Kalkınma İşbirliğinde Etkinlik Arayışları ve Yeni Aktörler: Paradigma Dönüşümü

Öz

Kalkınma yardımları, II. Dünya Savaşı sonrasında uluslararası ekonomi-politik açısından, sanayileşmiş zengin Batılı devletlerin önemli bir politika aracı olmuş; özellikle Soğuk Savaş döneminde yaşanan kutuplar arası mücadelede liberal blok ile sosyalist blok tarafından dünyanın geri kalan bölgelerinde üstünlük sağlama arayışlarında önemli ölçüde kullanılmıştır. Söz konusu yardımlar öte yandan, yardım yapılan ülkelerde kalkınma süreçlerine yeterli düzeyde katkı yapmadığı gibi bağımlı kılma, tek yönlü-dikey, şartlılık ve katılım ve uyum gibi sorunlar nedeniyle eleştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla düzenlenen yüksek düzeyli forumlarda bu soruna çözümler aranmış ve gelinen nokta itibarıyla, kalkınmanın yalnızca iktisadi bakış ve kamu finansmanı ile sağlanamayacağı; ayrıca özel sektör, sivil toplum ve diğer aktörlerin de sürece dahil edilmesi gibi yönetişim felsefesinin kalkınmada işbirliğini etkinliğinin artırılması bağlamında bir paradigma dönüşümüne katkı sağladığı görülmüştür. Çalışmamızda, kalkınma yardımlarında etkinliğin artırılmasına yönelik düzenlenen söz konusu forumları ve sürece dahil olan yeni aktörlerin konumları ve bu dönüşüme etkisi değerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kalkınma Yardımları, Kalkınma İşbirliği, Etkinlik, Aktörler, Yönetişim

Search for Effectiveness in Development Cooperation and New Actors: Paradigm Transformation

Öz

Development assistance has been an important policy instrument of the industrialized, rich Western countries in respect of international political-economy since the end of II. World War; and largely employed both by the Liberal Block and the Socialist Block particularly in the bi-polar Cold War maneuvering to establish superiority in other regions of the World. The development assistances, on the other hand, has been criticized for the problems of creating dependency, onesidedness, conditionality, and lack of participation and low adaptation as well as not contributing to the development processes adequately in the assistance recipient countries. The solutions for these problems were sought in high-level forums organized for this purpose, and it is understood that development cannot be achieved only through economic perspectives and public funding; As well as the involvement of the private sector, civil society and other actors in the development process in the context of governance philosophy, has contributed to a paradigm shift enhancing the effectiveness in development cooperation. In our study, the forums and the new actors involved in the development cooperation process in order to increase the effectiveness of development assistances and the impacts of this paradigm transformation were evaluated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Development Assistance, Development Cooperation, Effectiveness, Actors, Governance

Kaynakça

1. Abdenur, A. ve Fonseca, J. (2013). The North’s Growing Role in South-South Cooperation: Keeping the Foothold. Third World Quarterly, 34(8), s.1475-1491.
2. Assunção, M. ve Esteves, P. (2014). The BRICS and the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC). BPC Policy Brief, 4(3), Mart 2014. http://bricspolicycenter.org/homolog/arquivos/SSCMONITOR.pdf, 09.01.2017.
3. Ayhan, E. ve M. Önder (2017). “Yeni Kamu Hizmeti Yaklaşımı: Yönetişime Açılan Bir Kapı”, Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, C:3, S:2.
4. Balch, J. (2014). Why Do Parliaments Matter to Development Effectiveness? http: //devcooperation.org/2014/06/30/why-do-parliaments-matter-to-development-effectiveness/, 26.11.2015.
5. Barder, O. (2011a). What Happened in Busan? http: //www.owen.org/blog/5131, 18.03.2016.
6. Barder, O. (2011b). Brian Atwood (OECD-DAC Chair) Reflects on Busan Progress-Busan HLF4: The Will and the Way. Center for Global Development Blog. http: //www.cgdev.org/blog/brian-atwood-oecd-dac-chair-reflects-busan-progress, 18.03.2016.
7. Bartenev, V. ve Glazunova, E. (2013). International Development Cooperation: Set of Lectures. Moskova: Dünya Bankası.
8. Besharati, N.A. (2013). A Year After Busan: Where is the Global Partnership Going. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://www.saiia.org.za/occasional-papers/12-a-year-afterbusan-where-is-the-global-partnership-going/file, 08.01.2017.

9. BIAC (Business and Industry Advisory Committee to OECD). (2014). Private Sector Perspectives on Private Financing for Sustainable Development. BIAC Discussion Paper. http://biac.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/14-10-07-FIN-BIAC-Paper-on-Private-Sector-Financing-forDevelopment.pdf, 18.03.2016.
10. BM (2008). Background Study for the Development Cooperation Forum: Trends in South-South Cooperation and Triangular Development Cooperation (ECOSOC). New York.
11. Blankson, P. (2014). Civil Society’s Campaign for Effective Development: The Istanbul Principles. http://devcooperation.org/2014/07/31/civil-societys-campaign-for-effective-development-theistanbul-principles/, 03.11.2015.
12. BMZ (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2015). Strategy on Government-Civil Society Cooperation in Post-2015 Development Policy. BMZ Strategy Paper 5. https://www.bmz.de/en/publications/type_of_publication/strategies/Strategiepapier343_05_201 4.pdf, 14.01.2017.
13. Byiers, B. ve Rosengren, A. (2012). Common or Conflicting Interests? Reflections on the Private Sector (for) Development Agenda. European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) Discussion Paper No.131. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/DP-131- Conflicting-Interests-Private-Sector-Development-Agenda-2012.pdf, 19.01.2017.
14. Chahoud, T. (2008). Financing for Development Series: Southern Non-DAC Actors in Development Cooperation. German Development Institute Briefing Paper 13. https://www.diegdi.de/uploads/media/BP_13.2008.pdf, 22.01.2017.
15. Chidgey, D. (2013). The Role of Parliaments in Aid and Sustainable Development Effectiveness. http: //www.awepa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Lord-David-Chidgey-KeynoteAddres.pdf, 27.11.2015.
16. Coulloudon, V. (2015). Protecting Civil Society’s Role in Development Cooperation. http: //devcooperation.org/2015/01/08/protecting-civil-societys-role-in-development-co-operation/, 04.11.2015.
17. Craviotto, N. (2014). Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation: A Feminist Perspective Following the First High Level Meeting. http: //www.awid.org/news-andanalysis/global-partnership-effective-development-cooperation-feminist-perspective, 29.11.2015.
18. Cross, P. (2014). Country Ownership, Power and Development. https://www.devex.com/news/country-ownership-power-and-development-82908, 28.10.2015.
19. Çalışkan, E. ve M. Önder (2017). “Başkanlık Sistemi ve Mevcut Kamu Kurumları Üzerine Olası Etkileri”, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi/The Journal of International Social Research, 10:49.
20. Davies, P. (2010). A Review of the Roles and Activities of New Development Partners. CFP Working Paper Series No.4. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/ 824291468330960846/pdf/ 538660NWP0CFPW10Box345632B01PUBLIC1.pdf, 20.01.2017.
21. Davies, P. (2011). The Role of the Private Sector in the Context of Aid Effectiveness. OECD Consultative Finding Document. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/47088121.pdf, 22.01.2017.
22. Development and Cooperation (D+C). (2014). How Experts Assess the Results of the High-LevelMeeting (HLM) of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) in Mexico City. http://www.dandc.eu/en/article/how-experts-assess-results-high-levelmeeting-hlm-global-partnership-effective-development, 21.03.2016.
23. Di Bella, J., Grant, A., Kindornay, S. ve Tissot, S. (2013). How to Engage the Private Sector for Development. The North-South Institute Policy Brief. http://www.nsi-ins.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2013/09/How-to-Engage-the-Private-Sector-for-Development-PolicyBrief.pdf, 12.01.2017.
24. Dicke, V. (2012). New Paradigms in a New Millenium, Development and Cooperation.
25. Effective Development Cooperation. (2015). Background. http://effectivecooperation.org/ wordpress/effective-development-co-operation-background/, 03.10.2015.
26. Eğilmez, M. (2013). Küresel Ekonomik Görünüm. http://www.mahfiegilmez.com/ 2013/04/kureselekonomik-gorunum.html, 3 Nisan 2016.
27. Eklöf, G. (2014). The Future Role of the Private Sector in Development Cooperation: An Overview of Key Policy Processes. CONCORD, İsveç.
28. Esteves, P., da Costa Maia, F., de Abreu, A., Niv, A. ve Assunção, M. (2011).
29. Farah, A. M.; Ayhan, E. ve Önder, M. (2017). Dış Yardımların Alıcı Ülkelerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Yapısına Etkisi: Etiyopya Örneği, I.Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Öğrenci Kongresi, 12-13 Ekim 2017, Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF, Konya, http://www.isersc.org/
30. Fine, P. (2015). It’s Time We Broaden the Definition of Country Ownership. https://www.devex.com/news/it-s-time-we-broaden-the-definition-of-country-ownership86507, 25.10.2015.
31. Fraeters, H. (2011). Three-Way Learning: The South-South Agenda in Busan. World Bank Blogs. http://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/three-way-learning-the-south-south-agenda-in-busan, 20.03.2016.
32. Glennie, J. (2011a). Busan Has Been An Expression of Shifting Geopolitical Realities. The Guardian, 02.12.2011. http: //www.theguardian.com/global-development/povertymatters/2011/dec/02/busan-shifting-geopolitical-realities, 19.03.2016.
33. Glennie, J. (2011b). The OECD Should Give Up Control of the Aid Agenda. The Guardian, 29.04.2011. http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/ apr/29/oecd-control-aid-agenda, 05.10.2015.
34. Greenhill, R. ve Prizzon, A. (2012). Who Foots the Bill After 2015? What New Trends in Development Finance Mean for the Post-MDGs. ODI Working Paper 360. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/7905.pdf, 13.01.2017.
35. Heiner, J., Klingebiel, S. ve Mahn, T. (2014). How to Shape Development Cooperation? The Global Partnership and the Development Cooperation Forum. German Development Institute Brifing Paper 3. https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/BP_3.2014.pdf, 28.01.2017.
36. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2014). Draft Common Principles for Paliamentary Development. http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/principles14/principles.pdf, 28.01.2017.
37. Jones, R. (2013). CSOs and Their Roles in the Post 2015 Framework. https://www.devex.com/news/csos-and-their-role-in-the-post-2015-framework-81300, 07.11.2015.
38. Jones, S. (2014). Global Partnership Gathers in Mexico Amid Faltering Progress and Scepticism. The Guardian, 14.04.2014. http: //www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/apr/14/globalpartnership-mexico-scepticism-missing-targets, 30.11.2015
39. Kharas, H. (2012). The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. Brookings Institution Policy Paper 2012-04. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06- global-partnership-kharas.pdf, 23.01.2017.
40. Kharas, H. (2014). Improve Aid Effectiveness. http://effectivecooperation.org/ 2014/04/improve-aideffectiveness/, 25.10.2015.
41. Kharas, H., Jung, W., Makino, K. (2011). Overview: An Agenda for the Busan High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. Kharas, H., Jung, W., Makino, K. (editörler), Catalysing Development: A New Vision for Aid. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, s.3-40.
42. Kindornay, S. ve Morton, B. (2009). Development Effectiveness: Towards New Understandings. The North South Institute Issues Brief. http://www.nsi-ins.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/2009- Development-effectiveness-towards-new-understandings.pdf, 05.01.2017.
43. Klingebiel, S. ve Leiderer, S. (2011). Two-Speed Aid Effectiveness. The Broker Online, 06.12.2011. http://www.thebrokeronline.eu/Blogs/Busan-High-Level-Forum/Two-speed-aid-effectiveness, 16.03.2016.
44. Kondoh, H. (2015). Convergence of Aid Models in Emerging Donors? Learning Processes, Norms and Identities, and Recipients. JICA-RI Working Paper No: 106. https://www.jica.go.jp/jicari/publication/workingpaper/jrft3q00000026u5-att/JICA-RI_WP_No.106.pdf, 20.01.2017.
45. Kuga, M., Aoyagi, K. ve Akiyama, T. (2006). The Private Sector and Development: A Review of the Development Role of Developed Country Private Enterprise. Akiyama, T. ve Sasakoa, Y. (editörler), In Search of New Approaches to Japanese Development Assistance. Tokyo: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development, s.210-238.
46. Kwakkenbos, J. ve Romero, M.J. (2013). Engaging the Private Sector for Development: The Role of Development Finance Institutions, Private Sector Development: Ein neuer Businessplan für Entwicklung? Viyana: ÖFSE, s.25-30.
47. Leiszen, M., ve Balogh, R., Zazvorkova, M. ve Sutrop, M. (2013). Development Effectiveness and the Role of Civil Society Organisations. Trialog Policy Digest No.6. http://www.trialog.or.at/images/doku/policy_digest_development_effectiveness_12_12_2013.p df, 11.01.2017.
48. Martini, J., Mongo, R., Kalambay, H., Fromont, A., Ribesse, N. ve Dujardin, B. (2012). Aid Effectiveness from Rome to Busan: Some Progress But Lacking Bottom-Up Approaches or Behaviour Changes. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 17(7), Temmuz 2012, s.931- 933.
49. Mawdsley, E. (2014). A Post Aid World? Paradigm Shift in Foreign Aid and Development Cooperation at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum. Geographical Journal, Mart 2014, s.1-12.
50. Nallari, R., Yusuf, S., Griffith, B. ve Bhattacharya, R. (2011). Frontiers in Development Policy-A Primer on Emerging Issues. Washinghton DC: Dünya Bankası.
51. Neumayer, E. (2004). Arab-Related Bilateral and Multilateral Sources of Development Finance: Issues, Trends, and the Way Forward. World Economy, 27(2), 2004, s.281-300.
52. OECD. (2003). Rome Declaration on Harmonisation. http://www.who.int/hdp/publications/ 1b_rome_declaration.pdf, 15.09.2015.
53. OECD. (2005). The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: Five Principles For Smart Aid. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/45827300.pdf, 17.09.2015.
54. OECD. (2006). Development Cooperation Report 2005, Volume: 7 No: 1. http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/36364587.pdf, 11.01.2017.
55. OECD. (2008). The Accra High Level Forum and the Accra Agenda for Action. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/45827311.pdf, 22.09.2015.
56. OECD. (2011). Accelerating Progress in Aid Effectiveness: From here to 2011. http: //www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/45536364.pdf, 17.09.2015.
57. OECD. (2014). The changing role of NGOs and civil society in financing sustainable development. Development Co-operation Report 2014: Mobilising Resources for Sustainable Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/dcr-2014-13-en
58. OECD. (2015). In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD Publishing.
59. Oxfam (2012). Busan in a nutshell. What next for the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation? https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bn-busannutshell-global-partnership -021012-en_5.pdf, 24.09.2015.
60. Önder, M. (2006). How Local Conditions Affect the Existence and Capacity of the Nonprofit Sector: A Test of Competing Theories. (Kar Amacı Gütmeyen Sektörün Ortaya Çıkışını ve Kapasitesini Açıklayan Faktörler: Rakip Teorilerin Test Edilmesi, Florida Eyalet Üniversitesi, Doktora tezi).
61. Önder, M. (2010). “Kar Amacı Gütmeyen Sektörün Gizli Gücü ve Yerel Ekonomiler” II. Ulusal Yerel Ekonomiler Kongresi, Sivas.
62. Önder, M. (2011). “A Preliminary Cross National Test of Competing Theories of Nonprofits: Does Culture Matter?” The International Review of Public Administration. 16:1, (71-90).
63. Önder, M. (2011). “What Accounts for Changing Public Trust in Government? A Causal Analysis with Structural Equation Model” Journal of US-China Public Administration, 8:2, (154-165).
64. Önder, M ve Ayhan, E (2017). NGOs and Local Development: The Case of Tunceli (STK’lar ve Yerel Kalkınma: Tunceli Örneği), 4.Uluslararası Bölgesel Kalkınma Konferans (4.International Regional Development Conference), 21-23 Eylül 2017, Munzur Üniversitesi, Tunceli, http://www.bolgeselkalkinmakonferansi.org/index.html
65. Önder, M. ve F. Ulaşan (2016). “The Impact of Public Administration on Economic Growth: The Case of South Korea”, International Journal of Leadership Education and Management Studies, 1:1, May, (23-43).
66. Önder, M; Ayhan, E. ve Ayna, Y E (2017). Siyasal ve Bürokratik Kültürlerin Bölgesel Kalkınma Üzerindeki Etkisi (The Impact of Political and Administrative Cultures on Regional Development), 4.Uluslararası Bölgesel Kalkınma Konferansı (4.International Regional Development Conference), 21-23 Eylül 2017, Munzur Üniversitesi, Tunceli
67. Önder, M. ve Y. E. Ayna (2014). Kamu ve Özel Sektör Yönetimi İçin Yönetim Sözlüğü, (Editör: Mehmet Akif Özer), (Bölüm 5: 191-226).
68. Rank, R. (2014). Why Open Data Matters For Sustainable Development Post-2015. http://devcooperation.org/2014/07/24/why-open-data-matters-for-sustainable-developmentpost-2015/, 25.10.2015.
69. Rouis, M. (2010). Arab Development Assistance: Four Decades of Cooperation. MENA Knowledge and Learning Quick Notes Series; No. 28. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/10919.
70. Ryder, H. (2013). The Rise of Development Effectiveness. The Guardian, 13.03.2013. http: //www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/mar/13/ development-effectiveness-dfid-aid-india, 03.10.2015.
71. Samy, Y. ve Kindornay, S. (tarihsiz). Will the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation Deliver? Canadian International Development Platform. http://cidpnsi.ca/ willthe-global-partnership-for-effective-development-co-operation-deliver/, 04.10.2015.
72. Saner, R., ve Yiu, L. (2015). Participation of Civil Society Organisations in the United Nations and in the Aid Effectiveness Discourse and Related Standard-Setting Negotiations. Koral, G. ve Robin, L. (editörler), Public Policymaking in a Globalized World. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, s.149-183.
73. Shankland, A., ve Constantine, J. (2014). Beyond lip service on mutual learning: The potential of CSO and think-tank partnerships for transforming Rising Powers’ contributions to sustainable development. Tomlinson, B. (editör), Reality of Aid 2014 Report - Rethinking Partnerships in a Post-2015 World: Towards Equitable, Inclusive and Sustainable Development, Philippines: IBON International, s.105-116.
74. Shushan, D. ve Marcoux, C. (2011). The Rise (and Decline?) of Arab Aid: Generosity and Allocation in the Oil Era. World Development, 39(11), Kasım 2011, s.1969-1980.
75. Sinclair, J. (2013). The Global Partnership Ready to Broaden Its Mandate. CIPS Blog. http: //cips.uottawa.ca/is-the-global-partnership-ready-to-broaden-its-mandate/, 27.10.2015.
76. Smith, K. (2011). United Arab Emirates Statistical Reporting to the OECD Development Assistance Committee. http://www.oecd.org/dac/unitedarabemiratesstatisticalreportingtotheoecddevelopmentassistance committee.htm, 20.01.2017.
77. Smith, K., Fordelone, T. ve Zimmermann, F. (2010). Beyond the DAC: the Welcome Role of Other Providers of Development Co-operation. OECD DCD Issues Brief, Mayıs 2010. https://www.oecd.org/dac/45361474.pdf, 02.02.2017.
78. Southern Voice on Post-MDG International Development Goals. (2014). Dialogues on South-South Cooperation in the Context of Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. Southern Voice Occasional Paper Special Issue: 2. http://southernvoice.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/SV-Special-OP-2-dialogues-on-south-south-cooperation-in-thecontext-of-global-partnership-for-effective-development-cooperation.pdf, 15.01.2017.
79. The Parliamentary Network. (tarihsiz). Busan: Participation in HLF4. http://www.parlnet.org/node/192, 26.11.2015.
80. Trocaire. (2011). Making Aid Effective Means Protecting Civil Society. http://www.dochas.ie/sites/default/files/Making_aid_effective_means_protecting_civil_society. pdf, 01.01.2017.
81. Twessime, F. (2014). Challenges and Opportunities of Development Aid Actors. http: //devcooperation.org/2014/10/13/challenges-and-opportunities-of-development-aid-actors/, 25.10.2015.
82. UNDP. (2010). Parliamentary Engagement with Millenium Development Goals: A Manual for Use in Parliaments. New York.
83. UNDP. (2011). Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. http: //www.undp.org/content/dam/uspc/docs/OUTCOME_DOCUMENT_-_FINAL_EN.pdf, 24.09.2015.
84. Van Hoffen, R. (2011). A Killing Embrace of Diversity. The Broker Online, 05.12.2011. http: //www.thebrokeronline.eu/Blogs/Busan-High-Level-Forum/A-killing-embrace-of-diversity, 20.03.2016.
85. Venkatachalam, Lakshmi. Why Partnering with the Private Sector is Key to Inclusive Growth, devcooperation, 08.11.2014, http: //devcooperation.org/2014/08/11/why-partnering-with-theprivate-sector-is-key-to-inclusive-growth/ (Erişim Tarihi: 25.11.2015).
86. Venugopal, R. (2015). Neoliberalism As Concept. Economy and Society, 44(2), (165-187).
87. Walz, J. ve Ramachandran, V. (2011). Brave New World: A Literature Review of Emerging Donors and the Changing Nature of Foreign Assistance. Center for Global Development Working Paper 273. http://www.cgdev.org/publication/brave-new-world-literature-review-emergingdonors-and-changing-nature-foreign-assistance, 05.01.2017.
88. Yumnam, J. (2014). Challenges of the Private Sector in Effective Development: A Civil Society Perspective. http://devcooperation.org/2014/05/22/challenges-of-the-private-sector-indevelopment-a-civil-society-perspective/, 25.11.2015.
89. Zimmermann, F. ve Smith, K. (2011). More Actors, More Money, More ideas for International Dev. Cooperation. Journal of International Development, 23(5), 722-738.