Investigating University Students’ Perceptions and Experiences with AI-Assisted English Language Learning

Öz

This qualitative study examines first-year university students’ perceptions and experiences of AI-assisted English language learning at a state university in Türkiye. Thirteen students who had prior experience with AI tools participated in the study. Data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews lasting about 30–40 minutes. Thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase process, was used to analyze the data. The analysis revealed three main themes: AI engagement practices, perceived benefits, and challenges. Students stated that AI tools supported autonomous learning by aiding planning, revision, and progress tracking. Benefits included immediate feedback, flexible practice options, increased motivation, and a boost in confidence. Challenges included overreliance on AI, inconsistent feedback, limited human interaction, and cost-related access barriers. The results suggest that AI-assisted tools can effectively enhance language learning and promote learner independence; however, careful guidance and integration are essential to mitigate potential challenges. Recommendations for educators and curriculum developers are presented, highlighting strategies to maximize the use of AI in higher-education language learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial intelligence
• Language learning
• Higher education
• Learner experiences

Öğrencilerin Yapay Zeka Destekli İngilizce Dil Öğrenimine İlişkin Algı ve Deneyimlerini İnceleme: Üniversite Öğrencilerinden Elde Edilen Bulgular

Öz

Bu nitel araştırma, Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinde birinci sınıf üniversite öğrencilerinin yapay zeka (YZ) destekli İngilizce öğrenimine ilişkin algılarını ve deneyimlerini incelemektedir. Araştırmaya, daha önce yapay zeka araçlarını kullanmış olan on üç öğrenci katılmıştır. Veriler, yaklaşık 30–40 dakika süren yüz yüze yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde Braun ve Clarke’ın (2006) altı aşamalı sürecini izleyen tematik analiz kullanılmıştır. Analiz, üç ana tema ortaya çıkarmıştır: YZ kullanımı, algılanan faydalar ve zorluklar. Öğrenciler, YZ araçlarının planlama, tekrar ve ilerleme takibine yardımcı olarak özerk öğrenmeyi desteklediğini belirtmiştir. Faydalar arasında anında geri bildirim, esnek alıştırma seçenekleri, artan motivasyon ve özgüven artışı yer almaktadır. Zorluklar arasında ise YZ araçlarına aşırı bağımlılık, tutarsız geri bildirim, sınırlı insan etkileşimi ve maliyetle ilgili erişim engelleri gösterilmiştir. Sonuçlar, YZ destekli araçların dil öğrenimini etkili bir şekilde geliştirebileceğini ve öğrenenlerin bağımsızlığını artırabileceğini göstermektedir; ancak, olası zorlukları azaltmak için dikkatli rehberlik ve entegrasyon şarttır. Yükseköğretimde dil öğreniminde YZ kullanımını en üst düzeye çıkarmak için eğitimciler ve müfredat geliştiriciler için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial intelligence
• Language learning
• Higher education
• Learner experiences

Kaynakça

1. Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218
2. Almanea, M. (2024). Instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on using ChatGPT in English as a foreign language courses and its effect on academic integrity. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2410158
3. Arslan, S. (2025). English-as-a-foreign-language university instructors' perceptions of integrating artificial intelligence: A Turkish perspective. System, 131, 103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103680
4. Bateman, T. (2025). Teacher perspectives of ChatGPT as a pedagogical tool in the K-12 setting: a case study. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2024-0042
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
6. Chen, Z., Wei, W., & Zou, D. (2025). Generative AI technology and language learning: global language learners’ responses to ChatGPT videos in social media. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2511248
7. Chen, Y., Zhi, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2025). Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Into the English as a Foreign Language Classroom: Exploring Its Impact on Students' Achievement Emotions and Willingness to Communicate (WTC). European Journal of Education, 60(3), e70157. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70157
8. Chounta, I. A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of Artificial Intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 725-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5

9. Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.
10. Dai, K., & Liu, Q. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in English as a foreign language (EFL) classes: Challenges and opportunities in the spotlight. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108354
11. Derakhshan, A., & Ghiasvand, F. (2024). Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research‐active EFL teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1246-1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12561
12. Ding, D., & Yusof, M. B. (2025). Investigating the role of AI-powered conversation bots in enhancing L2 speaking skills and reducing speaking anxiety: a mixed methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05550-z
13. Dou, W., & Sun, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence tools: Improvement of motivation, psychological well-being, and psychological capital of EFL learners: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 92, 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102169
14. Duong, T. N. A., & Chen, H. L. (2025). An AI chatbot for EFL writing: Students’ usage tendencies, writing performance, and perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(2), 406-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241312363
15. El Shazly, R. (2021). Effects of artificial intelligence on English speaking anxiety and speaking performance: A case study. Expert Systems, 38(3), e12667. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12667
16. Fajt, B., & Schiller, E. (2025). ChatGPT in academia: University students’ attitudes towards the use of ChatGPT and plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1363–1382 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09603-5
17. Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103254
18. Hartono, W. J., Nurfitri, N., Ridwan, R., Kase, E. B., Lake, F., & Zebua, R. S. Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions in English language teaching: Teachers-students perceptions and experiences. Journal on Education, 6(1), 1452-1461. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3101
19. Hsu, T. C., Chang, C., & Jen, T. H. (2024). Artificial Intelligence image recognition using self-regulation learning strategies: effects on vocabulary acquisition, learning anxiety, and learning behaviours of English language learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 3060–3078. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2165508
20. Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Ozek Gunyel, F., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024). Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19343-19366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6
21. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Kasneci, E., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A. … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
22. Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Su, F. (2025). Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners' experiences and perceptions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100371
23. Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2025). Enhancing the emotional aspects of language education through generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): A qualitative investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 167, 108600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108600
24. Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2025). Learner perceptions of artificial intelligence-generated pedagogical agents in language learning videos: Embodiment effects on technology acceptance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1606-1627. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10447318.2024.2359222
25. Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Mahmud, M. M. (2025). Exploring learners’ experiences and perceptions of ChatGPT as a learning tool in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 917-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13065-4
26. Nugroho, A., Putro, N. H. P. S., Syamsi, K., Mutiaraningrum, I., & Wulandari, F. D. (2024). Teacher’s experience using ChatGPT in language teaching: An exploratory study. Computers in the Schools. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2441161
27. Özer-Altınkaya, Z., & Yetkin, R. (2025). Exploring pre-service English language teachers’ readiness for AI-integrated language instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 20(4), 584-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2025.2451299
28. Shafiee Rad, H. (2024). Revolutionizing L2 speaking proficiency, willingness to communicate, and perceptions through artificial intelligence: A case of Speeko application. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(4), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2309539
29. Slamet, J. (2024). Potential of ChatGPT as a digital language learning assistant: EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00143-2
30. Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
31. Wang, Y. (2025). Reducing anxiety, promoting enjoyment and enhancing overall English proficiency: The impact of AI‐assisted language learning in Chinese EFL contexts. British Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4187
32. Wang, Y., & Xue, L. (2024). Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: An intervention study. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108353
33. Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1261955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
34. Xin, Z., & Derakhshan, A. (2025). From excitement to anxiety: Exploring English as a foreign language learners' emotional experiences in the artificial intelligence‐powered classrooms. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108337
35. Xu, T., & Wang, H. (2024). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on English language learning achievement. System, 125, 103428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103428
36. Yang, L., & Zhao, S. (2024). AI-induced emotions in L2 education: Exploring EFL students’ perceived emotions and regulation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108337
37. Yuan, Y. (2023). An empirical study of the efficacy of AI chatbots for English as a foreign language learning in primary education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6774–6789. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2282112
38. Yuan, L., & Liu, X. (2025). The effect of artificial intelligence tools on EFL learners’ engagement, enjoyment, and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, 108474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108474
39. Zhang, W., Li, A.W. & Wu, C. (2025). University students’ perceptions of using generative AI in translation practices. Instructional Science, 53, 633–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09705-y
40. Zhang, Y. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Second Language Acquisition: Bridging Gaps in English Education. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 19(1), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15228327
41. Zhao, D. (2025). The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: An analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8055-8086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5
42. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice, (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford Press.
43. Zou, B., Liviero, S., Ma, Q., Zhang, W., Du, Y., & Xing, P. (2024). Exploring EFL learners’ perceived promise and limitations of using an artificial intelligence speech evaluation system for speaking practice. System, 126, 103497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103497
44. Zou, B., Lyu, Q., Han, Y., Li, Z., & Zhang, W. (2025). Exploring students’ acceptance of an artificial intelligence speech evaluation program for EFL speaking practice: an application of the Integrated Model of Technology Acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(5-6), 1366-1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2278608