Classrooms as Communities of Practice: Designing and Facilitating Learning in a Networked Environment

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 116 - 135, 04.01.2013

Naim Kapucu , Seda Erkoç

Öz

Learning is a continuing social action that takes place through interactions with the environment and other individuals. Forming communities of practice provides participants with an environment that combines knowledge and practice and the opportunity to learn through relationships with their peers and practitioners in the community. This study explores the classroom as a community of practice and examines the role classroom activities have in students' collaborative learning. The study uses a graduate-level public administration course as the case. The classroom activities in this course were designed to enhance peer interaction in the classroom and to facilitate learning by balancing theory and practice. The results of two separate surveys indicate that providing environments that blend practice with classroom knowledge lead to highly positive outcomes. Activities that foster peer interaction result in a dramatic increase in friendship relations between students while leading to only a slight increase in the advice network between students. One reason for this result might be the group projects, which create a silo effect on students and limit their work relationships with peers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Learning, communities of practice, student's relations

Kaynakça

• Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago:
• University of Chicago Press.
• Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (2004). Designing virtual communities in the service of learning.
• Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Barabaalsi, A. L. (2002) Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
• Benson, L., Harkavy, I., & J. Puckett. (2007). Dewey’s Dream: Universities and democracies in an age of
• education reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Berardo, R. (2011). Networking networkers: An initial exploration of patterns of collaboration among members of a new community in political science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(1), 69–75.
• Bok, D. (1986). Higher learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. C., & Freeman, L C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
• Brown, D. W., & Witte, D. (2008). Agents of Democracy. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
• Bushouse, B., & Morrison, S. (2001). Reflective Practicum: Applying the service learning pedagogical
• approach to Masters in Public Affairs programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7(1): 9–17.
• Crosby, B., & Bryson, J. (2005). Leadership for the common good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Cross, P. K. (1981). Adults as learners: Increasing participation and facilitating learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• N. Kapucu Journal of Public Affairs Education 607
• Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York: Free Press.
• ———. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
• Downes, S. (2005). An introduction to connective knowledge. Stephen Downes: Stephen’s Web. Retrieved from www.downes.ca/post/33034
• Guldberg, K. (2010). Using the lenses of socio-cultural activity theory and communities of practice to guide an empiri- cal study. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning,
• Retrieved from www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Guldberg.pdf
• Guldberg, K. K., & Pilkington, R. M. (2006). A community of practice approach to the development of nontraditional learners through networked learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,22(3), 159–172.
• Harlan, M. A. (2008). Personal learning networks: Professional development for the isolated school librarian. West- port, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
• Johnston, E. W., Hicks, D., Nan, N., & Auer, J. C. (2010). Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 21(4), 699–721. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq045.
• Jones, C. (2004). Networks and learning: Communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(1), 82–93.
• Kapucu, N., Arslan, T., Yuldashev, F., & Demiroz, F. (2010). Social Network Analysis (SNA) applications in evaluat- ing MPA classes. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(4), 541–563.
• Koliba, C. (2004). Assessing reflection assignments for public affairs courses: Implications for educating reflective practitioners. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(4), 295–309.
• Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In
• N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216–239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Lave, J. (1991). Situation learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological As- sociation.
• Lazer, D., Mergel, I., & Friedman, A. (2009). Co-citation of prominent social networking articles in sociology journals: The evolving canon. Connections, 29(1), 44–64.
• Neubauer, B. J., Hug, R. W., Hamon, K. W., & Stewart, S. K. (2011).Using personal learning networks to leverage communities of practice in public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(1), 9–25.
• Palmer, P. J. (2007). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
• Polin, L. G. (2008). Graduate professional education from a community of practice perspective. In C. Kimble, P. Hil- dreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators, Volume 2 (pp. 89–105). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
• Classrooms as Communities of Practice 608 Journal of Public Affairs Education Rudestam, K., & Schoenholtz-Read, J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of online learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Schwarz, R. (2002). The skilled facilitator. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Shields, P. M. (2003). The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration. Administration and Society, 35(5), 510–538.
• Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Tech- nology & Distance Learning, 2(3), 3–10. Retrieved from ticles/connectivism.htm
• www.elearnspace.org/ Ar
• Smith, M.K. (2003, 2009). Communities of practice. Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/biblio/communities_of_practice.htm Stivers, C. (2010). Democratic knowledge: The task before us. Administration & Society, 42(2), 248–259.
• Uzzi, B., & Dunlap, S. (2005). How to build your network. Harvard Business Review, 83(12), 53–60.
• Viskovic, A. (2006). Becoming a tertiary teacher: Learning in communities of practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4), 323–339.
• Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
• ———. (2005). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000, January–February). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 139–145.