ÇALIŞANLARIN YEŞİL DAVRANIŞLARINA YÖNELİK ARAŞTIRMALARIN BİBLİYOMETRİK AÇIDAN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Bu makalenin amacı, çalışan yeşil davranışı (ÇYD) ile ilgili yapılan araştırmalar hakkında kapsamlı bir literatür taraması yapmak, araştırma alanıyla ilgili teorik temelleri ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla, veriler Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında geçmişten günümüze (05.12.2024) kadar yayımlanan, yönetim ve işletme alanındaki 71 makale değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Arama sonucunda ulaşılan verilerin analizlerinin gerçekleştirilmesinde R Studio/Bibliyometrix/Biblioshiny arayüzünden yararlanılmıştır. Veriler, yıllara göre yayın ve atıf oranları, dergi-ülke-yazar karşılaştırmaları, makalelerin yayımlandığı kaynaklar, yazarların üretkenliği ve yazarların makalelerine gelen atıf sayıları, anahtar kelime, anahtar kelimelerin yıllara göre kullanım sıklığı ve anahtar kelimelerin ortak oluşum ağları açısından incelenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, en çok yayın üreten yazarın G. Tang (4) ve en çok atıf alan yazarın N. M. Ashkanasy (17) olduğu, en çok atıf alan makalenin R. Chaudhary tarafından 2020 yılında kaleme alınan “Green human resource management and employee green behavior: an empirical analysis” adlı makalenin olduğu, en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimenin “employee green behavior” olduğu, makalelerin en çok “Corporate social responsibility and environmental management” dergisinde yayımlandığı tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma, yönetim ve işletme alanında ÇYD araştırmalarına ilginin artırdığını ortaya koymuştur. Araştırma, ÇYD hakkında güncel eğilimleri ortaya koymakla birlikte araştırma alanının teorik temelleri hakkında kapsamlı bir bilgi sunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda araştırmanın gelecekteki araştırmalara rehberlik edeceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çalışan Yeşil Davranışı
• Yeşil Örgütsel Davranış
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• R Studio.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Employee Green Behavior

Öz

This study aims to conduct a comprehensive literature review on employee green behavior (EGB) research and establish the theoretical foundations of this research field. For this purpose, data from 71 articles published in the fields of management and business, indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database up to December 5, 2024, were evaluated. The data analysis used the R Studio/Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny interface. The data were examined in terms of annual publication and citation rates, journal-country-author comparisons, sources of publications, author productivity, citation counts of articles, keywords, frequency of keyword usage over the years, and keyword co-occurrence networks. According to the research findings, the most prolific author is G. Tang (4 publications), while the most cited author is N. M. Ashkanasy (17 citations). The most cited article is "Green human resource management and employee green behavior: an empirical analysis," authored by R. Chaudhary in 2020. The most frequently used keyword is "employee green behavior," and the journal with the highest number of publications is Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The study reveals a growing interest in EGB research within the fields of management and business. It provides a comprehensive overview of current trends in EGB and offers detailed insights into the theoretical foundations of the research area. In this context, the study is expected to serve as a guide for future research on this topic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Employee Green Behavior
• Green Organizational Behavior
• Bibliometric Analysis
• R Studio.

Kaynakça

1. ABORAMADAN, M., KUNDI, Y. M., & BECKER, A. (2022). Green Human Resource Management in Nonprofit Organizations: Effects on Employee Green Behavior and The Role of Perceived Green Organizational Support. Personnel Review, 51(7), 1788-1806.
2. AJZEN, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3. ALI, A., & JUAN, H. (2024). Trends and Trajectories in Employee Green Behavior Research. Front. Sociol. 9 (1486377), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1486377
4. ALKHAMMASH, R. (2023). Bibliometric, Network, and Thematic Mapping Analyses of Metaphor and Discourse in Covid-19 Publications from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1-16, 1062943.
5. ALTINBAY, A., & DURAK, H. (2022). Çevre Muhasebesi, Yeşil Muhasebe ve Karbon Muhasebesi Kavramları Hakkında Yazılan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi. International Journal of Applied Economic and Finance Studies, 7(1), 140-155.
6. APPELBAUM, E., BAILEY, T., BERG, P. & KALLEBERG, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca and London: Economic Policy Institute, Cornell University Press.
7. ARIA, M., & CUCCURULLO, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
8. AVŞAR, İ. İ., & ECEMİŞ, O. (2023). Yeşil Lojistik ve Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Üzerine İnceleme. Journal of International Economics, Finance and Trade, 1(1), 29-48.

9. AY, U. (2017). Çevreci Tüketim Davranışlarının Değer-İnanç-Norm Kuramı Temelinde İncelenmesi. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi= Journal of Consumer and Consumption Research, 9(1), 1-33.
10. BHATNAGAR, J., & AGGARWAL, P. (2020). Meaningful Work as A Mediator Between Perceived Organizational Support for environment and Employee Eco-Initiatives, Psychological Capital and Alienation. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(6), 1487-1511.
11. BISSING‐OLSON, M. J., IYER, A., FIELDING, K. S., & ZACHER, H. (2013). Relationships between Daily Affect and Pro‐Environmental Behavior at Work: The Moderating Role of Pro‐Environmental Attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 156-175.
12. BLAU, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
13. BLOK, V., WESSELINK, R., STUDYNKA, O., & KEMP, R. (2015). Encouraging Sustainability in the Workplace: A Survey on The Pro-Environmental Behaviour of University Employees. Journal of cleaner production, 106, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.063
14. BOIRAL, O., TALBOT, D., & PAILLE, P. (2015). Leading By Example: A Model of Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 532-550. doi: 10.1002/bse.1835
15. BOIRAL, O., & PAILLE, P. (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: Measurement and Validation. Journal of business ethics, 109, 431-445.
16. CIALDINI, R. B., RENO, R. R., & KALLGREN, C. A. (1990). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
17. COBO, M. J., MARTINEZ, M.A., GUTIERREZ-SALCEDO, M., FUJITA, H., & HERRERA-VIEDMA, E. (2015). 25 Years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 3-13.
18. CROPANZANO, R., & MITCHELL, M. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602.
19. ÇELİK, Z. & AYDIN, İ. (2022). Ulusal Sürdürülebilir Pazarlama Literatürünün Bibliyometrik Analizi. Dursun Keleş (ed), İşletmecilik Alanındaki Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik analizi (Muhasebe ve Finansman, Yönetim ve Organizasyon, Üretim Yönetimi ve Pazarlama Boyutlarıyla) içinde (s. 311-335), Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
20. DANIŞMAZ, A. T. (2023). Evaluation of Compulsory Green Employee Behaviour in the Framework of Compulsory Citizenship Behaviour. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 11(3), 966-974.
21. DE ARAUJO, F. F. (2014). Do I Look Good in Green?: A Conceptual Framework Integrating Employee Green Behavior, Impression Management, and Social Norms. Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade (AOS), 3(2), 7-23.
22. DECI, E. L., & RYAN, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
23. DIETZ, T., & STERN, P. C. (1995). Toward a Theory of Choice: Socially Embedded Preference Construction. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 24(2), 261-279.
24. DUMONT, J., SHEN, J., & DENG, X. (2017). Effects of Green HRM Practices on Employee Workplace Green Behavior: The role of Psychological Green Climate and Employee Green Values. Human resource management, 56(4), 613-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21792
25. DURMUŞ, Ş., & ERBAŞI, A. (2023). Yeşil imaj. Ali Erbaşı (Ed.), Tüm Yönleriyle Yeşil İşletme (Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı) içinde (s. 375-392). Konya: Atlas Akademi.
26. ERBAŞI, A., ÇALIŞKAN, A., & AKDENİZ, G. (2022). The Effect of Personality Traits on Green Organizational Behavior. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 154-185. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.903230
27. ERBAŞI, A. (2019). Yeşil Örgütsel Davranış Ölçeği: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. Istanbul Management Journal, (86), 1-23.
28. ETLİOĞLU, M. (2023). Görsel Haritalama Tekniği ile Yeşil Pazarlama Bibliyometrik Analizi. Five Zero, 3(1), 146-162.
29. FAROOQ, K., YUSLIZA, M. Y., MUHAMMAD, Z., OMAR, M. K., & NIK MAT, N. H. (2023). Employee Ecological Behavior Among Academicians at the Workplace. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(4), 713-740. DOI 10.1108/SRJ-04-2021-0147
30. GRAVES, L. M., SARKIS, J., & ZHU, Q. (2013). How Transformational Leadership and Employee Motivation Combine to Predict Employee Proenvironmental Behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.002
31. GUAN, X., AHMAD, N., SIAL, M. S., CHERIAN, J., & HAN, H. (2023). CSR and Organizational Performance: The Role of Pro‐Environmental Behavior and Personal Values. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 677-694.
32. HOBFOLL, S. E. (1989). Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
33. HOBFOLL, S. E. (2001). The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested-Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00062
34. HOMBURG, A., & STOLBERG, A. (2006). Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior with a Cognitive Theory of Stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 1-14.
35. IFTIKAR, T., HUSSAIN, S., MALIK, M. I., HYDER, S., KALEEM, M., & SAQIB, A. (2022). Green Human Resource Management and Pro-Environmental Behaviour Nexus With the Lens of Amo Theory. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2124603
36. KANBUR, E., KANBUR, A., & ÖZDEMIR, B. (2022). Çevresel Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(30. YönOrg 2022), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1144223
37. KELLERT, S. R., & WILSON, E. O. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press/Shearwater Books.
38. KERSE, G., MADEN, Ş. & TARTAN, SELÇUK, E. (2021). Yeşil Dönüştürücü Liderlik, Yeşil İçsel Motivasyon ve Çalışanın Yeşil Davranışı: Ölçek Uyarlama ve İlişki Tespiti. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(2), 1574-1591. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1216.
39. KHALID, B., SHAHZAD, K., SHAFI, M., & PAILLE, P. (2022). Predicting Required and Voluntary Employee Green Behavior Using The Theory of Planned Behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1300-1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2270
40. KIM, A., KIM, Y., HAN, K., JACKSON, S. E., & PLOYHART, R. E. (2017). Multilevel Influences on Voluntary Workplace Green Behavior: Individual Differences, Leader Behavior, and Coworker Advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335-1358.
41. KURT, Z. (2024). Yeşil Yönetim Anlayışı ile İlgili Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(2), 583-593. doi:10.33206/mjss.1435771.
42. KURTULGAN, İ. F., (2024). Sürdürülebilir Bir Gelecek için Yeşil Girişimcilik: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 59(1), 552-573.
43. KUZGUN, Ş. (2024). Yeşil Girişimcilik Literatürünün Bibliyometrik Analizi, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(2), 692-712.
44. LEGAULT, L. (2020). Self-determination theory. Virgil Zeigler-Hill & Todd K. Shackelford (Eds.), In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 4694-4702). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3
45. LI, W., ABDALLA, A. A., MOHAMMAD, T., KHASSAWNEH, O., & PARVEEN, M. (2023). Towards Examining the Link Between Green HRM Practices and Employee Green in-Role Behavior: Spiritual Leadership as A Moderator. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S396114
46. LÜLFS, R., & HAHN, R. (2013). Corporate Greening Beyond Formal Programs, Initiatives, and Systems: A Conceptual Model for Voluntary Pro‐Environmental Behavior of Employees. European Management Review, 10(2), 83-98.
47. LY, B. (2023). Green HRM and Eco-Friendly Behavior in Cambodian Public Organizations: The Mediation of Organizational Commitment. Environmental Challenges, 10, 100674, 1-8.
48. MAMUN, A. M. A. (2023). Motivating Green Behaviour in Bangladeshi Employees: Self-Determination Theory Application. Heliyon, 9(7), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18155.
49. MUKONZA, C., & SWARTS, I. (2019). Examining The Role of Green Transformational Leadership on Promoting Green Organizational Behavior. Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku (Ed.), In Contemporary Multicultural Orientations and Practices for Global Leadership (pp. 200-224). IGI Global.
50. NORTON, T. A., PARKER, S. L., ZACHER, H., & ASHKANASY, N. M. (2015). Employee Green Behavior: A Theoretical Framework, Multilevel Review, and Future Research Agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103-125.
51. NORTON, T. A., ZACHER, H., & ASHKANASY, N. M. (2014). Organisational Sustainability Policies and Employee Green Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Work Climate Perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49-54.
52. NORTON, T. A., ZACHER, H., PARKER, S. L., & ASHKANASY, N. M. (2017). Bridging the Gap Between Green Behavioral Intentions and Employee Green Behavior: The Role of Green Psychological Climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 996-1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2178
53. ONES, D.S., & DILCHERT, S. (2012). Employee Green Behaviors. In Susan E. Jackson, Deniz Ones, Stephan Dilchert (Eds.), Managing Human Resources for Environmental Sustainability (pp. 85-116). San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
54. PAILLE, P., & MEJIA-MORELOS, J. H. (2014). Antecedents of Pro-Environmental Behaviours at Work: The Moderating Influence of Psychological Contract Breach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.004
55. PENG, J., HOU, N., & PANG, Y. (2019). Employees’ Green Behavior: Summarizing the Concept and The Theoretical Explanation. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(7), 1297-1306. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01297
56. RAMUS, C. A., & STEGER, U. (2000). The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 605-626.
57. RANA, H., & PUNIA, B. K. (2014). Management Mechanisms and Implications of Workplace Deviance for Green Organizational Behavior. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 2(8), 1-8.
58. RAYNER, J., & MORGAN, D. (2018). An Empirical Study of ‘GREEN’WORKPLACE Behaviours: Ability, Motivation and Opportunity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 56-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12151
59. ROUHANI RAD, S., KESHAVARZ, M., & ROUHANI RAD, S. (2024). Analyzing the Impact of Green Policies on Employees' Eco-initiatives: The Mediating Role of Environmental Concerns and Effective Commitment to the Organization. Journals of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 37-51. doi: 10.30473/ee.2023.65056.2556
60. RUEPERT, A., KEIZER, K., STEG, L., MARICCHIOLO, F., CARRUS, G., DUMITRU, A., ... & MOZA, D. (2016). Environmental Considerations in The Organizational Context: A pathway to Pro-Environmental Behaviour at Work. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 59-70.
61. SABBIR, M. M., & TAUFIQUE, K. M. R. (2022). Sustainable Employee Green Behavior in The Workplace: Integrating Cognitive and Non‐Cognitive Factors in Corporate Environmental Policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 110-128.
62. SAIFULINA, N., CARBALLO‐PENELA, A., & RUZO‐SANMARTIN, E. (2021). The Antecedents of Employees' Voluntary Proenvironmental Behavior at Work in Developing Countries: The Role of Employee Affective Commitment and Organizational Support. Business Strategy & Development, 4(3), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.162
63. STERN, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
64. STERN, P. C., DIETZ, T., ABEL, T., GUAGNAGO, G. A., & KALOF, L. (1999). A Values-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Enviromentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6(2), 81-97.
65. TIRNO, R. R., ISLAM, N., & HAPPY, K. (2023). Green HRM and Ecofriendly Behavior of Employees: Relevance of Proecological Climate and Environmental Knowledge. Heliyon, 9(4), 1-15.
66. UDDIN, M. A., BISWAS, S. R., BHATTACHARJEE, S., DEY, M., & MAHMOOD, M. (2021). Inspiring Employees' Ecological Behaviors: The Roles of Corporate Environmental Strategy, Biospheric Values, and Eco‐Centric Leadership. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2367-2381.
67. WILSON, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. Cambridge (Mass.), London: Harvard University Press.
68. YOUNG, P. (2015). The Evolution of Social Norms. Annual Review of Economics. 7, 359-387. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ECONOMICS-080614-115322
69. ZAIDI, H., & AZMI, F. T. (2024). Workplace Pro-Environmental Behaviour: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(1), 158-185. DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-09-2021-0507
70. ZHANG, L., CARTER Jr, R. A., QIAN, X., YANG, S., RUJIMORA, J., & WEN, S. (2022). Academia's Responses to Crisis: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature on Online Learning in Higher Education During COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53,620-646.
71. ZHANG, N., GUO, M., BU, X., & JIN, C. (2023). Understanding Green Loyalty: A Literature Review Based on Bibliometric-Content Analysis. Heliyon, 9, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2023.e18029
72. ZHANG, Y., LUO, Y., ZHANG, X., & ZHAO, J. (2019). How Green Human Resource Management Can Promote Green Employee Behavior in China: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. Sustainability, 11(5408), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195408
73. ZHANG, X., PANATIK, S. A., & ZHANG, N. (2024). Employee Green Behavior: Bibliometric-content Analysis. Heliyon, 10, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31045
74. ZHANG, B., YANG, L., CHENG, X., & CHEN, F. (2021). How Does Employee Green Behavior Impact Employee Well-Being? An Empirical Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18(1669). 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18041669
75. ZHANG, Y., WANG, Z., & ZHOU, G. (2014). Determinants of Employee Electricity Saving: The role of Social Benefits, Personal Benefits and Organizational Electricity Saving Climate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.021
76. ZIENTARA, P., & ZAMOJSKA, A. (2016). Green Organizational Climates and Employee Pro-Environmental Behaviour in The Hotel Industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1142–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1206554.