Yüksek Performanslı İş Sistemleri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Analizi

Yıl 2024, , 365 - 388, 28.10.2024

Burak Nedim Aktaş

https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1539657

Öz

Bu çalışma, Yüksek Performanslı İş Sistemleri (YPİS) Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlama süreci, ölçeğin geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği üzerine yapılan analizleri ele almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, yazılım ve donanım geliştiren, ayrıca hizmet sağlayıcı teknoloji firmalarında çalışan toplam 201 beyaz yakalı katılımcıdan elde edilen bir veri seti oluşturulmuş, elde edilen veriler üzerinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA), güvenilirlik analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA), yakınsak ve ayırt edici geçerlilik analizleri uygulanmıştır. Değerlendirme sürecinde tanımlayıcı istatistiksel yöntemler (Frekans, Oran) dikkate alınmıştır. Bulgular, faktörlerin orijinal veri setindeki değişkenler arasında anlamlı ve kapsayıcı bir yapı oluşturduğunu göstermektedir. Cronbach alpha, 0.950 ile ölçeğin güvenilir olduğuna işaret etmektedir. DFA analizi ise verilerin kabul edilebilir ve güçlü uyum sergilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Son olarak, yakınsak ve ayırt edici geçerlilik analizleri ise ölçeğin geçerliliğini desteklemektedir. Sonuç olarak, bu ölçeğin, Türkiye'deki işletmelerin insan kaynakları uygulamalarını değerlendirmek ve geliştirmek için uygun bir araç potansiyeline sahip olduğu değerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yüksek performanslı iş sistemleri, ypis, stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi, ölçek uyarlama, geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik

Adaptation of the High-Performance Work Systems Scale into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Analysis

Öz

The present study focuses on the development of the High-Performance Work Systems Scale, its adaptation to the Turkish context, and an examination of its validity and reliability. Within this context, a dataset was obtained from 201 white-collar employees within technology companies engaged in software, hardware development, and service provision. The collected data was analyzed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), as well as convergent and discriminant validity analyses. The evaluations incorporated descriptive statistical methods, specifically frequency and ratio analyses. The findings reveal a significant and comprehensive structure among the factors and original variables within the dataset. The value of Cronbach alpha with 0.950 indicates that the scale is reliable. The DFA exhibited satisfactory and robust alignment with the data. The validity of the scale is further supported by conducting convergent and discriminant validity analyses. As a result, it is acknowledged that the scale has the potential to serve as an appropriate instrument for evaluating and improving human resource practices in Turkish businesses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

high-performance work systems, hpws, strategic human resources management, scale adaptation, validity and reliability

Kaynakça

• Agarwala, T. (2003). Innovative human resource practices and organizational commitment: An empirical investigation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(2), 175-197.
• Aghazadeh, S., & Seyedian, M. (2004). The high‐performance work system: Is it worth using?. Team Performance Management, 10(3/4), 60-64.
• Aktaş, B. N. (2023). The implementation and long-term sustainability of high-performance work systems: A literature review. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 11(1), 141-160.
• Alafeshat, R., & Tanova, C. (2019). Servant leadership style and high-performance work system practices: Pathway to a sustainable Jordanian airline industry. Sustainability, 11(22), 6191.
• Alnoaimi, M., & Almahamid, S. (2020). The missing link between high performance work system and product innovation: A systematic review. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 37(2), 1-10.
• Ambad, S. N. A., & Wahab, K. A. (2016). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian large companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2), 259-280.
• Appelbaum, E., & Batt, R. (1993). High-performance work systems: American models of workplace transformation. Economic Policy Institution.
• Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 16, 53-101.
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
• Boyraz, A. M. (2020). Yüksek performanslı çalışma sistemlerinin örgütsel performansa etkisi ve örgüt kültürünün aracılık rolü üzerine bir araştırma [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi.
• Bracken, B. A., & Barona, A. (1991). State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12(1-2), 119-132.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage.
• Bryson, A., & White, M. (2021). High-performance work systems and the performance of public sector workplaces in Britain. Oxford Economic Papers, 73(3), 1057-1076.
• Cao, M., Zhao, Y., & Zhao, S. (2020). Facilitating the implementation process of high-performance work systems: The role of authentic leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 550711.
• Cappelli, P., & Neumark, D. (2001). Do “high-performance” work practices improve establishment-level outcomes?. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(4), 737-775.
• Cattell, R. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. Plenum.
• Chiang, F. F., Birtch, T. A., Cai, Z., & Lam, Y. B. (2015). Continuous improvement: The influence of HPWS, work climate, and collectivism [Conference session]. 75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
• Çakmak, B. Y., & Yiğit, B. (2022). Türkiye’de yüksek performanslı çalışma sistemleri (YPÇS): Sistematik literatür analizi. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 6(1), 1-22.
• Çalışkan, Ç. (2018). Yüksek performanslı çalışma sistemleri algısı, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve yabancılaşma arasındaki ilişkiler [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi.
• Danayiyen, A., & Bekaroğlu, S. B. (2019). Hastanelerde yüksek performanslı iş sistemleri ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması (Sözlü Sunum). 3. Uluslararası 21. Ulusal Halk Sağlığı Kongresi, Antalya, Türkiye.
• de Oliveira, L. B., & da Silva, F. F. R. A. (2015). The effects of high performance work systems and leader-member exchange quality on employee engagement: Evidence from a Brazilian non-profit organization. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1023-1030.
• Delaney, J. T., & Godard, J. (2001). An industrial relations perspective on the high-performance paradigm. Human Resource Management Review, 11(4), 395-429.
• Department of Labor, O. o. (1993). High-performance work practices and firm performance. Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Labor.
• Ekici, Z., & Türkmen, E. (2020). Yüksek performanslı çalışma sistemleri ölçeği ’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 7(1), 1-16.
• Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, I., Demir, O., Özdamar, K., & Sanisoğlu, S. Y. (2013). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve uyum indeksleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 210-223.
• Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31(5), 758-775.
• Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Morris, T., & O'Regan, P. (2015). How do high-performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms?. Employee Relations, 37(2), 209-231.
• Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Rousseau, D. M., Morris, T., & O'Regan, P. (2017). High-performance work systems in professional service firms, examining the practices-resources-uses-performance linkage. Human Resource Management, 56(2), 329-352.
• Gahlawat, N., & Kundu, S. C. (2019). Progressive human resource management and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Indian context. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 471-43.
• Gardner, T. M., Wright, P. M., & Moynihan, L. M. (2011). The impact of motivation, empowerment, and skill-enhancing practices on aggregate voluntary turnover: The mediating effect of collective affective commitment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 315-350.
• Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 180-190.
• Han, J., Sun, J., & Wang, H. (2020). Do high-performance work systems generate negative effects? How and when?. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100699.
• Heffernan, M., & Dundon, T. (2016). Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems (HPWS) and employee well-being: The mediating effect of organisational justice. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 211-231.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Huang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Lee, A. Y. P., Chen, S. Y., & Hsieh, M. J. (2016). High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study. Personnel Review, 45(2), 296-314.
• Huang, Y., Ma, Z., & Meng, Y. (2018). High performance work systems and employee engagement: Empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(3), 341-359.
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
• Huselid, M. A., & Becker, B. E. (1995). The strategic impact of high-performance work systems. Working Paper. School of Management and Labor Relations. Rutgers University.
• Huselid, M. A., & Becker, B. E. (1997). The Impact of high-performance work systems, implementation effectiveness, and alignment with strategy on shareholder wealth. Working Paper. School of Management and Labor Relations. Rutgers University.
• Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1995). The effects of human resource management practices on productivity (Working Paper No. 5333). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699-1724.
• Karagöz, Y. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nicel-nitel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Karthik, P., & Devi, V. R. (2023). High-performance work systems in the healthcare ındustry: a systematic literature review. Management and Labour Studies, 48(4), 578-606.
• Kaushik, D., & Mukherjee, U. (2022). High-performance work system: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(6), 1624-1643.
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th Edition). Guilford Press.
• Kling, J. (1995). High-performonce work systems and firm performance. Monthly Labor Review, 118, 29-36.
• Kloutsiniotis, P. V., Katou, A. A., & Mihail, D. M. (2021). Examining the “dark-side” of high-performance work systems in the Greek manufacturing sector. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(5), 1104-1129.
• Krach, S. K., McCreery, M. P., & Guerard, J. (2017). Cultural-linguistic test adaptations: Guidelines for selection, alteration, use, and review. School Psychology International, 38(1), 3-21.
• Kruse, D. L. (1993). Profit sharing: Does it make a difference?: The productivity and stability effects of employee profit-sharing plans. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Press.
• Lepak, D. P., Liao, H., Chung, Y., & Harden, E. E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 25 (pp. 217-271). Emerald Group Publishing.
• Macduffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. ILR Review, 48(2), 197-221.
• Marathe, G., & Pathak, K. G. (2013). Identification of multiple theoretical linkages for high performance work system: A literature review. Management and Labour Studies, 38 (1-2), 39-52.
• Messersmith, J. G., Patel, P. C., Lepak, D. P., & Gould-Williams, J. S. (2011). Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1105-1118.
• Mushtaq, N., Saleem, S., & Bakhtawar, A. (2022). Exploring the relationship between high-performance work systems, employee commitment, and firm performance (A multi mediation model). Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 6(2), 262-282.
• Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Walking the tightrope: An assessment of the relationship between high-performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420-1442.
• Peprah, E. O. (2020). The impact of high-performance work systems on employee engagement: The moderating role of organizational justice. Business Excellence and Management, 10(4), 5-22.
• Pervan, M., Curak, M., & Pavic Kramaric, T. (2018), The influence of industry characteristics and dynamic capabilities on firms' profitability. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(1), 4.
• Sathyanarayana, S., & Mohanasundaram, T. (2024). Fit indices in structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis: Reporting guidelines. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(7), 561-577.
• Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th Edition). Lawrance Erlbaum Association.
• Sucu, M. (2018). Yüksek performanslı iş sistemlerinin örgütsel çevikliğe etkisi: Sivil havacılık sektöründe faaliyet gösteren yer hizmetleri işletmelerinde bir araştırma [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Arel Üniversitesi
• Sun, Y. (2016). The adoption of high-performance work system: Perspectives from SMES in China [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Manchester.
• Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069-1083.
• Tamkin, P. (2004). High-performance work practices. IES Research Network.
• Tang, G., Yu, B., Cooke, F. L., & Chen, Y. (2017). High-performance work system and employee creativity: The roles of perceived organisational support and devolved management. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1318-1334.
• Tannenbaum, S. I., & Dupuree-Bruno, L. M. (1994). The relationship between organizational and environmental factors and the use of innovative human resource practices. Group ve Organization Management, 19(2), 171-202.
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011) Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
• Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M., & Moynihan, L. M. (2003). The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(3), 21-36.
• Xi, M., He, W., Fehr, R., & Zhao, S. (2022). Feeling anxious and abusing low performers: A multilevel model of high-performance work systems and abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 91-111.
• Xiao, Z., & Björkman, I. (2006). High commitment work systems in chinese organizations: A preliminary measure. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 403-422.
• Yılmaz, H., & Karahan, A. (2014). Yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamaları, psikolojik güçlendirme ve duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi: Tekstil sektöründe bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(4), 607-637.
• Yiğitol, B., & Diken, A. (2021). Yüksek performanslı çalışma sistemleri: Konya ilinde bir araştırma. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(Armağan Sayısı), 19-35.
• Ylinen, M., & Gullkvist, B. (2014). The effects of organic and mechanistic control in exploratory and exploitative innovations. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 93-112.
• Zhang, M., Zhu, C. J., Dowling, P. J., & Bartram, T. (2013). Exploring the effects of high-performance work systems (HPWS) on the work-related well-being of Chinese hospital employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3196- 3212.
• Živadinović, K. N. (2004). Utvrđivanje osnovnih karakteristika proizvoda primjenom faktorske analize. Ekonomski Pregled, 55(11-12), 952-966.