Değişik Zamanlarda Hasat Edilen Farklı Tipteki Şeker Pancarı (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Bazı Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2019, , 1 - 8, 01.03.2019

Bekir Tosun , Tahsin Karadoğan Arif Şanlı

https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.430348

Cited By: 3

Öz

Isparta
ekolojik koşullarında 2012 ve 2013 yıllarında yürütülen bu araştırmada farklı
zamanlarda hasat edilen (çıkıştan 140, 155, 170, 185 ve 200 gün sonra) değişik
tiplerdeki şeker pancarı çeşitlerinin (Begonia, Aranka ve Esperanza (N tipi),
Sandrina ve Esperia (NZ tipi), Felicita ve Agnessa (Z tipi) verim ve bazı
kalite özellikleri incelenmiştir. En yüksek kök gövde ve biyolojik verim erken
sökümde Aranka, geç sökümde ise Esperia çeşitlerinden elde edilmiştir. En düşük
α-amino
azot miktarı erken sökümde Aranka (5.68 mmol/100g), geç sökümde ise Esperia
(2.05 mmol/100g) ve Esperanza (2.11 mmol/100g) çeşitlerinde belirlenmiştir. Erken
ve geç sökümlerde Z tipi olan Felicita ve Agnessa çeşitleri en yüksek polar
şeker oranına sahip olmuştur.  En yüksek
polar şeker verimi erken sökümde Aranka (1490 kg/da), geç sökümde ise Esperia
(1867 kg/da) ve Sandrina (1860 kg/da) çeşitlerinden elde edilmiştir. Çalışmada,
Isparta koşullarında yüksek verim ve teknolojik olgunluk bakımından Aranka ve
Begonia çeşitlerinin 200 gün, diğer çeşitlerin ise en az 185 günlük vejetasyon
dönemini tamamlaması gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Şeker pancarı, Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L., Çeşit, Hasat Zamanı, Verim, Kalite

Determination of Yield and Some Quality Traits of Varied Types of Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L) Cultivars Harvested at Different Times

Öz

The
present study was carried out at Isparta ecological conditions during 2012 and
2013 crop seasons to determine the effects of different harvest times (140,
155, 170, 185 and 200 days after emergence) at different types of sugarbeet cultivars
(Begonia, Aranka and Esperanza (N types), Sandrina and Esperia (NZ types),
Felicita and Agnessa (Z types) on yield and some quality parameters.The highest
sugarbeet yield and biyological yield per decare were obtained from Aranka cultivar
at early harvest times and from Esperia cultivar at lates harvest times. The
lowest amount of α-amino nitrogen were determined from Aranka (5.68 mmol/100g) at
early harvest and from Esperia (2.05 mmol/100g) and Esperanza (2.11 mmol/100g) cultivars
at late harvest time. The highest polar sugar content were determined from
Felicita and  Agnessa cultivars (Z types)
at early and late harvests. The highest polar sugar yield per decare were
obtained from Aranka cultivar (1490 kg/da) at early harvest and from Esperia cultivar  (1867 kg/da) and Sandrina (1860 kg/da)
cultivars at late harvest. It was concluded that Aranka and Begonia cultivars should
be completed 200 days while other cultivars at least 150 days of vegetation
period in terms of high root yield and technological quality in Isparta
conditions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sugar beet, Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L., Cultivars, Harvest time, Yield, Quality

Kaynakça

• [1] Er, C.. Uranbey, S., 1998. Nişasta Şeker Bitkileri. Ankara Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:1504. 334s. Ankara.
• [2] Jozefyova, L., Pulkrabek, J., Urbam, J., 2004. Effect of Harvest Time on Sugar Beet Fertilised with ;Increased Nitrogen. Science and Technology. 2. 232-237.
• [3] Heidari, G., Sohrabi, Y., 2008. Influence of Withholding Irrigation nd Harvest Times on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet(Beta vulgaris). International Journal of Agrıculture and Biology. 10(4). 427–431.
• [4] Karadoğan, T., Kurtçepe, Ş., 2005. Göller Yöresine Uygun Şeker Pancarı Çeşitlerinin Belirlenmesi. Türkiye VI. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. 5-9 Eylül Antalya.
• [5] Sohrabı, Y., Heidari, G., Esmaılpoor, B., 2007. Influence of Harvesting Time on Yield and Yield Components of Sugar Beet. Friends Science Publishers. 2. 69-73.
• [6] Refay, Y.A., 2010. Root Yield and Quality Traits of Three Suga Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Varieties in Relation to Sowing Date and Stand Densities .World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6 (5). 589-594.
• [7] Ahmad, S., Zubair, M., Iqbal, N., Cheema, M.N., Mahmood, K., 2012. Evaluation of Sugar Beet Hybrid Varieties under Thal-Kumbi Soil Series of Pakistan. Internatıonal Journal of Agrıculture and Biology. 14. 4. 605-608.
• [8] Minx, L., ve Rikanov, J., 1987. Yeild Depression of Sugar Beet Caused by Gaps in Stands Sown on Different Dates. Rostlinna Vyroba. 33(9). 959-964.
• [9] Akçin, A., Mülayim, A., Yıldırım, B., Sade, B., Tamkoç, A., Önder, M., 1992. Şeker Pancarında (Beta vulgaris var saccharifera L.) Çeşit ve Ekim Zamanının Verim. Verim Unsurları ve Kalite Üzerine Etkileri. Doğa Türk Tarım ve Ormancılık Dergisi. 16. 4. 731-743.
• [10] Durrant, M.J., Mash, S.J., Jaggard, K.W., 1993. Effects of Seed Advancement and Sowing Date on Establishment Bolting and Yield of Sugar Beet. Journal of Agricultural Science. 121. 3. 333-341.
• [11] Kerr, S., Leaman, M., 1997. Towateror not. Bri. Sugar Beet Rev., 65,11–3
• [12] Glauert, W., 1983. Carbon Exchange of a Sugar Beet Crop Through a Season. University of Nottingham, Department of Crop Science, PhD Thesis, 120s.
• [13] Hull, R., H., Webb, D., J., 1970. The Effect of Sowing Date and Harvesting Date on the Yield of Sugar Beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 75, 223-229.
• [14] Scott, R.K., English, S.D., Wood, D., W., Unsworth, M. H., 1973. The Yield of Sugar Beet in Relation to Weatherand Length of Growing Season. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 81, 339-347.
• [15] O’ Connor, L.J., 1981. Factors Affecting Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet in Ireland. National University of Ireland, Department of Crop Science, Phd Thesis, 200p, Dublin.
• [16] O’ Donovan, T.M., 2002.The Effects of Seed Treatment, Sowing Date Cultivar and Harvest Date on theYield and Quality of Sugar Beet. National University of Ireland, M. Sc. Thesis,140p. Dublin.
• [17] Harvey, C.W. and J.V. Dutton, 1993. Root quality and processing. The Sugar Beet Crop. Chapman and Hall, 675 p. London.
• [18] Pocock, T., Milford, G.F.J., Armstrong. M., 1988. Progress in Research Toward Site Specific Fertiliser Requirements. Britisth Sugar Beet Rev., 56,41-44.
• [19] Kováč, K., 1998, The Effect of Different Soil Cultivation and Fertilization on Yield, Quality and Uptake of Nutrients in Sugar Beet Rostl. Výr., 44, 59-64.
• [20] Jozefyova, L., Pulkrabek, J., Urban, J., 2003. The Influence of Harvest Date and Crop Treatment on The Production of Two Different Sugar Beet Variety Types, Plsnt Soil Environ., 49(11), 495-498.
• [21] Hozayn, M., Abd El-Monem A.A., Bakery A.A., 2013. Screening of Some Exotic Sugar Beet Cultivars Grown under Newlyre Claimed Sandy Soil for Yield and Sugar Quality Traits. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 9(3), 2213-2222.
• [22] Jozefyova, L.,Pulkrabek, J., Urbam, J., 2004. Effect of Harvest Time on Sugar Beet Fertilised with ;Increased Nitrogen. Science and Technology, 2, 232-237.
• [23] Jama, M., Bahadar, K., 1988. Varietal Performance of Sugar Beet in Bannu Area of NWFP J. Pure Applied Science, 7: 7–8.
• [24] Oad, F.C., Hameed, A., Ansari, B.K., Solangi, M.U., Khail, G.N., Oad, N.L., 2001. Performance Evaluation of Exotic Sugar Beet under Selected Agro-Climatic Conditions of Sindh Province. Internal Journal Agriculture Biology, 4, 472–474.
• [25] Khan, D., Khan, I., Khan,P., Rehman, G.,2004. Sugar Beet Cultivation in The Southern Parts of NWFP. Pakistan Sugar Journal, 19, 19–24.
• [26] Ebrahimian, H.R.,Sadegheian, S.Y., Jahadakbar, M.R., Abbasi, Z., 2009. Study of Daptabilityand Stability of Sugar Beet Monogerm Cultivars in Different Locations of Iran. Journal Sugar Beet, 24, 1–13
• [27] Johnson, R., T., Alexander, J., T., Rush, G., E., Hawkes, G., R., 1971. Advances in Sugar Beet Production Principlesand Practices (23-53).Çev. Bilgin, T., Erel, K., Onat, G. Türkiye Şeker Fabrikaları Yayınları, 479s, Ankara.
• [28] Akınerdem, F., Sade, B., Acar, R., Soylu, S., 1996. Konya Şartlarında Şeker Pancarının (Beta vulgaris L.) Hasat Zamanının Belirlenmesi. Tübitak-Doğa Dergisi, 20, 139-143.
• [29] Çakmakcı, R., Tıngır, N., 2001. Vejetasyon Periyodunun Uzunluğunun Şeker Pancarının Gelişim Verim ve Kalite Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 41-49.
• [30] Heidari, G., Sohrabi, Y., 2008. Influence of Withholding Irrigation and Harvest Times on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris). International Journal of Agrıculture and Biology, 10(4), 427–431.
• [31] Ada, R., 2010. Farklı Zamanlarda ve Tekniklerde Hasat Edilen Şeker Pancarında (Beta vulgaris saccharifera L.) Silolama Süresinin Verim ve Kalite Üzerine Etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 108s, Konya.
• [32] Smit, A.L., 1993. The İnfluence of Sowing Date and Plant Density on The Decision to Resow Sugar Beet. Field Crops Res., 34, 159-173.
• [33] Marlander, B., 1992. Hoher Ertragundhohe Qualitatein Widerspruchbeim Anbauvon Zuckerr. Ben, Zuckerin,. 117(11), 908-912.
• [34] Lauer, J.G., 1997. Sugar Beet Performance and Interactions with Planting Date, Genotype and Harvest Date. Agron. Journal, 89(3), 469- 475.
• [35] Tahisin, S., Hali, A., 2004. Plant Density and Sowing Date Effects on Sugar Beet Yield and Quality. Journal Agronomy, 3(3), 215-218.
• [36] Brown, S., 1997. Quality Harvesting Program. Bri. Sugar Beet Rev., 65, 12–3.