G-7 Ülkelerinin Yakınsama Deneyimi: 1870-2006

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

G-7 ÜLKELERİNİN YAKINSAMA DENEYİMİ: 1870-2006

Öz

Bu çalışmada, G-7 ülkelerinin 1870-2006 dönemindeki yakınsama deneyimi ele alınmaktadır. Analizde önce 1870-2006 aralığı, ardından da 1870-1945 ve 1946-2006 aralıkları incelenmektedir. Zaman serisi metodolojisine dayalı standart ADF birim kök testi ve ele alınan serilerde birim kökün varlığı halinde bile yakınsamaya izin veren Nahar-Inder testi, G7 örnekleminin yakınsama deneyimini test etmek için kullanılmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, Nahar-Inder testinin ADF birim kök testine göre daha güçlü yakınsama sonucu verdiğini göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yakınsama Hipotezi, G-7 Ülkeleri, Nahar-Inder Testi

Kaynakça

1. Barro, R. J. (1991). “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 407-43.
2. Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X. (1990). “ Economic Growth and Convergence Across the United States”. NBER Working Paper No: 3419.
3. Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X. (1992). “Convergence”. Journal of Political Economy, 100:223-51.
4. Baumol, W. J. (1986). “Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show?”. The American Economic Review, 76 (5): 1072-1085.
5. Bentzen, J. (2005). “Testing for cathing-up periods in time series convergence”, Economics Letters, 88: 232-328.
6. Bernard, A. B., Durlauf, S. N. (1996). “Interpreting Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis”, Journal of Econometrics 71: 161-173.
7. DeLong, B. J. (1988). “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: A Comment”, The American Economic Review, 78 (5): 1138-54.
8. Dowrick, S., Nguyen, D. (1989). “OECD Comperative Economic Growth 1950-85: Catch-Up and Convergence”. The American Economic Review, 79 (5): 11030.

9. Friedman, M. (1992), “Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?”. Journal of Economic Literature, 30: 2129-32.
10. Galor, O. (1996). “Convergence? Inference from Theoretical Models”. Economic Journal, 206: 1056-69.
11. Greasley , D., Oxley, L. (1995). “A Time Series Perspective on Convergence: Australia, UK, and USA since 1870”, Economic Record, 71: 259-270.
12. Greasley , D., Oxley, L. (1997). “Time Series Based Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis: Some Positive Results”, Economics Letters, 56: 143-147.
13. Islam, N. (2003). “What Have We Learnt From The Convergence Debate?”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 17 (3): 309-62.
14. King, R. G., Rebelo, S. T. (1989). “Transitional Dynamics and Economic Growth in the Neoclassical Model”, NBER Working Paper, No: 3185.
15. Mankiw, G. N., Romer, D., Weil, D. (1992) “A Contribution to The Empirics of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 407-37.
16. Nahar, S., Inder, B. (2002). “Testing Convergence in Economic Growth for OECD Countries”. Applied Economics, 34: 2011-2022.
17. Quah, D. (1993). “Galton’s Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95: 427-43.
18. Quah, D. (1996a). “Empirics for Economic Growth and Convergence”, European Economic Review, 40: 1353-75.
19. Quah, D. (1996b). “Convergence Empirics Across Economies”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1: 95-124.
20. Rassekh, F., Panik, J. M., Kolluri, B. R. (2001). “A Test of The Convergence Hypothesis: The OECD Experience, 1950-1990”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 10: 147.
21. Romer, P.M. (1986). “Increasing returns and long-run growth”, The Journal of Political Economy. 94 (5): 1002-1037.
22. Sala-i Martin, X. (1996a). “Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence”. European Economic Review, 40: 1325-52.
23. Sala-i Martin, X. (1996b). “The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis”, Economic Journal, 106: 1019-36.
24. Sala-i Martin, X. (2002). “15 Years of New Growth Economics: What Have We Learnt?”. Central Bank of Chile, Working Papers, No: 172.
25. Solow, R. M. (1956). “A contribution to the theory of growth”, Quartely Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65-94.
26. Ta-i Leung, T., Hinich, M. J., Khim-Sen Liew, V., Lim, K. (2008). “Time Series Test of Nonlinear Convergence and Transitional Dynamics”, Economics Letters, 100: 337-339. 27. www.ggdc.net