PLANLI DAVRANIŞ KURAMI VE DEĞER-İNANÇ-NORM KURAMI KAPSAMINDAKİ DEĞİŞKENLERE İLİŞKİN ÖLÇEKLERİN İKLİM DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ BAĞLAMINDA GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 49, 739 - 766, 31.07.2025

Ezgi Kaşdarma , Asiye Dursun , Çiğdem Gülçay Yeniçırak

https://doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.1583354

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Planlı Davranış Kuramı’nda ve Değer-İnanç-Norm Kuramı’nda tanımlanan değişkenlere ilişkin ölçeklerin iklim değişikliği bağlamında geliştirilmesi ve geçerliklerinin test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. İklim yanlısı davranışlara yönelik tutum, algılanan davranış kontrolü ve öznel normlar, Planlı Davranış Kuramı kapsamında geliştirilen ölçeklerdir. Değer-İnanç-Norm Kuramı çerçevesinde geliştirilen ölçekler, iklim değişikliğiyle ilgili sonuçların farkındalığı, iklim değişikliğine yönelik sorumluluk üstlenme ve iklim yanlısı davranışlara ilişkin kişisel normlar ölçekleridir. İlgili ölçeklerin psikometrik özellikleri üç kapsamlı çalışma ile incelenmiştir. Türkiye’nin tüm coğrafi bölgelerinden genel nüfusu temsil eden bir örneklem kullanılarak yürütülen üç ayrı çalışmada toplam 1.152 kişiden veri toplanmıştır. Birinci çalışmada, Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi ile ölçeklerin yapısı ve içeriği belirlenmiştir. İkinci çalışmada, ölçek yapılarını doğrulamak üzere Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi gerçekleştirilmiş ve ölçeklerin iç tutarlık güvenirlikleri incelenmiştir. Üçüncü çalışmada, ölçeklerin ait olduğu kuramsal modeller üzerinden nomolojik yapı geçerliği sınaması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Her bir ölçek için, maddeleri dört ile altı arasında değişen, geçerli ve güvenilir tek boyutlu yapılar elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

iklim , iklim değişikliği , ölçek geliştirme , Planlı Davranış Kuramı , Değer-İnanç-Norm Kuramı

Etik Beyan

Makale araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun olarak hazırlanmıştır. Bu çalışma için gerekli etik kurul izni, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulunun 28.11.2023 tarihinde gerçekleştirdiği 2023/11 numaralı toplantıdaki 8 sayılı kararıyla alınmıştır. Yazarlar çalışmaya ortak katkı sağlamıştır ve yazarlar arasında herhangi bir çıkar çatışması bulunmamaktadır.

Destekleyen Kurum

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK)

Proje Numarası

123K009 (TÜBİTAK 3005)

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK) tarafından 123K009 numaralı proje kapsamında desteklenmiştir. Yazarlar destekleri için TÜBİTAK’a teşekkürlerini sunar.

Development of Scales Related to Variables within the Framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory in the Context of Climate Change: A Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

In the context of climate change, this study aims to develop and test the validity of scales based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory (VBN) in Turkish. TPB-based scales measure attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms regarding pro-climate behaviors. VBN-based scales assess awareness of climate change consequences, personal responsibility toward climate change, and personal norms regarding climate change-related actions. The psychometric properties of these scales were examined through three comprehensive studies. Data were collected from a representative sample of Turkey’s population (N = 1,152) across all geographical regions. In Study 1, Exploratory Factor Analysis was used to identify the construct and content of the scales. In Study 2, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted to validate constructs, and internal consistency reliability was assessed. Study 3 focused on testing the nomological construct validity of the scales based on their theoretical models. Each scale demonstrated a valid, reliable, and unidimensional structure, with four to six items per scale.

Anahtar Kelimeler

climate , climate change , scale development , Theory of Planned Behaviour , Value-Belief-Norm Theory

Proje Numarası

123K009 (TÜBİTAK 3005)

Kaynakça

• Abrahamse, W. & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology Review, 18(1), 30-40.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50(2), 179-211.
• Ajzen, I., Brown, T. C., Carvajal, F. (2004). Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1108-1121.
• Aytaç, M. & Öngen, B. (2012). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yeni çevresel paradigma ölçeğinin yapı geçerliliğinin incelenmesi. İstatistikçiler Dergisi: İstatistik ve Aktüerya, 5(1), 14-22.
• Bilandzic, H. & Sukalla, F. (2019). The role of fictional film exposure and narrative engagement for personal norms, guilt and intentions to protect the climate. Environmental Communication, 13(8), 1069-1086.
• Brody, S., Grover, H., Vedlitz, A. (2012). Examining the willingness of Americans to alter behaviour to mitigate climate change. Climate Policy, 12(1), 1-22.
• Carfora, V., Cavallo, C., Catellani, P., Del Giudice, T., Cicia, G. (2021). Why do consumers intend to purchase natural food? Integrating theory of planned behavior, value-belief-norm theory, and trust. Nutrients, 13(6), 1-14.
• Chen, M. F. (2015). An examination of the value‐belief‐norm theory model in predicting pro‐environmental behaviour in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 145-151.
• Chen, M. F. (2016). Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan-moral obligation matters. Journal of Cleaner Production, (112), 1746-1753.
• Chu, H. & Yang, J. Z. (2020). Risk or efficacy? How psychological distance influences climate change engagement. Risk Analysis, 40(4), 758-770.
• Ciocirlan, C. E., Gregory‐Smith, D., Manika, D., Wells, V. (2020). Using values, beliefs, and norms to predict conserving behaviors in organizations. European Management Review, 17(2), 543-558.
• Clements, B., Coady, D., Fabrizio, S., Gupta, S. Shang, B. (2014). Energy subsidies: How large are they and how can they be reformed?. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 3(1), 1-18.
• Cohen, R. J. & Swerdlik, M. E. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment. McGraw-Hill Companies.
• De Groot, J. I. & Steg, L. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 318-332.
• De Groot, J. I. & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354.
• De Groot, J. I. & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368-378.
• dos Reis Neto, J. F., de Souza, C. C., Bitencourt, T. D. A., Cupertino, C. M., de Melo Neto, P. L., Soares, D. G., de Oliveira Rodrigues, I. (2021). Validating the scale of the new ecological paradigm (nep) in Brazilian university students. Research, Society and Development, 10(4), 1-11.
• Dunlap, R. E. & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.
• Dyr, W. & Prusik, M. (2020). Measurement of proecological attitudes within new ecological paradigm in Polish current settings. Social Psychological Bulletin, 15(3), 1-26.
• Emekçi, S. (2017). Planlı davranış teorisi kapsamında tüketicilerin yeşil tüketim davranışlarını açıklamaya yönelik bir model önerisi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Sostal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Engel, K. H. & Saleska, S. R. (2005). Subglobal regulation of the global commons: The case of climate change. Ecology LQ, (32), 183-233.
• Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2). Sage Publications.
• Fornara, F., Molinario, E., Scopelliti, M., Bonnes, M., Bonaiuto, F., Cicero, L., ... Bonaiuto, M. (2020). The extended Value-Belief-Norm theory predicts committed action for nature and biodiversity in Europe. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (81), 1-8.
• Fornara, F., Pattitoni, P., Mura, M., Strazzera, E. (2016). Predicting intention to improve household energy efficiency: The role of value-belief-norm theory, normative and informational influence, and specific attitude. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (45), 1-10.
• Garbyal, S. & Mittal, R. (2019). Climate change and global warming: Policies, planning and management. R. Singh, J. Singh, R. Nigam, W. Hasan, R. Verma (Ed.), Environmental Issues and Sustainable Agriculture, içinde (16-21. ss.), Weser Books.
• George, D. & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
• Ghadge, A., Wurtmann, H., Seuring, S. (2020). Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 44-64.
• Gkargkavouzi, A., Halkos, G., Matsiori, S. (2019). Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context: Integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norm, self-identity and habit. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, (148), 145-156.
• Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L. (2011). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, Pearson/Prentice Hall.
• Han, H. (2015). Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, (47), 164-177.
• Harvey, J. A., Heinen, R., Gols, R., Thakur, M. P. (2020). Climate change‐mediated temperature extremes and insects: From outbreaks to breakdowns. Global Change Biology, 26(12), 6685-6701.
• Hu, S. & Chen, J. (2016). Place-based inter-generational communication on local climate improves adolescents’ perceptions and willingness to mitigate climate change. Climatic Change, 138(3), 425-438.
• Jakovcevic, A. & Steg, L. (2013). Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, (20), 70-79.
• Kement, Ü. (2019). Ekoturizm faaliyetlerine katılan bireylerin değer inanç norm teorisi kapsamında çevre dostu davranışlarının açıklanması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(72), 2182-2195.
• Kıral Uçar, G. (2020). Değer yönelimleri ve çevre yanlısı davranışlar. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(39), 801-822.
• Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour - A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028-1038.
• Lee, S. S., Kim, Y., Roh, T. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior on electric vehicle use intention: Integrating value-belief-norm theory and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, (418), 1-10.
• Li, R., Thielmann, I., Balliet, D., De Vries, R. E. (2023). Development of the Generic Situational Strength (GSS) scale: Measuring situational strength across contexts. L. R. Ford, T. A. Scandura (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Survey Development and Application içinde (460-479. ss.), Sage Publications.
• Lind, H. B., Nordfjærn, T., Jørgensen, S. H., Rundmo, T. (2015). The value-belief-norm theory, personal norms and sustainable travel mode choice in urban areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (44), 119-125.
• Mamun, A., Hayat, N., Masud, M. M., Makhbul, Z. K. M., Jannat, T., Salleh, M. F. M. (2022). Modelling the significance of Value-Belief-Norm theory in predicting solid waste management intention and behavior. Frontiers in Environmental Science, (10), 1-12.
• Masud, M. M., Akhtar, R., Afroz, R., Al-Amin, A. Q., Kari, F. B. (2015). Pro-environmental behavior and public understanding of climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, (20), 591-600.
• Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97-110.
• Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., Sharma S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.
• Nordlund, A., Jansson, J. Westin, K. (2016). New transportation technology: Norm activation processes and the intention to switch to an electric/hybrid vehicle. Transportation Research Procedia, (14), 2527-2536.
• Preckel, F. & Brunner, M. (2017). Nomological nets. V. Zeigler-Hill, T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences içinde (1-4. ss.), Springer International Publishing.
• Sahin, E. (2013). Predictors of Turkish elementary teacher candidates’ energy conservation behaviors: An approach on value-belief-norm theory. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(2), 269-283.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Sijtsma, K. & van der Ark, L. A. (2020). Measurement models for psychological attributes: Classical Test Theory, Factor Analysis, Item Response Theory, and Latent Class Models. CRC Press.
• Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425.
• Steinhorst, J., Klöckner, C. A., Matthies, E. (2015). Saving electricity-For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (43), 125-135.
• Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social İssues, 56(3), 407-424.
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97.
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, (48), 1273-1296.
• Tavakol, M. & Wetzel, A. (2020). Factor Analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity. International Journal of Medical Education, (11), 245-247.
• Wang, X. & Chen, J. (2022). Fear emotion reduces reported mitigation behavior in adolescents subject to climate change education. Climatic Change, 174(1), 1-16.
• Wu, J. & Otsuka, Y. (2021). Pro-climate behaviour and the influence of learning sources on it in Chinese adolescents. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(1), 24-38.
• Xue, W., Marks, A. D., Hine, D. W., Phillips, W. J., Zhao, S. (2018). The new ecological paradigm and responses to climate change in China. Journal of Risk Research, 21(3), 323-339.
• Zhang, L., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Luo, B., Liang, Z., Swisher, M. E. (2020). Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (68), 1-11.