The Impact of ChatGPT on Language Assessment in ELT

Öz

This descriptive study scrutinizes the impact of ChatGPT on English Language Teaching (ELT) assessment and examines the extent to which it presents both opportunities and threats. A systematic review including 963 academic publications published between December 2023 and December 2024 was carried out so as to see the opportunities and threats. Out of 963 publications, the most relevant 150 articles were filtered to address the use of ChatGPT in online language assessment in ELT. Document analysis and thematic coding were utilized and 12 recurring themes were identified, including six classified opportunities and six threats. The findings reveal that six opportunities identified by ChatGPT were of automated grading, personalized feedback, practice partner simulation in speaking and writing, assessment item generation, engagement and motivation and multimodal & inclusive assessment, and six threats were academic dishonesty, validity & reliability concerns, algorithmic bias, overdependence & de-skilling, data privacy & institutional gaps, and adaptability. This study determines that ChatGPT's utilization in ELT assessment is dual-promising and problematic. The findings suggest this duality could be solved by pedagogical guidelines, interdisciplinary collaboration, curriculum calibration and ethical frameworks to harness its potential while safeguarding educational integrity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ChatGPT
• Online ELT assessment
• Artificial intelligence
• Opportunities
• Threats

Etik Beyan

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The author declares that there is no conflict of interest in this study. RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS STATEMENT The author declares that research and publication ethics are followed in this study. AUTHOR LIABILITY STATEMENT The author declares that she has done every step of this work herself. GENERATIVE AI USE DECLARATION The author declares that GenAI tools were not utilized in this study.

Kaynakça

1. Abduljawad, S. A. (2024). Investigating the impact of ChatGPT as an AI tool on ESL writing: Prospects and challenges in Saudi Arabian higher education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.367276
2. Alshahrani, H. A. A., & Alrodhan, W. A. (2025). Security and Privacy of ChatGPT: Proposed Enhancements. IJCSNS, 25(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2025.25.2.3
3. Adel, A., Ahsan, A., & Davison, C. (2024). ChatGPT promises and challenges in education: Computational and ethical perspectives. Education Sciences, 14(8), 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080814
4. Amsel, A. (1992). Frustration theory: An analysis of dispositional learning and memory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571193
5. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
6. Baskara, F. R., Puri, A. D., & Wardhani, A. R. (2023). ChatGPT and the pedagogical challenge: Unveiling the impact on early-Career academics in higher education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v5i3.22966
7. Biberman-Shalev, L. (2025). Prompting Theory into Practice: Utilizing ChatGPT-4 in a Curriculum Planning Course. Education Sciences, 15(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020196
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

9. Bucol, J. L., & Sangkawong, N. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT as a writing assessment tool. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(3), 867-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2363901
10. Cao, S., & Zhong, L. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT-based feedback compared with teacher feedback and self-feedback: Evidence from Chinese to English translation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.01645
11. Calvo, R. A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2010). Affect detection: An interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.1
12. Castillo, V. S., & Maldonado, E. J. (2025, May). ChatGPT as an assessment and feedback tool in higher education: Opportunities, challenges and ethics. In International Symposium on Generative AI and Education (pp. 218-229). Springer Nature Switzerland.
13. Celik, B., Yildiz, Y., & Kara, S. (2025). Using ChatGPT as a virtual speaking tutor to boost EFL learners’ speaking self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 102418-102418. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v8n1.102418
14. Chang, C. I., Choi, W. C., & Choi, I. C. (2024, December). Challenges and limitations of using artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) with ChatGPT in programming curriculum: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2024 7th Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference (pp. 372-378).
15. Chen, H., Yuan, K., Huang, Y., Guo, L., Wang, Y., & Chen, J. (2023). Feedback is all you need: from ChatGPT to autonomous driving. Science China Information Sciences, 66(6), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-023-3740-x
16. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
17. Çelik, F., Yangın Ersanlı, C., & Arslanbay, G. (2024). Does AI simplification of authentic blog texts improve reading comprehension, inferencing, and anxiety? A one-shot intervention in Turkish EFL context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7779
18. Dizon, G. (2024). ChatGPT as a tool for self-directed foreign language learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2413406
19. D’Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2012). Language and discourse are powerful signals of student emotions during tutoring. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(4), 304–317. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2012.10
20. Edelenbos, P., & Vinjé, M. P. (2000). The assessment of a foreign language at the end of primary (elementary) education. Language testing, 17(2), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700203 Fletcher, J. D., Tobias, S., & Wisher, R. A. (2011). Learning anytime, anywhere: Advanced distributed learning and the changing face of education. Educational Technology, 51(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07300034
21. Fryer, L. K., & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44039
22. Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. D. (2014). The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12084
23. Guilherme, A. (2019). AI and education: The importance of teacher and student relations. AI & Society, 34(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0693-8
24. Harahap, D. S. (2024). Implementation of ChatGPT to improve students' critical thinking abilities. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Humanities, 1(2), 33-39.
25. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
26. Ivanov, S. (2023). The dark side of artificial intelligence in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 43(15–16), 1055–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2258799
27. Jenkins, J., & Leung, C. (2019). From mythical ‘standard’ to standard reality: The need for alternatives to standardized English language tests. Language Teaching, 52(1), 86-110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000307
28. Jiwon, L., Minsong, S., Juyeon, J., & Watson, M. (2025). Determining authenticity in the era of ChatGPT. Humanising Language Teaching, 27(1). https://www.hltmag.co.uk/feb25/determining-authenticity
29. Jmaiel, H. A., Abukhait, R. O., Mohamed, A. M., Shaaban, T. S., Al-khresheh, M. H., & AL-Qadri, A. H. (2025). The role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL students’ ESP writing skills: an experimental study of gender and major differences. Discover Education, 4(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00700-6
30. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
31. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Freeman, D. (2008). Language moves: The place of “foreign” languages in classroom teaching and learning. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 147-186. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309426
32. Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2003). Designing social presence of social actors in human–computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 289–296). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642662
33. Li, B., Bonk, C. J., Wang, C., & Kou, X. (2024). Reconceptualizing self-directed learning in the era of generative AI: An exploratory analysis of language learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1489-1503. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3386098
34. Liang, W., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the use of ChatGPT to foster EFL learners’ critical thinking skills from a post-humanist perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101645
35. Looi, J. C., Anderson, K., Bonner, D., Maguire, P., & Reay, R. (2020). Student evaluations of teaching (SET): implications for medical education in psychiatry and an approach to evaluating SET and student performance. Australasian Psychiatry, 28(4), 463-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856220924327
36. Luu, T. M. V., & Doan, Q. V. (2025). ChatGPT’s impact on listening comprehension: Perspectives from Vietnamese EFL university learners. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 26(3), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.54855/callej.252633
37. MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relationship to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41(4), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00691.x
38. Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
39. McNamara, T. F. (2000). Language testing. Oxford University Press.
40. Melisa, R., Ashadi, A., Triastuti, A., Hidayati, S., Salido, A., Ero, P. E. L., Marlini, C., Zefrin, Z., & Al Fuad, Z. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of AI: A systematic review of AI's effects on higher education. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025031. https://doi.org/110.22521/edupij.2025.14.31
41. Mompean, J. A. (2024). ChatGPT for L2 pronunciation teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 78(4), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccae050
42. Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639667
43. Milakis, E. D., Argyrakou, C. C., Melidis, A., & Vrettaros, J. (2025). ChatGPT and AI chatbots in education: An umbrella review of systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and meta-analyses. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 19, 100-119. https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2025.19.11
44. Navigli, R., Conia, S., & Ross, B. (2023). Biases in large language models: Origins, inventory, and discussion. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality, 15(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597307
45. Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P.T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
46. Open AI (2025). ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue. https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/
47. Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
48. Pratiwi, N., Efendy, A. G., Rini, H. C., & Ahmed, N. A. (2024). Speaking practice using ChatGPT’s voice conversation: A review on potentials and concerns. Journal of Language Intelligence and Culture, 6(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.35719/jlic.v6i1.149
49. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/2018.0072
50. Rane, N. (2023). Enhancing the Quality of Teaching and Learning through ChatGPT and Similar Large Language Models: Challenges, Future Prospects, and Ethical Considerations in Education (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4599104). https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v5i1.1000
51. Ressel, J., Völler, M., Murphy, F., & Mullins, M. (2024). Addressing the notion of trust around ChatGPT in the high-stakes use case of insurance. Technology in Society, 78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102644
52. Tiffin‐Richards, S. P., Anand Pant, H., & Köller, O. (2013). Setting standards for English foreign language assessment: Methodology, validation, and a degree of arbitrariness. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12008
53. Turnitin. (2024). AI writing detection and academic integrity: Research insights. https://www.turnitin.com/research/ai-writing-detection-report
54. Volante, L., & DeLuca, C. (2024). Large-scale testing in the face of AI. Assessment & Development Matters, 16(1), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsadm.2024.16.1.48
55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
56. Wang, Y., Pan, Y., Yan, M., Su, Z., & Luan, T. H. (2023). A survey on ChatGPT: AI–generated contents, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 4, 280-302. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2023.3300321
57. Wu, X., Duan, R., & Ni, J. (2024). Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT. Journal of Information and Intelligence, 2(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiixd.2023.10.007
58. Yıldız, C. (2024). ChatGPT integration in EFL education: A path to enhanced speaking self-efficacy. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 18(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13861137
59. Yue, Y., Liu, D., Lv, Y., Hao, J., & Cui, P. (2025). A Practical Guide and Assessment on Using ChatGPT to Conduct Grounded Theory: Tutorial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e70122. https://doi.org/10.2196/70122
60. Zuckerman, M., Flood, R., Tan, R. J., Kelp, N., Ecker, D. J., Menke, J., & Lockspeiser, T. (2023). ChatGPT for assessment writing. Medical Teacher, 45(11), 1224-1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249239