Araştırma Makalesi

Bedenin Doğası, Doğanın Bedeni: Çağdaş Sanatta Algı, Mekân ve Ontoloji

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 30 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Nature of the Body, the Body of Nature: Perception, Space and Ontology in Contemporary Art

Abstract

This study aims to examine the ontological relationship between nature, the body, and art through contemporary art practices. By adopting a qualitative research method, works are analyzed by establishing an ontological theoretical foundation centered on Martin Heidegger's concept of being, Maurice Merleau-Ponty's theory of bodily perception, Gernot Böhme's approach defining nature as a living essence, and Meyer Howard Abrams’s philosophy of art. In the study, the representation of nature and the body is examined through the works of Olafur Eliasson, Ana Mendieta, Anselm Kiefer, Ursula von Rydingsvard, and Kiki Smith, who render the ontological orientation of contemporary art visible through perceptual spatial constructs, body-nature unity, layers of memory, organic forms, and bodily traces. The findings indicate that contemporary art treats nature as an existential phenomenon and that the relationship humans establish with nature creates a field of aesthetic and ethical awareness. By addressing the nature-body-art relationship within an ontological framework, the study contributes to the debates in contemporary art literature with an original perspective. Thus, it is demonstrated that art deepens the idea of co-existing with nature through bodily experience, and opens up a new space of awareness regarding being for the viewer.

Keywords

Nature , Body , Ontology , Phenomenology , Contemporary Art

Kaynakça

  1. Abrams, M. H. & Harpham, G. (2013). A glossary of literary terms. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  2. Abrams, M. H. (1953). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Aristoteles, (1997). Fizik (S. Babür, Çev.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  4. Böhme, G. (1993). Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 36(1), 113–126. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369303600107
  5. Böhme, G. (2013). Atmospheric architectures: the aesthetics of felt spaces (A. C. Engels-Schwarzpaul, Trans.). Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
  6. Coyne, L. (Jun 12, 2013). Heidegger and the Ethics of Land Art. International Society for Environmental Ethics: 10th Annual Meeting.
  7. Dreyfus, H. L. & Dreyfus, S. E. (1999). The challenge of merleau-ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment for cognitive science. In G. Weiss & H. F. Haber (Ed.). Perspectives on embodiment: the intersections of nature and culture (pp. 103–120). London: Routledge.
  8. Erzen, J. N. (2005). Mimar Sinan: Estetik bir analiz. Ankara: Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı Yayınları.
  9. Gadamer, H. G. (2007). Giriş. M. Heidegger içinde, Sanat eserinin kökeni (s. 83-98). (F. Tepebaşılı, Çev.). Ankara: De Ki Basım Yayım.
  10. Gorodeisky, K. (2016). 19th Century Romantic Aesthetics, In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aesthetics-19th-romantic/#AestNatu

Kaynak Göster

APA
Semizoğlu, B., & Anbarpınar, E. (2026). Bedenin Doğası, Doğanın Bedeni: Çağdaş Sanatta Algı, Mekân ve Ontoloji. STAR Sanat ve Tasarım Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.65660/stardergisi.1810536