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis.
39. Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle. Conference
40. on Shamaei, K, Sawicki, G.S., Dollar, A.M., 2013. Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness and Propulsive Work of the Human Ankle. The Stance Phase of Walking, 8(3), 1-12.
41. Shamaei, K., Sawicki, G.S., Dollar, A.M., 2013. Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Knee. The Stance Phase of Walking, 8(3), 1-10.
42. Shamaei, K., Sawicki, G.S., Dollar, A.M., 2013. Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Hip. The Stance Phase of Walking, 8(12), 1-11.
43. Skinner, S., Antonelli, D., Perry, J., Lester, D., 1985. Functional demands on the stance limb in walking. Orthopedics, 8, 355–361.
44. Smidt, G. L., 1973. Biomechanical Analysis of Knee Flexion and Extension. J. Biomech., 6, 79–92.
45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.06.009 .
46. Van Ham, R., Sugar, T. G., Vanderborght, B., Hollander K. W., ve Lefeber, D., 2009. Compliant Actuator Design; Review of actuators with passive adjustable compliance/controllable
47. applications. IEEE robotics & automation magazine, Eylül. stiffness for
48. robotic Veneman, J.F., Ekkelenkamp, R., Kruidhof, R., van der Helm,F.C.T., van der Kooij, H., 2006. A Series Elastic and Bowden-Cable-Based Actuation System For Use as Torque Actuator İn Exoskeleton-Type Robots. The Internatioanl Journal of Robotics Research, 25 (3), 261-281 .
49. Walsh, C., Paluska, D., Pasch, K., Grand, W., Valiente, A., vd., 2006. Development of a lightweight, underactuated
50. augmentation. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 15– 19 Mayıs, 3485–3491. for
51. load-carrying Wickiewcz, T. L., Roy, R. R., Powell, P. L., Edgerton, V. R., 1983. Muscle Architecture of the Human Lower Limb. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 179, 275–283.
52. Wilkie, D. R., 1950. The Relation between Force and Velocity in Human Muscle. J. Physiol.,110, 249–280.
53. Winter, D. A., Patla, A. E., Prince, F., Ishac, M. G., Gielo- Perczak, K., 1998. Stiffness Control of Balance in Quiet Standing. J. Neurophysiol., 80, 1211–1221.
54. Winter, D.A., Robertson, D.G.E., 1978. Joint torque and energy patterns in normal gait. Biological Cybernetics, 29, 137–142.
55. Winter, D., 2005. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
56. Winter, D. A., 1984. Kinematic and Kinetic Patterns in Human Gait: Variability and Compensating Effects. Hum. Movement Sci., 3, 51–76.
57. Zhu, X.,Jing, X., Cheng, L., 2012.Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers: A Review on Structure Design and Analysis,Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 28(3), 839-873.