Araştırma Makalesi

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2022
PDF İndir
EN

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Öz

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of different framework materials polyetheretherketone (PEEK), zirconia, and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) through direct metal laser sintered (DMLS) and conventional casting (CC) in fixed prosthetic restorations. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 stainless steel dies were embedded in silicone molds, and the master models obtained were divided into four groups (n=20): PEEK, zirconia, Co-Cr through DMLS and CC frameworks. The vertical marginal gap was measured by stereomicroscope at ×20 magnification. In addition to descriptive statistics in the evaluation of data, one-way ANOVA was used with the post hoc multiple comparison test Tamhane’s T2, as the data were normally distributed and variances differed according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in vertical marginal gap before and after cementation in all groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Before and after cementation, vertical marginal gap values of laser sintered Co-Cr, zirconia, and PEEK frameworks were clinically acceptable. Keywords: PEEK; Marginal Adaptation; Laser Sintered Co-Cr; Zirconia; Framework

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

ADYUBAPB-Adiyaman University Research Project Council (ADYUBAP)

Proje Numarası

(ADYUBAP) – DHFDUP/2019-0003)

Kaynakça

  1. American Dental Association. Guide to dental materials and devices. 5th ed. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1970. p. 87-8
  2. Att, W., Komine, F., Gerds, T., & Strub, J.R. (2009). Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 101(4), 239-47.
  3. Boitelle, P., Mawussi, B., Tapie, L., & Fromentin, O. (2014). A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 41(11), 853-74.
  4. Chaar, M.S., Passia, N., & Kern, M. (2020). Long-term clinical outcome of posterior metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with direct metal laser-sintering technology. Journal of prosthodontic research, 64(3), 354-7.
  5. Conrad, H.J., Seong, W.J., & Pesun, I.J. (2007). Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 98(5), 389-404.
  6. Contrepois, M., Soenen, A., Bartala, M., & Laviole, O. (2013). Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 110(6), 447-454.e10.
  7. Dahl, B.E., Dahl, J.E., & Rønold, H.J. (2018). Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses. European journal of oral sciences, 126(6), 512-7.
  8. Gassino, G., Barone Monfrin, S., Scanu, M., Spina, G., & Preti, G. (2004). Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new in vitro 360-degree external examination procedure. The International journal of prosthodontics, 17(2), 218-23.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Aralık 2021

Kabul Tarihi

29 Nisan 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çalışkan, C., Demirci, F., & Birgealp Erdem, M. (2022). COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences, 4(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1050112
AMA
1.Çalışkan C, Demirci F, Birgealp Erdem M. COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences. 2022;4(1):28-45. doi:10.55895/sshs.1050112
Chicago
Çalışkan, Cevdet, Fatih Demirci, ve Merve Birgealp Erdem. 2022. “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 4 (1): 28-45. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1050112.
EndNote
Çalışkan C, Demirci F, Birgealp Erdem M (01 Nisan 2022) COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 4 1 28–45.
IEEE
[1]C. Çalışkan, F. Demirci, ve M. Birgealp Erdem, “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”, Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences, c. 4, sy 1, ss. 28–45, Nis. 2022, doi: 10.55895/sshs.1050112.
ISNAD
Çalışkan, Cevdet - Demirci, Fatih - Birgealp Erdem, Merve. “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 4/1 (01 Nisan 2022): 28-45. https://doi.org/10.55895/sshs.1050112.
JAMA
1.Çalışkan C, Demirci F, Birgealp Erdem M. COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences. 2022;4:28–45.
MLA
Çalışkan, Cevdet, vd. “COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY”. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences, c. 4, sy 1, Nisan 2022, ss. 28-45, doi:10.55895/sshs.1050112.
Vancouver
1.Cevdet Çalışkan, Fatih Demirci, Merve Birgealp Erdem. COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences. 01 Nisan 2022;4(1):28-45. doi:10.55895/sshs.1050112

Cited By

                                         34329                                        
 

 

34328
 

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.