Alfred Marshall’ın “Zaman Öğesi” ve İktisat Teorisinde Doğurduğu Sorunlar

Yıl 2023, , 289 - 312, 26.10.2023

Mustafa Öziş

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.04.15

Öz

Alfred Marshall anaakım iktisadi düşünce metinlerinde geri dönüşlü zaman ve mekanik yöntem kullanan neoklasik iktisadın kurucularından biri olarak gösterilir. İlgili literatür ise özellikle son otuz yılda giderek artan ölçüde “her şeyin var olduğu Marshall’da” geri dönüşsüz zaman anlayışının ve evrimci analizin kullanıldığını yeniden keşfetmektedir. Dönemindeki önemli etkisine rağmen, “zaman öğesi”ne ve bunun teori bakımından neden olduğunu düşündüğü sorunlara takipçileri tarafından yeterince önem verilmemiştir. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız, değer ve denge gibi iktisat teorisinin iki önemli sorunuyla doğrudan ilişkili olan bu konuyu tartışmaya açmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alfred Marshall, Zaman Öğesi, Değer Sorunu, İktisadi Denge, Biyolojik Analiz

Destekleyen Kurum

Dr. Öğr. Üyesiyim bunun dışında bir destek söz konusu değildir.

Proje Numarası

Proje değildir.

Alfred Marshall's “The Element of Time” and the Problems it Created in Economic Theory

Öz

In mainstream texts of economic thought, Alfred Marshall is referred to one of the founders of neoclassical economics which uses reversible time concept and mechanical methodology. On the other hand, the relevant literature has rediscovered the use of irreversible time concepts and evolutionary analysis in Marshall, especially in the last thirty years. Despite his significant influence during his period and later, neither his pupils nor his followers paid enough attention to “the element of time” and the problems he thought they caused in the theory. This study aims to discuss this issue, which is directly related to two critical problems of economic theory such as value and equilibrium.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alfred Marshall, The Element of Time, Value Problem, Economic Equilibrium, Biological Analysis

Proje Numarası

Proje değildir.

Kaynakça

• Argyrous, G. (1990), “The Growth of knowledge and economic sciences: Marshall’s interpretation of the classical economists”, History of Political Economy, 22(3), 529-537.
• Arrow, K.J. & F.H. Hahn (1991), General Competitive Analysis, Elsevier Science Publishers.
• Currie, M. & I. Steedman (1990), Wrestling with time: Problems in economic theory, Manchester University Press.
• Dardi, M. (2006), “Partial equilibrium and period analysis”, in: T. Raffaelli et al. (eds.), The Edgar Companion to Alfred Marshall (215-225), Glos: Edgar Elgar.
• Eddington, A.S. (1929), The Nature of the Physical World, New York: The Macmillan Company.
• Fine, B. & D. Milonakis (2009), From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the social and the historical in the evolution of economic theory, Oxon: Routledge.
• Foster, J. (1993), “Economics and the Self-Organisation Approach: Alfred Marshall Revisited?”, The Economic Journal, 103(419), 975-991.
• Foster, J. (2006), “Time”, in: T. Raffaelli et al. (eds.), The Edgar Companion to Alfred Marshall (281-287), Glos: Edgar Elgar.
• Geoergecu-Roegen, N. (1971), The Entropy Law and Economic Progress, Cambridge: Harward University Press.
• Groenewegen, P. (2003), Classics and Moderns in Economics Volume I, Essays on nineteenth- and twentieth-century economic thought, London: Routledge.
• Groenewegen, P. (2017), “Frederick Lavington (1881-1927)”, in: R.A. Cord (ed.), The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics (495-512), London: The Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hart, N. (1992), “Increasing Returns and Marshall’s Theory of Value”, Australian Economic Papers, 31(59), 234-44.
• Hart, N. (2003) “Marshall's Dilemma: Equilibrium versus Evolution”, Journal of Economic Issues, 37(4), 1139-1160.
• Heisenberg, W. (2000), Fizik ve Felsefe, (Çev. Y. Öner), İstanbul: Belge Yayınları.
• Hicks, J. (1976), “Some Question of Time in Economics”, in: A.M. Tang et al. (eds.), Evolution, Welfare, and Time in Economics: Essays in Honor of Nicholas Geoergesco-Roegen (135-151), Toronto: Lexington Books.
• Hodgson, G.M. (1993), “The Mecca of Alfred Marshall”, The Economic Journal,103, 406-415.
• Koyre, A. (1965), Newtonian Studies, London: Chapman&Hall.
• Koyre, A. (1994), Yeniçağ Biliminin Doğuşu, (Çev. K. Dinçer), Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
• Loasby, B.J. (1978), “Whatever Happened to Marshall’s Theory of Value?”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 1-12.
• Loasby, B.J. (2001), “Time, knowledge and evolutionary dynamics: why connections matter”, J Evol Econ, 11, 393-412.
• Loasby, B.J. (2003), “Closed models and open systems”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 10(3), 285-306.
• Marshall, A. (2013), Principles of Economics, 8th Edition, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Metcalfe, J.S. (2007a), “Alfred Marshall and The General Theory of Evolutionary Economics”, History of Economic Ideas, 15(1), 81-110.
• Metcalfe, J.S. (2007b), “Alfred Marshall’s Mecca: Reconciling the Theories of Value and Development”, The Economic Record, 83(Special Issue), 1-22.
• Opie, R. (1931), “Marshall’s Time Analysis”, The Economic Journal, 41(162), 199-215.
• Öziş, M. (2009), “Alfred Marshall’ın ‘Evrimci’ İktisadı”, İktisat Dergisi, 506-7, 55-65.
• Quéré, M. (2006), “The Represantative Firm”, in: T. Raffaelli et al. (eds.), The Edgar Companion to Alfred Marshall (412-417), Glos: Edgar Elgar.
• Robinson, J. (1979), “History versus Equilibrium”, in: J. Robinson (ed.), Collected Economic Papers, Vol. V (48-58), London: Basil Blackwell.
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1954), History of Economic Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Shackle, G.L.S. (1958), Time in Economics, North-Holland Publishing Company.
• Vahabi, M. (2006), “Normal Value”, in: T. Raffaelli et al. (eds.), The Edgar Companion to Alfred Marshall (273-280), Glos: Edgar Elgar.