ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ

Taha Kurt

doi:10.15337/suhfd.1329422

ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ

Öz

Anayasa yargısı veya yargı denetimi, günümüz anayasal sistemlerinin temel özelliklerinden biri haline gelmiştir. Anavatan Amerika Birleşik Devletleri örneği bir yana bırakılırsa, anayasa yargısının temel olarak sırasıyla I. Dünya Savaşı’nın hemen ardından ve 20. yüzyılın son çeyreğinde sosyalist rejimlerin yıkılmasından sonra yaygınlaştığı görülür. 1989’da kurulan Macaristan Anayasa Mahkemesi, anayasal düzenin temel koruyucu kurumlarından biri olarak tasarlanmıştır. Yüksek Mahkeme kurulduğu ilk günden itibaren, yaklaşık çeyrek yüzyıl boyunca kuvvetler ayrığı, frenler ve dengeler mekanizması, temel hak ve özgürlüklerin güvenceye alınması, anayasal devletin tesisi konularında önemli fonksiyonlar yerine getirmiştir. Fakat daha sonra yapılan Anayasa değişiklikleri sonucunda bu niteliğini kaybetmiştir. Macaristan Anayasa Mahkemesinin incelendiği bu çalışmada salt-organik bir mahkeme incelemesi yapılmamıştır. Bizce anayasal sistemin önemli bir unsuru olarak kurulan Yüksek Mahkemenin değeri ve fonksiyonu hukuksal, siyasal ve tarihsel okumalarla daha iyi anlaşılabilir. İlk kez 1989’da kurulan ve kısa dönem içerisinde sıra dışı değişim ve dönüşümler yaşayan Anayasa Mahkemesinin, sosyalist rejim döneminden başlayarak bir incelemesi yapılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

ACKERMAN, Bruce: The Future of Liberal Revolution, Yale University Press, New Haven and London 2008.
ARATO, Andrew: “Post Sovereign Constitution-making in Hungary: After Success, Partial Failure, and Now What?”, pp.1-24; https://lapa.princeton.edu/conferences/hungary11/post_sovereign_constitution-making_in_hungary.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.04.2023).
ARATO, Andrew: “Redeeming the Still Redeemable: Post Sovereign Constitution Making”, International Journal of Politics Culture and Society, Vol. 22, 2009, pp. 1-24.
ARATO, Andrew: “The Hungarian Case”, Tilburg Foreign Law Review, Vol. 4, Iss. 65, 1994, pp.65-90.
BAHÇECİ, Barış, KarşılaştırmalıHukuktaveTürkiye’deDevletBaşkanının Veto Yetkisi, Ankara 2008.
BANKUTI, Miklos/DOMBOS, Tamas/FLECK, Zoltan, vd.: Amicus Brief for the Venice Commission on the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law and the Key Cardinal Laws, Halmai, Gabor/Scheppele, Kim Lane (Editors), pp. 1-82; https://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/hungary/Amicus_Cardinal_Laws_final.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 18.03.2023).
BANKUTI, Miklos/HALMAI, Gabor/SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane: “Hungary’s Illiberal Turn: Disabling the Constitution”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 23, Iss. 3, July 2012, pp.138-146.
BOROS, Tamas: “Constitutional Amendments in Hungary: The Government's Struggle against the Constitutional Court”, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, February 2013,https://www.policysolutions.hu/userfiles/elemzes/21/nachrichten_aus_ungarn_februar_2013.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2023).

BREWER-CARIAS, Allen, R.: Judicial Review in Comparative Law, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro: Judicial Review in the Contemporary World, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1971.
CSINK, Lorant/SCHANDA, Balazs: The Constitutional Court, Csink, Lorant/ Schanda, Balazs/ Varga, Andras Zs (Editors), The Basic Law of Hungary: A First Commentary, Clarus Press, UK 2012, pp. 293-310. DENEER, David: “Modern Anayasal Sistemlerde Yargı Denetimi”, Çev: Tunçer Karamustafaoğlu, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 26, S. 3, 1969, s.179-205.
EGRESI, Katalin:“Role Of The Holy Crown Doctrine And ‘Historical Constitution’ in The Hungarian Constitutionalism”, Studia Juridica et Politica Jaurinensis, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, 2014, pp.10-18.
FRÖHLICH, Johanna/CSINK, Lorant: “Topics of Hungarian Constitutionalism”, Tijdschrift voor Constitutioneel Recht, Oktober 2012, pp.424-439.
GARLICKI, Lech: Democracy and International Influences, Georg Nolte (Editor), European and US Constitutionalism, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005, pp. 405-440.
GÖNENÇ, Levent, Prospects for Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Countries, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague/London/New York 2002.
GÜNGÖRMÜŞ, Naciye: Macaristan’da Değişim ve Demokrasiye Geçiş (1989-2009), Ankara2010.
GÖZLER, Kemal: Anayasa Hukukunun Genel Esasları: Ders Kitabı, 14. Baskı, Bursa 2022.
HALMAI, Gabor: “The Reform of Constitutional Law in Hungary After the Transition”, Legal Studies, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, June 1998, pp.188-196.
HALMAI, Gabor: “Regeneration of Civil Society in Hungary: The Recodification of the Right of Assembly and Association” Law & Policy, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, April 1991, pp.135-147.
HALMAI, Gabor: “Silence of Transitional Constitutions: The “Invisible Constitution” Concept of The Hungarian Constitutional Court”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, November 2018, pp.969-984.
HALMAI, Gabor: “The Rise and Fall of Constitutionalism in Hungary”, https://me.eui.eu/gabor-halmai/wp-content/uploads/sites/385/2018/05/10.The-rise-and-fall-of-constitutionalism-in-Hungary-1.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2023).
HAJDÚ, József: The Transition from Welfare to Workfare in Times of Crisis: A Double-based Reform of the Hungarian Welfare StateBecker, Ulrich/Poulou, Anastasia (Editors),European Welfare State Constitutions after the Financial Crisis, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom 2020, pp. 49-71.
HANTINGTON, Samuel, (Çeviren: Ergun Özbudun): Üçüncü Dalga: Yirminci Yüzyıl Sonlarında Demokratlaşma, Ankara 1996.
JACKSON, C. Vicki/TUSHNET, Mark: Comparative Constitutional Law, Second Edition, Foundation Press, University Casebook Series, 2006.
KAYA, Seyithan/KURT, Taha, Anayasa Yargısı ve Bireysel Başvuru, 2. Baskı, Ankara 2023.
KENNY, Sally J./REISINGER, William M./REITZ, John C.: Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 1999.
KLINBERG, Ethan: “Judicial Review and Hungary's Transition from Communism to Democracy: The Constitutional Court, the Continuity of Law, and the Redefinition of Property Rights”, Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 41, 1992, pp.41-144.
KONTACI, Ali Ersoy, Kırılgan Demokrasilerde Siyasal Örgütlenme Özgürlüğü, 1. Baskı, Ankara 2016.
KOVACS, Kriszta/TOTH Gabor Attila: “Hungary’s Constitutional Transformation”, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, June 2011, pp.183-203.
LACH, Kasia/SADURSKİ, Wojciech: Constitutional Courts of Central and Eastern EuropeBetween Adolescence and Maturity, Harding, Andrew/Leyland/Wildy Peter, (Editors), Constitutional Courts: Forms, Functions and Practice in Comparative Perspective, Simmonds & Hill Publishing, England 2009, pp. 212-234.
MADDOX, Graham: “A Note on the Meaning of ‘Constitution’”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 76, Iss. 4, December 1982, pp.805-809.
MAINWARING, Scott: Introduction: Democratic Accountability in Latin America, Mainwaring, Scott/Welna, Christopher (Editors), Democratic Accountability in Latin America, Oxford University Press, New York 2003, pp. 3-33.
MAINWARING, Scott: “Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues”, Working Paper, Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, November 1989, pp.1-43.
NOLTE, Georg: European and US Constitutionalism: Comparing Essential Elements, Georg Nolte (Editor), European and US Constitutionalism, Cambridge University Press, New York 2005, pp. 1-20.
O’DONNELL, Guillermo/SCHMITTER, Philippe C.: Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Johns Hopkins University Press, United States of America 1986.
O’DONNELL, Guillermo/SCHMITTER, Philippe C./WHİTEHEAD, Laurence: “Transitions from Authoritarian Rule” Latin American Perspectives: Democratization and Class Struggle, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, Summer, 1988, pp.115-130. ÖRKENY, Antal/SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane: “Constitutionalism in Eastern Europe” International Journal of Sociology, Vol. 26, Iss. 4, Winter 1996/1997, pp.76-94.
ÖZBUDUN, Ergun: Türk Anayasa Hukuku, 16.Baskı, Ankara 2016.
PACZOLAY,Péter:“Changes in the Competences of the Hungarian Constitutional Court”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, S. 29, Ankara 2012, s.375-380.
PACZOLAY, Péter: “Limits and Possibilities of Expansion”, International Conference on Jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court in Riga.
RATİP, Mehmet: “Yeni Macar Anayasası Ne Anlatıyor? Türkiye’nin Katılımsız Bir Anayasa Yapım Sürecinden Çıkarabileceği Dersler”, Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı, Mayıs 2011, s.1-10.
SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane: “Hungary’s Constitutional Revolution”, https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/19/hungarys-constitutional-revolution, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2022).
SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane: “Understanding Hungary’s Constitutional Revolution”,https://law.yale.edu/system/files/understanding_hungarys_constitutional_revolution.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2022).
SCHWARTZ, Herman: “Constitutional Developments in East Central Europe”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 45, Iss. 1, Summer 1991, pp. 71-89.
SCHWARTZ, Herman: The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post - Communist Europe, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2000.
SHAPIRO, Martin: The Success of Judicial Review, Sally, J. Kenney/William, M.Reisinger/John, C. Reitz, (Editors), Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 1999, pp. 193-219.
SHAPIRO, Martin/STONE, Alec: “The New Constitutional Politics of Europe”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 26, January 1994, pp. 397-420.
SOLYOM, Lazlo: Comment, Georg Nolte (Editor), European and US Constitutionalism, Cambridge University Press, New York 2005, pp.249-250. SOLYOM, Lazlo: “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy: With Special Reference to Hungary”, International Sociology, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, pp.133-161.
SOLYOM, Lazlo/BRUNNER, G.: Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy:The Hungarian Constitutional Court, The University of Michigan Press, 2000.
SPULLER, Gabor: “Transformation of the Hungarian Constitutional Court:Tradition, Revolution, and (European) Prospects”, German Law Journal, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, 2014, pp.637-692.
STUMPF, Istvan: “Rule of Law, Division of Powers, Constitutionalism”, Acta Juridica Hungarica, Iss. 4, 2014, pp. 299-317.
STUMPF, Istvan: “The Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Place in the Constitutional System of Hungary”, Civic Review, Vol.13, Special Issue, 2017, pp.239-258.
SZENTE, Zoltan: “The Interpretive Practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court: A Critical View”, German Law Journal, Vol. 14, Iss. 8, 2013, pp.1591-1614.
TEZİÇ, Erdoğan:AnayasaHukuku, 21. Baskı, İstanbul 2017.
TROCSANYI, Laszlo: The Creation of the Basic Law of Hungary, Csink, Lorant/Schanda, Balazs/Varga, Andras Zs (Editors), The Basic Law of Hungary: A First Commentary, Clarus Press, UK 2012, pp. 29-79.
VISEGRADY, Antal: “A Balance of the Democratic Transformation in Central-Eastern Europe”, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos, Belo Horizonte, Iss. 103, July 2011, pp.41-67.
VISEGRADY, Antal: “On European Legal Cultures”, Revista Brasileira Estudos Politicos, Belo Horizonte, Vol. 107, Iss. 13, July 2013, pp.13-42
VISEGRADY, Antal: “Transition to Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Experiences of a Model Country-Hungary”, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, 1992, pp.245-265.
Constitution of the People’s Republic of Hungary, Budapest 20th August 1949, https://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/hungary/1949%20Hungarian%20constitution.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 13.05.2023).
Komisyon ve Mahkeme Kararları
CCH, 30.06.1995, Number of the Decision: 43/1995. (VI. 30.), http://www.codices.coe.int/NXT/gateway.dll/CODICES/precis/eng/eur/hun/hun-1995-2-004?fn=document-frameset.htm$f=templates$3.0, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.06.2022).
CCH, 13.11.2006, Number of the Decision: 61/2006. (XI. 15.), https://hunconcourt.hu/datasheet/?id=26ECD2BDB5419449C1258382003C3D42, (Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2022).
CCH, 27.02.2007, Number of the Decision: 8/2007. (II. 28.), https://hunconcourt.hu/datasheet/?id=FCFDF6515F5269B2C1258382003C3D09, (Erişim Tarihi: 16.08.2022).
CCH, 26.10.2010, Number of the Decision: 184/2010. (X. 28.), http://www.codices.coe.int/NXT/gateway.dll/CODICES/precis/eng/eur/hun/hun-2010-3-009, (Erişim Tarihi: 16.09.2022).
CCH, 06.05.2011,Number of the Decision: 37/2011 (V.10.), http://www.codices.coe.int/NXT/gateway.dll/CODICES/precis/eng/eur/hun/hun-2011-2-005, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2023).
CCH, 19.12.2011, Number of the Decision: 165/2011. (XII. 20.), http://www.codices.coe.int/NXT/gateway.dll/CODICES/precis/eng/eur/hun/hun-2011-3-007, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.01.2023).
Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Hungary’s Media Legislation in Light of Council of Europe Standards on Freedom of the Media, https://rm.coe.int/16806daac3, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2023)
ECHR, In the Case of N.K.M. v. Hungary, Application No. 66529/11, 14.05.2013, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2023).
ECHR, In the Case of ATV Zrt v. Hungary, Application No. 61178/14, 28.04.2020, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.10.2023).
European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission): Opinion No. 614/2011, Strasbourg, 28 March 2011, https://www.venice.coe.int/WebForms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)001-e, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.05.2022).
European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission): Opinion No. 618/2011, Strasbourg 20 June 2011, https://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/hungary/venice%20commission%20hungarian%20constitution.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2022).
European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission): Opinion No: 662/2012, Strasbourg, 23 September 2014, https://www.venice.coe.int/WebForms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)001-e, (Erişim Tarihi: 16.03.2023).
European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission): Opinion No: 665/2012, Strasbourg, 19 June 2012; https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2012)009-e, (Eri-şim Tarihi: 20.04.2023).
European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) : Opinion No: 798 / 2015, Strasbourg, 22 June 2015, https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2015)015-e, (Erişim Tarihi: 19.01.2023).
European Parliament Resolution of 10 March 2011 on Media Law in Hungary, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2011-0094+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN, (Erişim Tarihi: 19.01.2023).
Human Rights Watch, Wrong Direction on Rights: Assessing the Impact of Hungary’s New Constitution and Laws, https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/hungary0513_ForUpload.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2023). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2011-0315+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2022).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Anayasa Hukuku

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Taha Kurt ^*
0000-0002-7699-8810
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

31 Aralık 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Temmuz 2023

Kabul Tarihi

16 Aralık 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.1329422

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA72YL76HN

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kurt, T. (2023). ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(4), 1729-1777. https://doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.1329422

AMA

1.Kurt T. ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;31(4):1729-1777. doi:10.15337/suhfd.1329422

Chicago

Kurt, Taha. 2023. “ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 31 (4): 1729-77. https://doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.1329422.

EndNote

Kurt T (01 Aralık 2023) ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 31 4 1729–1777.

IEEE

[1]T. Kurt, “ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 31, sy 4, ss. 1729–1777, Ara. 2023, doi: 10.15337/suhfd.1329422.

ISNAD

Kurt, Taha. “ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 31/4 (01 Aralık 2023): 1729-1777. https://doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.1329422.

JAMA

1.Kurt T. ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;31:1729–1777.

MLA

Kurt, Taha. “ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 31, sy 4, Aralık 2023, ss. 1729-77, doi:10.15337/suhfd.1329422.

Vancouver

1.Taha Kurt. ANAYASAL DÜZENİN KORUYUCULUĞUNDAN SIRADAN BİR MAHKEMEYE EVRİLME ÖRNEĞİ OLARAK MACARİSTAN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2023;31(4):1729-77. doi:10.15337/suhfd.1329422

Cited By

YARGISAL AKTİVİZM KAVRAMI VE ANAYASA MAHKEMESİNİN YARGISAL YORUMU

Ankara Barosu Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1578206