Hayvansal Üretim Sistemlerinde Hidroponik Yem Kullanımı

Öz

Genel olarak, kaba yem temini büyük ve küçükbaş hayvan yetiştiriciliğinde en önemli konulardan biridir. Kaba yem olmadan, ruminant yetiştiriciliği düşünülemez. Kaba yemin dışarıdan satın alınması, ruminant yetiştiriciliğinde sürdürülebilir ve ekonomik üretimin önündeki engellerden biridir. Kaba yem veya yem fiyatları genellikle süt fiyatları düştüğünde yükselmeye başlar. Hidroponik yem üretimi, Türkiye'de 2000'li yılların başında, kaba yem için yeterli arazisi olmayan veya hiç arazisi olmayan işletmeler için bir alternatif olarak popüler hale geldi. 2025 yılı itibarıyla bu konu bir kez daha çiftçiler için öncelikli hale geldi. Hidroponik yem üretiminin avantajları arasında arpa samanı yıl boyunca üretilebilmesi ve işlemin sekiz günde bir tekrarlanabilmesi, daha düşük su tüketimi ve işgücü gereksinimi yer almaktadır. Ancak, bu yöntemle arpa samanı üretiminin besin kayıplarına yol açtığı da bir gerçektir. Örneğin, bir kilogram arpa samanı kuru maddesi, bir kilogram arpa tanesi kuru maddesinden 3,4 kat daha pahalıyken, enerji 3,7 kat, protein ise 2,2 kat daha pahalıdır. Bu makale, yetiştiricileri bu yöntemin avantajları ve dezavantajları konusunda bilgilendirmek amacıyla hazırlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hidroponik üretim
• yem
• yeşil arpa
• maliyet
• geviş getiren hayvanlar

Destekleyen Kurum

Hayır

Proje Numarası

No

Etik Beyan

Derleme makalesi olduğundan etik kurul belgesine gerek yoktur.

Teşekkür

Hayır

The Use of Hydroponic Fodder in Animal Production Systems

Öz

In general, roughage supply is one of the most important issues in large and small ruminant farming. Without roughage, ruminant farming is unthinkable. Purchasing roughage from outside sources is one of the obstacles to sustainable, economical production in ruminant farming. Roughage or feed prices generally begin to rise when milk prices fall. Hydroponic fodder production became popular in Türkiye in the early 2000s as an alternative for farms with insufficient land for roughage or no land at all. As of 2025, this topic has once again become a priority for farmers. The advantages of hydroponic fodder production include the ability to produce green barley year-round and repeat the process every eight days, as well as lower water consumption and labor requirements. However, it is also true that producing green barley using this method leads to nutrient losses. For instance, the cost of one kilogram of green barley dry matter is 3.4 times higher than that of barley grain dry matter, whereas the costs of energy and protein are 3.7 and 2.2 times higher, respectively. This article has been prepared to inform growers about the pros and cons of this method.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hydroponic production
• fodder
• green barley
• cost
• ruminants

Destekleyen Kurum

This review article no external funding.

Proje Numarası

No

Etik Beyan

Since it is a review article, there is no need for an ethics committee document.

Teşekkür

No

Kaynakça

1. Abdula, A. H. (2022). Contribution of hydroponic feed for livestock production and productivity. Science Frontiers, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20220301.11
2. Anonymous, (2015a). Hydroponics made simple. The way nature intended to grow barley. http://www.fodderfactory.com.au/ (access date:31.10.2025).
3. Anonymous, (2015b). Hyroponics Fodder Factory. http://www.ilinova.org/downloads/(access date:31.10.2025).
4. Bayskar, A. (2025). Hydroponics: a promising alternative technology for fodder production. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 31 (3), 432-448.
5. Cisneros-Saguilán, P., Cruz-Bautista, P., & Hernández-Hernández, M. (2023). Hydroponic green forage as an alternative forage in animal feeding. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 26 (2023): 1-16 http://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4679
6. Gallegos, H. M. L. (2015). Hydroponic green forage, http://www.unm.edu/(access date:03.03.2015).
7. Ghorbel, R., Chakchak, J., Kosum, N., & Cetin, N. S. (2022). Hydroponic technology for green fodder production: concept, advantages, and limits. In 6th International Students Science Congress Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.52460/issc.2022.010
8. Hassen, A., & Dawid, I. (2022). Contribution of Hydroponic Feed for Livestock Production and Productivity: A Review. International Journal of Ground Sediment & Water 15: 889-916. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767438

9. Fazaeli, H., Golmohammadi, H. A., Tabatabayee, S. N., & Asghari-Tabrizi, M. (2012). Productivity and nutritive value of barley green fodder yield in hydroponic system. World Applied Sciences Journal 4: 531-539.
10. Mooney, J. (2005). Topic: Growing cattle feed hydroponically. http://www.nuffield. com.au/(access date:31.10.2025).
11. Morgan, J., Hunter, R. R., & O'Haire, R. (1992). Limiting factors in hydroponic barley grass production. 8th International congress on soilless culture, Hunter's Rest, South Africa.
12. Naik, P. K., Gaikwad, S. P., Gupta, M. J., Dhuri, R. B., Dhumal, G. M., & Singh, N. P. (2013). Low cost devices for hydroponics fodder production. www.indairyasso.org./ (access date:31.10.2025).
13. Naik, P. K. (2014). Hydroponics green fodder for dairy animals. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, 403, 191-210.
14. Naik, P. K., Swain, B. K., & Singh, N. P. (2015). Production and utilisation of hydroponics fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 32(1), 1-9.
15. Pastorelli, G., Serra, V., Turin, L., & Attard, E. (2024). Hydroponic fodders for livestock production–a review. Annals of Animal Science 24(3), 645-656. http://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2023-0075.
16. Sneath, R., & Mclntosh, F. (2003). Review of hydroponic fodder production for beef cattle. http://www.qcl.farmonline.com.au(access date:31.10.2025).
17. Tranel, L. F. (2013). Hydroponic fodder systems for dairy cattle? Animal industry report. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/(access date:31.10.2025).
18. Yahyaei, M., & Talebi, B. (2024). Hydroponic fodder for livestock production and productivity: a Review. Greenhouse Plant Production Journal 1(3), 1-12.