Farklı adeziv uygulama tekniklerinin dentine mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımlarının değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 210 - 217, 15.06.2023

Gülşah Yenier Yurdagüven , Berna Tarım

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1235999

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, basitleştirilmiş adeziv sistemlerde farklı adeziv uygulama tekniklerinin dentine olan mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımına (μTBS) etkisini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Yetmiş iki adet çekilmiş çürüksüz insan üçüncü büyük azı dişi rastgele 18 gruba ayrıldı (n=4). Dentin yüzeyleri #600-grit silikon-karbit kağıt ile cilalandı. Kontrol grubunu Clearfil SE Bond [SE] (Kuraray), deney gruplarını iki aşamalı etch&rinse Adper Single Bond2 [SB] (3M ESPE) ve tek aşamalı self-etch Clearfil S3 Bond [S3] (Kuraray) oluşturdu. Test edilen adezivler, üretici firmanın talimatları [Kontrol] veya %2 Klorheksidin ile [CHX], veya iki kat adeziv uygulaması ile [x2K] veya ilave hidrofobik reçine tabaka [HR] ile uygulandı. Kompozit blok (Filtek Ultimate, 3M ESPE) tabaklama yöntemiyle oluşturuldu ve distile suda bekletildi (24 saat/37°C). 1mm2 reçine-dentin çubuklarına (Isomet) ayrılarak hemen [24sa] veya 37°C’de altı ay [6.ay] suda bekletildikten sonra μTBS testine tabi tutuldu (Bisco) (Çapraz kafa hızı 0.5 mm/dk). Veriler Three-way ANOVA ve post-hoc Tukey testleri kullanılarak analiz edildi (p<0.05).
Bulgular: Dentine μTBS değerleri; adeziv sisteme (p:0.001), adeziv uygulama tekniklerine (p:0.001), zamana (p:0.001) göre anlamlı farklılık göstermiştir. SE-Kontrol en yüksek μTBS gösterirken (p:0.001), SB-Kontrol ve S3-Kontrol arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmamaktadır (p>0.05). Tüm grupların 6.ay µTBS değerleri anlamlı düzeyde azalmıştır (p<0.01). HR ve x2K, CHX ve Kontrol gruplarından anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek μTBS sergilerken (p<0.01), CHX ve Kontrol arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Adezivler karşılaştırıldığında 6.ayda, x2K ve HR uygulaması S3’de anlamlı düzeyde yüksektir (p<0.01).
Sonuçlar: HR ve x2K dentine μTBS değerlerini arttırırken; CHX ile anlamlı düzeyde bir artış gözlenmemiştir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Dental adezivler, dentin, dentin yapıştırma ajanları, klorheksidin, uzun ömürlülük

Anahtar Kelimeler

dental adezivler, dentin, dentin yapıştırma ajanları, klorheksidin, uzun ömürlülük

Destekleyen Kurum

İstanbul Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Proje Numarası

40735

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmayı destekleyen İstanbul Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi' ne (Proje No: 40735) teşekkür ederiz.

Evaluation of different adhesive applications on dentine microtensile bond strength

Öz

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different adhesive applications on dentine microtensile bond strength (μTBS) in simplified adhesive systems.
Methods: Seventy-two extracted non-carious human third molars were randomly divided 18 groups (n=4). Dentin surfaces were polished with #600-grit silicon-carbide paper. Two-step etch&rinse Adper Single Bond2 [SB](3M ESPE) and one-step self-etch Clearfil S3 Bond [S3](Kuraray) were tested, two-step self-etch Clearfil SE Bond [SE](Kuraray) was used as control. The tested adhesives were applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions [MI] or with 2% Chlorhexidine [CHX] or double application of the adhesive [DA] or with hydrophobic resin layer [HR]. Composite build-up (Filtek Ultimate,3MESPE) was restored incrementally and stored in distilled water (24h/37°C). Teeth were sectioned as 1mm2 resin-dentin sticks (Isomet) and subjected to μTBS test (Bisco) immediately [24h] or after six months of water-storage [6M] (Crosshead speed:0.5mm/min.) Data were analyzed by Three-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s tests (p<0.05).
Results: The dentine µTBS was significantly influenced by the adhesive system (p:0.001), adhesive applications (p:0.001), and storage time (p:0.001). The highest μTBS was found in SE-MI (p<0.05), while the interaction between SB-MI and S3-MI was not significant (p>0.05). The µTBS of all groups decreased significantly at 6M (p<0.01). HR and DA showed significantly higher μTBS than CHX and MI (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between CHX and MI (p>0.05). When adhesives were compared, DA and HR were significantly higher μTBS in S3 (p<0.01).
Conclusion: HR and DA improved the μTBS while no significant enhancement was observed by CHX.
Keywords: Chlorhexidine, dental adhesives, dentin, dentin bonding agents, longevity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

chlorhexidine, dental adhesives, dentin, dentin bonding agents, longevity

Proje Numarası

40735

Kaynakça

• 1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Journal of Dental Research 1955; 34(6): 849-853.
• 2. Swift Jr EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence International (Berlin, Germany: 1985), 1995; 26(2): 95-110.
• 3. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding—Variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dental Materials 2010; 26(2): e24-e37.
• 4. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dental Materials 2011: 27(1), 17-28.
• 5. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dental Materials 2011; 27(1): 1-16.
• 6. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1982; 16(3): 265-273.
• 7. Sano H. Microtensile testing, nanoleakage, and biodegradation of resin-dentin bonds. Journal of Dental Research 2006; 85(1): 11-14.
• 8. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dental Materials 2008; 24(1), 90-101.
• 9. Hashimoto M. A Review—Micromorphological evidence of degradation in resin dentin bonds and potential preventional solutions. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2010; 92(1): 268-280.
• 10. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Operative Dentistry 2008; 28(3): 215-235.
• 11. Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Grande RHM, et al. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin?. Journal of Dentistry 2008; 36(5): 309-315.
• 12. Reis AF, Carrilho MR, Ghaname E, Pereira PN, Giannini M, Nikaido T, et al. Effects of water-storage on the physical and ultramorphological features of adhesives and primer/adhesive mixtures. Dental Materials Journal 2010; 29(6): 697-705.
• 13. Loguercio AD, Mânica D, Ferneda F, Zander-Grande C, Amaral R, Stanislawczuk R, et al. A randomized clinical evaluation of a one-and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months. Operative Dentistry 2010; 35(3): 265-272.
• 14. Hashimoto M, Nagano F, Endo K, Ohno H. A review: biodegradation of resin–dentin bonds. Japanese Dental Science Review 2011; 47(1): 5-12.
• 15. Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 2013; 25(4): 219-241.
• 16. Reis A, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Loguercio AD. Overview of clinical alternatives to minimize the degradation of the resin-dentin bonds. Operative Dentistry 2013; 38(4): E103-E127.
• 17. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. Journal of Dental Research 2000; 79(6): 1385-1391.
• 18. De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, et al. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. Journal of Dental Research 2012; 91(4): 351-357.
• 19. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dental Materials 2010; 26(2): e78-e93.
• 20. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2009;11(3): 175-190.
• 21. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Mine A, Cardoso MV, Peumans M,Van Meerbeek B. Filler debonding & subhybrid-layer failures in self-etch adhesives. Journal of Dental Research 2010; 89(10): 1045-1050.
• 22. De Munck J, Mine A, Van den Steen PE, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Opdenakker G, et al. Enzymatic degradation of adhesive–dentin interfaces produced by mild self‐etch adhesives. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2010;118(5): 494-501.
• 23. Skovron L, Kogeo D, Gordillo LAA, Meier MM, Gomes OM, Reis A, et al. Effects of immersion time and frequency of water exchange on durability of etch‐and‐rinse adhesive. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2010; 95(2): 339-346.
• 24. Zander-Grande C, Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Martins GC, Gomes OM, Reis A. The effect of 6-month water storage on the bond strength of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. American Journal of Dentistry 2011; 24(4): 239-244.
• 25. Feitosa VP, Leme AA, Sauro S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Watson TF, Sinhoreti MA, et al. Hydrolytic degradation of the resin–dentine interface induced by the simulated pulpal pressure, direct and indirect water ageing. Journal of Dentistry 2012; 40(12), 1134-1143
• 26. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes.Dental Materials 2010; 26(2): e100-e121.
• 27. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Tay FR, Kaga M, Kudou Y. Micromorphological changes in resin dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 2002; 63(3):306-311.
• 28. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BYONG, Carvalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. American Journal of Dentistry 2004;17(4): 271-278.
• 29. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu CE. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 6449-6459.
• 30. Zhou J, Tan J, Chen L, Li D, Tan Y. The incorporation of chlorhexidine in a two-step self-etching adhesive preserves dentin bond in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 2009;37(10): 807-812.
• 31. Breschi L, Cammelli F, Visintini E, Mazzoni A, Vita F, Carrilho M. Influence of chlorhexidine concentration on the durability of etch-andrinse dentin bonds: a 12-month in vitro study. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2009;11(3):191.
• 32. Campos EA, Correr GM, Leonardi DP, Barato-Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Zielak JC. Chlorhexidine diminishes the loss of bond strength over time under simulated pulpal pressure and thermo-mechanical stressing. Journal of Dentistry 2009; 37(2):108-114.
• 33. Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Polli LG, Costa JA, Michel MD, Reis A. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate concentration and application time on resin–dentin bond strength durability. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2009;117(5): 587-596.
• 34. Campos EAD, Correr GM, Leonardi DP, Pizzatto E, Morais EC. Influence of chlorhexidine concentration on microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesive systems. Brazilian Oral Research 2009; 23(3): 340-345.
• 35. Hashimoto M, Sano H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Kaga M, Oguchi H, et al. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Operative Dentistry 2004; 29(4):416-423.
• 36. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Prosperi G, Di Bussolo G, De Angelis F, D’Amario M, et al. The influence of adhesive thickness on the microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2009;11(2):109-15.
• 37. Erhardt MC, Osorio R, Pisani-Proenca J, Aguilera FS, Osorio E, Breschi L, et al. Effect of double layering and prolonged application time on MTBS of water/ethanol-based self-etch adhesives to dentin. Operative Dentistry 2009;34(5): 571-577.
• 38. Elkassas DW, Fawzi EM, El Zohairy A. The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives. European Journal of Dentistry 2014; 8(2): 184-190.
• 39. Silva ALF, Lima DANL, Souza GMD, Santos CTD, Paulillo LAMS. Influence of additional adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems. Operative Dentistry 2006; 31(5): 562-568.
• 40. King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hashimoto M, Ito S, Brackett WW. Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. American Journal of Dentistry 2005; 18(2): 126-34.
• 41. Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of double-application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one-step self-etch systems in enamel and dentin. Operative Dentistry 2008; 33(5): 564-570.
• 42. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Munck JD, Lambrechts P, Meerbeek BV. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dental Materials 2006; 22(6): 533-544.
• 43. Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. Journal of Dentistry 2014;42(5):595-602.
• 44. Silva SMDA, de Oliveira Carrilho MR, Junior LM, Garcia FCP, Manso AP, Alves MC. Effect of an additional hydrophilic versus hydrophobic coat on the quality of dentinal sealing provided by two-step etch-andrinse adhesives. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2009; 17(3): 184-9.
• 45. Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Influence of bonded enamel margins on dentin bonding stability of one-step selfetching adhesives. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2009; 11(5): 347-353.
• 46. De Munck J, Shirai K, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Van Landuyt KL, Lambrechts P, et al. Effect of water storage on the bonding effectiveness of 6 adhesives to Class I cavity dentin. Operative Dentistry 2006; 31(4):456-465.
• 47. Chiaraputt S, Roongrujimek P, Sattabanasuk V, Panich N, Harnirattisai C, Senawongse P. Biodegradation of all-in-one self-etch adhesive systems at the resin-dentin interface. Dental Materials Journal 2011; 30(6): 814-826.
• 48. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LHA, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dental Materials 2010; 26(2): e50-e62.