TO BE A MASTER OR BETTER THAN OTHERS? A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK REGARDING THE MULTIPLE ACHIEVEMENT GOALS

Öz

Individuals should have specific goal identification to be successful in a motivational manner. As the center of their goal identification some may choose to be a master in a field that they love, feel competent or free on the other hand, some may choose to do better scores or show comparatively better performance in their existing environments than the others. Outcome based performance goals; may narrow down the focus on the tasks that individuals have been doing or create a ceiling effect. Individual who focuses on the result may underestimate the quality of the process and less learning may be actualized. For this reason, rather than increasing the number of performance based achievements, organizations and societies should encourage the mastery based achievements. However, rapidly changing socio-economic conditions may require individuals to have more than one achievement goal orientation. In this respect having more than one achievement goal orientation may seem adaptive to twenty-first century’s competitive conditions. In this study, theoretical framework of achievement goals regarding the performance and mastery dimensions have been pointed out. Besides it has also been emphasized that the pursuit of performance and mastery goals at the same time might be possible. Furthermore this study has shed a light on having individuals with mastery goal orientation play a significant role on the progress of societies and increases the levels of development in the long run.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Goals,Achievement Goals,Multiple Goal Pursuit,Mastery,Performance

USTA OLMAK MI DİĞERLERİNDEN DAHA İYİ OLMAK MI? ÇOKLU BAŞARI HEDEFLERİNE DAİR TEORİK ÇERÇEVE

Öz

Bireylerin motive biçimde başarılı olmaları için belirgin bir hedef kimliğine sahip olmaları gerekmektedir. Kimilerinin hayatta merkeze koydukları hedef kimliği sevdiği, yeterlilik hissettiği ve özgür olabildiği bir alanda usta olabilmekken, kimilerinin hedef kimliği ise var olduğu ortamda diğerlerinden daha iyi skor üretebilmek, kıyaslamalı olarak kendini diğerlerine göre daha iyi performans üretebilmektir. Sonuç odaklı olan performans hedefleri; kişilerin yaptıkları işte odaklarını daraltarak veya tavan etkisi oluşturmaktadır. Sonuca odaklanan birey sürecin kalitesini önemsemeyebilmekte ve daha az öğrenme gerçekleşebilmektedir. Bu yüzden örgütler ve toplumlar performans temelli başarıların sayısını arttırmak yerine ustalık temelli başarıları desteklemelidir. Ancak hızla değişen sosyo-ekonomik şartlar bireylerin birden fazla başarı hedef yönelimine sahip olmalarını gerektirebilmektedir. Bu bağlamda birden fazla başarı hedef yönelimine sahip olmak 21.yüzyılın rekabetçi şartlarına uyumlu görünebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada; başarı hedeflerinin performans ve ustalık boyutlarına ilişkin kavramsal çerçeve belirtilmektedir. Bunun yanı sıra performans ve ustalık hedeflerinin aynı anda takip edilebileceğinin de mümkün olduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Ayrıca bu çalışma ustalık hedef yönelimine sahip bireylerin toplumların kalkınmasında önemli rol oynadığına ve uzun vadede gelişmişlik düzeylerini arttıracağına ışık tutmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hedefler,Başarı Hedefleri,Çoklu Hedef Takibi,Ustalık,Performans

Kaynakça

1. AMES, C., (1992), Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261- 271.
2. AMES, C., Archer, J., (1988), Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students’ Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 260- 267.
3. BARRON, K. E., Harackiewicz, J. M., (2001) Achievement Goals and Optimal Motivation: Testing Multiple Goal Models, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706-722.
4. BUSS, D. M., (2008), Human Nature and Individual Differences: Evolution of Human Personality, içinde, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, (Third Edition), John, O. P., Robins, R. W., Pervin, L. A., Guilford Press.
5. DIENER, C. I., Dweck, C. S., (1978), An Analysis of Learned Helplessness: Continuous Changes in Performance, Strategy, and Achievement Cognitions Following Failure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (5), 451- 462.
6. DRUCKER, P.F., (1986), Management, Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, New York: Truman Talley Books.
7. DWECK, C. S., (1998), The Development of Early Self-Conceptions: Their Relevance for Motivational Processes, içinde, Motivation and Self- Regulation Across the Life Span, Heckhausen, J., Dweck, C. S. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. DWECK, C. S., Leggett, E. L., (1988), A Social- Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality, Psychological Review, 95 (2), 256- 273.

9. ELLIOT, A. J., (1999), Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Achievement Goals, Educational Psychologist, 34 (3), 169- 189.
10. ELLIOT, A. J., Church, M. A., (1997), A Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (1), 218-232.
11. ELLIOT, A. J., Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., (2011), A 3x2 Achievement Goal Model, Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (3), 632- 648.
12. ELLIOT, A.J., Mcgregor, H. A., (2001), A 2x2 Achievement Goal Framework, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (3), 501-519.
13. EMMONS, R. A., (1986), Personal Strivings: An Approach to Personality and Subjective Well-Being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1058- 1068.
14. EPPLER, M. A., Harju, B. L., (1997), Achievement Motivation Goals in Relation to Academic Performance in Traditional and Nontraditional College Students, Research in Higher Education, 38 (5), 557- 573.
15. GRAHAM, S., Weiner, B. (1996), Theories And Principles Of Motivation, İçinde Handbook Of Educational Psychology, Berliner, D. C., Calfee, R., New York: Macmillan.
16. HARACKIEWICZ, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., Elliot, A. J., (1997), Predictors and Consequences of Achievement Goals in the College Classroom: Maintaining Interest and Making the Grade, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (6), 1284-1295.
17. HARACKIEWICZ, J. M., Barron, K. E., Elliot, A. J., (1998), Rethinking Achievement Goals: When are they Adaptive for College Students and Why?, Educational Psychologist, 33, 1-21.
18. KOCH, A. K., Nafziger, J., (2011), Self- Regulation through Goal Setting, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113 (1), 212- 227.
19. LATHAM, G. P. (2003), Goal Setting: A Five- Step Approach to Behavior Change, Organizational Dynamics, 32 (3), 309-318.
20. LATHAM, G. P., (2007), Work Motivation: History, Theory, Research, and Practice, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
21. LATHAM, G. P., (2009), Becoming the Best Evidence-Based Manager, Davies- Black.
22. LATHAM, G. P., Borgogni, L., Petitta, L., (2008), Goal Setting and Performance Management in the Public Sector, International Public Management Journal, 11 (4), 385- 403.
23. LATHAM, G. P., Locke, E. A., (2007), New Developments in and Directions for Goal-setting Research, European Psychologist, 12 (4), 290-300.
24. LOCKE, E. A., Latham, G. P., (2009), Has Goal Setting Gone Wild, or Have Its Attackers Abandoned Good Scholarship?, Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (1), 17- 23.
25. LOCKE, E. A., Latham, G.P., (1990), A Theory of Goal-Setting and Task Performance, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
26. LOCKE, E. A., Latham, G.P., (1990), A Theory of Goal-Setting and Task Performance, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
27. LOCKE, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., Latham, G. P., (1981)., Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980, Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 125-152.
28. LOCKE, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., Latham, G. P., (1981)., Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980, Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 125-152.
29. LOCKE, E.A., Latham, G.P., (2006), New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15 (5), 265- 268.
30. MACLEOD, L., (2013), Making SMART Goals Smarter, Physician Executive, 68-72.
31. MAEHR, M. L., Zusho, A., (2009), Achievement Goal Theory: The Past, Present, and Future, içinde, Handbook of Motivation at School, Wentzel, K. R., Wigfield, A., New York: Routledge.
32. MASLOW, A. H., (1987), Motivation and Personality, USA: Harper&Row Publishers.
33. MATOS, L., Lens, W., Vansteenkiste, M., Mouratidis, A., (2017), Optimal Motivation in Peruvian High Schools: Should Learners Pursue and Teachers Promote Mastery Goals, Performance-Approach Goals or Both, Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 87-96.
34. MCCLELLAND, D. C., (1961), The Achieving Society, New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
35. MCCLELLAND, D. C., (1985), How Motives, Skills, and Values Determine What People Do, American Psychologist, 40 (7), 812-825.
36. MIDGLEY, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R., Urdan, T., (2000), Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS), Michigan: The University of Michigan.
37. MINER, J. B., (2005), Organizational Behavior 1, Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership, New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
38. MURAYAMA, K., Elliot, A. J., Yamagata, S., (2011), Separation of Performance –Approach and Performance- Avoidance Achievement Goals: A Broader Analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (1), 238- 256.
39. PINTRICH, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., McKeachie, W. J., (1991), A Manual for the Use of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), Michigan: University of Michigan Publications.
40. RYAN, R. M. (2012), Motivation and the Organization of Human Behavior: Three Reasons for the Reemergence of a Field, içinde, The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation,
41. SCHUNK, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008), Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications, (Third Edition), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education
42. SCHUNK, D.H., Usher, E. L., (2012), Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation, içinde, The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, Ryan, R. M., New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. SELIGMAN, M. E. P., Maier, S. F., (1967), Failure to Escape Traumatic Shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(1), 1-9.
44. SELIGMAN, M.E.P., Maier, S.F., Geer, J., (1968), The Alleviation of Learned Helplessness in Dogs, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73, 256-262.
45. SUN, S. H., Frese, M., (2013), Multiple Goal Pursuit, içinde, New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance, Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., Routledge Chapman & Hall.
46. THRASH, T. M., Elliot, A. J., (2002), Implicit and Self-attributed Achievement Motives: Concordance and Predictive Validity, Journal of Personality, 70(5), 729- 755.
47. THRASH, T. M., Hurst, A. L., (2008), Approach and Avoidance Motivation in the Achievement Domain: Integrating the Achievement Motive and Achievement Goal Traditions, içinde, Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation, Elliot, A. J., New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
48. VAN Yperen, N.W., Blaga, M., Postmes, T., (2014), A meta-analysis of self-reported achievement goals and nonself-report performance across three achievement domains (work, sports, and education), Plos One, 3, 9 (4), 1-8.
49. WEINER, B., (1986), An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion, New York: Springer- Verlag.
50. WENTZEL, K. R., (2000), What is it that I’m Trying to Achieve? Classroom Goals from a Content Perspective, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 105–115.
51. http://www.achieve-goal-setting-success.com/smart-goal.html