SAĞLIKLI GENÇ BİREYLERDE ELİN ANTROPOMETRİK KARAKTERİSTİKLERİ İLE KAVRAMA KUVVETİ VE EL BECERİSİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Year 2023, , 552 - 560, 23.09.2023

Tuba İnce Parpucu , Tahir Keskin , Ayla Günal , Ferdi Başkurt , Zeliha Başkurt

https://doi.org/10.17343/sdutfd.1348704

Abstract

Amaç
Antropometri ve kavrama kuvveti ilişkisi farklı etnik popülasyonlar
arasında saptanmış olsa da çok az sayıdaki
çalışmada bunların performans üzerindeki etkisi
ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışma, el antropometrisinin genç
yetişkinler arasında kavrama kuvveti ve el becerisi ile
ilişkili olduğu hipotezini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapıldı.
Gereç ve Yöntem
Çalışmaya, 18-25 yaş aralığında 197 sağlıklı öğrenci
alındı. Katılımcıların yaş, boy, vücut ağırlığı, cinsiyet
gibi bilgileri içeren sosyo-demografik bilgileri kaydedildi.
El antropometrik ölçümü olarak; el uzunlukları, el
genişlikleri, el spam uzunlukları, parmak uzunlukları
ve avuç içi uzunlukları mezura ile ölçüldü. El kavrama
kuvveti el kavrama dinamometresiyle, el beceri değerlendirmesi
ise Dokuz Delikli Peg Testiyle (DDPT) değerlendirildi.
Bulgular
Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre tüm antropometrik
ölçümlerin ve kavrama kuvveti değerlerinin ve her iki
üst ekstremiteye ait DDPT Testi takma skorlarının erkeklerde
kadınlardan anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu
tespit edildi (p<0,05). Tüm antropometrik ölçümlerin
sol dominant olan kişilerde anlamlı düzeyde yüksek
olduğu belirlendi (p<0,05). Her iki üst ekstremite için
parmak uzunlukları dışındaki diğer tüm antropometrik
ölçümlerin ve kavrama kuvvetinin kilolu bireylerde normal
vücut ağırlıklı bireylere göre anlamlı düzeyde yüksek
olduğu gözlemlendi (p<0,05). Tüm antropometrik
ölçümlerin birbiri ile ve kavrama kuvveti ile pozitif yönde
güçlü (r= 0,50 – 0,74) korelasyon gösterdiği tespit
edildi (p<0,001). Ayrıca sağ üst ekstremite DDPT
skorlarının antropometrik ölçüm değerleri ve kavrama
kuvveti ile pozitif yönde orta düzeyde (r= 0,25 – 0,49)
korelasyon gösterdiği belirlendi (p<0,001).
Sonuç
Çalışmamızda, el antropometrik karakteristikleri ile el
kavrama kuvvetinin ve el becerisinin ilişkili olduğu hipotezi
doğrulanmıştır.

Keywords

El Antropometri, Kavrama Kuvveti, El Becerisi

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTHROPOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HAND AND GRIP STRENGTH AND DEXTERITY IN HEALTHY YOUNG INDIVIDUALS

Abstract

Objective
Although the relationship between anthropometry and
grip strength has been determined between different
ethnic populations, few studies have addressed their
impact on performance. This study was conducted
to evaluate the hypothesis that hand anthropometry
is associated with grip strength and dexterity among
young adults.
Material and Method
197 healthy students between the ages of 18-25 included
in the study. The socio-demographic information
of the participants, including age, height, body weight,
and gender, was recorded. As a hand anthropometric
measurement, hand length, hand width, hand spam
length, finger length, and palm length were measured
with a tape measure. Handgrip strength was evaluated
with a handgrip dynamometer, and dexterity was
evaluated with the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT).
Results
According to the results of our study, it was determined
that all anthropometric measurements and grip
strength values and the NHPT insertion scores of
both upper extremities were significantly higher in
men than in women (p<0.05). All anthropometric measurements
were found to be significantly higher in
left-dominant subjects (p<0.05). It was observed that
all anthropometric measurements and grip strength
for both upper extremities, except finger lengths, were
significantly higher in overweight individuals than in
normal individuals (p<0.05). It was determined that all
anthropometric measurements showed a strong positive
(r=0.50–0.74) correlation with each other and with
grip strength (p<0.001). In addition, it was determined
that the NHPT scores of the right upper extremity
showed a moderate positive (r= 0.25 – 0.49) correlation
with the anthropometric measurement values and
grip strength (p<0.001).
Conclusion
In our study, the hypothesis that hand anthropometric
characteristics are related to hand grip strength and
dexterity has been confirmed.

Keywords

Hand Anthropometri, Grip Strength, Dexterity

Project Number

-

References

• 1. Bhat AK, Jindal R, Acharya AM. The influence of ethnic differences based on upper limb anthropometry on grip and pinch strength. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2021; 21:101504
• 2. Koley SM, Gandhi A. Pal singh: Association of handgrip strength with Heigth, weigth and BMI in boys and girls aged 6–25 years of Amritsar, Panjab, India. Int j biological anthropology. 2008;2(1).
• 3. Zaccagni L, Toselli S, Bramanti B, Gualdi-Russo E, Mongillo J, Rinaldo N. Handgrip strength in young adults: association with anthropometric variables and laterality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:4273
• 4. Alahmari KA, Silvian SP, Reddy RS, Kakaraparthi VN, Ahmad I, Alam MM. Hand grip strength determination for healthy males in Saudi Arabia: A study of the relationship with age, body mass index, hand length and forearm circumference using a handheld dynamometer. J. Int. Med. Res. 2017;45:540–548.
• 5. Massey-Westrop N, Rankin W, Ahern M, Krishnan J, Hearn TC. Measuring grip strength in normal adults: reference ranges and a comparison of electronic and hydraulic instruments. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2004;29:514-519.
• 6. Syddall H, Cooper C, Martin F, Briggs B, Save A. Is grip strength a useful single marker of frailty? Age ageing. 2003;32(6):650- 656.
• 7. Koley SM, Gandhi A. Effect of hand dominance in grip strength in collegiate population of Amritsar, Panjab, India. Anthropologist. 2010;12(1):13–16.
• 8. Rostamzadeh S, Saremi M, Vosoughi S, Bradtmiller B, Janani L, Farshad AA, Taheri F. Analysis of hand-forearm anthropometric components in assessing handgrip and pinch strengths of school-aged children and adolescents: a partial least squares (PLS) approach. BMC Pediatrics. 2021;21:39.
• 9. Nurul Shahida MS, Zawiah S, Case K. The relationship between anthropometry and hand grip strength among elderly Malaysians. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2015;50:17-25.
• 10. Ekşioğlu M. Normative static grip strength of population of Turkey, effects of various factors and a comparison with international norms. Appl Ergon. 2016;52(1):8–17.
• 11. Perissinotto E, Pisent C, Sergi G, Grigoletto F. Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: age and gender differences. Br. J. Nutr.,2002;87(2):177-186.
• 12. Singh AP, Koley S, Sandhu JS. Association of hand grip strength with some anthropometric traits in collegiate population of Amritsar. The Oriental Anthropologist. 2009;9(1):99-110
• 13. Koley S, Singh AP. An association of dominant hand grip strength with some anthropometric variables in Indian collegiate population. Anthropol. Anz. 2009;67:21–8.
• 14. Koley S, Kaur N, Sandhu JS. Association of hand grip strength and some anthropometric traits in female labourers of Jalandhar, Punjab, India. J Life Sci. 2009;1:57–62.
• 15. Hajaghazadeh M, Taghizadeh M, Mohebbi I, Khalkhali H. Hand anthropometric dimensions and strengths in workers: A comparison of three occupations. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf. 2022;32:373–388.
• 16. Aygün N. Obezite tanımı, komplikasyonları, endokrin kontrolü ve beslenme tedavisi. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi. 2014;30(1):45-9.
• 17. Staff of Antropology Research Project. Anthropometric Source Book: NASA Reference Publication 1024. Yellow Springs, Ohio: NASA; 1978.
• 18. Peebles L, Norris B. Adultdata: The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements: Data for Design Safety. London: DTI; 1998.
• 19. Shechtman O, Gestewitz L, Kimble C. Reliability and validity of the DynEx dynamometer. J Hand Ther. 2005; 18(3): 339-347.
• 20. Grice KO, Vogel KA, Le V, Mitchell A, Muniz S, Vollmer MA. Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 2003; 57(5): 570-573.
• 21. Hu H, Li Z, Yan J, Wang X, Xiao H, Duan J, et al. Anthropometric measurement of the Chinese elderly living in the Beijing area. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(4):303-311.
• 22. Gnaneswaran V, Bishu RR. Anthropometry and hand performance evaluation of minority population. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2011; 41: 661-670.
• 23. Yücel H, Kayıhan H. Elin fiziksel özelliklerinin el fonksiyonu üzerine etkileri. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2008; 19(1):24-29.
• 24. Peebles L, Norris B. Filling ‘gaps’ in strength data for design. Applied Ergonomics. 2003;34:73-88.
• 25. Shrestha P, Mansur Dİ, Maskey S, Shrestha S, Jha RK. Correlation between hand grip strength and anthropometric measurement among undergraduate medical students. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College. 2023;12(1):43
• 26. Koley S, Kaur SP. Correlations of Handgrip Strength with Selected Hand-Arm-Anthropometric Variables in Indian Inter- university Female Volleyball Players. Asian J Sports Med. 2011;2(4): 220–226.
• 27. Pizzigalli L, Cremasco MM, Torre AL, Rainoldi A, Benis R. Hand grip strength and anthropometric characteristics in Italian female national basketball teams. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2016; 57(5):521-528.
• 28. Rawat S, Varte LR, Singh IJ, Choudhary S, Singh S. Anthropometry based prediction of dominant hand grip strength in Indian office going females. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;7(6):58-62.
• 29. Nicolay CW, Walker AL. Grip strength and endurance: influence of anthropometric variation, hand dimention and gender. Int J Ind Ergon. 2005;35:605–618.
• 30. Fallahi AA, Jadidian AA. The effect of hand dimensions, hand shape and some anthropometric characteristics on handgrip strength in male grip athletes and non-athletes. Journal of Human Kinetic. 2011;29:151-159.
• 31. Rostamzadeh S, Saremi M, Tabatabaei S. Normative hand grip strength and prediction models for Iranian office employees. Work. 2019;62(2):233–241.
• 32. Rostamzadeh S, Saremi M, Bradtmiller B. Age, gender and side- stratified grip strength norms and related socio-demographic factors for 20–80 years Iranian healthy population: Comparison with consolidated and international norms. Int J Ind Ergon. 2020;80:103003.
• 33. Visnapuu M, Jürimäe T. Handgrip strength and hand dimensions in young handball and basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(3):923–9.
• 34. Tonak HA, Kara ÖK, Şahin S. Correlation of hand functionality and grip strengths with anthropometric measurements. Work. 2021;69(1):187-195.