Cultural Heritage and Semiotic Interpretation: The Case of Süleymaniye Mosque
Öz
One of the most critical responsibilities of a society’s members is to preserve cultural heritage. At this point, ‘awareness’ is critical. It means keeping, promoting, and transferring cultural values, which play a vital role in forming social reality, cultural identity, and consciousness. However, to realize the acts of preservation, promotion, and transmission, it is a must to know, experience, and comprehend the heritage. We call it a consciousness-raising activity, contributing to forming individual’s identity and national consciousness. Hence, individuals can comprehend themselves, fundamental values of the society, importance of being a nation through cultural heritage, and transfer it to future generations. The significance of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the Süleymaniye Mosque one of the most important cultural heritages in the world. In the study, the main internal and external structural features that make the magnificent artwork meaningful, the relational value of the elements contributing to the integrity of the architecture, its semantic universe, and reflections of each formative elements on human life are examined regarding surrounding/surrounded, form/substance, vertical/horizontal dichotomies within semiotics.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Süleymaniye Mosque, semiotics, semantic universe, architectural structure, cultural heritage
Kaynakça
- Adorno, Wiesengrund Theodor (1970). Aesthetic Theory. London: Routledge.
- Ağaoğlu, Mert and Değirmenci, Hilal (2019). Süleymaniye Camii. In Online Türkiye Turizm Ansiklopedisi, https://turkiyeturizmansiklopedisi.com/suleymaniye-camii (accessed 05 August 2025).
- Ahunbay, Zeynep (1988). “Mimar Sinan Yapılarında Kullanılan Yapım Teknikleri ve Malzeme”. In Mimarbaşı Koca Sinan: Yaşadığı Çağ ve Eserleri, 1, 531-538, İstanbul: Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü.
- Aslan, Ayhan and Şahin, Abdurrahman (2016). “Seismic Behaviour Evaluation of Suleymaniye Mosque Under Different Earthquake Records”. Disaster Science and Engineering, 2 (2), 67-75.
- Barthes, Roland (1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.
- Barthes, Roland (1986). “Semiology and the Urban”. In The city and the sign: An introduction to urban semiotics, 87-98. New York, Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
- Barthes, Roland (1989). Empire of Signs. New York: Hill and Wang-The Noonday Press.
- De Saussure, Ferdinand (1959). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
- Durkheim, Emile (1912). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen & Unwin.
- Düzenli, Halil İbrahim (2019). “Architecture in İstanbul between the XVI and XVII centuries”. History of İstanbul, 19, 1-72. https://istanbultarihi.ist/695-architecture-in-istanbul-between-the-xvith-and-xviith-centuries (accessed 5 October 2022).
