MADURO'NUN ABD TARAFINDAN YAKALANMASI: ULUSLARARASI HUKUK AÇISINDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz

Bu çalışma, Venezuela Devlet Başkanı Nicolás Maduro’nun Amerika Birleşik Devletleri tarafından alıkonulmasını uluslararası hukuk ışığında incelemektedir. Makale, söz konusu operasyonun; kuvvet kullanma yasağı, devlet egemenliği ve dokunulmazlık gibi sistemin kurucu normlarını ağır biçimde ihlal ettiğini savunmaktadır. Olayı jus ad bellum, teamül hukuku ve devletin sorumluluğu çerçevesinde analiz eden çalışma; operasyonun "kolluk faaliyeti" kılıfı altında meşrulaştırılamayacağını ve kuvvet kullanma yasağının hiçbir hukuki istisnasına uymadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, görevdeki bir liderin yabancı topraklara kaçırılmasını, toprak bütünlüğüne ve siyasi bağımsızlığa yönelik doğrudan bir saldırı teşkil ettiğini vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca, teamül hukuku uyarınca devlet başkanlarının sahip olduğu mutlak kişisel dokunulmazlığın, suçun ağırlığına bakılmaksızın yabancı yargı yetkisini engellediğini hatırlatmaktadır. Bu bağlamda operasyonun, ABD’nin kendi geçmiş hukuki pozisyonları ve uluslararası emsallerle çeliştiğinin altı çizilmektedir. Sonuç olarak çalışma, güçlü devletlerin hukuk normlarını seçici bir şekilde araçsallaştırmasının, uluslararası hukuk düzeninin evrenselliğini ve uzun vadeli meşruiyetini tehdit eden tehlikeli bir emsal oluşturduğunu savunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Devlet Başkanı Dokunulmazlığı
• Maduro Vakası
• Egemen Eşitlik
• Kuvvet Kullanımı
• Venezuela.

THE US CAPTURE OF MADURO IN VENEZUELA: AN ASSESSMENT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

Öz

This study examines the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by the United States in light of international law. The article argues that this operation severely violated the founding norms of the system, such as the prohibition of the use of force, state sovereignty, and immunity. Analyzing the event within the framework of jus ad bellum, customary law, and state responsibility, the study demonstrates that the operation cannot be justified under the guise of "law enforcement activity" and does not comply with any legal exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force. The study emphasizes that the forceful seizure of a sitting leader on foreign soil constitutes a direct attack on territorial integrity and political independence. Furthermore, it recalls that, according to customary law, the absolute personal immunity enjoyed by heads of state prevents foreign jurisdiction regardless of the severity of the crime. In this context, it underlines that the operation contradicts the US's own past legal positions and international precedents. In conclusion, the study argues that the selective instrumentalization of legal norms by powerful states sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the universality and long-term legitimacy of the international legal order.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Head of State Immunity
• Maduro Case
• Sovereign Equality
• Use of Force
• Venezuela.

Kaynakça

1. AGENJO, Adrián: “Which Immunity for Nicolás Maduro? Personal Immunity, Inviolability, and the Implausible Exceptions the US Might Claim”, EJIL: Talk!, 22 January 2026, https://www.ejiltalk.org/which-immunity-for-nicolas-maduro-personal-immunity-inviolability-and-the-implausible-exceptions-the-us-might-claim/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2026).
2. AHMED, Mustak: “The Politics of Kidnapping: U.S. Intervention and the Detention of Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro—Implications for International Law and State Sovereignty”, SSRN Working Paper, University of Rajshahi, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6036036 (Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2026).
3. AKANDE, Dapo/SHAH, Sangeeta: “Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts”, European Journal of International Law, C. 21, S. 4, 2011, s. 815–852.
4. Arbitration Between Great Britain and Costa Rica (Tinoco Case), 1 R.I.A.A. 369 (1923).
5. Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2002.
6. BASSIOUNI, M. Cherif: Introduction to International Criminal Law, 2nd ed., Leiden 2011.
7. BBC NEWS TÜRKÇE: “ABD’den Venezuela’ya saldırı: ‘Maduro yakalanıp ülke dışına çıkarıldı’”, YouTube video, 3 January 2026.
8. BROWNLIE, Ian: Principles of Public International Law, 7th ed., Oxford 2008.

9. CENTER FOR PREVENTIVE ACTION: U.S. Confrontation With Venezuela, Council on Foreign Relations, January 2026, https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/instability-venezuela (Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2026).
10. Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1949.
11. CRAWFORD, James: Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 9th ed., Oxford 2019.
12. CURTIS, John: The US Capture of Nicolás Maduro, House of Commons Library Briefing Paper CBP-10452, January 2026, https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10452/ (Erişim Tarihi: 15.01.2026).
13. FOX, Hazel/WEBB, Philippa: The Law of State Immunity, 3rd ed., Oxford 2015.
14. GRAY, Christine: International Law and the Use of Force, 4th ed., Oxford 2018.
15. HARB, Ali: “Abduction of Venezuela’s Maduro Illegal Despite US Charges, Experts Say”, Al Jazeera, 8 January 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/8/abduction-of-venezuelas-maduro-illegal-despite-us-charges-experts-say (Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2026).
16. INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION: Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001.
17. INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION: Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Sixty-Fifth Session, UN Doc. A/68/10, 2013.
18. INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION: Second Report on Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction, UN Doc. A/CN.4/661, 2013.
19. KEITNER, Chimène I.: “Head of State Immunity and Maduro on Trial”, Just Security, 6 January 2026, https://www.justsecurity.org/128073/head-of-state-immunity-maduro-trial/ (Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2026).
20. MCKELVIE, Geraldine: “Is There Any Legal Justification for the US Attack on Venezuela?”, The Guardian, 3 January 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/03/is-there-any-legal-justification-for-the-us-attack-on-venezuela-trump-maduro (Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2026).
21. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1986.
22. OLAY, Matthew: Trump Announces U.S. Military's Capture of Maduro, US Department of War, Jan. 3, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4370431/trump-announces-us-militarys-capture-of-maduro/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2026).
23. ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, 17 July 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90.
24. RYNGAERT, Cedric: Jurisdiction in International Law, 2nd ed., Oxford 2015.
25. SHAW, Malcolm N.: International Law, 8th ed., Cambridge 2017.
26. UNITED NATIONS: Charter of the United Nations, San Francisco 1945.
27. UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL: Resolution 138, UNSC Res. 138 (1960).
28. UNITED NATIONS SECRETARIAT: Memorandum on the Immunity of State Officials, 2008.
29. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE: Rewards for Justice Program: Venezuela, Washington DC 2020.
30. U.S. DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK: United States v. Nicolás Maduro Moros, Superseding Indictment, S4 11 Cr. 205 (AKH).