Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi

Tugay Ülkü; Sema Polatcı

doi:10.54733/smar.1388417

TR EN

Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı aydınlık ve karanlık üçlünün etik olmayan örgüt yanlısı davranışlar sergileme niyetlerini içsel ve dışsal motivasyonun aracılığı ve kurum imajının düzenleyiciliği altında ele almaktır. Kişiliğin aydınlık ve karanlık tarafının birbirini harmanlayan yapısına ek olarak etik olmayan örgüt yanlısı davranışların zıtlık içeren doğasını kişilik perspektifinden açıklamaya çalışmak yazına katkı sağlayacaktır. Nicel araştırma deseni ile tasarlanan bu çalışmada, araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye’de çalışan 187.586 banka personeli oluşturmaktadır. Türkiye’nin yedi coğrafi bölgesini temsil yetkisi bulunacak şekilde “Tabakalı Örnekleme Yöntemi” ile 430 katılımcıya ulaşılmıştır. SPSS 26., SPSS Amos ve Hayes Process Macro 4.2 eklentisi üzerinden gerçekleştirilen aracılık etki analizleri sonucunda aydınlık üçlünün hem içsel hem dışsal motivasyonun aracılığı ile karanlık üçlünün sadece dışsal motivasyonun aracılığı ile etik olmayan örgüt yanlısı davranışları etkilediği görülmüştür. Kurum imajının yer aldığı durumsal aracılık etki analizlerinde kurum imajının düzenleyicilik etkisinin anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular ışığında araştırma sonuçları ve sonraki çalışmalar için tartışma konuları ele alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

aydınlık üçlü, karanlık üçlü, motivasyon, kurum imajı, etik olmayan örgüt yanlısı davranışlar

Dark and Light Side in the Corporate World: Exploring the Influence of Personality Traits on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to examine the intentions of the light and dark triad to exhibit unethical pro-organizational behaviors under the conditional mediation of internal/external motivation and the corporate image. In addition to the blending structure of the light and dark sides of personality, trying to explain the contradictory nature of unethical pro-organizational behaviors from the personality perspective will contribute to the literature. In this study, a quantitative research design was used, and the research population consists of 187.586 bank personnel working in Türkiye. 430 participants were reached with the "Stratified Sampling Method", which has the authority to represent seven geographical regions of Türkiye. As a result of the mediating effect analyzes performed on SPSS 26., SPSS Amos and Hayes Process Macro 4.2 plugin, it was seen that the light triad effected unethical pro-organizational behaviors through both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and the dark triad only through extrinsic motivation. It was determined that the corporate image's moderator effects were insignificant in the conditional mediation effect analyzes. In light of the findings obtained, the research results and discussion topics for further studies are discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

light triad, dark triad, motivation, corporate image, unethical pro-organizational behaviours

Etik Beyan

İnsan katılımcıları içeren çalışmalarda gerçekleştirilen tüm prosedürler, kurumsal ve/veya ulusal araştırma komitesinin etik standartlarına ve 1964 Helsinki deklarasyonuna ve daha sonraki değişikliklerine veya karşılaştırılabilir etik standartlara uygundur. Bu araştırma için Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Araştırmaları Etik Kurulundan 14.10.2022 tarih ve 13.02 karar sayısı ile Etik Kurul Onayı alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2013). Kent devletinden imparatorluğa. İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Pine Forge Press.
Altunışık, R., Gegez, E., Koç, E., Sığrı, Ü., Yüksel, A., Boz, H., & Yıldız, E. (2022). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Yeni perspektifler. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Andreassen, T. W., & Lindestad, B. (1998). Customer loyalty and complex services: The impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239810199923
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and weil‐being in two work settings1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.002
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Nitel, nicel araştırma deseni ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (Çev. Ed. Demir, S. B., 3. Baskı). Eğiten Kitap.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23, https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self‐determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x

Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
Donald, J. N., Bradshaw, E. L., Conigrave, J. H., Parker, P. D., Byatt, L. L., Noetel, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Paths to the light and dark sides of human nature: A meta-analytic review of the prosocial benefits of autonomy and the antisocial costs of control. Psychological Bulletin, 147(9), 921-946. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000338
Dowling, G. R. (1986). Managing your corporate images. Industrial Marketing Management, 15(2), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(86)90051-9
Effelsberg, D., Solga, M., & Gurt, J. (2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1644-z
Erhan, T. (2022). Karanlık ve aydınlık üçlü kişilik özellikleri bağlamında yapıcı sapma davranışı: Havacılık çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Aviation Research, 4(1), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.51785/jar.1066310
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Furnham, A., & Eysenck, H. J. (2008). Personality at work: Individual differences in the workplace. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203134122
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Galperin, B. L. (2012). Exploring the nomological network of workplace deviance: Developing and validating a measure of constructive deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 2988-3025. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00971.x
Galvin, B. M., Lange, D., & Ashforth, B. E. (2015). Narcissistic organizational identification: Seeing oneself as central to the organization's identity. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0103
Gerymski, R., & Krok, D. (2019). Psychometric properties and validation of the Polish adaptation of the Light Triad Scale. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 7(4), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.92960
Hafez, M. (2018). Measuring the impact of corporate social responsibility practices on brand equity in the banking industry in Bangladesh: The mediating effect of corporate image and brand awareness. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(5), 806-822. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2017-0072
Harrison, A., Summers, J., & Mennecke, B. (2018). The effects of the dark triad on unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 53-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3368-3
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hongdan, Z., & Jun, Z. (2017). Corporate hypocrisy, moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Moderated mediating effect. Foreign Economics & Management, 39(01), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2017.01.002
Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95-96, 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
Irshad, M., & Bashir, S. (2020). The dark side of organizational identification: a multi-study investigation of negative outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 572478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572478
Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480274
Jonason, P. K., & Ferrell, J. D. (2016). Looking under the hood: The psychogenic motivational foundations of the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.039
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
Jonason, P. K., Strosser, G. L., Kroll, C. H., Duineveld, J. J., & Baruffi, S. A. (2015). Valuing myself over others: The dark triad traits and moral and social values. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.045
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958
Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. (2019). The light vs. dark triad of personality: Contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
Kurtulmuş, B. E. (2019). The dark side of leadership: An institutional perspective. Springer International Publishing.
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2019). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z
Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.846
Liu, D., Zhang, S., Wang, L., & Lee, T. W. (2011). The effects of autonomy and empowerment on employee turnover: Test of a multilevel model in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1305-1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024518
Luan, Y., Zhao, K., Wang, Z., & Hu, F. (2023). Exploring the antecedents of unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB): A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 187, 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05269-w
Lukić, P., & Živanović, M. (2021). Shedding light on the light triad: Further evidence on structural, construct, and predictive validity of the light triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, 110876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110876
Lyons, M. (2019). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy in everyday life. Academic Press.
March, E., & Marrington, J. Z. (2021). Antisocial and prosocial online behaviour: Exploring the roles of the dark and light triads. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1390-1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01552-7
Markland, D., Ryan, R. M., Tobin, V. J., & Rollnick, S. (2005). Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(6), 811-831. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2005.24.6.811
Mishra, M., Ghosh, K., & Sharma, D. (2022). Unethical pro-organizational behavior: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 179, 63-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04764-w
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195-206). Oxford University Press.
Naseer, S., Bouckenooghe, D., Syed, F., Khan, A. K., & Qazi, S. (2020). The malevolent side of organizational identification: Unraveling the impact of psychological entitlement and manipulative personality on unethical work behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(3), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09623-0
Neumann, C. S., Kaufman, S. B., ten Brinke, L., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsykayama, E. (2020). Light and dark trait subtypes of human personality-A multi-study person-centered approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110121
Nguyen, N., & Leblanc, G. (2001). Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(4), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(00)00029-1
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Özdemir, O., Özdemir, P. G., Kadak, M. T., & Nasıroğlu, S. (2012). Kişilik gelişimi. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 4(4), 566-589.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Pektaş, S., & Durmuş, G. (2022). Adaptation of the light triad scale to Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(3), 664-674. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1167809
Polatcı, S., & Ülkü, T. (2023). Aydınlık ve karanlık üçlünün etik olmayan örgüt yanlısı davranışlar sergileme motivasyonları: Banka personeli üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 230-259. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1245688
Polatcı, S., & Yeloğlu, H. O. (2021). Karanlık ve aydınlık kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyeti üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. Journal of Organizational Behavior Review, 3(1), 73-87. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jobreview/issue/59746/836306
Prusik, M., & Szulawski, M. (2019). The relationship between the dark triad personality traits, motivation at work, and burnout among HR recruitment workers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01290
Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., & Bill, J. B. (1997). Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017989205184
Rogoza, R., & Cieciuch, J. (2019). Structural investigation of the short dark triad questionnaire in Polish population. Current Psychology, 38(3), 756-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9653-1
Saruhan, Ş. C., & Özdemirci, A. (2018). Bilim, felsefe ve metodoloji. Beta Yayınları.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Sevi, B., Urgancı, B., & Sakman, E. (2020). Who cheats? An examination of light and dark personality traits as predictors of infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110126
Shaw, K. H., Tang, N., & Liao, H. Y. (2020). Authoritarian-benevolent leadership, moral disengagement, and follower unethical pro-organizational behavior: An investigation of the effects of ambidextrous leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00590
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox, & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151-174). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics: Pearson new international edition. Pearson.
Tekeş, B., & Bıçaksız, P. (2021). Aydınlık üçlü (light triad) ölçeğinin psikometrik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 8(3), 535-556. https://doi.org/10.31682/ayna.871395
Thietart, R. A., & Forgues, B. (1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.19
Tian, Q., & Peterson, D. K. (2016). The effects of ethical pressure and power distance orientation on unethical pro‐organizational behavior: The case of earnings management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12109
Tran, M. A., Nguyen, B., Melewar, T. C., & Bodoh, J. (2015). Exploring the corporate image formation process. Qualitative Market Research, 18(1), 86-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-05-2014-0046
Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(4), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167
Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0559
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769-780. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214
Uzunbacak, H. H., Akçakanat, T., & Bayrakçı, E. (2019). İyi niyetli kötü davranışlar: banka çalışanlarının örgüt yararına ahlaki olmayan davranışları üzerine nitel bir araştırma. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 12(18. UİK Özel Sayısı), 658-683. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.590468
Vadera, A. K., Pratt, M. G., & Mishra, P. (2013). Constructive deviance in organizations: Integrating and moving forward. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1221-1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313475816
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359
Wang, J., Shi, W., Liu, G., & Zhou, L. (2021). Moving beyond initiative: the reconceptualization and measurement of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 640107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640107
Wang, X., Zheng, X. J., & Zhao, S. (2022). Repaying the debt: An examination of the relationship between perceived organizational support and unethical pro-organizational behavior by low performers. Journal of Business Ethics, 179, 697-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04809-0
Webster, B. D., & Smith, M. B. (2019). The dark triad and organizational citizenship behaviors: The moderating role of high involvement management climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 621-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9562-9
Xiao, M., Wang, Z., Kong, X., Ao, X., Song, J., & Zhang, P. (2021). Relatedness need satisfaction and the dark triad: The role of depression and prevention focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 677906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677906
Zimbardo, P. (2018). Exploring human nature and inspiring heroic social action. In A.A. Ariyanto, H. Muluk, P. Newcombe, F. P. Piercy, E. K. Poerwandari, & S. H. R. Suradijono (Eds.), Diversity in unity: Perspectives from psychology and behavioral sciences, (pp. 3-9). Routledge.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Örgütsel Davranış

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Tugay Ülkü ^*
0000-0002-4337-4876
Türkiye

Sema Polatcı
0000-0002-4671-1356
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Aralık 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Kasım 2023

Kabul Tarihi

20 Aralık 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1388417

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA58KL37CN

APA

Ülkü, T., & Polatcı, S. (2023). Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(4), 503-531. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1388417

AMA

1.Ülkü T, Polatcı S. Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi. SMAR. 2023;4(4):503-531. doi:10.54733/smar.1388417

Chicago

Ülkü, Tugay, ve Sema Polatcı. 2023. “Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 4 (4): 503-31. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1388417.

EndNote

Ülkü T, Polatcı S (01 Aralık 2023) Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 4 4 503–531.

IEEE

[1]T. Ülkü ve S. Polatcı, “Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi”, SMAR, c. 4, sy 4, ss. 503–531, Ara. 2023, doi: 10.54733/smar.1388417.

ISNAD

Ülkü, Tugay - Polatcı, Sema. “Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 4/4 (01 Aralık 2023): 503-531. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1388417.

JAMA

1.Ülkü T, Polatcı S. Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi. SMAR. 2023;4:503–531.

MLA

Ülkü, Tugay, ve Sema Polatcı. “Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, c. 4, sy 4, Aralık 2023, ss. 503-31, doi:10.54733/smar.1388417.

Vancouver

1.Tugay Ülkü, Sema Polatcı. Kurumsal Dünyada Karanlık ve Aydınlık Taraf: Kişilik Özelliklerinin Etik Olmayan Örgüt Yanlısı Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisinin Keşfi. SMAR. 01 Aralık 2023;4(4):503-31. doi:10.54733/smar.1388417