TÜRKİYE’DE TERÖR SUÇLARINDAN HÜKÜMLÜ YA DA TUTUKLU OLANLARIN İNFAZ REJİMİ

Öz

Radikalleşme basamaklarında önemli bir yer tuttuğu kabul edilen ceza infaz kurumları; terör suçlarından hükümlü ya da tutuklu olanların infaz rejiminde adî suçlara nazaran farklı uygulamalara ev sahipliği yapmaktadır. Terör suçlarına ilişkin bazı ön kabuller ve tehlikelilik karinesi infaz rejiminde farklı uygulamaları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Barındırma, iyileştirme faaliyetleri, dış dünya ile iletişim farklılaşmanın olduğu önemli yerlerdir. Ancak bunların yanı sıra infazın gevşetildiği ve tahliyenin söz konusu olduğu eşiklerde uygulamanın daha da farklılaştığı görülmektedir. Yeniden sosyalleşmenin ve cezanın bireyselleştirildiği temel enstrüman olan koşullu salıverilme ve onun türevi olan denetimli serbestlik tedbiri uygulanarak cezanın infazında olabildiğince titiz davranılmaktadır. Adi suçlara göre daha sert bir infaz rejiminin uygulandığı görülmektedir. Toplumun reaksiyonlarına duyarlı olan infaz rejimi, terör suçları söz konusu olduğunda toplumun sesine daha da dikkat kesilmektedir. Bu çalışmada terör suçlarında uygulanan infaz rejimi, mevzuat, uygulama ve yargı kararları ışığında ele alınacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• radikalleşme
• terör
• rehabilitasyon
• topluma yeniden kazandırma
• infaz rejimi

Penal Execution Regime For Individuals Sentenced Or Detained For Terrorism-Related Offenses In Türkiye

Öz

Prisons, which are acknowledged to occupy a significant place within the stages of radicalization, host distinct practices within penal execution regime for individuals sentenced or detained for terrorism-related offences, as compared to ordinary crimes. Certain presuppositions concerning terrorism offences, together with a presumption of dangerousness, give rise to differentiated applications within the penal execution regime. Accommodation conditions, rehabilitative activities, and communication with the outside world constitute major areas where such differentiation becomes evident. Beyond these aspects, it is observed that the divergence becomes even more pronounced at critical thresholds where the execution of the sentence is relaxed and release becomes possible. Conditional release and its derivative measure, probation, are implemented with particular caution in the execution of sentences for terrorism offences. A stricter penal execution regime is applied. Sensitive to societal reactions, the execution regime becomes even more attentive to public sentiment when terrorism offences are concerned. This study examines the execution regime applicable to terrorism offences in light of legislation, practice, and judicial decisions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• radicalisation
• terrorism
• rehabilitation
• Reintegration into Society
• penal execution regime

Kaynakça

1. AKBULUT, Berrin / DEMİRKOL, Neslihan / TURAN, Taha Yasin: Execution Law, Ankara 2021.
2. AKBULUT, Berrin: “The Convict’s Right to Benefit from Periodical or Non-Periodical Publications (LESSM Art. 62)”, Necmettin Erbakan University Law Faculty Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1 (2024), pp. 264-290.
3. AKBULUT, Berrin: Criminal Law General Provisions, Ankara 2018.
4. AKDENİZ, Galma / ELVERİŞ, İdil / ALPAN, Arca: “Visible Punishment, Invisible Execution: Compliance with Judgments in Light of Penal and Execution Policies in Türkiye”, Istanbul Medipol University Law Faculty Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 2019, pp. 5-37.
5. ALTINTAŞ, Muhammed Esat: “A Qualitative Study on Spiritual Guidance and Religious Services Conducted in Penal Institutions (Kayseri Sample)”, Diyanet Scientific Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1 (2019), pp. 81-119.
6. ARSLAN, Çetin / KAYANÇİÇEK, Murat: Allocation to Open Penal Institutions and Probation (In Force Legislation and Within the Scope of Provisional Article 10 Added to Law No. 5275 by Law No. 7456), Ankara 2023.
7. ARTUK, M. Emin / ALŞAHİN, M. Emin: Criminology, 5th Edition, Ankara 2024.
8. ARTUK, M. Emin / GÖKCEN, Ahmet / ALŞAHİN, M. Emin / ÇAKIR, Kerim: Criminal Law General Provisions, 19th Edition, Adalet Publishing, Ankara 2025.

9. ARTUK, Mehmet Emin / ALAN AKCAN, Esra: “Security Measures in Comparative Law and Turkish Criminal Law”, Istanbul Medipol University Law Faculty Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Fall 2016), pp. 5-37.
10. AVCI, Engin: “Terrorist Rehabilitation and Deradicalisation: A Model Proposal”, Aegean Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2021), pp. 1-19.
11. BACAKSIZ, Pınar: “Punishment and Reintegration into Society”, Dokuz Eylül University Law Faculty Journal, Vol. 16, Special Issue (2015), pp. 4917–4941.
12. BEŞGÜL, Birce: The Prison Radicalisation Strategies of Feto Prisoners: A Comparison Between Türkiye And Europe, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, Vol. 60, No. 4 (2025), pp. 4535-4552.
13. BOZDAĞ, Ahmet: The Institution of Conditional Release in Turkish Criminal Law and the Development of Its Effectiveness, Ankara 2019.
14. BRISARD, Jean-Charles: Zarqawi: The New Face of Al-Qaeda, trans. Çetin Öngün, Ankara 2007.
15. CEVİZ, Mehmet: “Deradicalisation Practices in Germany”, Osman Şen (ed.), in. The Radicalisation Process in All Its Dimensions and Country Practices in Combating Radicalisation, Ankara 2021.
16. CORNER, Emily / GILL, Paul: “A False Dichotomy? Mental Illness and Lone-Actor Terrorism”, Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 39, No. 1 (2015), pp. 23–34.
17. COUNCIL OF EUROPE: Handbook for Prison and Probation Services Regarding Radicalisation and Violent Extremism, European Committee on Crime Problems (CDPC) – Council for Penological Co-operation (PC-CP), Strasbourg 2016.
18. COYLE, Andrew, Managing Prisons in a Time of Change, International Centre for Prison Studies, London 2002.
19. ÇAKIR, Muhammed Faruk et al.: Radicalisation, Violent Extremism and Terrorism, Police Academy Publications, Ankara 2017.
20. ÇATLI, Bengisu: “The Psychodynamic Dimension of Radicalisation”, Osman Şen (ed.), in. The Radicalisation Process in All Its Dimensions and Country Practices in Combating Radicalisation, Ankara 2021.
21. ÇELİK BAŞBOZKURT, Özlem: “Monitoring the Letters of Persons Convicted or Detained for Terrorism in Light of Constitutional Court Decisions”, İzzet ÖZGENÇ (ed.), in. Terrorism, Terror Crimes and Execution Law in Comparative and Turkish Law, Vol. III, Turkish Academy of Sciences Publications, Ankara 2024, p. 327.
22. DEAR, Greg E. / THOMSON, Donald M. / HILLS, Adelma M.: “Self-Harm in Prison: Manipulators Can Also Be Suicide Attempters”, Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 2 (2000), pp. 160-175.
23. DEMİRBAŞ, Timur: Execution Law, 4th Edition, Ankara 2015.
24. DEMİRTAŞ, Bayram: Terrorism Exploiting Religion: A Study Based on Prisoners, Ankara 2023.
25. DITTON, Paula M. / WILSON, Doris James: Truth in Sentencing in State Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report, January 1999, NCJ 170032, pp. 1-16.
26. DÖNMEZER, Sulhi: “Rehabilitation of Terrorists”, Istanbul Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 1 (1985), pp. 3–21.
27. DUDECK, Manuela / DRENKHAHN, Kirstin / SPITZER, Carsten / BARNOW, Sven / KOPP, Daniel / KUWERT, Philipp / FREYBERGER, Harald J. / DÜNKEL, Frieder: “Traumatization and Mental Distress in Long-Term Prisoners in Europe”, Punishment & Society, Vol. 13, No. 4 (2011), pp. 403–423.
28. EKMEN, Serhan: “Introduction to Radicalisation Debates”, Osman Şen (ed.), in. The Radicalisation Process in All Its Dimensions and Country Practices in Combating Radicalisation, Ankara 2021.
29. ERBAŞ, Rahime, “Organized Crime-Related Legislation in the Turkish Criminal Law”, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2015), pp. 275-304.
30. FEIN, Robert A. / VOSSEKUIL, Bryan: “Assassination in the United States: An Operational Study of Recent Assassins, Attackers, and Near-Lethal Approachers”, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 2 (1999), pp. 321–333.
31. GILL, Paul / HORGAN, John / DECKERT, Paige: “Bombing Alone: Tracing the Motivations and Antecedent Behaviors of Lone-Actor Terrorists”, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 59, No. 2 (2014), pp. 425-435.
32. GRUENEWALD, Jeff / CHERMAK, Steven / FREILICH, Joshua D.: “Distinguishing ‘Loner’ Attacks from Other Domestic Extremist Violence: A Comparison of Far‐Right Homicide Incident and Offender Characteristics”, Criminology & Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2013), pp. 65–91.
33. HAFIZOĞULLARI, Zeki / KURŞUN, Günal: “Organised Crime in Turkish Criminal Law”, Turkish Bar Association Journal, No. 71 (2007), pp. 26-80.
34. HAMM, Mark S.: “Prison Islam in the Age of Sacred Terror”, British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 49, No. 5 (2009), pp. 667-685.
35. HAMM, Mark S.: The Spectacular Few: Prisoner Radicalization and the Evolving Terrorist Threat, New York University Press, New York 2013.
36. HAVLE, Nedim: “Temperament and Character Profiles of Women Convicted/Detained for Terror Crimes in Türkiye: A Comparative Case-Control Study”, Türkiye Clinics Journal of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Sciences, (2025), pp. 1-9.
37. HAVLE, Nedim: The Anatomy of Terrorism: A Psychological, Social and Ideological Synthesis, Istanbul 2025.
38. HORGAN, John G.: The Psychology of Terrorism, Routledge, London 2004.
39. INPROVE EEIG (Consortium): Technical Assistance Project for the Evaluation of the 2014, 2015 and 2016 Türkiye Annual Programmes – Theme 9: Prisons (Final Report), Ankara, 2022.
40. JONES, Clarke R., “Are Prisons Really Schools for Terrorism? Challenging the Rhetoric on Prison Radicalization”, Punishment & Society, Vol. 16, No. 1 (2014), pp. 74-103.
41. KANGAL, Zeynel T.: “Terror and Terror Crimes in Terms of the Principle of Legality”, İzzet Özgenç (ed.), in. Terrorism, Terror Crimes and Execution Law in Comparative and Turkish Law, Vol. I, Turkish Academy of Sciences Publications, Ankara 2024.
42. KARAKEHYA, Hakan: “Conditions for Conditional Release of Those Convicted of Terror Crimes”, İzzet Özgenç (ed.), in. Terrorism, Terror Crimes and Execution Law in Comparative and Turkish Law, Vol. III, Turkish Academy of Sciences Publications, Ankara 2024.
43. KOCA, Mahmut / ÜZÜLMEZ, İlhan: Turkish Criminal Law General Provisions, 13th Edition, Ankara 2020.
44. KURT, Mehmet: Execution of Sentences and the Problems of Penal Institutions, Ankara 2007.
45. LIPSEY, Mark W. / CULLEN, Francis T.: “The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews”, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 3 (2007), pp. 297-320.
46. MARTIN, Gus, Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues, 3rd Edition, California 2010.
47. McCAULEY, Clark / MOSKALENKO, Sophia: “Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism”, Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 20, No. 3 (2008), pp. 415-433.
48. MOGHADDAM, Fathali M.: “The Staircase to Terrorism: A Psychological Exploration”, American Psychologist, Vol. 60, No. 2 (2005), pp. 161-169.
49. MONOD, Guillaume / AMBAR-AKKAOUI, Myriam / LEVASSEUR, Lucie / PHAM-SCOTTEZ, Anne: “Clinical Characteristics of a Sample of 90 Detainees for Jihadist Terrorism”, L'Encephale, Vol. 51, No. 4 (2025), pp. 361–367.
50. NEUMANN, Peter R.: “The Trouble with Radicalization”, International Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 4 (2013), pp. 873-893.
51. NUHOĞLU, Ayşe: “The Measure of Transfer to Solitary Confinement”, Justice Journal, No. 65 (December 2020), pp. 73-97.
52. O’HEAR, Michael, “Good Conduct Time for Prisoners: Why (and How) Wisconsin Should Provide Credits Toward Early Release”, Marquette Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 1 (2014), pp. 487-552.
53. OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY: https://www.oed.com/dictionary (Accessed: 20.02.2026).
54. ÖZAR, Süleyman: “The Concept of Dangerous Offender and Problems Concerning the Restriction of Rights Attached to This Category”, İzzet Özgenç (ed.), in. Terrorism, Terror Crimes and Execution Law in Comparative and Turkish Law, Vol. III, Turkish Academy of Sciences Publications, Ankara 2024.
55. ÖZBEK, Veli Özer: “The Concept of Special Dangerous Offender in Turkish Criminal Law and the Special Execution Regime Applicable to Such Offenders”, İzzet ÖZGENÇ (ed.), Terrorism, Terror Crimes and Execution Law in Comparative and Turkish Law, Vol. III, Turkish Academy of Sciences Publications, Ankara 2024.
56. ÖZBEK, Veli Özer: Execution Law, 6th Edition, Ankara 2015.
57. ÖZGENÇ, İzzet: “The Crime of Propaganda of Terrorism and Terrorist Organisation and Criminal Liability”, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Law Faculty Journal, Vol. XXV, No. 2 (2021), pp. 373-431.
58. ÖZGENÇ, İzzet: Turkish Criminal Law General Provisions, 15th Edition, Ankara 2019.
59. ÖZTEKTEN, Özkan: “The Words ‘Mahpus’ and ‘Prison’ in Turkish”, Emine Gürsoy Naskali / Hilal Oytun Altun (eds.), in. The Prison Book, Istanbul 2005.
60. PHILLIPS, Peter J.: “Lone Wolf Terrorism”, Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, Vol. 17, No. 1 (2011), pp. 1-29.
61. PRESIDENCY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS: ISIS: A Religion Exploitation Based on Terror, Ankara 2018.
62. RONCO, Daniela / SBRACCIA, Alvise / TORRENTE, Giovanni: Prison De-radicalization Strategies, Programmes and Risk Assessment Tools in Europe, Antigone Edizioni, Rome 2019.
63. SARMA, Kiran M. / CARTHY, Sarah L. / COX, Katie M.: “Mental Disorder, Psychological Problems and Terrorist Behaviour: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”, Campbell Systematic Reviews, Vol. 18, No. 3 (2022), pp. 1-65.
64. SELÇUK, Sami: “Conditional Release Turning into an ‘Amnesty’ Through Transformation and the Unique Story of Evading Constitutional Majority”, https://t24.com.tr (Access Date: 10.02.2026).
65. SELÇUK, Sami: “The Law’s Test with Terrorism”, Turkish Justice Academy Journal, Vol. 1, No. 5 (2011), pp. 57-92.
66. SPAAIJ, Ramón: “The Enigma of Lone Wolf Terrorism: An Assessment”, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 33, No. 9 (2010), pp. 854–870.
67. SÜMER, Arif Emre: “Evaluation of Exceptional Regulations Concerning the Execution Regime for Organised Crimes in the Light of Constitutional Court Decisions”, Selçuk University Law Faculty Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2022), pp. 637–677.
68. SYDES, Michelle / HINE, Lorelei / HIGGINSON, Angela / McEWAN, James / DUGAN, Laura / MAZEROLLE, Lorraine: “Criminal Justice Interventions for Preventing Radicalisation, Violent Extremism and Terrorism: An Evidence and Gap Map”, Campbell Systematic Reviews, No. 19 (2023), pp. 1-64.
69. ŞEN, Ersan / BAŞER BERKÜN, Beyza: “How Is It Determined That a Convict Has Disengaged from the Organisation?”, sen.av.tr (Access Date: 07.02.2026).
70. ŞEN, Ersan / BAŞER BERKÜN, Beyza: “Prohibition of Conditional Release Due to Receiving Three Solitary Confinement Penalties under Anti-Terror Law Art. 17/2 and Law No. 5275 Art. 48/2”, sen.av.tr (Access Date: 11.02.2026).
71. THIJSSEN, Gaby / MASTHOFF, Erik / SIJTSEMA, Jelle / BOGAERTS, Stefan: “Understanding Violent Extremism: Socio-demographic, Criminal and Psychopathological Background Characteristics of Detainees Residing in Dutch Terrorism Wings”, Criminology & Criminal Justice, Vol. 23, No. 2 (2023), pp. 290–308.
72. TOKGÖZ, Havva Begüm: “Execution Regime in Organized Crime”, Adem Sözüer (ed.), in. 7th International Crime and Punishment Film Festival – Justice, Istanbul, 2022, pp. 217–239.
73. TROTTER, Sarah: “Hope’s Relations: The Right to Hope in European Human Rights Law”, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 2 (2022), pp. 1-21.
74. TURİNAY, Faruk Y.: “Absolute and Relative Terror Crimes under the Anti-Terror Law”, Human & Human, Year 6, No. 20 (2019), pp. 337-350.
75. UNODC: Handbook on the Management of Violent Extremist Prisoners and the Prevention of Radicalization to Violence in Prisons, Criminal Justice Handbook Series, United Nations, New York 2016.
76. ÜNAL, İrem / ALTAY, Yağmur: “Rehabilitation and Intervention Programs Applied to Female Detainees and Convicts in Türkiye”, Journal of Security Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2025), pp. 353-388. van de RIJT, Jill / van GINNEKEN, Esther F. J. C. / BOONE, Miranda M., “Normalisation by Default and Normalisation by Design: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies on Normalisation in Prison Practice,” Incarceration, Vol. 4 (2023), pp. 1-19.
77. WEATHERSTON, David / MORAN, John: “Terrorism and Mental Illness: Is There a Relationship?”, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 47, No. 6 (2003), pp. 698–713.
78. WILLIAMS, Ryan / LIEBLING, Alison: “Do Prisons Cause Radicalization? Order, Leadership, Political Charge and Islamist Extremism in Two UK Prisons”, The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 63, No. 1 (2023), pp. 97-114.
79. YAVUZ, Hakan A.: Penal Execution System and Probation, Ankara 2018.
80. YERDELEN, Erdal: “Execution Regime Concerning Terror Prisoners, Allocation to Open Penal Institutions, Conditional Release, Release on Probation”, in: Prof. Dr. İzzet Özgenç (ed.), Terrorism, Terror Crimes and Execution Law in Comparative and Turkish Law, Vol. III, Turkish Academy of Sciences Publications, Ankara 2024, pp. 225-246.
81. YERDELEN, Erdal: Turkish Criminal Law Sanctions and Their Execution, Ankara 2021.
82. YETGİN, Feridun: Annotated Case-Law Execution Law Handbook, 4th Edition, Ankara 2021.
83. YOKUŞ SEVÜK, Handan: “Communication of Detainees and Convicts with the Outside World in the Light of European Court of Human Rights Decisions”, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University Law Faculty Journal, Vol. VII, No. 3–4, 2003, pp. 335–384.