Bazı Sillojistik ve Kardinalite Karşılaştırmalı Lojiklerin Türetimlerinin Cebirsel ve Etiketli Çizge Teorik Özellikleri Üzerine
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- [1] Miller, G. A. 1995. WordNet: a lexical database for English, Communications of the ACM, 38(11): 39-41s.
- [2] Smith, R. 1989. Aristotle: Prior Analytics, translated with introduction notes and commentary, Indianapolis, Hackett, 265s.
- [3] Moss, Lawrence S. 2016. Syllogistic Logic with Cardinality Comparisons. In: J. Michael Dunn on Information Based Logics. Springer International Publishing, 391-415s.
- [4] Velleman D. J. 2006 How to Prove It: A Structured Approach, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, England, 384s.
- [5] Iyanaga, S., Kawada, Y. 1980. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1005s.
- [6] Bang-Jensen, J., Gregory G. 2000. Digraphs, Theory: Algorithms and Applications, Springer Verlag, 798s.
- [7] Champin, P. A., Solnon C. 2003. Measuring the Similarity of Labeled Graphs, Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, K. Ashley and D. Bridge, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2689: 80-95s.
- [8] Moss, Lawrence S. 2008. Completeness theorems for syllogistic fragments. Logics for linguistic structures, 29: 143-173s
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
28 Nisan 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
27 Eylül 2016
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3
Cited By
Effect of the production of dried fruit and fruit chips on chemical, sensory and bioactive properties
Exploration of Foods and Foodomics
https://doi.org/10.37349/eff.2025.101077