Modern Pazarlama Düşünce Okulları

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 83 - 96, 29.12.2021

D. G. Brian Jones Eric H. Shaw Paula A. Mcclean Çevirmen: Sinem Makul

Öz

Amaçlarımız için bu bölümde, pazarlama düşüncesi okulunu "bir dizi bilim insanı tarafından geliştirilen, pazarlama faaliyetlerinin ne, nasıl, kim, neden, ne zaman ve nerede yapıldığının en az bir yönünü açıklayan önemli bir bilgi bütünü" olarak tanımlayan önceki bölümü takip etmekteyiz. Yirminci yüzyılın ortalarında, bir dizi yeni okul geliştikçe, pazarlama düşüncesinde geleneksel yaklaşımları gölgede bırakan bir paradigma değişikliği olmuştur. Okullar sırasıyla: Pazarlama yönetimi, pazarlama sistemleri, tüketici davranışı, makro pazarlama, mübadele ve pazarlama tarihidir. Bu bölüm, bahsedilen altı modern pazarlama düşüncesi okulunun değişimini izlemektedir.
Paradigmanın geleneksel yaklaşımlardan modern pazarlama düşüncesi okullarına doğru değişimi, bir takım gelişmelerden kaynaklanmaktadır. Örneğin İkinci Dünya Savaşı sırasında doğrusal programlama gibi matematiksel modellemedeki askeri gelişmelerden etkilenmiştir. Savaşın ardından kapasitenin askeri üretimden tüketim mallarına kayması, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde ekonomik büyümeyi teşvik etmiştir. Bu da arz fazlalığının oluşması ve bununla birlikte firmaların talep yaratma faaliyetlerine ihtiyaç duymasına yol açmıştır.
Paradigma değişimi aynı zamanda Ford Vakfı ve Carnegie Vakfı'nın 1959 tarihli işletme eğitiminde daha fazla uygunluk çağrısı yapması ve önemli müfredat değişiklikleri üretmek için vakıf finansmanı sağlayan raporlarından etkilenmiştir. Yine de pazarlama düşüncesinde paradigma değişiminin en büyük nedenlerinden biri zamanının en baskın bilim insanlarından olan Wroe Alderson’dır. Sayısız makalesi, pazarlama teorisi seminerleri, haber bültenleri ve iki çığır açan kitabı (1957, 1965); pazarlama yönetimi, pazarlama sistemleri, tüketici davranışı, makro pazarlama ve mübadele dahil olmak üzere en modern düşünce okullarıyla sonuçlanmış veya bunları etkilemiştir. İlginç bir şekilde Alderson’ın (1957) Pazarlama Davranışı ve Yönetici Eylemi, Ford Vakfı tarafından işletme eğitiminin ilerlemesi gereken yönün bir örneği olarak övülmüştür (Tadajewski, 2006).
Modern pazarlama okullarından ilki, pazarlamayı anlamak için yönetimsel bir yaklaşım benimseyen pazarlama yönetimidir. Pazarlama sistemleri okulu Alderson’un işlevselci yaklaşımı ile oldukça ilişkili ve yine Alderson’un bir dizi meslektaşı ve öğrencisi tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Tüketici davranışı okulu, Alderson’un akademik araştırmanın bir temeli olarak ekonomiyi desteklemek için davranış bilimlerine yaptığı vurgudan etkilenmiştir. Sonuç olarak çok sayıda psikolog, sosyal psikolog ve sosyolog, pazarlama çalışmalarına çekilmiştir. Pazarlama yönetimi ve tüketici davranışı okullarının yükselişi ve pazarlama sistemleri düşüncesinin azalan etkisiyle, makro pazarlama; pazarlama faaliyetlerinin toplum ve toplumun pazarlama üzerindeki etkisi ve sonuçlarıyla ilgilenmek için, pazarlama sistemlerini de kapsayacak şekilde, bir düşünce okulu olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Alderson’un öncülüğünü yaptığı bir başka pazarlama alt alanı da; piyasa işlemlerinde bir satıcı ile bir alıcının etkileşimi ve kanal geçişlerindeki alıcı ve satıcı gruplarının etkileşimleriyle ilgilenen mübadele okuludur. Pazarlama tarihi okulu ise pazarlama çalışmalarına en eski yaklaşımları ortaya koysa da yalnızca son zamanlarda bir pazarlama düşüncesi okulu olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

pazarlama tarihi, düşünce okulları, modern pazarlama

Kaynakça

• Alderson, W. (1957) Marketing Behavior and Executive Action. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Alderson, W. (1964) ‘A Normative Theory of Marketing Systems’, in R. Cox, W. Alderson and S.J. Shapiro (eds) Theory in Marketing, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, pp. 92–108.
• Alderson, W. (1965) Dynamic Marketing Behavior. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Alderson, W. and Miles, M.W. (1965) ‘Toward a Formal Theory of Transactions and Transvections’, Journal of Marketing Research, 2(May): 117–127.
• Alexander, R.S., Surface, F.M., Elder, R.F. and Alderson, W. (1940) Marketing. New York: Ginn & Company.
• Arndt, J. (1978) ‘How Broad Should the Marketing Concept Be?’, Journal of Marketing, 42(January): 101–103.
• Assael, H. (1998) Consumer Behavior. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.
• Bagozzi, R.P. (1975) ‘Marketing as Exchange’, Journal of Marketing, 39(October): 32–39. Bagozzi, R.P. (1978) ‘Marketing as Exchange: A Theory of Transactions in the Marketplace’, American Behavioral Scientist, 21(March/ April): 535–556.
• Bagozzi, R.P. (1979) ‘Toward a Formal Theory of Market Exchanges’, in O.C. Ferrell, S. Brown and C. Lamb, Jr (eds) Conceptual and Theoretical Development in Marketing, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 431–447.
• Barger, H. (1955) Distribution’s Place in the American Economy Since 1869. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Bartels, R. (1962) The Development of Marketing Thought. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Bartels, R. (1988) The History of Marketing Thought. Columbus, OH: Publishing Horizons. Bartels, R. and Jenkins, R. (1977) ‘Macromarketing’, Journal of Marketing, 41(October): 17–20.
• Bartos, R. (1977) ‘Ernest Dichter: Motive Interpreter’, Journal of Advertising Research, 17(June): 3–9.
• Beckman, T.N. and Engle, N.H. (1937) Wholesaling. New York: Ronald Press.
• Boddewyn, J. (1966) ‘A Construct for Comparative Marketing Research’, Journal of Marketing Research, 3(May): 149–153.
• Borden, N.H. (1964) ‘The Concept of the Marketing Mix’, Journal of Advertising Research, 4(June): 2–7.
• Boulding, K.E. (1956) ‘General Systems Theory: The Skeleton of Science’, Management Science, 2(April): 197–208.
• Breyer, R.F. (1934) The Marketing Institution. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Brown, S., Hirschman, E. and Maclaren, P. (2001) ‘Always Historicize! Researching Marketing History in a Post-Historical Epoch’, Marketing Theory, 1(1): 49–90.
• Bucklin, L.P. (1970) Vertical Marketing Systems. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
• Carnegie, D. (1964) How to Win Friends and Influence People. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Cassels, J.M. (1936) ‘The Significance of Early Economic Thought on Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 1(October): 129–133.
• Cohen, J. (1972) Behavioral Science Foundations of Consumer Behavior. New York: The Free Press.
• Commons, J.R. (1924) Institutional Economics. New York: Macmillan.
• Converse, P.D. (1933) ‘The First Decade of Marketing Literature’, NATMA Supplemental Bulletin, (November): 1–4.
• Converse, P.D. (1945) ‘The Development of the Science of Marketing – An Exploratory Survey’, Journal of Marketing, 10(July): 14–23.
• Converse, P.D. (1959) The Beginnings of Marketing Thought in the United States. Austin, TX: Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas.
• Converse, P.D. and Huegy, H.W. (1930) Elements of Marketing. New York: Prentice-Hall.
• Culliton, J.W. (1948) The Management of Marketing Costs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Cunningham, P. (2003) ‘The Textbooks of Philip Kotler: Their Role in Defining Marketing Thought and Practice’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2): 201–212.
• Davis, K.R. (1961) Marketing Management. New York: Ronald Press.
• Dixon, D.F. (1967) ‘A Social Systems Approach to Marketing’, Social Science Quarterly, 48(September): 164–173.
• Duddy, E.A. and Revzan, D.A. (1947) Marketing: An Institutional Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Engel, J.F., Kollat, D.T. and Blackwell, R.D. (1968) Consumer Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Farley, J.U. and Ring, L.W. (1970) ‘An Empirical Test of the Howard Sheth Model of Buyer Behavior’, Journal of Marketing Research, 7(November): 28–33.
• Farmer, R.N. (1967) ‘Would You Want Your Daughter to Marry a Marketing Man?’, Journal of Marketing, 31(January): 1–10.
• Ferrell, O.C. and Perrachione, J.R. (1980) ‘An Inquiry into Bagozzi’s Formal Theory of Marketing Exchanges’, in C. Lamb, Jr and P.M. Dunne (eds) Theoretical
• Developments in Marketing, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 158–161.
• Ferrell, O.C. and Zey-Ferrell, M. (1977) ‘Is All Social Exchange Marketing?’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 5(4): 307–314.
• Fishbein, M. (1967) ‘Attitude and the Prediction of Behavior’, in M. Fishbein (ed.) Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, New York: John Wiley, pp. 477–492.
• Fisk, G. (1967) Marketing Systems: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
• Fisk, R.P., Brown, S.W. and Bitner, M.J. (1993) ‘Tracking the Evolution of the Services Marketing Literature’, Journal of Retailing, 69(Spring): 61–103.
• Frank, R.E. (1974) ‘Editor’s Comments’, Journal of Consumer Research, 1(1): iv.
• Frey, A.W. (1956) The Effective Marketing Mix. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College.
• Golder, P. (2000) ‘Historical Method in Marketing Research with New Evidence on Long-term Market Share Stability’, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(May): 156–172.
• Grether, E.T. (1976) ‘The First Forty Years’, Journal of Marketing, 40(July): 63–69.
• Hagerty, J.E. (1936) ‘Experiences of an Early Marketing Teacher’, Journal of Marketing, 1(1): 20–27.
• Holbrook, M.B. (1987) ‘What is Consumer Research?’, Journal of Consumer Research, 14(June): 128–132.
• Hollander, S.C. (1960) ‘The Wheel of Retailing’, Journal of Marketing, 25(July): 37–42.
• Hollander, S.C. (1966) ‘Note on the Retailing Accordion’, Journal of Retailing, 42(Summer): 29–40.
• Holloway, R.J., Mittelstaedt, R.A. and Venkatesan, M. (1971) Consumer Research: Contemporary Research in Action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
• Hotchkiss, G.B. (1938) Milestones of Marketing. New York: Macmillan.
• Houston, F.S. and Gassenheimer, J.B. (1987) ‘Marketing and Exchange’, Journal of Marketing, 51(October): 3–18.
• Howard, J.R. (1957) Marketing Management: Analysis and Decision. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Howard, J.R. and Sheth, J.N. (1969) The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
• Hunt, S.D. (1976) Marketing Theory: Conceptual Foundations of Research in Marketing. Columbus, OH: Grid.
• Hunt, S.D. (1981) ‘Macromarketing as a Multidimensional Concept’, Journal of Macromarketing, 1(Spring): 7–8.
• Hunt, S.D. (1983) ‘General Theories and the Fundamental Explananda of Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 47(Fall): 9–17.
• Hunt, S.D. (1988) Foundations of Marketing Theory: Toward a General Theory of Marketing. London: M.E. Sharpe.
• Hunt, S.D. and Burnett, J.J. (1982) ‘The Macromarketing–Micromarketing Dichotomy: A Taxonomical Model’, Journal of Marketing, 46(Summer): 11–26. Jones, D.G.B. (1993) ‘Historiographic Paradigms in Marketing’, in S.C. Hollander and K. Rassuli (eds) Marketing, Volume I, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 136–145.
• Jones, D.G.B. and Monieson, D.D. (1990) ‘Early Development of the Philosophy of Marketing Thought’, Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 102– 113.
• Jones, F. (1936) ‘Retail Stores in the United States, 1800–1860’, Journal of Marketing, 1(October): 135–140.
• Kassarjian, H.H. and Robertson, T.S. (1968) Perspectives in Consumer Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
• Keith, R.J. (1960) ‘The Marketing Revolution’, Journal of Marketing, 24(1): 35–38.
• Kelley, E.J. (1969) ‘From the Editor’, Journal of Marketing, 33(January): 1–2.
• Kelley, E.J. and Lazer, W. (1958) Managerial Marketing: Perspectives and Viewpoints. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Kelley, W.T. (1956) ‘The Development of Early Thought in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 20(July): 62–67.
• Kotler, P. (1967) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Kotler, P. (1972) ‘A Generic Concept of Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 36(April): 46–54.
• Kotler, P. (1973) ‘Buying is Marketing Too!’, Journal of Marketing, 37(January): 54–59. Kotler, P. (1975) Marketing for Non Profit Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
• Kotler, P. (1980) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Kotler, P. and Levy, S.J. (1969) ‘Broadening the Concept of Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 33(January): 10–15.
• Laczniak, G.R. and Michie, D.A. (1979) ‘The Social Disorder of the Broadened Concept of Marketing’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 7(Summer): 214–229.
• Lazer, W. (1969) ‘Marketing’s Changing Social Relationships’, Journal of Marketing, 33(January): 3–9.
• Lazer, W. (1971) Marketing Management: A Systems Approach. New York: John Wiley.
• Lazo, H. and Corbin, A. (1961) Management in Marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Litman, S. (1950) ‘The Beginnings of Teaching Marketing in American Universities’, Journal of Marketing, 15(October): 220–223.
• Luck, D.J. (1969) ‘Broadening the Concept of Marketing – Too Far’, Journal of Marketing, 33(July): 53–55.
• Luck, D.J. (1974) ‘Social Marketing: Confusion Compounded’, Journal of Marketing, 38(October): 70–71.
• Mallen, B.E. (1967) The Marketing Channel: A Conceptual Viewpoint. New York: John Wiley.
• Marburg, T. (1951) ‘Domestic Trade and Marketing’, in H.F. Williamson (ed.) The Growth of the American Economy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 551–553.
• Maynard, H.H. (1941a) ‘Marketing Courses Prior to 1910’, Journal of Marketing, 5(April): 382–384.
• Maynard, H.H. (1941b) ‘Notes and Communications – Early Teachers of Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 7(October): 158–159.
• McCarthy, E.J. (1960) Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• McGarry, E.D. (1950) ‘Some Functions of Marketing Reconsidered’, in R. Cox and W. Alderson (eds) Theory in Marketing, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, pp. 263– 279.
• McInnes, W. (1964) ‘A Conceptual Approach to Marketing’, in R. Cox, W. Alderson and S. Shapiro (eds) Theory in Marketing (second edn.), Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, pp. 51–67.
• Merriam-Webster (1994) Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.
• Nevett, T. (1991) ‘Historical Investigation and the Practice of Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 55(3): 13–23.
• Nicosia, F.M. (1966) Consumer Decision Processes: Marketing and Advertising Implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
• Nystrom, P.H. (1951) ‘Retailing in Retrospect and Prospect’, in Hugh G. Wales (ed.) Changing Perspectives in Marketing, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 117–138.
• Phelps, D.M. (1953) Marketing Management. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Schwartz, G. (1963) Development of Marketing Theory. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
• Shapiro, S. and Doody, A. (1968) Readings in the History of American Marketing. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
• Shaw, E.H. (1995) ‘The First Dialogue on Macromarketing’, Journal of Macro- marketing, 15(Spring): 7–20.
• Shaw, E.H. and Dixon, D.F. (1980) ‘Exchange: A Conceptualization’, in C. Lamb, Jr and P.M. Dunne (eds) Theoretical Developments in Marketing, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 150–153.
• Sheth, J.N. (1992) ‘Acrimony in the Ivory Tower: A Retrospective on Consumer Research’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(Fall): 345–353.
• Sheth, J.N. and Garrett, D.E. (1986) Marketing Theory: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.
• Sheth, J.N. Gardner, D.M. and Garrett, D.E. (1988) Marketing Theory: Evolution and Evaluation. New York: John Wiley.
• Smith, A. (1776/1937) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.
• Smith, R.A. and Lux, D.S. (1993) ‘Historical Method in Consumer Research: Developing Causal Explanations of Change’, Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4): 595–610.
• Smith, W.R. (1956) ‘Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies’, Journal of Marketing, 21(July): 3–8.
• Steiner, R.L. (1976) ‘The Prejudice Against Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 40(July): 2–42.
• Stern, L. (1969) Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
• Sweeney, D.J. (1972) ‘Marketing: Management Technology or Social Process’, Journal of Marketing, 36(October): 3–10.
• Tadajewski, M. (2006) ‘The Ordering of Marketing Theory: The Influence of McCarthyism and the Cold War’, Marketing Theory, 6(2): 163–200.
• Vaile, R.S., Grether, E.T. and Cox, R. (1952) Marketing in the American Economy. New York: Ronald Press.
• Vargo, S. and Lusch, R.F. (2004) ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 68(1): 1–17.
• Von Bertalanffy, L. (1951) ‘General Systems Theory: A New Approach to a Unity of Science’, Human Biology, 23(December): 303–361.
• Wasson, C. (1960) ‘What is “New” About a New Product?’, Journal of Marketing, 24(July): 52–56.
• Webster, F.E. Jr (1992) ‘The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation’, Journal of Marketing, 56(October): 1–17.
• Weld, L.D.H. (1941) ‘Early Experience in Teaching Courses in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 5(April): 380–381.
• White, P.D. (1980) ‘The Systems Dimension in the Definition of Macromarketing’, Journal of Macromarketing, 1(Spring): 11–13.
• Wilkie, W. and Moore, E. (2003) ‘Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the Four Eras of Thought Development’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(Fall): 116– 146.
• Witkowski, T. (1993) ‘A Writer’s Guide to Historical Research in Marketing’, in Stanley C. Hollander and Kathleen Rassuli (eds), Marketing, Volume I, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 146–155.
• Witkowski, T. and Jones, D.G. Brian. (2006) ‘Qualitative Historical Research in Marketing’, in R.W. Belk (ed.) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 70–82. Witkowski, T. and Jones, D.G. Brian. (2008) ‘Historiography in Marketing: Its Growth, Structure of Inquiry, and Disciplinary Status’, Business and Economic History, 6(June): 1–20.
• Zaltman, G., Pinhson, C.R.A. and Angelmar, R. (1973) Metatheory and Consumer Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.