THE IMPACT OF GOSSIP PERCEIVED IN THE WORKPLACE ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND TAKING CHARGE

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 973 - 986, 30.07.2018

Şeyda Seçkin

Öz

In this study, the impact of perceived gossip in the workplace on psychological safety and taking charge was investigated. Although gossip is pervasive in a wide variety of organizations; studies on workplace gossip are relatively limited. Especially in domestic literature, gossip was predominantly examined within the scope of exploring how gossip is perceived and interpreted by employees, employee reactions to its existence and their subjective evaluations regarding to its potential drivers. There does not exist any study investigating the relationship of perceived gossip, psychological safety and taking charge with the moderating role of supervisor support. Thus, it can be said that study findings may contribute to the relevant area. Field research was conduct on 211 white-collar employees working in medium and big sized firms operating in food and textile sector. According to research results, gossip perceived in the workplace has a negative effect on both psychological safety and taking charge. Besides, it was found that perceived gossip-taking charge relationship is mediated by psychological safety and moderated by supervisor support.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Workplace Gossip, Psychological Safety, Taking Charge

İŞYERİNDE ALGILANAN DEDİKODUNUN PSİKOLOJİK RAHATLIK VE SORUMLULUK ÜSTLENME DAVRANIŞI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, işyerinde algılanan dedikodunun psikolojik rahatlık ve sorumluluk üstlenme davranışı üzerine etkisi incelenmiştir. Dedikodu gayri resmi bir iletişim biçimi olarak pek çok işletmede yaygın olmasına rağmen konu üzerine yapılan araştırmalar göreceli olarak sınırlı sayıdadır. Yerli yazında ise konuya ilişkin yapılan saha araştırmalarının daha çok dedikodunun çalışanlar nezdinde nasıl algılanıp yorumlandığı; örgütlerde dedikodunun varlığına ilişkin çalışan tepkileri ve dedikoduyu tetikleyen nedenlere dair çalışanların görüşlerinin belirlenmesi üzerinde yoğunlaştığı görülmektedir. Algılanan dedikodunun, psikolojik rahatlık ve sorumluluk üstlenme davranışı ile ilişkisini ele alan herhangi bir çalışmaya ise rastlanmamıştır. Bu nedenle, elde edilen bulguların ilgili alana katkı sağlayacağı düşünülebilir. Saha araştırması gıda ve tekstil sektöründe faaliyet gösteren orta ve büyük ölçekli işletmelerde çalışan 211 idari personel üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Elde edilen sonuçlar, işyerinde algılanan dedikodunun hem psikolojik rahatlık hem de sorumluluk üstlenme davranışı üzerinde negatif bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Bunun yanı sıra, algılanan dedikodu- sorumluluk üstlenme davranışı ilişkisinde psikolojik rahatlığın aracı; algılanan yönetici desteğinin de düzenleyici bir etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dedikodu, Psikolojik Rahatlık, Sorumluluk Üstlenme Davranışı

Kaynakça

• AIKEN, L. S., WEST, S. G.(1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
• BAKER, J. S., JONES, M. A.(1996). “The poison of grapevine: How destructive are gossip and rumor in the workplace?” Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol.7, 75-86.
• BAUMEISTER, R.F., ZHANG, L., VOHS, K.D. (2004). “Gossip as cultural learning”. Review of General Psychology, Vol.8, 111-121.
• BRADY, D.L., BROWN, D.J., LIANG, L.H (2017). “Moving Beyond Assumptions of Deviance: The Reconceptualization and Measurement of Workplace Gossip”. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.102, No.1, 1-25.
• BRISLIN, R. W. (1986). “The wording and translation of research instruments”, s.137-164, W. J. LONNER, J.W. BERRY (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• CARMELI, A., GITTELL, J. H. (2009). “High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.30, 709-729.
• COLE, M. S., BRUCH, H., VOGEL, B. (2006). “Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.27, 463-484.
• DECOSTER, S., CAMPS, J., STOUTEN, J., VANDEVYVERE, L., TRIPP, T., M. (2013). “Standing by Your Organization: The Impact of Organizational Identification and Abusive Supervision on Followers’ Perceived Cohesion and Tendency to Gossip”. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.118, 623-634.
• DUNBAR, R. I. M. (2004). “Gossip in evolutionary perspective”. Review of General Psychology, Vol.8, 100-110.
• EDMONDSON, A. (1999). “Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.44, 350-383.
• EDMONDSON, A. C., LEI, Z. (2014). “Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct”. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol.1, 23-43.
• EISENBERGER R., STINGLHAMBER F., VANDENBERGHE, C., SUCHARSKI, I. L., RHOADES, L. (2002). “Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention”. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, 565–573.
• EDMONDSON, A. C. (2004). “Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens”, s.239-272, R. M. KRAMER, K. S. COOK (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
• EYIUSTA, C. M. (2015). “İşgörenlerin Güçlendirme Algılarının Sorumluluk Üstlenme Davranışları Üzerindeki Etkisi: İşe Adanmışlık ve İş Tatmini Değişkenlerinin Aracılık Rolü”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Say.43, 68-78.
• FEINBERG, M., WILLER, R., STELLAR, J., KELTNER, D. (2012). “The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.102, 1015-1030.
• FOSTER, K.E. (2004). “Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions”. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78-99.
• FRIEDER, R., E., K., HOCHWARTER, W. A., HAMPTON, H., L., FERRIS, G., R. (2014). “Supervisor political support as a buffer to subordinates’ reactions to politics perceptions: A three-sample investigation”. Career Development International, 19(1), 27-48.
• FULLER, B., MARLER, L., E. (2009). “Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.75, 329-345.
• GİRAY, M. D., ŞAHİN, N.D., (2012). “Algılanan Örgütsel, Yönetici ve Çalışma Arkadaşları Desteği Ölçekleri: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Vol.15, No.30, 1-9.
• GROSSER, T., J., KİDWELL, L., V., LABİANCA, G., J., ELLWARDT, L. (2012). “Hearing it through the grapevine: Positive and negative workplace gossip.” Organizational Dynamics, Vol.41, 52-61.
• GUCHAIT,P., PAŞAMEHMETOĞLU, A., DAWSON, M. (2014). “Perceived supervisor support and co-worker support for error management: Impact on perceived psychology safety and service performance”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol.41, 28-37.
• KAHN, W. A. (1990). “Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.33, 692 – 724.
• KIM, T. Y., LIU, Z., DIEFENDORFF, J. M. (2015). „Leader-member exchange and job performance: The effects of taking charge and organizational tenure”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.36, 216-231.
• KNIFFIN, K. M., WILSON, D. S. (2005). “Utilities of gossip across organizational levels”. Human Nature, Vol.16, 278-292.
• KNIFFIN, K. M., WILSON, D. S. (2010). “Evolutionary Perspectives on Workplace Gossip: Why and How Gossip Can Serve Groups”. Group & Organization Management, Vol.35, No.2, 150-176.
• KUO, C.C., CHANG, K., QUINTON, S., LU, C.Y., LEE, I. (2015). “Gossip in the workplace and the implications for HR management: a study of gossip and its relationship to employee cynicism”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(18), 2288-2307.
• KURLAND, N. B., PELLED, L. H. (2000). “Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace”. Academy of Management Review, Vol.25, 428-438.
• MICHELSON, G., MOULY, V. S.(2004). “Do loose lips sink ships? The meaning, antecedents and consequences of rumour and gossip in organizations”. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 9(3), 189-201.
• MOON, H., KAMDAR, D., MAYER, D. M., TAKEUCHI, R. (2008). “Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations”. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.93, 84-94.
• MORRISON, E. W., PHELPS, C. C. (1999). “Taking Charge at Work: Extra Role Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.42, No.4, 403-419.
• NG, T.W.H., SORENSEN, K.L. (2008). “Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes – a meta-analysis”. Group & Organization Management, 33(3), 243–268.
• PODSAKOFF, P. M., MACKENZIE, S. B., LEE, J., PODSAKOFF, N. P. (2003). “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies”. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.88, No.5, 879-903.
• PODSAKOFF, P. M., MACKENZIE, S. B, PODSAKOFF, N. P. (2012). “Sources of Method Bias in social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It”. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.63, pp.539-569.
• RICHARDSON, H. A., SIMMERING, M. J., STURMAN, M. C. (2009). “A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance”. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762-800.
• ROBINSON, L.S., BENNETT, J. R. (1995). “A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multi-dimensional scaling study”. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.
• SHANOCK, L. R., EISENBERGER, S. (2006). “When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.91, 689–695.
• STRAHAN, R., GERBASI, K. C. (1972). “Short, Homogeneous Versions of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale”. Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol.28, 191-193.
• TU, Y., LU, X., CHOI, J., N., GUO, W. (2018). “Ethical Leadership and Team-Level Creativity: Mediation of Psychological Safety Climate and Moderation of Supervisor Support for Creativity”. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-15
• WALTERS, K. N., DIAB, D., L. (2016). “Humble Leadership: Implications for Psychological Safety and Follower Engagement”. Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol.10, No.2, 7-18.
• WU, X., KWAN, H. K., WU, L. Z., MA, J. (2015). “The Effect of Workplace Negative Gossip on Employee Proactive Behavior in China: The Moderating Role of Traditionality” Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 801-815.
• YENER, S. (2015). “Psikolojik Rahatlık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması”. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(13), 280-305.
• YÜCEL, E., AKYÜZ, M. (2015). “Dünyanın En Eski Medyası: Dedikodunun Örgüt Düzeyindeki İşlevleri ve Algılanışı: Sağlık Örgütlerinde Bir Alan Araştırması”. Journal of World of Turks, 7(2), 149-166.