Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity

Gizem Karadeniz; Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak

doi:10.54733/smar.1377965

EN TR

Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity

Öz

This study was conducted to adapt the "Citizenship Fatigue Scale," which was developed to measure the "Citizenship Fatigue" concept in Turkish culture. The adaptation study was conducted on two samples: academics and teachers. In this study, language, content, construct and criterion validity studies were conducted to determine the validity of the Citizenship Fatigue Scale. After the language validity of the scale was completed, data were collected from 330 teachers and 311 academics and analyses were performed. All analyses were performed using SPSS and AMOS package programs. EFA, CFA and measurement invariance analysis by gender were conducted using the teachers’ data. The other sample group was academics working in public and private universities. With the data collected from this group, CFA and criterion-related validity were tested. The reliability study was carried out with an internal consistency coefficient and test-retest methods, and the scale was found to be reliable. As a result of the analyses, it can be said that the six-item unidimensional Citizenship Fatigue Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool and can be used to measure employees' citizenship fatigue in both academic and teacher samples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

citizenship fatigue, organizational citizenship behavior, validity, reliability, scale adaptation

Vatandaşlık Yorgunluğu Ölçeğinin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışma, "Vatandaşlık Yorgunluğu" kavramını ölçmek üzere geliştirilen "Vatandaşlık Yorgunluğu Ölçeği"nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Uyarlama çalışması akademisyenler ve öğretmenler olmak üzere iki farklı örneklem üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışma kapsamında vatandaşlık Yorgunluğu Ölçeği'nin geçerliliğini belirlemek için dil, kapsam, yapı ve kriter geçerliliği çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin dil geçerliliği tamamlandıktan sonra 330 öğretmen ve 311 akademisyenden veri toplanmış ve analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Tüm analizler SPSS ve AMOS paket programları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğretmenlerden toplanan verilerle AFA, DFA ve cinsiyete göre ölçüm değişmezliği analizleri yapılmıştır. Diğer örneklem grubu ise kamu ve özel üniversitelerde çalışan akademisyenlerdir. Bu gruptan toplanan verilerle DFA ve ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlilik test edilmiştir. Güvenirlik çalışması iç tutarlılık katsayısı ve test-tekrar test yöntemleri ile gerçekleştirilmiş ve ölçek güvenilir bulunmuştur. Yapılan analizler sonucunda altı maddelik tek boyutlu Vatandaşlık Yorgunluğu Ölçeği'nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu ve hem akademisyen hem de öğretmen örnekleminde çalışanların vatandaşlık yorgunluğunu ölçmek için kullanılabileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

vatandaşlık yorgunluğu, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı, geçerlilik, güvenilirlik, ölçek uyarlama

Kaynakça

Altaf, A., Sajid, K., & Ali, S. Z. (2020). Challenge-hindrance stressors and psychological well-being: The moderating role of citizenship pressure and mediating role of citizenship fatigue. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 5(5), 231-239. http://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2020-55003
Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X288838
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost?. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078-1095. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26585791
Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., Gorbaniuk, O., Bendayan, R., McNeill, M., Angeluci, A., Abreu, A. M., Ben-Ezra, M., Benvenuti, M., Blanca, M. J., Brkljacic, T., Babić, N. Č., Gorbaniuk, J., Holdoš, J., Ivanova, A., Karadağ, E., Malik, S., Mazzoni, E., Milanovic, A., Musil, B., Pantic, I., Rando, B., Seidman, G., D’Souza, L., Abeele, M. M. P. V., Wołonciej, M., Wu, A. M. S., & Yu, S. (2021). Measurement invariance of the phubbing scale across 20 countries. International Journal of Psychology, 56(6), 885-894. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12790
Bolino, M. C., & Klotz, A. C. (2015). The paradox of the unethical organizational citizen: The link between organizational citizenship behavior and unethical behavior at work. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.026
Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., & Harvey, J. (2012). A Challenge or a hindrance? Citizenship and citizenship fatigue. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 14404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2012.14404abstract
Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037583
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 542-559. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1847
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Buonocore, A. (2016). Too much of one good thing… from organizational citizenship behavior to citizenship fatigue: Where do we draw the line?. From Science to Practice, 2(1), 9-12.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (28. Basım). Ankara.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington R., Hutchison S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the people’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0051
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224378101800104
Gupta, B., & Singh, A. (2017). Predicting employee engagement, knowledge sharing & ocb. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(4), 675-688.
Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz) (2. Basım). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Halbesleben, J. R., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1452-1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017595
Hammack, M. (2018). Citizenship pressure, citizenship fatigue, and gender [Master's Thesis, Publicaton No. 10844944]. Azusa Pacific University.
Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164588
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical transactions of the royal society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology, 3, 1-49.
Lan, J., Gong, Y., & Yuan, B. (2022). Requested to do right things excessively: How citizenship pressure/future focus influence health-related work outcomes in health organizations during the pandemic. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 36(6), 748-766. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2021-0374
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Liu, X., & Yu, K. (2019). Emotional stability and citizenship fatigue: The role of emotional exhaustion and job stressors. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.033
Malach-Pines, A. (2005). The burnout measure, short version. International Journal of Stress Management, 12(1), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.12.1.78
Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-Collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160204
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
Muniz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International test commission guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Narciso, C. D. (2017). Lack of reciprocity, organizational citizenship behaviors and citizenship fatigue: a tale of two theories [Master's Thesis]. University Institute of Lisbon.
Neves, P. C., & Andrade, C. (2021). Citizenship fatigue as mediator between compulsory citizenship behavior and work-family conflict. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 21(4), 1785-1791. https://doi.org/10.5935/rpot/2021.4.21945
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. Mcgraw Hill Book Company.
Paine, J. B., & Organ, D. W. (2000). The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: Some preliminary conceptual and empirical observations. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00038-8
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206300026003
Qiu, Y., Lou, M., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior motives and thriving at work: The mediating role of citizenship fatigue. Sustainability, 12(6), 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062231
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-16). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50005-8
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Edition). Pearson.
Tümkaya, S., Çam, S., & Çavuşoğlu, İ. (2009). Tükenmişlik ölçeği kısa versiyonu’nun Türkçe’ye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(1), 387-398.
Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2010). Çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve iş stresinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş performansına etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 17(2), 183-206.
Xu, F., Xu, S., Zhu, J., Zhou, J., Zhang, B., & Yang, C. (2021). Why and when do good soldiers behave unethically? Introducing conservation of resources theory to explain the curvilinear effects of organizational citizenship behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 619-657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619657
Zugay, B. M. (2021). Stressed and confused: An exploration into citizenship fatigue and the dark side of workplace friendship [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Wisconsin.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Örgütsel Davranış

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Gizem Karadeniz ^*
0000-0001-6405-177X
Türkiye

Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak
0000-0002-3297-1659
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Aralık 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Ekim 2023

Kabul Tarihi

30 Kasım 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1377965

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA93WC48FR

APA

Karadeniz, G., & Uzunbacak, H. H. (2023). Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(4), 558-576. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1377965

AMA

1.Karadeniz G, Uzunbacak HH. Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity. SMAR. 2023;4(4):558-576. doi:10.54733/smar.1377965

Chicago

Karadeniz, Gizem, ve Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak. 2023. “Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 4 (4): 558-76. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1377965.

EndNote

Karadeniz G, Uzunbacak HH (01 Aralık 2023) Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 4 4 558–576.

IEEE

[1]G. Karadeniz ve H. H. Uzunbacak, “Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity”, SMAR, c. 4, sy 4, ss. 558–576, Ara. 2023, doi: 10.54733/smar.1377965.

ISNAD

Karadeniz, Gizem - Uzunbacak, Hasan Hüseyin. “Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 4/4 (01 Aralık 2023): 558-576. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1377965.

JAMA

1.Karadeniz G, Uzunbacak HH. Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity. SMAR. 2023;4:558–576.

MLA

Karadeniz, Gizem, ve Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak. “Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, c. 4, sy 4, Aralık 2023, ss. 558-76, doi:10.54733/smar.1377965.

Vancouver

1.Gizem Karadeniz, Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak. Adaptation of Citizenship Fatigue Scale into Turkish Culture: The Study of Reliability and Validity. SMAR. 01 Aralık 2023;4(4):558-76. doi:10.54733/smar.1377965