Large Sialolith of the Submandibular Gland: Report of a Case and Comparison of Sialolithotomy VS Sialoadenectomy

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 41 - 43, 23.03.2016

Poyzan Bozkurt Mehmet Kolsuz Erdal Erdem

Öz

Introduction and Purpose: In this report we present a patient with a large sialolith of the submandibular gland and its treatment by sialolithotomy. Sialoadenectomy vs. sialolithotomy for treatment of large submandibular gland calculi has been discussed.
Case Report: A 49 year-old male administered to our clinic with an ultrasonography report specifying submandibular gland calculi. An orthopantomograph was obtained and a large radio opaque lesion was detected just below the left mandibular border, in alignment with the second molar tooth. Computerized tomography examination was made and the calculus was designated to be in the posterior part of the gland. The sialolith was removed under general anesthesia, sialoadenectomy was not performed. At 3 months, 6 months and 1-year follow-up patient did not have any complaints.
Result: We are in the opinion that sialolithotomy should be preferred primarily for large submandibular sialoliths and sialoadenectomy should be considered only if symptoms occur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Submandibuler Bezde Büyük Tükürük Bezi Taşı: Olgu Sunumu ve Sialolitotomi ile Sialoadenektominin Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Giriş ve Amaç: Bu olgu sunumunda submandibular bezinde büyük bir sialolit bulunan hastanın sialolitotomi ile tedavisini sunuyoruz. Büyük submandibular bez sialolitlerinin tedavisinde sialoadenektomi ve sialolitotomi tedavileri tartışılmıştır.
Olgu Sunumu: 49 yaşında erkek hasta mandibular bez taşı olduğunu belirten ultrasonografi raporu ile kliniğimize başvurdu. Alınan ortopantomografta sol mandibula alt kenarında ikinci molar diş hizasında radyoopak lezyon teşhis edildi. Yapılan kompüterize tomografi incelemesinde taşın bezin posterior kısmında lokalize olduğu görüldü. Sialolitotomi genel anestezi altında yapıldı fakat sialoadenektomi uygulanmadı. 3 ay, 6 ay ve 1 yıl takiplerinde herhangi bir komplikasyona rastlanmadı.
Sonuç: Büyük submandibular bez sialolitlerinin tedavisinde sialolitotominin birincil tedavi seçeneği olması gerektiği, sialoadenektominin semptomların devam etmesi durumunda gündeme getirilmesi gerektiği görüşündeyiz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sialolit, Submandibular Bez, Sialoadenektomi, Sialolitotomi

Kaynakça

• Fowell C, MacBean A. Giant salivary calculi of the submandibular gland. Journal of Surgical Case Reports 2012; :6.
• Santos TS, Arau’jo FAC, Frota R, Caubi AF, EDO Silva; Intraoral Approach for Removal of Large Sialolith in Submandibular Gland. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23:1845-1847.
• Liu DG, Zhang ZY, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Yu GY. Diagnosis and management of sialolithiasis with a semirigid endoscope. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; :9-14.
• Graziani F, Vano M, Cei S, Tartaro GP, Mario G. Unusual Asymptomatic Giant Sialolith of the Submandibular Gland: A Clinical Report, The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2006; (3):549-552.
• Wallace E, Tauzin M, Hagan I. et al; Management of giant sialoliths: Review of the literature and preliminary experience with interventional sialendoscopy. Laryngoscope ;120(10):1974-1978.
• Dag A, Ketani MA, Zengingul AI, Ketani S. The effects of Sialoadenectomy and Epidermal Growth Factor on Gingival Tissues in Rats: An ultrastructural Study 2008; 22:1002-1004.
• Jung JH, Hong SO, Noh K, Lee DW; A Large Sialolith on the Parenchyma of the Submandibular Gland: A case report. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2014; 8:525-526
• Walvekar RR, ,Carrau RL, Schaitkin B. Endoscopic sialolith removal: orientation and shape as predictors of success. American Journal of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery 2009; 30:153–156.
• Markou K,Dova S, Krommydas A, Psillas G, Blioskas S, Karkos PD. Giant submandibular gland mucocele as a complication of previous sialolith removal. Am J Otolaryngol ;36(1):114-116.