Afete Hazırlık Perspektifinden Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Psikolojik Sağlamlık, Fiziksel Aktivite ve Afete Müdahale Öz Yeterlik Düzeylerinin İlişkisi

Öz

Amaç: Çalışma, hemşirelik öğrencilerinde psikolojik sağlamlık, fiziksel aktivite ve afete müdahale öz yeterlik düzeylerinin ilişkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma Hemşirelik Bölümü lisans 3. ve 4. sınıflarında öğrenim gören 152 öğrenci üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak bireysel özellikler veri formu, Kısa Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği, Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi Kısa Form (UFAA) ve Afete Müdahale ÖZ-Yeterlik Ölçeği (AMÖYÖ) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan olguların %73’ü kadın ve %27’si erkektir. Olguların yaş ortalaması 22.46±3.901 (min-maks:21-26 yıl) yıl olarak belirlenmiştir. Olguların toplam fiziksel aktivite skorunu 2224.74±2560.249 MET-dk/hafta, KPSÖ’nin toplam puanı ortalaması 17.38±4.96, AMYÖ’nin toplam puanı ortalaması ise 57.73±13.87 olarak belirlenmiştir. Psikolojik sağlamlık ile fiziksel aktivite düzeyi arasında (r=0.203, p<0.05) ve psikolojik sağlamlık ile afete müdahale öz-yeterlik arasında (r=0.196, p<0.05) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönde ilişkiler saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Ulusal ve yerel düzeyde afetlerle mücadelede hemşirelerin ve hemşirelik öğrencilerinin afetlere müdahale öz-yeterlikleri ile psikolojik sağlamlık ve fiziksel aktivitelerini geliştirmeye yönelik uygun hazırlık yapılması önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afet
• Hemşirelik
• Psikolojik Sağlamlık
• Fiziksel Aktivite
• Afete Müdahale

The Relationship Between Psychological Resilience, Physical Activity, and Disaster Response Self Efficacy Levels

Öz

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the relationship between psychological resilience, physical activity, and disaster response self-efficacy levels among nursing students. Material and Methods: The study was conducted on 152 students enrolled in the 3rd and 4th years of the Nursing Department undergraduate program. The data collection instruments included an individual characteristics data form, the Brief Resilience Scale, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF), and the Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale (DRSES). Results: Of the participants, 73.0 % were female and 27.0% were male. The participants' mean age was 22.46±3.901 years (range: 21-26 years). The total physical activity score of the participants was 2224.74±2560.249 MET-min/week, with mean scores of 17.38±4.96 for the Brief Resilience Scale and 57.73±13.87 for the Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale. Statistically significant and positive correlations were found between psychological resilience and physical activity level (r=0.203, p<0.05), as well as between psychological resilience and disaster response self-efficacy (r=0.196, p<0.05). Conclusion: Adequate preparation should be made at the national and local levels to improve the disaster response self-efficacy, psychological resilience, and physical activity of nurses and nursing students in dealing with disasters.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disaster
• Nursing
• Psychological resilience
• physical activity
• disaster response

Kaynakça

1. 1. EM-DAT The International Disaster Database. Disaster in numbers 2022 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.emdat.be/publications
2. 2. Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency in Turkey. Press bulletin about the Earthquake in Kahramanmaraş [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://en.afad.gov.tr/
3. 3. Asian Disaster Reduction Center. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030 [Internet]. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: Geneva, Switzerland; 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf
4. 4. T.C. Başbakanlık Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı (AFAD). Türkiye Afet Müdahale Planı (TAMP) [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/e_Kutuphane/Planlar/TAMP.pdf
5. 5. Kako M, Ranse J, Yamamoto A, Arbon P. What was the role of nurses during the 2011 Great East Earthquake of Japan? An integrative review of the Japanese literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(3):275–9.
6. 6. Hemşirelik Ulusal Çekirdek Eğitim Programı (HUÇEP) 2022 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Ulusal-cekirdek-egitimi-programlari/hemsirelik_cekirdek_egitim_programi.pdf
7. 7. Kamanyire JK, Wesonga R, Achora S, Labrague LL, Malik A, Alshaqsi S, et al. Nursing students’ perceived disaster preparedness and response: Pilot study in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021;21(4):621–5.
8. 8. Çiriş Yildiz C, Yildirim D. The effects of disaster nursing education program on beliefs in general disaster preparedness, disaster response self-efficacy, and psychological resilience in nursing students: A single-blind, randomized controlled study. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2022;43(5):287–91.

9. 9. Uhm D, Jung G, Yun Y, Lee Y, Lim C. Factors affecting the disaster response competency of emergency medical technicians in South Korea. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019;13(4):264–9.
10. 10. Demirbilek Ö, Gökkaya E. Investigation of the relationship between disaster preparedness and psychological resilience in emergency aid and disaster. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim Derg. 2022;11(2):617–24.
11. 11. Stephens TM. Nursing student resilience: A concept clarification. Nurs Forum. 2013;48(2):125–33.
12. 12. Sevin B, Partlak Günüşen N. Hemşirelerin psikolojik dayanıklılığının merhamet yorgunluğu, tükenmişlik ve merhamet memnuniyetini yordayıcı rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi. 2021;14(4):379–86.
13. 13. Xia B, Ma Z, Hu Y. Research on the relationship between physical exercise, psychological flexibility and positive emotion of college students based on computer mathematical model. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1578(1).
14. 14. Hugelius K. COVID-19 resource centre with free information on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. Elsevier Connect. 2020.
15. 15. Hugelius K. Disaster nursing research: A scoping review of the nature, content, and trends of studies published during 2011–2020. Int Emerg Nurs. 2021;59:101107.
16. 16. Deuster PA, Silverman MN. Physical fitness: A pathway to health and resilience. US Army Med Dep J. 2013;Oct:24–35.
17. 17. Doğan T. Kısa Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. J Happiness Well-Being. 2015;3(1):93–102.
18. 18. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194–200.
19. 19. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, İnal İnce D, Boşnak Güçlü M, Karabulut E, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):278–84.
20. 20. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.
21. 21. Koca B, Çağan Ö, Türe A. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale in undergraduate nursing students. Acibadem Univ Saglik Bilim Derg. 2020;11(3):515–21.
22. 22. Li HY, Bi RX, Zhong QL. The development and psychometric testing of a Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;59(June):16–20.
23. 23. Shao AT. Marketing Research: An Aid to Decision Making. Cincinnati, Ohio: South Western College; 2002. p. 53–77.
24. 24. Khairina I, Nelwati, Maisa EA. Self-efficacy and nurses’ disaster competency in disaster preparedness management. Malays J Med Health Sci. 2023;19(3):310–4.
25. 25. Toraman Uysal A, Konal Korkmaz E. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin afete müdahalede öz yeterliliklerinin belirlenmesi. İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim Fakültesi Derg. 2023;8(2):509–14.
26. 26. Bülbül E. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin afete müdahale öz-yeterlilik durumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Emergency. 2021;45(Sep):45–9.
27. 27. Durmuş S, Sarıkahya S, Yorulmaz DS. Hemşire öğrencilerin afete müdahale öz yeterliliğinin değerlendirilmesi: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel çalışma. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Derg. 2023;7:206–15.
28. 28. Ovando RV, Cordero EM, Orozco GL, Cruz CH, Martínez JAA, Estela MAI, et al. Theory of nursing systems and benefits of physical activity. South Florida J Dev. 2023;3(6):6407–17.
29. 29. Fie S, Norman IJ, While AE. The relationship between physicians’ and nurses’ personal physical activity habits and their health-promotion practice: A systematic review. Health Educ J. 2013;72(1):102–19.
30. 30. Department of Health. Physical activity guidelines for (19–64 years) [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213740/dh_128145.pdf
31. 31. Dwyer T. Physical activity as a core component of the nursing curriculum. Evid Based Nurs. 2017;20(2):51.
32. 32. Seçer E, Çakmak Yildizhan Y. The relationship between physical activity levels and psychological resilience of university students. Propósitos y Represent. 2020;8(SPE2).
33. 33. Xu S, Liu Z, Tian S, Ma Z, Jia C, Sun G. Physical activity and resilience among college students: The mediating effects of basic psychological needs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3722.
34. 34. Erkoç B, Danış MZ. Üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik sağlamlık düzeylerinin tespit edilmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2020;4(1):34–42.
35. 35. Gençoğlu C, Namlı S. Spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin psikolojik sağlamlık ve empati düzeyleri/Erzurum Teknik Üniversitesi örneği. Sport Sciences. 2020;15(3):33–43.