Üç Farklı Programa Göre Eğitim Alan Okul Öncesi Çocukların Sosyal Kural Algılarının İncelenmesi

Yıl 2012, Sayı: 28, 197 - 207, 01.08.2012

Kezban Tepeli Elif Yılmaz

Öz

Bu çalışmada, üç farklıprograma Montessori Yaklaşımı, Çoklu Zekâ Kuramına DayalıEğitim ve Milli Eğitim BakanlığıTarafından Uygulanan Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı göre eğitim alan okul öncesi çocukların sosyal kural algılarıincelenmiştir. Normal gelişim gösteren ve yaşları60 ile 66 ay arasında değişen toplam 62 çocuk çalışmaya katılmıştır. Çocukların 21 tanesi Montessori Yaklaşımına göre, 19 tanesi Çoklu Zekâ Kuramına göre, 22 tanesi ise Milli Eğitim Bakanlığıtarafından halıhazırda uygulanan okul öncesi eğitim programına göre bir eğitim-öğretim yılıboyunca okul öncesi eğitim almışlardır. Deneysel bir çalışma olan bu araştırma da ön-test ve son-test verileri, Smetana 1981 tarafından geliştirilen Ahlaki ve Sosyal Kural AlgısıÖlçeği’nin Sosyal Kural Algısıalt ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistiklerin yanısıra, araştırmanın amaçlarınıtest etmek amacıyla, ANCOVA, ANCOVA’nın anlamlıolduğu durumlarda Bonferroni Testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda çocukların Sosyal Kural Algısıalt ölçeğinin Sosyal Kurallarda Ciddiyet, Sosyal Kurallarda Otoritenin Yokluğu ve Sosyal Kurallarda Ceza alt boyutlarına ait puanların çocukların eğitim aldığıokul öncesi eğitim programına göre değiştiği saptanmıştır. Bonferroni çoklu karşılaştırma sonuçları, farklılığın Montessori Yaklaşımı’na göre eğitim alan grubun lehine olduğunu göstermiştir. Sosyal Kuralların Yokluğu ve Sosyal KurallarıGenelleme alt boyutlarına ait puanların ise çocukların eğitim aldığıokul öncesi eğitim programına göre anlamlıbir şekilde farklılaşmadığıtespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Okul öncesi eğitim, çocukların sosyal kural algıları, okulöncesi eğitim programları, Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı, Montessori Yaklaşımı

Examination of Preschool Children’s Conceptions of Social Rules Regarding Three Different Preschool Education Programs

Öz

Pre-school education is important in terms of children's acquisition of social rules and rearing them as socialized individuals. However, it seems that there are limited studies regarding the issue of which pre-school education approach or pre-school education program is more effective on the development of children's perception of social rule. Therefore, with this research it is aimed to study the social rule perceptions of 5-year old children who get education according to three different programs Montessori Approach, Multiple Intelligences Theory-Based Education and Preschool Education Program Implemented by the Ministry of Education *Dependent variable of this experimental study is the social rule perception of 5-year old children while independent variables are three different preschool education programs Montessori approach, education based on multiple intelligences theory, Preschool Education Program implemented by the Ministry of Education with effects on children’s perception of social rule. Total of 62 children participated in this study, including 21 children attending a university kindergarten where Montessori Approach is applied, 19 children attending nursery class within primary school where education based on Multiple Intelligences Theory is implemented within the scope of EU Project called “If there are multiple intelligences there is no unsuccessful child ” and 22 randomly selected children attending an independent kindergarten and nursery class within primary school where Preschool education program of Ministry of Education is implemented. Age of these children showing normal development ranged from 60 to 66 months. "Conception of Moral and Social Rules Scale" that was used to evaluate social rule perception of the children participating in this study, was developed by Smetana 1981 . The scale which consists of 10 conventional pictures showing transgression of moral and social rules, includes two sub-scales. They are: "Conception of Moral Rule" and "Conception of Social Rule" subscales. In this study, only " Conception of Social Rule" sub-scale was used according to the purposes of the research. Conception of Social Rule sub scale consists of 5 pictures showing transgression of social rules. Children were asked 5 questions consecutively for each of these pictures. Each question asked aimed to create data for 5 sub dimensions of the scale. Sub dimensions of the sub scale are; Seriousness in Social Rules, Absence of Authority in Social Rules, Absence of Social Rules, Generalization of Social Rules and Punishment in Social Rules. Conception of Social Rule sub scale of Conception of Moral and Social Rules Scale was applied to the children in working group in a pre-test and post-test form. Pre-test data were collected at the beginning of the academic year, while post-test data were collected at the end of the academic year. No intervention that would affect children’s perception of social rule in a desired direction was made to the education programs of the institutions where different pre-school education programs are implemented. Single-factor ANCOVA was used in order to determine whether social rule perception of the children included in the study differs according to the preschool education program they attend. Bonferroni test was used in cases where ANCOVA was significant. According to the Covariance Analysis results significant difference was found F 2,58 = 7.210, p< .01 between adjusted posttest mean scores received from Seriousness in Social Rules sub dimension of social rule conception sub scale by the children that get education according to Montessori approach, education program based on the theory of multiple intelligence and preschool education program implemented by the Ministry of Education. Likewise, the observed difference between adjusted posttest mean scores from Absence of Authority in Social Rules F 2,58 = 8.813 , and Punishment in Social Rules F 2,58 = 9.117 sub dimensions of Social Rule Conception sub scale was found to be significant p .05; F 2,58 = .013, p> .05]. Results of Bonferroni test, which was implemented to determine the pre-school education program or programs that cause the significant difference obtained from Seriousness in Social Rules, Absence of authority in Social Rules and Punishment in Social Rules sub-dimensions in accordance with Covariance Analysis, show that Seriousness in Social Rules, Absence of authority in Social Rules and Punishment in Social Rules sub-dimensions scores of the children who receive education according to Montessori approach are significantly higher than the scores of the children who receive education according to the other preschool education programs. In this study which compares social rule conception of the preschool children getting education according to Montessori approach, education program based on the theory of multiple intelligence and pre-school education program implemented by the Ministry of Education; it’s observed that the children who receive education according to Montessori approach had significantly higher scores than the children who receive education according to the other pre-school education programs in Seriousness in Social Rules, Absence of Authority in Social Rules and Punishment in Social Rules sub-dimensions of social rule conception sub scale. This situation indicates that the children receiving education based on Montessori Approach take social rules more serious and their perception regarding importance of obeying the rules even in absence of the authority mother-father, teacher etc. is higher. These children obey the rules not because the authority wants them to do so, but because they comprehend the importance and necessity of acting in accordance with the rules. In other words, the children getting education in Montessori Approach have internalized social rules. The researchers state that children's conception of social rules may develop as they experience the rules and practices of the social system in which they exist Smetana, Schlagman and Adams, 1993; Smetana, 1984 . This means that, Montessori Approach is able to offer this experience to the children in a better way than the other pre-school education programs. Another sub-dimension where difference between the means was statistically significant was Punishment in Social Rules sub dimension. According to these finding obtained, perception of punishment in case of breaking social rules is higher in children getting education according to Montessori Approach than the children getting education in other pre-school education programs. This means the children that receive education according to Montessori Approach are more decisive in necessity of obeying social rules and punishing those who transgress social rules. It was identified that scores regarding Absence of Social Rules and Generalization of Social Rules sub dimensions of Social Rule Conception sub scale did not differ depending on the pre-school education program attended. In other words perception of all the participant children is found to be equivalent to each other regarding the necessity of obeying social rules even if there is no verbally expressed rule and acceptance of social rules in every environment lived in. In any case, pre-school educational institutions provide the best environment for children so that they acquire social rules and understand the importance of these rules. Seçer and Sarı 2006 , who studied moral and social rule conception of the children who attend and who do not attend preschool educational institution, determined that mean score of the children attending pre-school educational institution received from Absence of Authority in Social Rules, Generalization of Social Rules and Absence of Social Rules sub dimensions is significantly higher than those who do not attend pre-school educational institution

Anahtar Kelimeler

Preschool education, children’s conceptions of social rules, preschool education programs, MultipleIntelligence

Kaynakça

• Bayhan, P. ve Artan, İ (2004). Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi, İstanbul, Morpa Yayınları.
• Cüceloğlu, D. (2005). İnsan ve Davranışı Psikolojinin Temel Kavramaları, 14.Basım, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi.
• Çağdaş, A. ve Seçer, Z. (2005). Çocuk ve Ergende Sosyal ve Ahlaki Gelişim, Ed: R. ARI, Konya, S. Ü M.E. F.Yaşatma ve Geliştirme Vakfı Yayınları, Yayın No: 1.
• Demirel, Ö. ; Başbay, A. ve Yıldırım, E. (2006). Eğitimde Çoklu Zeka Kuram ve Uygulama, (Çev: E. Kılıç). 2. Basım, İstanbul, Alfa Yayıncılık.
• Güleş, F (2011). “Montessori Eğitim Uygulamaları İle İlgili Araştırmalar,” Okul Öncesi Eğitimde Montessori Yaklaşımı, Ed.:E. Çakıroğlu Wilbrandt, Ankara, Kök Yayıncılık.
• Koçyiğit, S., Kayılı, G. (2008). “Montessori Eğitimi Alan ve Almayan Anaokulu Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Becerilerinin Karşılaştırılması,” Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sayı 20, 511-516.
• Lillard, A., Else-Quest, N. (2006). “Evaluating Montessori Education,” Science, Vol: 313, 1893-1894.
• Mallory, T. (1989). Montessori ve Çocuğunuz, Ana-Baba El Kitabı, (Çev: F. Gülten ve C. Gülten), Ankara, Hatiboğlu Yayınevi.
• MEB. (2006). 36-72 Aylık Çocuklar İçin Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı, İstanbul, Ya-Pa Yayınları.
• Oktay, A. (2004). Yaşamın Sihirli Yılları: Okul Öncesi Dönem, 5. Baskı, İstanbul Epsilon Yayınları.
• Saban, A. (2001). Çoklu Zekâ Teorisi ve Eğitim, 1. Baskı, Ankara, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Sarı, H. (2009). “Farklı Ortamlarda Öğrenim Gören İşitme Engelli Öğrencilerin Sosyal ve Etik Kurallarla İlgili Bilgilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi,” Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 21, 389-404.
• Seçer, Z. ve Sarı, H.. (2006). “Okul Öncesi Eğitim Kurumuna Devam Eden ve Etmeyen Çocukların Ahlaki ve Sosyal Kural Bilgilerinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Analizi,” Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Sayı 127, 126-142.
• Selçuk, Z. (1997) Eğitim Psikolojisi, Ankara, Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Smetana, J.G. (1981) “Preschool Children’s Conceptions of Moral and Social Rules,” Child Development, Vol: 53, 1333-1336.
• Smetana, J.G. (1984) “Toddler’s Social Interactions Regarding Moral and Conventional Transgressions,” Child Development, University of Rochester, 55, 1767–1776.
• Smetana, J.G., N. Schlagman, P.W. Adams(1993). Preschool Children’s Judgments About Hypothetical and Actual Transgressions,” Child Development, Vol: 64, 202-214.
• Temel, F. (2005). “Okul Öncesi Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar,” Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim Dergisi, 6: 62.
• Uysal, F. (2006). “Okul Öncesi Çocuk Eğitim Merkezlerinde İç ve Dış Mekan Organizasyonlarının Eğitim Yaklaşımları Çerçevesinde İncelenmesi.” Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Vural, B. (2005). Öğrenci Merkezli Eğitim ve Çoklu Zekâ, 3. Baskı, İstanbul, Hayat Yayıncılık.