Girişimsel Düşünceyi Anlamak: Düşünme Tarzı ve Risk Tercihinin Girişimsel Özyetkinlik ve Girişimcilik Niyeti İle İlişkisi

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 143 - 159, 01.09.2013

  Yrd.Doç.Dr.Canan Nur Karabey

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the relation of thinking (cognitive) style and risk preference to entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention. To test research hypotheses, data were gathered from 208 students at the Economics Program of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences in a university in Turkey. The findings demonstrated that intuitive individuals’ entrepreneurial intention and self-efficacy is not different from analytical individuals’. No significant difference was found between high risk and individuals preferring low risk in terms of entrepreneurial intention and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Drawing from the results, the impact of thinking style and risk preference on the emergence of entrepreneurship is discussed

Anahtar Kelimeler

Analytical and intuitive thinking, risk preference, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intention

GİRİŞİMSEL DÜŞÜNCEYİ ANLAMAK: DÜŞÜNME TARZI VE RİSK TERCİHİNİN GİRİŞİMSEL ÖZYETKİNLİK VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, girişimciliği destekleyen zihinsel süreçleri daha iyi anlamak için düşünme tarzının (bilişsel-kognitif tarz) ve risk tercihinin girişimsel öz yetkinlik ve girişimcilik niyeti ile ilişkisini incelemektir. Araştırma hipotezlerinin test edilmesi için ülkemizdeki bir üniversitenin İİBF. İktisat Bölümü’nde öğrenim gören 208 öğrenciden veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, sezgisel düşünenlerin girişimcilik niyeti ve girişimsel özyetkinlik düzeyinin analitik düşünenlerden farklı olmadığını göstermiştir. Risk tercihi yüksek bireylerle düşük bireyler arasında da girişimcilik niyeti ve girişimsel özyetkinlik açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Sonuçlar doğrultusunda düşünme tarzı ve risk tercihinin girişimciliğin ortaya çıkışındaki etkisi tartışılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Analitik ve sezgisel düşünce, risk tercihi, girişimsel öz yetkinlik, girişimcilik niyeti

Kaynakça

• Allinson, C. W. ve J. Hayes (2000), “The Cognitive Style Index: A measure of intuition analysis for organizational research”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 33 No. 1, 119-135.
• Allinson, C., E. Chell ve J. Hayes (2000), “Intuition and Entrepreneurial Behaviour”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 9 No.1, 31–43.
• Armstrong, S. ve A. Hird (2009), “Cognitive Style and Entrepreneurial Drive of New and Mature Business Owner-Managers”, Journal of Business Psychology, Vol. 24, 419–430.
• Bandura, A. (1982), “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency”, American Psychologist, Vol. 37, No. 2, 122-147.
• Barbosa, S. ve J. Kickul (2007), “Differing Pathways to Intentionality: The Role of Cognitive Style and Risk Propensity”, 4th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange Queensland, Australia. Conference,
• Barbosa, S., M. Gerhardt ve J. Kickul (2007), “The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions”, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, Vol. 13 No. 4, 86- 104.
• Barbosa, S., J. Kickul ve B. Smith (2008), “The road less intended: integrating entrepreneurial cognition and risk in entrepreneurship education”, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol. 16 No.4, 411–439.
• Baron, R. (2007), “Behavioural and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 1, 167–182.
• Baron, R. (1998), “Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.12, 275-294.
• Begley, T. (1995), “Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10, 249– 263.
• Begley, T. ve D. Boyd (1987), “Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial Şrms and smaller businesses”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 2, 79–93.
• Bowen, D. ve R. Hisrich (1986), “The Female Entrepreneur: A Career Development Perspective” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11
• Brockhaus, R. (1987), “Entrepreneurial Folklore”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 25, 1-6.
• Brockhaus, R. (1980), “Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23 No.3, 509-520.
• Brockhaus, R. ve W. Nord (1979), “An exploration of factors affecting the entrepreneurial decision: personal characteristics vs. environmental conditions”, Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 364–368.
• Broehl, W.G. (1978), The Village Entrepreneurs, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Burch, J. (1986), Entrepreneurship, John Wiley, New York.
• Busenitz, L. ve C. Lau (1996), “A cross-cultural model of new venture creation”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 20 No. 4, 25–38.
• Cantillon, R. (1931), Essai sur la nature de commerce en general, Edt: Henry Higgs, Macmillan Pub., London, (1. baskı 1755).
• Carland, J. C. ve J. W. Carland (1992), “Managers, small business owners and entrepreneurs: The cognitive dimension”, Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 4 No. 2, 55-66.
• Carland, J.W. III, J. W. Jr Carland, J. A. Carland ve J. W. Pearce (1995), “Risk-taking propensity among entrepreneurs, small business owners, and managers”, Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 7 No. 1, 15–23.
• Chen, C., P. Greene ve A. Crick (1998), “Does Entrepreneurial Self- Efficacy Distinguish Entrepreneurs from Managers?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13, 295-316.
• Cox, L., S. Mueller ve S. Moss (2002), “The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial self-efŞcacy”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Vol. 1 No. 2, 229–245.
• Creative Research Systems, http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm, 30.12.2012.
• De Noble, A. F., D. Jung ve S. Ehrlich (1999), “Entrepreneurial Self- Efficacy: The Development of a Measure and Its Relationship to Entrepreneurial Action”, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.
• Douglas, E. ve D. Shepherd (2002), “Self-employment as a Career Choice: Attitudes, Entrepreneurial Intentions, and Utility Maximization”, Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, Vol. 26 No. 3, 81- 90.
• Ettlie, J., K. Groves ve C. Vance (2011), “The Role of Thinking Style and Innovative Intentions for Optimal Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”, 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
• Forbes D. P., (2005), “The Effects of Strategic Decision Making on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, September: 599-626.
• Gartner, W. B. (1989), “Who is an entrepreneur? is the wrong question”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Summer: 47-67.
• Groves, K., C. Vance, D. Choi (2011), “Examining entrepreneurial cognition: an occupational analysis of balanced linear and nonlinear thinking and entrepreneurship success”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 49 No. 3, 438-466.
• Hayes, J. ve C. Allinson (1994), “Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 5, 53-71.
• Hull, D., J. Bosley ve G. Udell, (1980), “Reviewing the heffalump: Identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality characteristics”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, 11–18.
• Hunt, R. G., F. J. Krzystofiak, J. R. Meindl ve A. M. Yousry, (1989), “Cognitive style and decision making”, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 44, 436–453.
• Hyrsky, K. ve M. Tuunanen, (1990), “Innovativeness and Risk-taking Propensity: A Cross-Cultural Study of Finnish and U.S. Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owners”, Liiketaloudellinen Aikakauskirja, Vol. 48, 238-256.
• Jung, D. I., S. Ehrlich, A. De Noble, K. Baik (2001), “Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and its Relationship to Entrepreneurial Action: A comparative Study between the US and Korea”, Management International, Vol. 6 No. 1, 41-53.
• Kickul, J. ve R. D'Intino (2005) “Measure for measure: modeling Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy onto instrumental tasks within the new venture creation process,” New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 8 No. 2, 9-47.
• Kickul, J., L. K. Gundry, S. D. Barbosa ve L. Whitcanack (2009), “Intuition Versus Analysis? Testing Differential Models of Cognitive Style on Entrepreneurial Self-EfŞcacy and the New Venture Creation Process”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, March: 439-453.
• Krueger, N. F. (2003), “The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship” Acs ve Audretsch (eds.) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction, New York, Springer.
• Krueger, N. ve J. Kickul (2006) “So you thought the intentions model was simple: cognitive style and the specification of entrepreneurial intentions models” US Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference, Tuscon.
• Liles, P.R. (1974) New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur, Irwin, Homewood: IL.
• Litzinger, W. (1965), “The motel entrepreneur and the motel manager”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 8, 268–281.
• Lucas, W. ve S. Cooper (2005) “Measuring Entrepreneurial Self- Efficacy”, EDGE conference bridging the Gap: Entrepreneurship in Theory and Practice, Singapore.
• Luthans, F. ve E. Ibrayeva (2006), “Entrepreneurial self-efficacy in Central Asian transition economies: quantitative and qualitative analyses”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37, 92–110.
• Markman, G. D. ve R. Baron (2003), “Person–entrepreneurship fit: why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 13, 281–301.
• Markman, G., D. Balkin ve R. Baron (2002), “Inventors and New Venture Formation: the Effects of General Self-Efficacy and Regretful Thinking”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter: 149-165.
• Masters, R. ve R. Meier (1988), “Sex differences and risk-taking propensity of entrepreneurs”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 26, No. 1, 31–35.
• McCarthy, B. (2000), “The cult of risk taking and social learning: a study of Irish entrepreneurs” Management Decision, Vol. 38, No. 8, 563 –575.
• Messick, S. (1984), “The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promises in educational practice”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 19, 59-74.
• Mitchell, K., L. Busenitz, T. Lant, P. McDougall, E. Morse ve J. Smith (2002), “Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter: 93-104.
• Neisser, U. (1986) “Cognition and reality: principles and implications of cognitive psychology”, Freeman, San Francisco: CA.
• Petrakis, P. E. (2005) “Risk Perception, Risk Propensity and Entrepreneurial Behaviour: The Greek Case”, The Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol. 7 No. 1, 233-242.
• Sánchez, J., T. Carballo ve A. Gutiérrez (2011), “The entrepreneur from a cognitive approach”, Psicothema, Vol. 23 No. 3, 433-438.
• Şeşen, H. ve N. Basım (2012) Demografik Faktörler ve Kişiliğin Girişimcilik Niyetine Etkisi: Spor Bilimleri Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt 12, 21-28.
• Shane, S. ve S. Venkataraman (2000), “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25
• Sitkin, S. B. ve A. L. Pablo (1992), “Reconceptualising the determinants of risk behaviour”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 1, 9- 38.
• Sitkin, S. B. ve L. R. Weingart (1995), “Determinants of risky decision- making behaviour: a test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 6, 1573- 1592.
• Stewart, W., W. Watson, J. Carland, ve J. Carland (1998), “A proclivity for entrepreneurship: a comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 14, 189–214.
• Streufert, S. ve G. Y. Nogami (1989) “Cognitive style and complexity: Implications for I/O psychology”, Edt: Cary Cooper ve Ivan Robinson, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, John Wiley, Chichester: UK.
• Unni, V. K. (1990), “Perceptions of Risk among Entrepreneurs and Nonentrepreneurs in India and France: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 7 No. 3, 270–279.
• Vance, C., K. Groves, Y. Paik, H. Kindler (2007), “Understanding and Measuring Linear/Nonlinear Thinking Style for Enhanced Management Education and Professional Practice”, Academy of Managerial Learning and Education, Vol. 6 No. 2, 167–185.
• Wenhong, Z. ve F. Liuying (2010), “The impact of entrepreneurial thinking system on risk-taking propensity and entrepreneurial behaviour”, Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2 No. 2, 165- 174.
• Witkin, H. A., C. A. Moore, D. R. Goodenough ve P. W. Cox (1977), “Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 47, 1– 64.