Elektrik Enerjisi Piyasasında Regülasyon ve Bağımsız Düzenleyici Kurumlar: Türkiye Örneği

Yıl 2018, , 37 - 51, 31.10.2018

Özgür Emre Koç , Mustafa Alpin Gülşen

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2018.04.03

Cited By: 1

Öz

Günümüzde sosyal ve iktisadi hayatta önemli bir yeri olan elektrik ürününe kamu kesimi gerek üretim gerekse iletim ve dağıtım aşamalarında sıklıkla müdahalede bulunmaktadır. Bu açıdan elektrik piyasası, 1970’lere kadar kamusal mülkiyete sahip kuruluşların idaresi altındayken özellikle 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren deregülasyon faaliyetleri sonucu daha çok özel sektörün etkisi altına girmiştir. Çalışmada elektrik sektöründeki regülasyonların nedenleri anlatılarak regülatörlerin bu süreçte konumuna Türkiye ve dünya örnekleriyle yer verilmiştir. Türkiye’de elektrik tüketiminde dışa bağımlı bir yapının bulunması, yapılacak regülasyonların da kapsamını daraltmaktadır. Uzun vadeli ve geniş kapsamlı yapısal regülasyonlar yerine kısa vadeli ve cari sorunların çözümüne yönelik regülasyonların varlığı sektör açısından negatif yönlü etkide bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren sektördeki katılımcıların artması, rekabet açısından pozitif yönlü bir gelişme olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Regülasyon, Elektrik Sektörü, Bağımsız Düzenleyici Kurumlar, Türkiye

Regulation and Independent Regulatory Authority for Electricity Energy Market: The Case of Turkey

Öz

The public sector is frequently intervened in the production, transmission and distribution phases of electrical products, which are an important part of social and economic life today. From this point of view, while the electricity market was under the administration of public property holders until the 1970s, the electricity market became more dominant in the private sector as a result of deregulation activities since the 1990s. The study describes the reasons for the regulations in the electricity sector. In addition, the role of regulators in this process (examples of Turkey and the world) are included. In our country, the scope of regulation is narrowing because there is a dependency on imports in electricity consumption. The existence of short-term and current regulations to solve current problems, rather than long-term and wide-ranging structural regulations, has a negative impact on the sector. In addition, since the 1990s, the increase in the number of participants in the sector has been a positive development in terms of competition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Regulation, Electricity Sector, Independent Regulatory Agencies, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Buchanan, J. M. (1984). Politics without romance: A sketch of positive public choice theory and its normative implications. The theory of public choice II, 11-22.
• Butler, E. (2012). Public Choice-A Primer. Institute of Economic Affairs Occasional Paper, CRE Activity Report 2015 Reference document, http://www.cre.fr/en/documents/publications/annual-reports (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2017)
• Den Hertog, J. A. (1999). General Theories of Regulation. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics: 223-270.
• Depoorter, B. W. (1999). Regulation of natural monopoly. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Part V-Regulation of contracts.
• Domah, P., Pollitt, M. & Stern, J., (2002). Modelling the costs of energy regulation: Evidence of human resource constraints in developing countries. Cambridge—MIT Institute. CMI Working Paper 11; Department of Applied Economics Working Paper 0229.
• Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom,(with new preface in the 40th anniversary edition in 2002).
• Fumagalli, E., Schiavo, L., & Delestre, F. (2007). Service quality regulation in electricity distribution and retail. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Joskow, P. L. (2007). Regulation of natural monopoly. Handbook of law and economics, 2, 1227-1348.
• Kanazawa, M. T., & Noll, R. G. (1994). The origins of state railroad regulation: the Illinois constitution of 1870. in The regulated economy: A historical approach to political economy. University of Chicago Press.
• Machlup, F., (1967). .The Political Economy of Monopoly: Business, Labor and Government Policies. Johns Hopkins Press.
• Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of public policy, 17(2), 139-167.
• Majone, G., & Baake, P. (1996). Regulating europe. Psychology Press.
• Peltzman, S., Levine, M. E., & Noll, R. G. (1989). The economic theory of regulation after a decade of deregulation. Brookings papers on economic activity. Microeconomics, 1989, 1-59.
• Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a More General Theory of Regulation, 19 Journal of Law and Ecolnomics 211-40.
• Posner, R. (1974). Theories of Economic Regulation, 5 BellJournal of Economics and Management Science 335-58.
• RAP (The Regulatory Assistance Project) (2011). Electiricty Regulation in the U.S. A Guide, Montpelier, Vermont: The regulatory Assistance Project.
• Sharkey, W.W. (1982). The Theory of Natural Monopoly. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Stigler, G. J., (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell journal of economics and management science: 3-21.
• Tomain, J. P. (2002). The past and future of electricity regulation. Environmental Law, 435-474.
• Türkkan, E., (2001). Rekabet Teorisi ve Endüstri İktisadı, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara