Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure

Turhan Karakaya; Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu

doi:10.54733/smar.1684944

EN TR

Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure

Öz

This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research at the intersection of circular economy principles and organizational sustainability to map the intellectual structure and evolution of this interdisciplinary field. We employed a multi-method bibliometric approach analyzing 411 publications from the Scopus database. The methodology combined performance analysis (publication trends, influential authors, journals, and countries) with science mapping techniques to reveal the conceptual structure and development of the field. The analysis reveals exponential growth in publications since 2016, with European institutions dominating research contributions. Five major thematic areas emerge: (1) conceptual integration of circular economy and sustainability paradigms, (2) circular business models and value creation, (3) supply chain and operations management for circularity, (4) organizational transformation and change management, and (5) performance measurement and impact assessment. The field has evolved from conceptual foundations toward implementation-focused research, with increasing attention to digital technologies as enablers. Social dimensions remain relatively underdeveloped compared to economic and environmental aspects. Our findings highlight theoretical contributions to understanding how circular economy principles can advance organizational sustainability across the triple bottom line. We identify significant limitations in current research, including geographic imbalance, methodological constraints, limited longitudinal studies, and underdeveloped social dimensions. The study outlines eight promising directions for future research: expanding geographic diversity, advancing methodological approaches, strengthening social dimension research, exploring digital transformation, investigating organizational capabilities, examining resilience connections, developing integrated theoretical frameworks, and exploring policy-practice interactions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

circular economy, organizational sustainability, bibliometric analysis, sustainable business models

Döngüsel Ekonomi İlkeleri Aracılığıyla Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik: Araştırma Evrimi ve Entelektüel Yapı Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışma, bu disiplinler arası alanın entelektüel yapısını ve gelişimini haritalandırmak için döngüsel ekonomi ilkeleri ve kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğin kesişme noktasındaki araştırmaların kapsamlı bir bibliyometrik analizini yapmaktadır. Scopus veri tabanındaki 411 yayını analiz eden çok yöntemli bir bibliyometrik yaklaşım kullandık. Metodoloji, alanın kavramsal yapısını ve gelişimini ortaya çıkarmak için performans analizini (yayın eğilimleri, etkili yazarlar, dergiler ve ülkeler) bilim haritalama teknikleriyle (ortak atıf analizi, bibliyografik birleştirme, anahtar kelime eş-oluşumu) birleştirdi. Analiz, 2016'dan bu yana yayınlarda üstel bir büyüme olduğunu ve Avrupa kurumlarının araştırma katkılarına hakim olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Beş ana tematik alan ortaya çıkmaktadır: (1) döngüsel ekonomi ve sürdürülebilirlik paradigmalarının kavramsal entegrasyonu, (2) döngüsel iş modelleri ve değer yaratma, (3) döngüsellik için tedarik zinciri ve operasyon yönetimi, (4) organizasyonel dönüşüm ve değişim yönetimi ve (5) performans ölçümü ve etki değerlendirmesi. Bu alan, kavramsal temellerden uygulama odaklı araştırmalara doğru evrilmiş ve dijital teknolojilere etkinleştirici olarak artan bir ilgi gösterilmiştir. Sosyal boyutlar, ekonomik ve çevresel boyutlara kıyasla nispeten daha az gelişmiştir. Bulgularımız, döngüsel ekonomi ilkelerinin üçlü kar hanesi boyunca kurumsal sürdürülebilirliği nasıl geliştirebileceğini anlamaya yönelik teorik katkıları vurgulamaktadır. Coğrafi dengesizlik, metodolojik kısıtlamalar, sınırlı boylamsal çalışmalar ve az gelişmiş sosyal boyutlar da dahil olmak üzere mevcut araştırmalardaki önemli sınırlamaları tespit ediyoruz. Çalışma, gelecekteki araştırmalar için sekiz umut verici yönün ana hatlarını çizmektedir: coğrafi çeşitliliği genişletmek, metodolojik yaklaşımları ilerletmek, sosyal boyut araştırmalarını güçlendirmek, dijital dönüşümü araştırmak, örgütsel yetenekleri araştırmak, esneklik bağlantılarını incelemek, entegre teorik çerçeveler geliştirmek ve politika-uygulama etkileşimlerini araştırmak.

Anahtar Kelimeler

döngüsel ekonomi, kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik, bibliyometrik analiz, sürdürülebilir iş modelleri

Kaynakça

Babbitt, C. W., Gaustad, G., Fisher, A., Chen, W. Q., & Liu, G. (2018). Closing the loop on circular economy research: From theory to practice and back again. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 1-2.
Bansal, P., & Song, H. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105-149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095
Baxter, W., Aurisicchio, M., & Childs, P. (2017). Contaminated interaction: Another barrier to circular material flows. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12612
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
Braungart, M., McDonough, W., & Bollinger, A. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), 1337-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
Brydges, T. (2021). Closing the loop on take, make, waste: Investigating circular economy practices in the Swedish fashion industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126245
Circle Economy. (2019). The circularity gap report 2019. Circle Economy.
Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2022). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(2), 421-432.
Cousins, P. D., Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., & Fugate, B. (2019). Investigating green supply chain management practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(5), 767-786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2018-0676
Cullen, J. M. (2017). Circular economy: Theoretical benchmark or perpetual motion machine?. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 483-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12599

De Angelis, R., Howard, M., & Miemczyk, J. (2018). Supply chain management and the circular economy: Towards the circular supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244
de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001
de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8
Demirel, P., & Danisman, G. O. (2019). Eco-innovation and firm growth in the circular economy: Evidence from European small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1608-1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2336
Durach, C. F., Blesik, T., von Düring, M., & Bick, M. (2021). Blockchain applications in supply chain transactions. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12238
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, & McKinsey Center for Business and Environment. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Opportunities for the consumer goods sector (Vol. 2).
Ferasso, M., Beliaeva, T., Kraus, S., Clauss, T., & Ribeiro‐Soriano, D. (2020). Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3006-3024. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2554
Fitch-Roy, O., Benson, D., & Monciardini, D. (2020). Going around in circles? Conceptual recycling, patching and policy layering in the EU circular economy package. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 983-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1673996
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
García-Quevedo, J., Jové-Llopis, E., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2020). Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium-sized firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2450-2464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2513
Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Grewal, J., & Serafeim, G. (2020). Research on corporate sustainability: Review and directions for future research. Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 14(2), 73-127. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000061
Hobson, K. (2020). ‘Small stories of closing loops’: Social circularity and the everyday circular economy. Climatic Change, 163(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02480-z
Hou, J., Wang, C., & Luo, S. (2020). How to improve the competiveness of distributed energy resources in China with blockchain technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119744
Inigo, E. A., & Blok, V. (2019). Strengthening the socio-ethical foundations of the circular economy: Lessons from responsible research and innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 280-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.053
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053-1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2268
Ioannou, I., Li, S. X., & Serafeim, G. (2016). The effect of target difficulty and incentive provision on managers’ performance in achieving environmental targets. Accounting Review, 91(5), 1467-1492. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51307
Jaeger-Erben, M., Jensen, C., Hofmann, F., & Zwiers, J. (2021). There is no sustainable circular economy without a circular society. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168, 105476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105476
Jawahir, I. S., & Bradley, R. (2016). Technological elements of circular economy and the principles of 6R-based closed-loop material flow in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 40, 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.067
Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., & Rosado, L. (2018). Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N. M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G. C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N. S., Kasperson, R. E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., O’Riordan, T., & Svedin, U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641-642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386
Kazancoglu, Y., Ozbiltekin, M., Ozkan-Ozen, Y. D., & Sagnak, M. (2021). A proposed sustainable and digital collection and recovery management for post-pandemic circular economy. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(1), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-02-2020-0043
Khan, S. A. R., & Qianli, D. (2017). Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms' performance: An empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(20), 16829-16844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9172-5
Khan, S. A. R., Razzaq, A., Yu, Z., & Miller, S. (2021). Retracted: Industry 4.0 and circular economy practices: A new era business strategies for environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4001-4014. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2853
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018b). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018a). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111
Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107831
Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2019). At the nexus of blockchain technology, the circular economy, and product deletion. Applied Sciences, 9(8), 1712. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081712
Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J. (2015). Waste to wealth: The circular economy advantage. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530707
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042
Linder, M., & Williander, M. (2017). Circular business model innovation: Inherent uncertainties. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1906
Liu, J. Y. S. (2012). Circular economy and environmental efficiency–the case of traditional Hakka Living system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1183
Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763
Mathews, J. A., & Tan, H. (2016). Circular economy: Lessons from China. Nature, 531, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/531440a
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2010). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
McDowall, W., Geng, Y., Huang, B., Barteková, E., Bleischwitz, R., Türkeli, S., Kemp, R., & Doménech, T. (2017). Circular economy policies in China and Europe. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 651-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597
Meuer, J., Koelbel, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2020). On the nature of corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 33(3), 319-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619850180
Morais, D. O. C., & Silvestre, B. S. (2018). Advancing social sustainability in supply chain management: Lessons from multiple case studies in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.097
Morseletto, P. (2020). Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(4), 763-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12987
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
Narayan, R., & Tidström, A. (2019). Circular economy inspired imaginaries for sustainable innovations. In N. Bocken, P. Ritala, L. Albareda, & R. Verburg (Eds.), Innovation for Sustainability (pp. 393-413). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97385-2_21
Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., & Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(19), 7912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197912
Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2020). From theory to practice: Systematising and testing business model archetypes for circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105029
Potting, J., Hekkert, M. P., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain. PBL Publishers.
Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., Najmi, A., Tseng, M. L., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Dynamic and causality interrelationships from municipal solid waste recycling to economic growth, carbon emissions and energy efficiency using a novel bootstrapping autoregressive distributed lag. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 166, 105372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105372
Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. J., & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or refurbished as CE 3.0?—Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027
Rekha, A. G., & Resmi, A. G. (2021). An empirical study of blockchain technology, innovation, service quality and firm performance in the banking industry. In Eurasian Economic Perspectives: Proceedings of the 29th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 75-89). Springer International Publishing.
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2019). Circular business models versus circular benefits: An assessment in the waste from electrical and electronic equipments sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 940-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.310
Roy, V., & Khastagir, D. (2016). Exploring role of green management in enhancing organizational efficiency in petro-chemical industry in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.039
Schröder, P., Lemille, A., & Desmond, P. (2020). Making the circular economy work for human development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686
Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2019). The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732
Seyfang, G. (2009). The new economics of sustainable consumption: Seeds of change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sheehy, B., & Farneti, F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability, sustainable development and corporate sustainability: What is the difference, and does it matter? Sustainability, 13(11), 5965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115965
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937-967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937
Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531, 435-438. https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a
Suárez-Eiroa, B., Fernández, E., Méndez-Martínez, G., & Soto-Oñate, D. (2019). Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 952-961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271
Tambovceva, T. T., Melnyk, L. H., Dehtyarova, I. B., & Nikolaev, S. O. (2021). Circular economy: Tendencies and development perspectives. Mechanism of an Economic Regulation, 2, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.21272/mer.2021.92.04
United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future.
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247
Velenturf, A. P. M., & Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1437-1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018
Velis, C. A., & Vrancken, K. C. (2015). Which material ownership and responsibility in a circular economy?. Waste Management & Research, 33(9), 773-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X15599305
Walker, A. M., Opferkuch, K., Roos Lindgreen, E., Simboli, A., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Raggi, A. (2021). Assessing the social sustainability of circular economy practices: Industry perspectives from Italy and the Netherlands. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 831-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.030
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists' warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11, 3107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

İşletme , Örgütsel Davranış

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Turhan Karakaya
0000-0003-0818-8522
Türkiye

Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu ^*
0000-0001-7138-2972
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Ocak 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

27 Nisan 2025

Kabul Tarihi

6 Aralık 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1684944

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43EY98RD

APA

Karakaya, T., & Balcıoğlu, Y. S. (2026). Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 7(1), 23-59. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1684944

AMA

1.Karakaya T, Balcıoğlu YS. Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure. SMAR. 2026;7(1):23-59. doi:10.54733/smar.1684944

Chicago

Karakaya, Turhan, ve Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu. 2026. “Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 7 (1): 23-59. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1684944.

EndNote

Karakaya T, Balcıoğlu YS (01 Ocak 2026) Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 7 1 23–59.

IEEE

[1]T. Karakaya ve Y. S. Balcıoğlu, “Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure”, SMAR, c. 7, sy 1, ss. 23–59, Oca. 2026, doi: 10.54733/smar.1684944.

ISNAD

Karakaya, Turhan - Balcıoğlu, Yavuz Selim. “Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 7/1 (01 Ocak 2026): 23-59. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1684944.

JAMA

1.Karakaya T, Balcıoğlu YS. Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure. SMAR. 2026;7:23–59.

MLA

Karakaya, Turhan, ve Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu. “Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure”. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, c. 7, sy 1, Ocak 2026, ss. 23-59, doi:10.54733/smar.1684944.

Vancouver

1.Turhan Karakaya, Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu. Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure. SMAR. 01 Ocak 2026;7(1):23-59. doi:10.54733/smar.1684944

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Organizational Sustainability through Circular Economy Principles: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution and Intellectual Structure

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Döngüsel Ekonomi İlkeleri Aracılığıyla Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik: Araştırma Evrimi ve Entelektüel Yapı Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster