RESİPROKAL HAREKET İLE KULLANILAN ISIL İŞLEM GÖRMÜŞ TEK EĞE NİKEL TİTANYUM SİSTEMLERİN VÜCUT SICAKLIĞINDA DÖNGÜSEL YORGUNLUK DİRENÇLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 658 - 664, 31.12.2021

Gözde Baş Elçin Yüzgüleç Cangül Keskin Uğur İnan Ali Keleş

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.760048

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue ve North Profa RC Blue nikel titanyum (NiTi) tek eğe döner sistemlerin vücut sıcaklığında döngüsel yorgunluğa bağlı kırılma dirençlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue ve North Profa RC Blue döner eğe sistemlerinin her birinden on ikişer adet kullanıldı. Tüm eğeler statik model döngüsel yorgunluk deney düzeneğinde, 60°’lik kurvatür açısına, 5 mm kurvatür yarıçapına ve 1,4 mm kanal iç çapına sahip seramik yapay kanallarda ve 37°C’de kırılıncaya kadar kullanıldı. Eğelerin kırılma zamanı dijital kronometre ile kaydedildi ve kırılıncaya kadarki tur sayıları hesaplandı. Normal dağılım göstermediği saptanan veriler Kruskal-Wallis H testi ile analiz edildi. Tahmini sağlam kalma oranının belirlenmesi için Weibull analizi yapıldı.
Bulgular: North Profa RC Blue grubu ile Reciproc Blue grubu arasında ve Reciproc Blue grubu ile WaveOne Gold grubu arasında döngüsel yorgunluk direnci bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark görülmedi (p> 0.05). North Profa RC Blue eğelerin döngüsel yorgunluk direnci WaveOne Gold eğelerden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu (p <0.05). Kırık yüzeylerden alınan SEM görüntüleri incelenerek aletlerin döngüsel yorgunluk sonucunda kırıldığı doğrulandı.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmada, North Profa RC Blue ve Reciproc Blue eğelerin döngüsel yorgunluk dirençleri arasında fark bulunmazken, WaveOne Gold eğelerin döngüsel yorgunluk direnci North Profa RC Blue eğelerden daha düşük bulundu.

Anahtar Kelimeler

North Profa, Reciproc Blue, Seramik kanal, Taramalı elektron mikroskobu, WaveOne Gold

Kaynakça

• 1. Pruett J P, Clement D J,Carnes Jr D L. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997; 23 (2): 77-85.
• 2. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S, Plotino G, Grande N, Rapisarda E,La Rosa G. Influence of cyclic torsional preloading on cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel–titanium instruments. Int Endod J 2015; 48 (11): 1043-50.
• 3. Sattapan B, Nervo G J, Palamara J E,Messer H H. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000; 26 (3): 161-65.
• 4. Shen Y, Cheung G S-p, Bian Z,Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006; 32 (1): 61-65.
• 5. Cheung G S. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2009; 16 (1): 1-26.
• 6. Plotino G, Grande N M, Mercade Bellido M, Testarelli L,Gambarini G. Influence of Temperature on Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal Rotary Files. J Endod 2017; 43 (2): 200-02.
• 7. Plotino G, Grande N M, Cotti E, Testarelli L,Gambarini G. Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2014; 40 (9): 1451-53.
• 8. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008; 41 (4): 339-44.
• 9. You S-Y, Bae K-S, Baek S-H, Kum K-Y, Shon W-J,Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010; 36 (12): 1991-94.
• 10. De‐Deus G, Moreira E, Lopes H,Elias C. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010; 43 (12): 1063-68.
• 11. Pedullà E, Grande N M, Plotino G, Gambarini G,Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013; 39 (2): 258-61.
• 12. Alcalde M P, Duarte M A H, Bramante C M, de Vasconselos B C, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J M, Pinto J C, Só M V R,Vivan R R. Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments. Clin Oral Investig 20171-7.
• 13. Van der Vyver P J,Vorster M. WaveOne® Gold reciprocating instruments: Clinical application in the private practice: Part 1. International Dentistry African Edition 2017; 7 (4): 6-19.
• 14. Adıgüzel M,Capar I D. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold small, primary, and large instruments. J Endod 2017; 43 (4): 623-27.
• 15. Al-Huwaizi H. Evaluation of the Cyclic Fatigue of Wave One Gold and Reciproc Blue using Different Irrigating Medium. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2018; 7 (1): 27-31.
• 16. Gündoğar M,Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne gold, and Reciproc blue nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2017; 43 (7): 1192-96.
• 17. Keskin C, İnan U, Demiral M,Keleş A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22 (9): 3007-12.
• 18. Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Alsharekh H, Almuzaini E, Alzahrani S,Jamleh A. Effects of sodium hypochlorite concentration and temperature on the cyclic fatigue resistance of heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2018; 44 (10): 1563-66.
• 19. Ertuğrul İ F,Orhan E O. Cyclic fatigue and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy examination of the novel ROTATE instrument. Microsc Res Tech 2019;82: 2042-8.
• 20. Wan J, Rasimick B J, Musikant B L,Deutsch A S. A comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary nickel‐titanium instruments. Aust Endod J 2011; 37 (3): 122-7.
• 21. Huang X, Shen Y, Wei X,Haapasalo M. Fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments exposed to high-concentration hypochlorite. J Endod 2017; 43 (11): 1847-51.
• 22. de Vasconcelos R A, Murphy S, Carvalho C A, Govindjee R G, Govindjee S,Peters O A. Evidence for Reduced Fatigue Resistance of Contemporary Rotary Instruments Exposed to Body Temperature. J Endod 2016; 42 (5): 782-7.
• 23. Dosanjh A, Paurazas S,Askar M. The Effect of Temperature on Cyclic Fatigue of Nickel-titanium Rotary Endodontic Instruments. J Endod 2017; 43 (5): 823-26.
• 24. Jamleh A, Yahata Y, Ebihara A, Atmeh A R, Bakhsh T,Suda H. Performance of NiTi endodontic instrument under different temperatures. Odontology 2016; 104 (3): 324-28.
• 25. Bonaccorso A, Tripi T R, Rondelli G, Condorelli G G, Cantatore G,Schäfer E. Pitting corrosion resistance of nickel–titanium rotary instruments with different surface treatments in seventeen percent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and sodium chloride solutions. J Endod 2008; 34 (2): 208-11.
• 26. Shen Y, Zhou H-m, Zheng Y-f, Peng B,Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod2013; 39 (2): 163-72.
• 27. Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Hecksher F, Dos Santos Oliviera MRS, Dos Santos Antunes H, Moreira EJL. Cyclic fatigue using severely curved canals and torsional resistance of thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 2633-8.
• 28. Grande N, Plotino G, Pecci R, Bedini R, Malagnino V,Somma F. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three‐dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel–titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J 2006; 39 (10): 755-63.
• 29. Tripi T R, Bonaccorso A,Condorelli G G. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102 (4): e106-e14.
• 30. Cheung G, Zhang E,Zheng Y. A numerical method for predicting the bending fatigue life of NiTi and stainless steel root canal instruments. Int Endod J 2011; 44 (4): 357-61.
• 31. Plotino G, Grande N, Testarelli L,Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012; 45 (7): 614-18.