Analysis of Characters Affecting Yield and Yield in Chickpea Plant

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 3, 508 - 523, 16.12.2024

Ömer Sözen , Ufuk Karadavut

Öz

It aimed to reveal some chickpea varieties' yield and yield parameters with descriptive statistics in Yozgat ecological conditions for two years in 2022 and 2023. In the study, 10 chickpea varieties (Azkan, Çağatay, Çakır, Gökçe, Hasanbey, İnci, Seçkin, Sezenbey, Uzunlu 99 and Zuhal) were used as materials. In the study, plant height (cm), first pod height (cm), biological yield (g), number of pods per plant (pcs), number of seeds per plant (pcs), seed yield per plant (g), hundred seed weight (g), harvest index. (%) and seed yield per decare (kg da-1) characteristics were examined. As a result of the study, it was revealed that chickpea varieties were significantly affected by all the examined agronomic characteristics except the height of the first pod.
According to the two-year averages of chickpea varieties, the number of pods per plant varied between 13.67-39.33 units, the number of seeds per plant varied between 12.00-28.67 units, seed yield per plant varied between 4.26-8.37 g, hundred seed weight varied between 28.67-36.37 g and seed yield per decare varied between 82.71-124.5 kg da-1. It was observed that Gökçe, Çakır, and Çağatay chickpea varieties included in the study had high seed yield.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yozgat; Chickpea, Variety, Yield Parameters, Descriptive Statistics

Etik Beyan

Writing—preparing, reviewing, and editing original expenses, Ö.S, U.K.; in carrying out the analysis, the U.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.

Kaynakça

• Aarif M, Rastogi NK, Johnson PL, Chandrakar PK (2014). Genetic analysis of seed yield and its attributing traits in kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Legumes 27 (1): 24-27.
• Agrawal T, Kumar A, Kumar S, Kumar, A, Kumar RR, Kumar S, Singh PK (2018). Correlation and path coefficient analysis for grain yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under normal and late sown conditions of Bihar, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7 (2): 1633-1642.
• Akdağ C, Şehirali S (1995). Effects of bacterial inoculation, nitrogen doses, and planting frequency on yield and yield components of chickpea. Journal of Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture 12: 122-134.
• Akhtar LH, Pervez MA, Nasim M (2011). Genetic divergence and inter-relationship studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 48(1): 35-39.
• Ali MA, Nawab NN, Rasool G, Saleem M (2008). Estimates of variability and correlations for quantitative traits in Cicer arietinum. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences 4: 177-179.
• Aswathi PV, Ganesamurthy K, Jayamani P (2019). Genetic variability for morphological and biometrical traits in chickpea Cicer arietinum. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 10 (2): 699-705.
• Atta BM, Haq MA, Shah TM (2008). Variation and inter-relationships of quantitative traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 40 (2): 637-647.
• Burcu D (2021). Product report. Agricultural Economics and Policy Development Institute Tepge, Tepge Publishing Number: 342, Ankara.
• Ceyhan E, Kahraman A, Önder M, Ateş MK, Karadaş S, Topak R, Avcı MA (2012a). Physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress of chickpea genotypes. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering 6(6): 352-357.
• Ceyhan E, Önder M, Kahraman A, Topak R, Ateş MK, Karadas S, Avcı M (2012b). Effects of drought on yield and some yield components of chickpea. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, 6(6): 347-351.
• Ceyhan E, Kahraman A, Ateş MK, Topak R, Şimşek D, Avcı MA, Önder M, Dalgıç H (2013). Konya koşullarında nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) genotiplerinin tane verim ve verim unsurlarının belirlenmesi. Türkiye X. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 10 – 13 Eylül, Konya, Türkiye. Cilt 1, pp. 789-796.
• Çancı H, Toker C (2009). Evaluation of yield criteria for drought and heat resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Agronomy & Crop Science, 195: 47-54.
• Dowd K, Burke KJ (2013). The influence of ethical values and food choice motivations on intentions to purchase sustainably sourced foods. Appetite 69: 137-144.
• Dua RP (1992). Differential response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to salinity. The Journal of Agricultural Science 119 (3): 367-371.
• Fang X, Turner NC, Yan G, Li F, Siddique KHM (2010). Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 335-345.
• Fang X, Turner NC, Li FM, Siddique KHM (2011). An early transient water deficit rendece flower number and pod production but increases seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop and Pasture Science 62(6): 481-487. FAO (2022). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home Roma, İtalya.
• Fogelberg F, Martensson AM (2021). Aspects on cultivation of vegetable soybean in Sweden-cultivars, soil requirements, inoculation and nitrogen contribution. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science 71 (7): 633-644.
• Joachim VB (2009). Addressing the food crisis: Governance, market functioning and investment in public goods. Food Security 1: 9-15.
• Kaçar B (1995). Chemical Analyzes of Plants and Soil 3: Soil Analyzes. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Education Research and Development Foundation Publications 3, Ankara, Türkiye, p. 705.
• Kahraman A, Önder M, Ceyhan E, Ulukuş F (2016). Nohut genotiplerinde cluster analizi ve önemli kalite parametreleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 25(1): 196-200.
• Khan RU, Ahad A, Rashid A, Khan A (2001). Chickpea production as influenced by row spacing under rainfed conditions of Dera Ismail Khan. Online Journal of Biological Science 3: 103-104.
• Kalefetoğlu MJ, Ekmekçi Y (2009). Alterations in photochemical and physiological activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 195: 335-346.
• Karadavut U, Sözen Ö, Yağmur M (2019). Estimation of root growth of chickpea plants grown at different sowing times with the Weibull model. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 6(4): 893-903.
• Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Crouch JH, Serraj R (2006). Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea L.) under terminal drought stress. Field Crops Research 95: 171-181.
• Kıymaz T, Şahinöz A (2011). World and Turkey food security situation. Economic Approach 21(76): 130.
• Mohammed AA, Tahir IS, Elhashimi AM (2015). Assessment of genetic variability and yield stability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars in River Nile State, Sudan. Journal of Plant Breeding Crop Science 7: 219-225.
• Nayak G, Altekar N (2015). Effect of biofield treatment on plant growth and adaptation. Journal of Environmental Health Sciences 1: 1-9.
• Ölmez M, Erman M, Erden Z, Çöçen E (2020). Determination of the effect of different row and plant frequency applications on plant growth and yield in ‘Aziziye-94’ chickpea cultivar. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research 9 (2): 166-177.
• Palta JA, Nandwal AS, Kumari S, Turner NC (2005). Foliar nitrogen applications increase the seed yield and protein content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) subject to terminal drought. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 105-112.
• Pandey RL, Rastogi NK (2003). Attributes of seed yield in relation to seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 16(1): 24-28.
• Pellet P (1988). The place of lentils and chickpeas in human nutrition. Lentils Symposium for Everyone (29-30 September), Soil Crops Office Publications, Ankara, Türkiye, pp. 37-135.
• Pramanik MHR, Khan MAH, Mushi AAA, Sadeque MA (1990). Optimum plant population for chickpea in Bangladesh. Progressive Agriculture 1(1): 61-67.
• Saeed U, Ali Q, Naveed MT, Saleem M (2012). Correlation analysis of seed yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum l.) Genotypes. IJAVMS 6 (4): 269-276.
• Santos HB, Bharadwaj C, Santos S, Raghavendra KP, Kumar J (2017). Genetic diversity analysis for productivity enhancement through desi-kabuli introgression breeding in chickpea. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 8 (1): 125-133.
• Shrestha R, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Turner DW (2006). Physiological and seed yield responses to water deficits among lentil genotypes from diverse origins. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57: 903-915.
• Slafer GA, Kantolic AG, Appendino ML, Miralles DJ, Savin R (2009). Crop development: genetic control, environmental modulation and relevance for genetic improvement of crop yield. Eds: Sadras VO, Calderini DF, Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, pp.277-308.
• Sohail A, Ahmad S, Rahman H, Burni T, Shah SMA, Ali S, Hussain Q (2018). Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance as per cent of mean and correlation studies among F7 populations of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pure Applied Biology 7(1): 57-65.
• Sözen Ö, Karadavut U (2019). Correlation and path analysis of some chickpea genotypes grown in kırşehir ecological conditions for yield components. Science and Technique in the 21st Century 2 (12): 29-40.
• Sözen Ö, Yağmur M, Aydoğan Y (2021). Evaluation in terms of agricultural characteristics of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties grown in Eskisehir ecological conditions. Manas Journal of Agriculture Veterinary and Life Sciences 11(1): 35-47.
• Topalak C, Ceyhan E (2015). Nohutta farklı ekim zamanlarının tane verimi ve bazı tarımsal özellikler üzerine etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 2(2): 130-139.
• Thomas H (2006). Trade reforms and food security, country case studies and synthesis. FAO, Roma, ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0581e/ a0581e00.pdf.
• Karaman G (2023). A Study on determination of agronomic characteristics of some chickpea varieties in Karaman ecological conditions. Master's Thesis, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University (unpublished), Türkiye.
• Ustaahmetoğlu E, Toklu İT (2015). A survey on the effect of attitude, health consciousness, and food safety on organic food purchase intention. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research 11 (1): 197-211.
• Yadav NP, Sharma CH, Haque MF (2001). Correlation and regression study of seed yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural University 13: 149-151.